answersLogoWhite

0

Boston Massacre

The Boston Massacre, the death of five civilians on March 5, 1770, helped spark the American Revolutionary War.

852 Questions

Who was Thomas walker of the Boston massacre?

Thomas Walker was a key figure associated with the Boston Massacre, which occurred on March 5, 1770. He was a Bostonian who witnessed the event and later testified about it. His accounts contributed to the public's perception of the conflict between British soldiers and American colonists, highlighting the tensions leading up to the American Revolution. Walker's testimony helped frame the narrative of the massacre as a pivotal moment in the struggle for independence.

Which event increased anti-British sentiment because British soldiers fired at a crowd of unarmed colonists?

The event that increased anti-British sentiment was the Boston Massacre, which occurred on March 5, 1770. During this confrontation, British soldiers fired into a crowd of unarmed colonists, killing five individuals. The incident fueled outrage and resentment towards British rule, becoming a rallying point for colonial resistance and contributing to the growing desire for independence. It was widely publicized and used as propaganda by colonial leaders to galvanize opposition against British authorities.

What day of the week was the Boston Massacre?

The Boston Massacre occurred on March 5, 1770, which was a Monday. This event marked a significant turning point in colonial resistance against British rule and contributed to the growing tensions that led to the American Revolution.

What was the name of the first people to be killed while gaining independence from Britain during the Boston massacre?

The first people killed during the Boston Massacre, which occurred on March 5, 1770, were Crispus Attucks, a Black man and sailor, and Samuel Gray, a rope maker. Attucks is often recognized as the first martyr of the American Revolution, symbolizing the struggle for independence from British rule. The incident escalated tensions between American colonists and British authorities, ultimately contributing to the push for independence.

What conclusion can be made about why so much conflict occurred in Boston?

The conflict in Boston, particularly during the pre-Revolutionary period, stemmed from escalating tensions between colonists and British authorities over issues like taxation without representation, restrictive laws, and the presence of British troops. Incidents such as the Boston Massacre and the Boston Tea Party exemplified the growing resentment and resistance among colonists. These events revealed deep-seated grievances regarding colonial autonomy and fueled a desire for independence, ultimately leading to revolutionary fervor. The clash of interests between the British government and the colonists created a volatile environment ripe for conflict.

People in the colonies had a much different perspective of the events of the Boston Massacre than people in Great Britain. Which of the following best describes the British interpretation of the event?

The British interpretation of the Boston Massacre viewed the incident as a tragic but necessary response to colonial unrest and aggression. They saw the soldiers as acting in self-defense against violent and unruly mobs, emphasizing the need for law and order. This perspective often downplayed the colonial grievances and the context of escalating tensions, framing the event as an unfortunate clash rather than a deliberate attack on civilians. Overall, the British narrative portrayed their troops as upholding justice in the face of disorder.

What did the colonists do after the British retreated to Boston?

After the British retreated to Boston following the battles of Lexington and Concord, the colonists fortified their positions and formed the Continental Army, appointing George Washington as its commander. They also organized a siege of Boston, surrounding the city and cutting off British supply lines. This strategic move aimed to force the British to abandon the city, ultimately leading to the pivotal events of the Revolutionary War. The colonists unified their efforts, fostering a sense of shared purpose and resistance against British rule.

How is Chromatin folding determined by?

Chromatin folding is primarily determined by a combination of DNA sequence elements, histone modifications, and the binding of various proteins such as transcription factors and structural proteins. These factors contribute to the formation of higher-order structures, including loops and domains, which are essential for regulating gene expression and maintaining genome integrity. Additionally, the spatial organization within the nucleus and interactions with the nuclear scaffold also play crucial roles in chromatin folding. Overall, chromatin architecture is a dynamic process influenced by both intrinsic and extrinsic factors.

What was the Sharpenville massacre?

The Sharpeville Massacre occurred on March 21, 1960, in Sharpeville, South Africa, when police opened fire on a crowd of peaceful protesters demonstrating against the apartheid pass laws. The event resulted in the deaths of 69 individuals and wounded over 180 others. This brutal act garnered international condemnation and highlighted the oppressive nature of apartheid, leading to increased resistance against the regime and fostering global awareness of South Africa's racial injustices. The massacre is commemorated annually as Human Rights Day in South Africa.

How many people died in the east Saint Louis massacre?

The East St. Louis massacre, which occurred in late May and early July 1917, resulted in the deaths of an estimated 100 to 250 African Americans. The violence was triggered by racial tensions and economic competition between white and black residents. The exact number of fatalities remains uncertain due to the chaos of the event and the subsequent lack of accurate record-keeping. Additionally, many injuries and instances of displacement were reported, highlighting the massacre's severe impact on the community.

Why did the riot that ended with boston massacre begin?

The Boston Massacre began as a confrontation between colonists and British soldiers stationed in Boston, who were seen as oppressive enforcers of British taxation. Tensions had been escalating due to resentment over the Stamp Act and Townshend Acts, which imposed taxes without colonial representation. On March 5, 1770, a group of colonists began taunting and throwing snowballs at the soldiers, leading to a chaotic situation where the soldiers fired into the crowd, resulting in the deaths of five colonists. This incident fueled anti-British sentiments and was used as a rallying point for colonial resistance.

Why did Samuel Drowne write the testimony of the Boston massacre?

Samuel Drowne wrote his testimony of the Boston Massacre to provide a firsthand account of the events that transpired on March 5, 1770, when British soldiers killed five colonists. His account aimed to document the violence and tension between British authorities and American colonists, emphasizing the need for justice and accountability. By sharing his perspective, Drowne sought to contribute to the growing anti-British sentiment and rally support for the colonists' cause for independence. This testimony also served to preserve the memory of the incident and its significance in the broader context of the American Revolution.

What was Paul Rivera's role in making the Boston massacre famous?

Paul Revere, not Rivera, was a silversmith and engraver who created an engraving depicting the Boston Massacre in 1770. His engraving, titled "The Bloody Massacre Perpetrated in King Street Boston on March 5th, 1770," was based on a drawing by Henry Pelham and was widely circulated, helping to shape public opinion against British rule. Revere's depiction exaggerated the events of the massacre, portraying British soldiers firing directly at unarmed colonists, and played a significant role in spreading anti-British sentiment in the American colonies.

Why did people leave England to come to America?

For the same reason that people from almost every other country in the world moved there, for greater opportunity and the hope of a better life.Michael Montagne

Answerif this question refers to the first colonists of America, the English settlers that emmigrated were puritanical fanatisists that were unhappy with the 'corruption' of protestant England - some left out of choice and some were forced to leave.

How many people were killed in the 2004 tsunami?

Where Indian Ocean when 02004-12-262004, December 26 death toll 229,866

What did colonial leaders use for propaganda?

Colonial leaders used pamphlets, newspapers, posters, and speeches to spread their messages and influence public opinion. They often emphasized themes like independence, liberty, and unity to rally support for the revolutionary cause against British rule. Symbols and slogans were also commonly used to evoke emotions and mobilize the colonists.

What would be the best sources of primary source information on Revolutionary War propaganda?

The best sources of primary source information on Revolutionary War propaganda would include collections of pamphlets, newspapers, and printed speeches from the time period, as well as personal correspondence, diaries, and other writings of individuals involved in promoting or responding to propaganda efforts during the war. Archives, libraries, and historical societies that specialize in American history would be valuable resources for locating these primary sources.

How did colonial leaders use the Boston massacre as propaganda?

The Boston Massacre was not really a massacre, but more like a riot. In fact only five people died. One of the most common myths is that the BM was the event that led to the Revolutionary War. In fact, many important events led up to the massacre. It was called a massacre by the use of propaganda. It mainly started by the British trying to enforce laws. British Soldiers were sent to America to enforce the Proclamation and to maintain order but their presence just made matter worse. It all started March 5 by a couple of boys throwing snowballs at British soldiers. A crowd soon gathered throwing ice and making fun of them. Soon after, the British started firing wildly. Other weapons were clubs, knives, swords, and a popular weapon, your own bare hands.

Propaganda article of the Boston massacre?

Boston Massacre, riot in the city of Boston, Massachusetts, on March 5, 1770, in which British soldiers fired on a group of unarmed American colonists. The incident was one of the events that led to outbreak of the American Revolution in 1775.

Who used the Boston massacre as propaganda against the british?

The Boston Massacre was not really a massacre, but more like a riot. In fact only five people died. One of the most common myths is that the BM was the event that led to the Revolutionary War. In fact, many important events led up to the massacre. It was called a massacre by the use of propaganda. It mainly started by the British trying to enforce laws. British Soldiers were sent to America to enforce the Proclamation and to maintain order but their presence just made matter worse. It all started March 5 by a couple of boys throwing snowballs at British soldiers. A crowd soon gathered throwing ice and making fun of them. Soon after, the British started firing wildly. Other weapons were clubs, knives, swords, and a popular weapon, your own bare hands.

Who was the lawyer for the British soldiers in the Boston Massacre?

Captain Thomas Preston, Corporal William Wemms, Hugh Montgomery, John Carroll, William McCauley, William Warren and Matthew Kilroy were members of the 29th Regiment of Foot (Infantry) of His Majesty's Army and were indicted for their actions in an incident in King's Street, Boston (modern State Street) on the 5th of March 1770. The charges brought against the soldiers was the murder of five colonists after a riot had occurred that started with men and boys mocking the sentry (Hugh White) at the Customs House. A young Boston lawyer by the name of John Adams was asked to represent the men at trial. Adams took the case because he had a conviction that legal counsel should always be available in a civilized society. Refusing to be swayed by mob opinion that had been whipped into a frenzy by Samuel Adams (a cousin of John), Adams defended his clients eloquently and well, emphasizing that only facts and solid evidence would carry the case. Adams had two other lawyers on his team; Josiah Quincy II and Robert Auchmuty. Paul Revere served as a forensic sketch artist and Sampson Salter Blowers investigated potential jury members. The prosecution was headed up by Robert Treat Paine. Interestingly enough; Sam Adams, John Adams, and Robert Treat Paine all served in the Continental Congress and John Adams went on to become the first Vice President and second President of the United States.

How many people were killed on planes on September 11 2005?

On September 11, 2001, nearly 3,000 people were killed in the terrorist attacks in the United States, including passengers on the planes that were hijacked by terrorists. The attacks led to the deaths of passengers, crew members, and individuals in the targeted buildings.