How many casualties were in Battle of Stalingrad during World War 2?
The Germans in Stalingrad
Estimated 750,000 were killed, missing or wounded
91,000 were captured at the end of the battle
Aircraft: 900 (along with other transport planes) Luftwaffe was creamed.
Tank/artillery losses same as the Soviet losses of tanks and artillery
Total: 841,000 casualties
The Russians in Stalingrad
478,741 killed or missing
650,878 wounded and sick
40,000 civilians dead
4,341 tanks
15,728 guns and mortars
2,769 combat aircraft but their air force was not demolished
Total: 1,129,619 casualties
Total deaths of civilians in Russia caused by the murders the Nazis did against them = 20 million deaths and millions of rapes against women
How did the stubborness of both Hitler and Stalin effect the outcome of the Battle of Stalingrad?
Hitler stubbornly refused to let his Generals retreat, surrender and failed to get them resupplied and send in backup troops or relief. He failed to understand how cold it really was there in Stalingrad and let his people die from exposure. He expected them to hold Stalingrad at all costs including everyone dying to keep their position.
Stalin was not nearly so stubborn. He demand the Reds (his soldiers) to fight to the death but he did all he could to support his generals. He merely had to wait right along with his generals to let mother nature (old man winter) to do their job of killing off the Nazis. Then they could walk right up to the Germans and toss in lots of grenades. Those who did not die surrendered and ended up dying on the way to Siberian POW camps or once they got there.
What are the differences between the Battle of the Bulge and the Battle of Stalingrad?
During the battle of the Bulge the German were is serious need of fuel during the attack, and hoped to obtain fuel from American fuel depots overrun by the Germans, without excess. Also, bad winter weather prevented allied air strikes, but when the weather did clear the German positions were bombed.......
During the battle of Stalingrad the German forces were not equiped with winter clothing and equipment which hampered operations. Hitler refused to allow General Paules to retreat from Stalingrad when Paules realized the Russians were about to incircle his position, but hitler refused to let german forces retreat, and the german were overrun..........
What was one of Germany's greatest battle defeats in 1943?
The German defeat at Stalingrad on 2 February, 1943 was a great victory for the Soviets and a huge loss for the Germans. They were under-supplied and outnumbered, and the Red Army took advantage of this. They were forced to retreat, but not before taking 815,000 casualties.
How many German POW's were there in the Battle of Stalingrad?
91,000 German Soldiers were captured as POW's by the end of the Battle of Stalingrad.
How did the Battle of Stalingrad end?
The Battle of Stalingrad ended when Germany began to decline from stalingrad and this counted as a surrender. Reason for this was towards the end of the battle, the German 6th Army, which were trapped inside the pile of rubel city known as Stalingrad since mid-early November 1942, was destroyed due to being trapped and had close to no resources comming in for them to survive and fight back the soviets.
Was it the battle of Leningrad or Stalingrad in World War 2?
.Both the siege of Leningrad (8 September 1941 - 27 January 1944) and the battle for Stalingrad (23 August 1942 - 2 February 1943) were events in WW2 .
Leningrad is now know as Saint Petersburg and Stalingrad is now Volgograd .
What was the operation name for the battle of Stalingrad?
There was 5 Operations in Battle of Stalingrad. They were;
Who was an important Sniper during the Battle of Stalingrad?
The best known sniper at the battle of Stalingrad was Vasily Grigorevich Zaytsev, he killed 225 Axis troops during the battle of Stalingrad, and many before and after Stalingrad.
He was blinded by a mortar round during the battle of Stalingrad, but was able to have his sight restored.
Zaytsev was given the title "Hero of the Soviet Union" and was eventually promoted to the rank of captain.
You might also find this list at http://www.wio.ru/galgrnd/sniper/sniper.htm interesting to look at. It does not specify whether these snipers were at the battle of Stalingrad, but I would lay money on a guess that most of them were at some point.
What did the Germans lose in the Battle of Stalingrad?
Germany lost many things in Stalingrad; soldiers, oil, equipment but most of all it lost its ability to win the war. until then the only nations in the world to defeat Germany were Britain in the skies over their homeland, and the American/British alliance in Africa. But at Stalingrad they had encountered the brutality of the Red Army.
It was such a devastating defeat that after Stalingrad Germany could only prolong the war. There was no chance of a German victory after that.
What are the best books about the Battle of Stalingrad?
Some of the better books on the Battle of Stalingrad are Enemy at the Gates : The battle For Stalingrad by William Craig , Stalingrad by Heinz Schroter , The Road to Stalingrad : Stalin's War With Germany Vol 1 by John Erickson , To The Gates of Stalingrad : Soviet - German Combat Operations , April - August 1942 Vol 1 by David M . Glantz , Armageddon in Stalingrad : September - November 1942 Vol 2 by David M . Glantz and , yet to be published , Vol 3 by David M . Glantz - title undetermined .
Also , An Infantryman in Stalingrad: From 24 September 1942 to 2 February 1943
An Artilleryman in Stalingrad - Memoirs of a Participant in the Battle .
Why was the Battle of Stalingrad considered the turning point in the war against Germany?
The Battle of Stalingrad (August 23, 1942 and February 2, 1943) marked the furthermost Eastern point the Nazi army reached on the Eastern Front . After the battle the Russians could not be stopped on their way to Germany's capitol of Berlin marking the end of war for the Russians and Germans both .
Where was the German army was defeated by Russians?
Moscow, early winter 1941.
No other battle in WWII comes close to being this decisive. Some German generals, realizing the battle was lost, could see no way to victory in the long run and advocated that Germany seek terms, any terms, to conclude the fight.
Had the Germans taken Moscow in 1941, fairly easily done in August-September 1941, more difficult in November-December 1941, the entire outcome of the war changes.
Russia was a huge empire, centered like no other major nation on earth, around its capital, Moscow. The empire ruled by ruthless suppression a wide variety of non-Russian ethnic peoples, much like the British empire. Moscow was thus the political and cultural center of Russia.
The Russian railroad network centered on Moscow too. Controlling it for Russia meant that troop movements from north to south were fairly easy, and likewise, difficult for the Germans. Capture Moscow and the situation flips.
Moscow was also a huge industrial and economic center. The greater Moscow area represented probably 20% of the entire Soviet economic output, similar in this regard to the eastern Ukraine.
Moscow was also geographically important. Its capture by Germany means that Leningrad is isolated and cannot be supplied. Thus that city, second largest in the USSR and representing about 6% of the Soviet economy, also falls soon after. Additionally, capturing air fields in the Moscow area puts German bombers within range, barely, of the Ural industrial complexes.
As I see it played out, after the major battle July 1941 for Smolensk, the Germans are in control of the battlefield. The roads are dry. The air force strong. The Soviets are in disarray. A two week respite allows the Germans to regroup and begin the offensive agains. By mid-September they have captured Moscow. Leningrad is not attacked directly, but falls due to lack of supply during the winter 1941-42. German forces move south in November 1941 to east of Kiev. Possibly that city has already fallen to the German southern armies. When strong winter weather hits in mid December 1941, German troops are well positioned all along the front, east of Leningrad/Moscow down to the Don River.
In the actual event the German forces are strung out in a late winter offensive, routed and nearly destroyed. The loss of trucks and artillery is appalling and the Germans never make up their losses in full for the rest of the war. These losses were unnecessary and avoidable with a Moscow initiative earlier in 1941.
If Moscow falls, the Soviets are left with the loss of all their largest cities and industrial centers. The Urals, their last industrial bastion, is full of flimsy buildings with weak AA batteries. The remaining Soviet industrial output is very vulnerable to air attack because the plants mostly relied on electricity from an almost undefended grid. The generators/turbines which supply the electricity are not even manufactured in Russia and their loss virtually guarantees a major shutdown in the Soviet economy.
Politically the loss of the capital weakens the Soviet system, no matter how quickly a new government center is established. If desertions and surrender were commonplace in the actual event, image what they would have been with Moscow in German hands.
Also note: Could the Germans have held the city? Couldn't the Russians have retaken it like they retook so much in December 1941? Doubtful. The Soviets only had about 80,000 troops for that offensive. It was successful only because the Germans were strung out, exhausted, without supply, and not dug in. All that changed as noted above.
After this stage of the war, the Germans can concentrate on finishing Russia by taking the oil fields of the Caucasus. The loss of the oil fields is devastating to the remaining Russian forces as it renders them near immobile. Getting that oil to Germany is more difficult task, and not enough is likely to be moved to significantly alter German petroleum supplies for a couple of years.
With fewer difficulties in Russia, Germany can also release some additional resources to battle the British in north Africa. By 1943, the Germans are in command of the Russian front to the Volga. The Russians likely request an armistic to prevent further German inroads and bombing campaigns.
Assuming Hitler does not loose his temper and declare war on the USA, the war quickly becomes a statemate with Germany in control of Europe from the Volga to the English channel. The German air forces are adequately supplied and not reduced to ruin in 1943 as in the actual event. With even moderate German air forces, D Day is not going to occur. Additional resources can also be allocated to the German submarine forces and to the scientific community.
Thus, Germany should be able to prevent the western allies from penetrating mainland Europe indefinitely. Their own scientific community is able to develop atomic weapons in reasonable time, although they might have only reached the level of major size 'dirty' bombs. The war ends in 1944 or 45. A 'cold war' ensues but with an adversary for the west that is much more capable than the Russian empire.
What would happen if germany won the battle of stalingrad?
The primary reason for attempting to capture Stalingrad was it had Stalin's name in it. It was a political target only. It wasn't of any use to the German invasion because they hadn't captured the oil-rich Caucausus area. If they had captured Stalingrad, the Germans most likely would have taken the Caucausus oil fields, had many more T-34s in German service, held out another year, and had a slim chance of winning.
What did the Battle of Stalingrad result in?
The Battle of Stalingrad was a crucial victory for the Russians. Because the battle was fought inside the city, German supplies such as grenades and firebombs were useless, whereas other supplies dwindled quickly in number with the surprise attacks the Russians could launch in a city they knew well. Finally, in 1943, the German commanded in Stalingrad disobeyed Hitler's commands to relieve the embattled troops and, instead, surrendered the ragged remainder of the army he had left. Perhaps one of the most shocking consequences was the number of casualties. More than a quarter of a million German, Romanian, and Italian bodies were found in the wrecked city. Two times that many Germans had died in the whole battle. The Russians suffered up to a million casualties, including 100,000 civilians. This was a huge victory for Russia, and a major defeat for Germany. After this battle, Hitler appeared less and less often in public, and his popularity dwindled along with it. Thus, the Battle of Stalingrad was key in destroying Hitler's popularity as well as being one of the most devastating battles in history.
Why did the Soviets have the advantage at the Battle of Stalingrad?
They took advantage of Germany's flanks, which were poorly guarded by Romania and Italy. Once the flanks were out of the way, they blocked supply routes and essentially surrounded the 6th Army within Stalingrad. In the end, though, 2 things helped the Russians win the battle - the bitter cold of a Russian Winter (that Hitler had failed to take into account though it had been the same thing that stopped Napoleon from capturing Russia more than a century earlier) and their resilience. Even when the German's controlled 90% of the city in the early stages of the battle, the Red Army refused to surrender and resorted to house-to-house combat.
Why was the Battle of Stalingrad a turning point in war?
It put the Germans on the defensive until they were pushed back to Berlin.
Stalingrad was a huge turning point because that was really the first battle that Germany lost. They had been on a huge roll since the beginning of the war, and it showed the Allies that Germany wasn't invincible. Even though Adolf Hitler demanded they fight to the last man, General Field Marshal Friedrich Von Paulus's 6th army surrendered.
What was the significant about battle Stalingrad?
Following their disastrous defeat at Stalingrad during the winter of 1942-43, the German armed forces launched a climactic offensive in the East known as Operation Citadel on July 4,1943. The climax of Operation Citadel, the Battle of Kursk, involved as many as 6,000 tanks, 4,000 aircraft and 2 million fighting men and is remembered as the greatest tank battle in history. The high-water mark of the battle was the massive armor engagement at Prochorovka (also spelled Prokhorovka), which began on July 12. But while historians have categorized Prochorovka as a victory of improved Soviet tactics over German firepower and heavy tanks, new evidence casts the struggle at the 'gully of death' in a very different light.
The Germans' goal during Citadel was to pinch off a large salient in the Eastern Front that extended 70 miles toward the west. Field Marshal Günther von Kluge's Army Group Center would attack from the north flank of the bulge, with Colonel General Walther Model's Ninth Army leading the effort, General Hans Zorn's XLVI Panzer Corps on the right flank and Maj. Gen. Josef Harpe's XLI Panzer Corps on the left. General Joachim Lemelsen's XLVII Panzer Corps planned to drive toward Kursk and meet up with Field Marshal Erich von Manstein's Army Group South, Col. Gen. Hermann Hoth's Fourth Panzer Army and the Kempf Army, commanded by General Werner Kempf.
Opposing the German forces were the Soviet Central Front, led by General Konstantin K. Rokossovsky, and the Voronezh Front, led by General Nikolai F. Vatutin. The Central Front, with the right wing strengthened by Lt. Gen. Nikolai P. Pukhov's Thirteenth Army and Lt. Gen. I.V. Galinin's Seventeenth Army, was to defend the northern sector. To the south, the Voronezh Front faced the German Army Group South with three armies and two in reserve. The Sixth Guards Army, led by Lt. Gen. Mikhail N. Chistyakov, and the Seventh Guards Army, led by Lt. Gen. M. S. Shumilov, held the center and left wing. East of Kursk, Col. Gen. Ivan S. Konev's Steppe Military District (renamed Steppe Front on July 10, 1943) was to hold German breakthroughs, then mount the counteroffensive.
If their plan succeeded, the Germans would encircle and destroy more than five Soviet armies. Such a victory would have forced the Soviets to delay their operations and might have allowed the Wehrmacht desperately needed breathing room on the Eastern Front. Model's Ninth Army never came close to breaking the Soviet defenses in the north, however, and soon became deadlocked in a war of attrition that it could not win. On the southern flank, Kempf's III Panzer Corps, commanded by General Hermann Breith, also encountered tough Soviet resistance.
By July 11, however, Hoth's Fourth Panzer Army was in position to capture the town of Prochorovka, secure a bridgehead over the Psel River and advance on Oboyan. The Psel was the last natural barrier between Manstein's panzers and Kursk. The Fourth Panzer Army's attack on the town was led by SS General Paul Hausser's II SS Panzer Corps, General Otto von Knobelsdorff's XLVIII Panzer Corps and General Ott's LII Army Corps. Hausser's corps was made up of three panzer divisions-the 1st Leibstandarte Adolf Hitler (Adolf Hitler's bodyguard), 2nd SS Das Reich (The Empire) and 3rd SS Totenkopf (Death's Head). Although all three were technically Panzergrenadier divisions, each had more than 100 tanks when Citadel began. Knobelsdorff's corps was composed of the 167th and 332nd infantry divisions, the 3rd and 11th panzer divisions, Panzergrenadier Division Grossdeutschland and Panther Brigade Decker, and Ott's corps contained the 25th and 57th infantry divisions.
Opposing Hausser at Prochorovka was the newly arrived and reinforced Fifth Guards Tank Army, commanded by Lt. Gen. Pavel A. Rotmistrov. The Fifth Guards was the Soviet strategic armored reserve in the south, the last significant uncommitted armored formation in the sector, with more than 650 tanks. The Soviet operational armored reserve, General Mikhail E. Katukov's First Tank Army, was already in action against Hoth's Fourth Panzer Army south of the Psel. Katukov's army had been unable to prevent the Germans from reaching the river, however. His VI Tank Corps, originally equipped with more than 200 tanks, had only 50 left by July 10 and 11, and the other two corps of Katukov's army also had sustained serious losses. On July 10, the 3rd SS Division Totenkopf, commanded by SS Maj. Gen. Hermann Priess, had established a bridgehead over the Psel, west of Prochorovka.
By July 11, the division's panzer group had crossed the river on pontoon bridges and reached the bridgehead. What was left of Katukov's armor regrouped to oppose the XLVIII Panzer Corps below Oboyan or counterattack the Psel bridgehead. Reinforced with the XXXIII Rifle Corps and X Tank Corps, Katukov launched continuous attacks on the Totenkopf units on the north bank of the river.
During the evening of July 11, Hausser readied his divisions for an assault on Prochorovka. Totenkopf anchored the left flank of the corps, while Leibstandarte, commanded by SS Maj. Gen. Theodore Wisch, was in the center, assembled west of the town between a rail line and the Psel. Das Reich, commanded by SS Lt. Gen. Walter Krüger, moved into its attack zone on the corps' right flank, which was several kilometers south of Tetrevino and southwest of Prochorovka.
While Hausser's SS divisions prepared for battle, there was feverish activity in the Soviet camp as well. On July 11, the Fifth Guards Tank Army arrived in the Prochorovka area, having begun its march on July 7 from assembly areas nearly 200 miles to the east. The army consisted of the XVIII and XXIX Tank Corps and the V Guards Mechanized Corps. Rotmistrov's 650 tanks were reinforced by the II Tank Corps and II Guards Tank Corps, increasing its strength to about 850 tanks, 500 of which were T-34s. The Fifth Guards' primary mission was to lead the main post-Kursk counteroffensive, known as Operation Rumyantsev, and its secondary mission was as defensive insurance in the south. The commitment of Rotmistrov's army at such an early date is stark evidence of Soviet concern about the situation on the Psel. The Fifth Guards' arrival at the Psel set the stage for the Battle of Prochorovka.
Prochorovka is one of the best-known of the many battles on the Eastern Front during World War II. It has been covered in articles, books and televised historical documentaries, but these accounts vary in accuracy; some are merely incomplete, while others border on fiction. In the generally accepted version of the battle, the three SS divisions attacked Prochorovka shoulder to shoulder, jammed into the terrain between the Psel and the railroad. A total of 500 to 700 German tanks, including dozens of Panzerkampfwagen Mark V Panther medium tanks with 75mm guns and Panzerkampfwagen Mark VI Tiger heavy tanks with deadly 88mm cannons, lumbered forward while hundreds of nimble Soviet T-34 medium tanks raced into the midst of the SS armor and threw the Germans into confusion. The Soviets closed with the panzers, negating the Tigers' 88mm guns, outmaneuvered the German armor and knocked out hundreds of German tanks. The Soviet tank force's audacious tactics resulted in a disastrous defeat for the Germans, and the disorganized SS divisions withdrew, leaving 400 destroyed tanks behind, including between 70 and 100 Tigers and many Panthers. Those losses smashed the SS divisions' fighting power, and as a result Hoth's Fourth Panzer Army had no chance to achieve even a partial victory in the south.
While it makes a dramatic story, nearly all of this battle scenario is essentially myth. Careful study of the daily tank strength reports and combat records of II SS Panzer Corps-available on microfilm at the National Archives in Washington, D.C.-provides information that forces a historical reappraisal of the battle. These records show, first of all, that Hausser's corps began with far fewer tanks than previously believed and, more important, that they suffered only moderate losses on July 12, 1943. As those reports were intended to allow the corps commander to assess the combat strength of his divisions, they can be considered reasonably accurate. Considering that information, it seems that the Germans may have been near a limited success on the southern flank of the salient.
The number of SS tanks actually involved in the battle has been variously reported as high as 700 by some authorities, while others have estimated between 300 to 600. Even before the Battle of Kursk began, however, the II SS Panzer Corps never had 500 tanks, much less 700. On July 4, the day before Operation Citadel was launched, Hausser's three divisions possessed a total of 327 tanks between them, plus a number of command tanks. By July 11, the II SS Panzer Corps had a total of 211 operational tanks-Totenkopf had 94 tanks, Leibstandarte had only 56 and Das Reichpossessed just 61. Damaged tanks or tanks undergoing repairs are not listed. Only 15 Tiger tanks were still in action at Prochorovka, and there were no SS Panthers available. The battalions that were equipped with Panthers were still training in Germany in July 1943.
On July 13, the day after the Battle of Prochorovka, Fourth Panzer Army reports declared that the II SS Panzer Corps had 163 operational tanks, a net loss of only 48 tanks. Actual losses were somewhat heavier, the discrepancy due to the gain of repaired tanks returned to action. Closer study of the losses of each type of tank reveals that the corps lost about 70 tanks on July 12. In contrast, Soviet tank losses, long assumed to be moderate, were actually catastrophic. In 1984, a history of the Fifth Guards Tank Army written by Rotmistrov himself revealed that on July 13 the army lost 400 tanks to repairable damage. He gave no figure for tanks that were destroyed or not available for salvage. Evidence suggests that there were hundreds of additional Soviet tanks lost. Several German accounts mention that Hausser had to use chalk to mark and count the huge jumble of 93 knocked-out Soviet tanks in the Leibstandarte sector alone. Other Soviet sources say the tank strength of the army on July 13 was 150 to 200, a loss of about 650 tanks. Those losses brought a caustic rebuke from Josef Stalin. Subsequently, the depleted Fifth Guards Tank Army did not resume offensive action, and Rotmistrov ordered his remaining tanks to dig in among the infantry positions west of the town.
Another misconception about the battle is the image of all three SS divisions attacking shoulder to shoulder through the narrow lane between the Psel and the rail line west of Prochorovka. Only Leibstandarte was aligned directly west of the town, and it was the only division to attack the town itself. The II SS Panzer Corps zone of battle, contrary to the impression given in many accounts, was approximately nine miles wide, with Totenkopfon the left flank, Leibstandarte in the center and Das Reich on the right flank. Totenkopf's armor was committed primarily to the Psel bridgehead and in defensive action against Soviet attacks on the Psel bridges. In fact, only Leibstandarte actually advanced into the corridor west of Prochorovka, and then only after it had thrown back initial Soviet attacks.
Early on July 12, Leibstandarte units reported a great deal of loud motor noise, which indicated massing Soviet armor. Soon after 5 a.m., hundreds of Soviet tanks, carrying infantry, rolled out of Prochorovka and its environs in groups of 40 to 50. Waves of T-34 and T-70 tanks advanced at high speed in a charge straight at the startled Germans. When machine-gun fire, armor-piercing shells and artillery fire struck the T-34s, the Soviet infantry jumped off and sought cover. Leaving their infantry behind, the T-34s rolled on. Those Soviet tanks that survived the initial clash with SS armor continued a linear advance and were destroyed by the Germans.
When the initial Soviet attack paused, Leibstandartepushed its armor toward the town and collided with elements of Rotmistrov's reserve armor. A Soviet attack by the 181st Tank Regiment was defeated by several SS Tigers, one of which, the 13th (heavy) Company of the 1st SS Panzer Regiment, was commanded by 2nd Lt. Michael Wittmann, the most successful tank commander of the war. Wittmann's group was advancing in flank support of the German main attack when it was engaged by the Soviet tank regiment at long range. The Soviet charge, straight at the Tigers over open ground, was suicidal. The frontal armor of the Tiger was impervious to the 76mm guns of the T-34s at any great distance. The field was soon littered with burning T-34s and T-70s. None of the Tigers were lost, but the 181st Tank Regiment was annihilated. Late in the day, Rotmistrov committed his last reserves, elements of the V Mechanized Corps, which finally halted Leibstandarte.
Das Reich began its attack from several kilometers southwest of Prochorovka and was quickly engaged by aggressive battle groups of the II Tank Corps and II Guards Tank Corps. Fierce, somewhat confused fighting broke out all along the German division's axis of advance. Battle groups of 20 to 40 Soviet tanks, supported by infantry and ground-attack planes, collided with Das Reich regimental spearheads. Rotmistrov continued to throw armor against the division, and combat raged throughout the day, with heavy losses of Soviet armor. Das Reich continued to push slowly eastward, advancing into the night while suffering relatively light tank losses.
Meanwhile, on the left flank, Soviet First Tank Army elements unsuccessfully tried to crush Totenkopf's bridgehead. The SS division fought off the XXXI and X Tank Corps, supported by elements of the XXXIII Rifle Corps. In spite of the Soviet attacks, Totenkopf's panzer group drove toward a road that ran from the village of Kartaschevka, southeast across the river and into Prochorovka.
The fighting, characterized by massive losses of Soviet armor, continued throughout July 12 without a decisive success by either side-contrary to the accounts given in many well-known studies of the Eastern Front, which state that the fighting ended on July 12 with a decisive German defeat. These authors describe the battlefield as littered with hundreds of destroyed German tanks and report that the Soviets overran the SS tank repair units. In fact, the fighting continued around Prochorovka for several more days. Das Reich continued to push slowly eastward in the area south of the town until July 16. That advance enabled the III Panzer Corps to link up with the SS division on July 14 and encircle several Soviet rifle divisions south of Prochorovka. Totenkopf eventually reached the KartaschevkaÂProchorovka road, and the division took several tactically important hills on the north edge of its perimeter as well. Those successes were not exploited, however, due to decisions made by Adolf Hitler.
After receiving the news of the Allied invasion of Sicily, as well as reports of impending Soviet attacks on the Mius River and at Izyum, Hitler decided to cancel Operation Citadel. Manstein argued that he should be allowed to finish off the two Soviet tank armies. He had unused reserves, consisting of three experienced panzer divisions of XXIV Panzer Corps, in position for quick commitment. That corps could have been used to attack the Fifth Guards Tank Army in its flank, to break out from the Psel bridgehead or to cross the Psel east of Prochorovka. All of the available Soviet armor in the south was committed and could not be withdrawn without causing a collapse of the Soviet defenses. Manstein correctly realized that he had the opportunity to destroy the Soviet operational and strategic armor in the Prochorovka area.
Hitler could not be persuaded to continue the attack, however. Instead, he dispersed the divisions of the II SS Panzer Corps to deal with the anticipated Soviet diversionary attacks south of the BelgorodÂKharkov sector. On the night of July 17-18, the corps withdrew from its positions around Prochorovka. Thus, the battle for Prochorovka ended, not because of German tank losses (Hausser had over 200 operational tanks on July 17) but because Hitler lacked the will to continue the offensive. The SS panzer divisions were still full of fight; in fact, two of them continued to fight effectively in southern Russia for the rest of the summer.
Leibstandarte was ordered to Italy, but Das Reichand Totenkopf remained in the East. Those two divisions and the 3rd Panzer Division, which replaced Leibstandarte, were transferred to the Sixth Army area, where they conducted a counterattack from July 31 to August 2 that eliminated a strong Soviet bridgehead at the Mius River. Without pause, the three divisions were then transferred to the Bogodukhov sector in early August 1943. Under the command of the III Panzer Corps, they were joined by another unit, the Fifth SS PanzergrenadierDivision Wiking. During three weeks of constant combat, the four divisions played a major role in stopping the main Soviet post-Kursk counteroffensive, Operation Rumyantsev. They fought Rotmistrov's Fifth Guards Tank Army, rebuilt to 503 tanks strong, and major portions of the First Tank Army, now at 542 tanks.
By the end of the month, Rotmistrov had less than 100 tanks still running. Katukov had only 120 tanks still in action by the last week of August. While at no time did any of the German divisions have more than 55 tanks in operation, they repeatedly blunted the thrusts of the two Soviet tank armies, which were also reinforced by several rifle corps.
Totenkopf repeatedly cut off and defeated all of the First Tank Army's thrusts toward the KharkovÂPoltava rail line. Das Reich threw back two Soviet tank corps south of Bogodukhov and blunted Rotmistrov's last major attack west of Kharkov, and the III Panzer Corps halted Operation Rumyantsev.
After Kharkov itself fell, however, the German front gradually collapsed. The Soviets regrouped, committed additional strong reserves and renewed their attack toward the strategically important Dnepr River. Army Group South was subsequently forced to abandon much of southern Ukraine in a race for the safety of the Dnepr. Despite the remarkable efforts of the German army and Waffen SS panzer divisions during July and August, the Germans were too weak to hold the KharkovÂBelgorodÂPoltava sector after their summer losses.
It is apparent from their operations during the late summer that the SS panzer divisions were not destroyed at Prochorovka. This reassessment of the battle provides food for thought regarding possible German successes if Manstein's panzer reserves had been utilized as he had intended.
To what extent the course of events in Russia would have been changed is, of course, unknown, but it is interesting to speculate. If Army Group South's panzer reserve had been used to encircle and destroy the Fifth Guards Tank Army and the First Tank Army, the outcome of the war in Russia might have been significantly different. Although it was beyond the German army's capabilities to force a military end to the war by the summer of 1943, a limited victory in the south could have resulted in a delay of Soviet strategic operations for months or perhaps longer. It is doubtful, however, that this pause would have lasted long enough for the Germans to transfer enough forces to the West to defeat the June 6, 1944, D-Day invasion.
But one fact is beyond any question, regardless of the number of tanks possessed by the Germans or Soviets or what might have been possible. Due to Hausser's panzer corps' failure to take Prochorovka on July 12 and the subsequent misuse of German panzer reserves, the momentum of the Fourth Panzer Army was slowed dramatically. When Hitler abandoned Operation Citadel on July 13, the Germans' last opportunity to influence events on a strategic level in the East was lost.
It is interesting that the information regarding German tank losses at Prochorovka has not been made available before now. Due to the lack of crucial primary-source information-especially the records of the II SS Panzer Corps on the Eastern Front-there had been no evidence to correct the erroneous accounts and impressions given in previous studies of the Eastern Front.
Waffen SS formations' records of their Eastern Front operations were not declassified until 1978Â1981. By that time, many of the major works about the Eastern Front had already been published. Later authors accepted the accounts of the battle as given in the earlier books and failed to conduct additional research. As a result, one of the best known of all Eastern Front battles has never been understood properly. Prochorovka was believed to have been a significant German defeat but was actually a stunning reversal for the Soviets because they suffered enormous tank losses.
As Manstein suggested, Prochorovka may truly have been a lost German victory, thanks to decisions made by Hitler. It was fortunate for the Allied cause that the German dictator, a foremost proponent of the value of will, lost his own will to fight in southern Ukraine in July 1943. Had he allowed Manstein to continue the attack on the two Soviet tank armies in the Prochorovka area, Manstein might have achieved a victory even more damaging to the Soviets than the counterattack that had recaptured Kharkov in March 1943.
What where the short and long term impacts of the Battle of Stalingrad?
The battle of Stalingrad (August 1942-Feb 1943) had one main effect on WW2. The soviets stood strong and defeated the nazi's. The battle of Stalingrad was a turning point for WW2. If the nazi's won stalingrad it would have been very likely that they won.
What is the total Russian casualties in the Battle of Stalingrad?
The total number of casualties in Russia were 9,150,000. Russia is at the top of the list for most casualties lost
What is facts about the Battle of Stalingrad?
The Battle of (or for) Stalingrad, also called the Hell of Stalingrad started on 23 August 1942 and lasted up to 2 February 1943. It was the then-bloodiest battle of World War II and opposed the Axis (Nazi Germany, Romania, Italy, Hungary, and Croatia) to the Red (Soviet) Army.
What was the importance of the outcome of the Battle of Stalingrad?
Notably , it marked the turning point of the war on the Eastern Front where the Germans eventually were later defeated in Berlin .
Why is the Battle of Stalingrad significant?
The heavy losses inflicted on the German army made it a significant turning point in the whole war. After the Battle of Stalingrad, German forces never recovered their earlier strength, and attained no further strategic victories in the East.
How was the weather in Battle of Stalingrad?
It began in July 1942, and ended in Feb '43 (winter).
^^^^
The weather during the initial phases of the battle are report ably at summer conditions which were mid 70-to high 80's.
Suddenly when fall and winter arrived the weather dropped to around -10 C which is around 14 F and below which is very cold especially for soldiers fighting under those conditions. God bless all of them.