0
Boston Massacre
The Boston Massacre, the death of five civilians on March 5, 1770, helped spark the American Revolutionary War.
852 Questions
How do you use Boston Massacre in a sentence?
The Boston Massacre was a famous event in history.We studied the Boston Massacre in class.
What year was the Boston Massacre?
Why did George Washington lose the battle of long island?
pay attention in S.S - Mustafa M.
NEW RESPONDENT
Because Washington Army of about 10,000 men was outnumbered by the British Army of about 32,000 men.
Furthermore, British Gen. Lord Howe succeeded in outmaneuvering the Americans, mounting a massive attack led by the bulk of his army on the rear of the Patriot's right flank, thus provoking the collapse of Washington Army.
What are the names of the 5 people who died in the Boston Massacre?
Those who died in the so-called Boston Massacre, in the order in which they are listed on their common grave stone, were:
- Samuel Gray
- Samuel Maverick
- James Caldwell
- Crispus Attucks
- Patrick Carr
How did Paul use the Boston massacre?
He used the Boston Massacre as a way to make the colonists angry with the British.
Why did Sam Adams name it the Boston Massacre?
The Boston Massacre was an event that took place on March 5, 1770 where British Armed Troops opened fire on a small mob of Boston citizens who were crowding around the soldiers and threatening them. The soldiers killed five citizens. And the Sons of liberty wanted to make the British look bad so they named it the Boston Massacre.
When did the British flee Boston?
The British evacuated the city on March 17, 1776, after the patriots had fortified Dorchester Heights.
Who defend the British from the Boston massacre?
no one did. The boston Massacre happened in new England not in England. Now if you asked who stopped the British soldiers from massacring british citizens living in north america at the time the answer would be no one. They fired into a crowd.
Was Crispus Attucks Native American?
Crispus Attucks was biracial, sometimes called a 'Black Indian'. Contrary to popular belief Crispus Attucks was not simply black as people in his time and place defined it. Attucks was the product of the union of an African man who was an escaped slave and a woman of the Natick band of the Massachusett, Wampanoag Indians.
By the one drop rule African Americans claim him as black.
By the rules of matrilineal descent that the Indians of that region used, Attucks would be considered an Indian because he was the son of one of their women.
Why did Adams label the violence in Boston as a massacre?
To make colonists want to fight the British ~APEX~
How did the location of Yorktown help the Patriots win the war?
Yorktown's location on a peninsula was a tremendous aid to the American cause as it sought to defeat Cornwallis and his army in 1781. Having pinned down the British in the peninsula, and with no mass-escape possible due to the presence of the French fleet that patrolled the deep waters nearby, the Americans forced Cornwallis to fight or to surrender -- and without hope of being resupplied, as there were no land- or sea-routes available that were not contested.
What did William Pitt do in the American Revolutionary war?
When William was fourteen he was sent to Pembroke Hall, Cambridge. His health remained poor and he spent most of the time with his tutor, the Rev. George Pretyman. William, who studied Latin and Greek, received his M.A. in 1776.
William grew up with a strong interest in politics and spent much of his spare time watching debates in parliament. On 7th April 1778 he was present when his father collapsed while making a speech in the House of Lords and helped to carry his dying father from the chamber.
In 1781 Sir James Lowther arranged for William Pitt to become the M.P. for Appleby. He made his first speech in the House of Commons on 26th February, 1781. William Pitt had been well trained and afterwards, Lord North, the prime minister, described it as the "best speech" that he had ever heard.
Soon after entering the House of Commons, William Pitt came under the influence of Charles Fox, Britain's leading Whig politician. Pitt joined Fox in his campaign for peace with the American colonies. On 12th June he made a speech where Pitt insisted that this was an "unjust war" and urged Lord North's government to bring it to an end.
Pitt also took an interest in the way that Britain elected Members of Parliament. He was especially critical of the way that the monarchy used the system to influence those in Parliament. Pitt argued that parliamentary reform was necessary for the preservation of liberty. In June 1782 Pitt supported a motion for shortening the duration of parliament and for measures that would reduce the chances of government ministers being bribed.
When Lord Frederick North's government fell in March 1782, Charles Fox became Foreign Secretary in Rockingham's Whig government. Fox left the government in July 1782, as he was unwilling to serve under the new prime minister, Lord Sherburne. Short of people willing to serve him, Sherburne appointed the twenty-three year old Pitt as his Chancellor of the Exchequer. Fox interpreted Pitt's acceptance of this post as a betrayal and after this the two men became bitter enemies.
On the 31st March, 1783, Pitt resigned and declared that he was "unconnected with any party whatever". Now out of power, Pitt turned his attention once more to parliamentary reform. On 7th May he proposed a plan that included: (1) checking bribery at elections; (2) disfranchising corrupt constituencies; (3) adding to the number of members for London. His proposals were defeated by 293 to 149. Another bill that he introduced on 2nd June for restricting abuses in public office was passed by the House of Commons but rejected by the House of Lords.
In Parliament he opposed Charles Fox's India Bill. Fox responded by making fun of Pitt's youth and inexperience and accusing him of following "the headlong course of ambition". George III was furious when the India Bill was passed by the House of Commons. The king warned members of the House of Lords that he would regard any one who voted for the bill as his enemy. Unwilling to upset the king, the Lords rejected the bill by 95 votes to 76.
The Duke of Portland's administration resigned and on 19th December, 1783, the king invited William Pitt to form a new government. At the age of only twenty-four, Pitt became Britain's youngest prime minister. When it was announced that Pitt had accepted the king's invitation, the news was received in the House of Commons with derisive laughter.
Pitt had great difficulty finding enough people to join his government. Except for himself, his cabinet of seven contained no members of the House of Commons. Charles Fox lead the attack on Pitt and although defeated in votes several times in the House of Commons, he refused to resign. After building up his popularity in the country, Pitt called a general election on 24th March, 1784. Pitt's timing was perfect and 160 of Fox's supporters were defeated at the polls. Pitt himself stood for the seat of Cambridge University.
Pitt now had a majority in the House of Commons and was able to persuade parliament to pass a series of measures including the India Act that established dual control of the East India Company. Pitt also attacked the serious problem of smuggling by reducing duties on those goods that were mainly being imported illegally into Britain. The success of this measure established his reputation as a shrewd politician.
In April 1785 Pitt proposed a bill that would bring an end to thirty-six rotten boroughs and to transfer the seventy-two seats to those areas where the population was growing. Although Pitt spoke in favour of reform, he refused to warn the House of Commons that he would resign if the measure was defeated. The Commons came to the conclusion that Pitt did not feel strongly about reform and when the vote was taken it was defeated by 248 votes to 174. Pitt accepted the decision of the Commons and never made another attempt to introduce parliamentary reform.
The general election of October 1790 gave Pitt's government an increased majority. For the next few years Pitt was occupied with Britain's relationship with France. Pitt had initially viewed the French Revolution as a domestic issue which did not concern Britain. However, Pitt became worried when parliamentary reform groups in Britain appeared to be in contact with French revolutionaries. Pitt responded by issuing a proclamation against seditious writings.
When Pitt heard that King Louis XVI had been executed in January 1793, he expelled the French Ambassador. In the House of Common's Charles Fox and his small group of supporters attacked Pitt for not doing enough to preserve peace with France. Fox therefore blamed Pitt when France declared war on Britain on 1st February, 1793.
Pitt's attitude towards political reform changed dramatically after war was declared. In May 1793 Pitt brought in a bill s
From ( http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.UK/PRpitt.htm )
Who did the Boston massacre gain support from?
The colonist, but the whole event was used as propaganda by the few colonist who wanted to start problems against the British troops. What a lot of people don't realize is that John Adams defended the troops who were put on trial for the event.
What act by customs officers begin a series of events that led to the Boston massacre?
novanet--the seizure of the merchant ship liberty for smuggling--ninaboo
Who was the former slave that was killed in the Boston Massacre?
Crispus Attucks was the only slave killed in the Boston Massacre. He was young and was thought to be a slave that was "just passing through" the town. I have heard that he moght have been a runaway but that might be true. He is considered a hero to African Americans since he was the first to die in the war. (although the real war had not yet begun)
Yes, but only if is they did things such as running away. Sometimes more cruel owners would kill those if there caught not working or slacking off, possibly stealing to.
How does the engraving tell a different story from the above description of the massacre?
this engraving by Paul Revere a leader of Boston son's liberty was sent through out of the colonies in the following weeks to arouse anti British feelings.
Why is the Boston massacre viewed as a symbol of british tyranny?
It was A symbol of Aggression. British Soldiers attacked a group of colonists
How are the British soldiers portrayed in the Boston massacre?
The Boston Massacre was a political story of its time and recent research shows that they did not fire on the people in that street. The fact that John Adams defended them and won is important, but the Massacre became the propaganda tool of its time. The handbill that Revere made shows this to be true. They wanted people to be upset with the British, so I don't think the British had any choice but to allow the trial.
Why did the colonists do those bad things to the soldiers in the Boston massacre?
Many of the colonists were drunk and other were just angry with the British for taxing them. Also, one of the British soldiers had knocked down a kid because the boy was throwing snow at him.
*Hope it helped!*
Was it the colonists fault for the Boston massacre?
Jeg kender dig ikke fortælle mig. Denne hjemmeside aldrig har noget godt på den. Hvem er disse dumme folk tror, de er? Dette er den værste hjemmesiden nogensinde. Jeg ønsker at brække sig på min laptop det stinker så slemt!
-Danish
How are the colonist portrayed in the Boston Massacre picture?
What picture? If I am thinking about the right picture... it showed how they were being attacked and the it was on purpose
