It depends. In most courts, The law was given that the person should not bring their camera whenever something like a testing is in progress. The law was given by the Supreme Court and is still a rule that was applied for no one to take or even think about bringing their cameras.

In many states and citys a court is allowed to tell the person who is filming or taking pictures not to film or take photo. The same could be said in stores because the property owner does not want their work to be reused or written. A court will also be notifyed and if a important meeting is recorded or filmed on videotape without the owner's permission. The person responsible can get sued or arrested! Many states carry this rule and still apply and are warned when a person does something like film and breaks the law without permission.

The same can be said for a person. If you videotape a person without his or / her permission. The owner can end up calling the police and they can charge you with trespassing on private or public property. That's why the owner wants to take really good care of their property and wants to make sure it's not caught on tape nor on camera. The person may ask the person to turn the camera off without even warning them and if a person refuses to cooperate or listen to them then they can be charged with tresspassing and can be arrested for doing so. The rule is applied to only public places and stores which have the rule for not allowing cameras inside. For example, Many stores like Kmart, Barnes And Noble Bookstore, Wal-Mart, Khol's, Or other places may have this rule so as for people to not film their private property or put their marketing on tape. The person may not allow the other person to record and put the video they made on YouTube, Etc, The person can be responsible for damages and may be liable for copyright infringement and may end up getting a sentence for about to 12 weeks in local jail or prison. In malls the same can be said when the person does not want their face to be shown on TV or on videotape. However if the person who notifys or asks you to stop filming them and you still don't listen to their instructions then they can end up getting or calling the police.

They sometimes might have signs that notify filmmakers and photographers not to bring their cameras inside the store. The store and the court has a right to protect their property from being used in television commercials, Marketing, Or even used for advertisements. If the person finds out that the filmmaker has copied or used their face in one of their videos then they could end up sueing the person and or having them charged or placed under arrest. The person may not want their identity exposed and they are known to show their face on television without their permission.

A person also can end up notifying the state attorney and also the authorites for having to put the video on YouTube and the person may be liable for damages depending on how bad he copyrights the products or items in the store. Copyright infringement is also a big crime and if the person is seen commiting it or using various products in the store to create or use them to create an ad without permission. Then the owner might get angry and tell them to stop filming and leave the store. All stores have this and there will be consequences if the person is told to stop filming and does not comply. For example, You can't film people or their public property and you certainly cannot film inside a courtroom while it's in progress and someone's inside of it. You cannot also film public meetings or even film court hearings that the person recieves and if you refuse or do not comply with the rules then they may find out and you will end up going to jail. The same with tresspassing and also for attempting not to leave the property when told to do so. The person may contact and notify the authorites and mall security can also be called if the person refuses to put their camera away! The same can be said for police and security if they tell someone that they don't want to be filmed.

So is filming a problem in stores, Courtrooms, And even inside local public shopping malls.

Yes.

Will you get sued if you use the video for advertising, Advertisements, Copyright infringement, Or use the property without the owner's permission.

Yes.

Will you get into trouble for filming local security officers and police officers inside public places.

Yes.

Will you be charged and placed under arrest for tresspassing and also for filming public local places without permission!

Yes.

The merchandise found inside dollar stores and local shopping places may be a crime to film and record without the owner's permission. In fact it is a rule that you do not film or use the products for using in your video to advertise. Some stores may not allow this and some places might tell you to leave and might say no. And other places will let you film without having a problem with attempting to tell you leave or warning you. This applies to all stores and they have this rule and policy because of security reasons so there may be reason why they don't want you filming inside buildings, Malls, Dollar stores, Or anywhere else!

When your 500 years was what i was told i guess?(:

The Homecoming Court is a representative group of students that, in a coeducational institution, consists of a King and Queen, and possibly Prince(s) and Princess(es). In a single-gender institution, the Homecoming Court will usually consist of only a King and Princes (for a male school) or a Queen and Princesses (for a female school), although some schools may choose to join with single-gender schools of the opposite gender to elect the Homecoming Court jointly.

Generally, the King and Queen are students completing their final years of study at their school (also called seniors), while the Princes and Princesses are underclassmen. In high school, 17- or 18-year-old students in their final year are represented by a King or Queen; in college, students who are completing their final year of study, usually between 21 and 23 years old.

Classmates traditionally nominate students who have done a lot to contribute to their school, then students vote for members of the Court from the nominees. Once the Homecoming Court candidates are announced, the entire student body votes for the Queen and King. The voting is often conducted by secret ballot, but other methods may also be used by certain schools.

Local rules determine when the Homecoming Queen and King are crowned. Sometimes, the big announcement comes at a pep rally, school assembly, or public ceremony one or more days before the game. Other schools crown their royalty at the Homecoming football game, a dance or other school event.

Often, the previous year's Queen and King are invited back to crown their successors. If they are absent for whatever reason, someone else - usually, another previous Queen or King, a popular teacher, or other designated person - will perform those duties. Usually, the Queen is crowned first, followed by the King. The crowning method also varies by school.

Homecoming court members who are not crowned king or queen are often called escorts or royalty . They are often expected to participate in the week's activities as well. At some schools, a Homecoming Prince/Princess, Duke/Duchess etc. (often underclassmen nominated by their classmates) are crowned along with the King and Queen; sometimes, middle school and junior high students may partake in the high school activities.

know more about the homecoming day:http://www.icollageformac.com/special-day-articles/welcome-to-homecoming.html#175

It is called an injunction

A quinceanera's court typically consists of 14 to 15 people, including the quinceanera herself as well as damas (maids) and chambelanes (male escorts).

A motion in limine is a motion done before trial, or before evidence. It literally means "at the threshold." For example: Say I have a case where I know the other side is going to try and introduce evidence that my client was, say, drunk, when the accident happened. However, the accident happened because the tire blew, not because my client was drunk. I will file a motion in limine (before the other side attempts to put into evidence that fact that my client was drunk) and ask the judge to determine ahead of time whether or not that testimony can be heard by the jury.

If the underage divorced mother is below the age of emancipation in her state, the fact that she is a mother does not automatically confer emancipation on her. Therefore, her parent can legally make decisions for her until such time as she reaches legal age, or becomes emancipated.

This case is related to Automobiles in

general and Motor bikes in specific.

And this was reported in Times of India or

Indian Express i am not very sure.

The case pertains to a Bajaj CT 100

motorcycle where Vehicle dealer had promised

a mileage of 100 + kms

Since the customer could not get the

promised mileage he approached the dealer

and during the subsequent checking of the

defective vehicle even by company service

engineers could not achieve the promised

figures customer demanded compensation.

Since they refused to entertain any claims

for compensation the customer had no other

option than approaching the consumer forum.

The case was finally settled by the national

commission in favour of customer by awarding

replacement of vehicle and monetary

compensation along with court cost.

If you visit either of the news papers site

i think you will find lots of information on

consumer's forum.

To protect the accused and to guarantee a speedy trial. This would prevent authorities from holding a person for a long time before trial. It prevents the government from silencing its critics by holding them for years in jail, without trials. A public trial guarantees that the trial be conducted in full view of the people who are interested in that trial. It also makes sure that the person on trial knows the charges against him/her so he/she may plan a defense.

Most federal cases begin in the district courts.

The court is 16' X 16' divided evenly both horizontally and vertically into 4 squares

A penalty imposed by a court is known as a ruling or verdict. This may be inform of a jail sentence or cash fines.

by banging your mom

The Revolutionary Tribunal was a court created to handle the trials of French political offenders. Its use was quickly abused, particularly by Maximillian Francois Marie Isidore de Robespierre, who used it to condemn his advisories to death.

A writ requiring appearance in court to give testimony is called a subpoena.

Union calvary troops cut off the retreat of the Confederate Army of Northern Virginia (under the command of General Robert E. Lee) near the Appomattox Court House. Lee knew the Confederate cause was effectively lost by this point, but was not yet willing to surrender. Confederate supplies at Appomattox were gone, but supplies were available at the Confederate railhead of Lynchburg to the west, so if Lee could reach Lynchburg, he stood a chance of at least delaying defeat (and potentially of negotiating better terms for the surrender).

Under the assumption that he was facing Union cavalry only, Lee ordered the Army of Northern Virginia to attack to try to break through Union lines. This worked to some extent, but when Confederate troops crested a ridge after fighting through several lines of cavalry they saw all of the Union XXIV Infantry Corps directly ahead of them, with the V Corps to their right.

Shortly after this, it became obvious to nearly all Lee's staff that surrender under whatever terms Grant was offering was essentially their only viable option. Fortunately, these turned out to be about as favorable as Lee could have hoped for, since the men under his command were not to be imprisoned or prosecuted for treason (which they were, at least technically, guilty of), but released on "parole" under the condition that they not again take up arms against the Government of the United States.

However, "why it happened" was basically "The Union Army got in the way of Lee's retreat, and Lee mistakenly thought he could break through."

In criminal cases, the victim is called a "prosecuting witness."

The right to a speedy and public trial, the right to an impartial jury of your peers, the right to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusations against you, the right to be confronted by the witnesses against you, the right to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in your favor, the right to assistance of counsel for your defense.

At the beginning of a sentence and when it forms part of the proper noun or when it is used as a direct address.

Examples:

The Supreme Court of the Philippines

The State Court of Appeals

The sixth amendment states:

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.

So yes, it is ;)