Are creation story's the same as creation myths?
It depends how you define the word 'story'. If you use it to refer to an actual event which is being retold, then, no they are not synonymous. If you use 'story' to refer to a tale that is made-up, then, yes, it means the same as myth.
For a Christian, the Creation is an actual historical event which explains the beginnings of our earth and life upon it. For sceptics, the term 'myth' is applied since they choose not to accept it as a record of an event in time.
Are humans believed to be the only animals who have dreams?
No, humans are not the only animals believed to have dreams. Studies suggest that many animals, including mammals like dogs, cats, and even birds and reptiles, exhibit behaviors during sleep that are consistent with dreaming. Brain activity patterns similar to humans experiencing REM sleep have been observed in these animals, supporting the idea that they may also dream.
Darwinism and the theory of evolution do not necessarily disprove the concept of divine creation. Many individuals reconcile their faith with evolution by seeing it as a natural process that was initiated by a higher power. The Ionian philosophers' ideas can still hold value and be appreciated in a modern context, even as science continues to provide new understandings of the natural world.
Was the Earth created through implosion?
That would go against Newton's law of mass, that mass is neither created nor destroyed.
Answer:
Th e heavier materials that form the Earth (iron, aluminum, silicon, etc.) were released by novas and supernovas from old stars where they had been formed by fusion reactions. This is an explosion of sorts. The accumulation of material into the planets was due to gravitational attraction and falling together of these materials.
An implosion is the sudden creation of a vacuum which sucks things together. There is no mechanism like this in the formation of the Earth.
Do Buddhists believe in a creation story?
Buddhists do not have a specific creation story like those found in other religions. Instead, Buddhism focuses on the concept of dependent origination, where all things arise due to causes and conditions. This aligns with the teachings of impermanence and interconnectedness in Buddhism.
Are there questions about creationism on standardized tests?
There are unlikely to be questions about creationism in standardized tests, unless the subject for the tests is religion.
For more information about creationism and its relationship to traditional religion and to the teaching of science, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation
What are the morals for the creation story?
The morals from creation stories can vary, but common themes include respecting the natural world, understanding the origins of humanity, and recognizing the importance of harmony and balance in the universe. These stories often emphasize the role of humans as caretakers of the Earth and the interconnectedness of all living things.
Does Confucianism have a creation story of how people began to live in the world?
Confucianism does not have a creation story in the same way that some other religions do. It focuses more on ethics, morality, and relationships rather than on explaining the origins of human existence. Confucian teachings emphasize personal development, moral cultivation, and social harmony rather than cosmology or creation myths.
Who argues that Intelligent Design has no place?
Young-earth Creationists disagree with the Intelligent Design movement for denying the designer. They also don't agree with long-age proponents of ID.
A different approach:
On the contrary, Intelligent design means, by definition, that there is a designer. While Young Earth creationists and Old Earth creationists disagree on God's methods, they certainly agree completely that Evolution is the adversary.
How can the appearance of design in the world lead to or support the belief in God?
Design points to a Designer. Complexity points to wisdom and purposefulness. The same goes for cooperation such as symbiosis. For example, theoretical physicist and popular science writer Paul Davies (whose early writings were not especially sympathetic to theism) states concerning the fundamental structure of the universe, "the impression of design is overwhelming" (Davies, 1988, p. 203).
"A living cell is so awesomely complex that its interdependent components stagger the imagination and defy evolutionary explanations" (Michael Denton, author).
"The astounding structural complexity of a cell" (U.S. National Library of Medicine).
See also:
God's wisdom seen in His creations
Creationism is based on a person's beliefs and faith system. No one can change your mind either way to a yes or no if you simply won't hear it (which is often the case with Creationism), so you'll have to gather facts and so on to draw your own conclusions.
It could be true if science was nothing but an illusion created by God to test our faith. If all scientific facts, theories and laws were really fabrications of God and had no basis in reality and if reality as we perceive it is only there because God put it there for us to experience. So the answer is this question cannot be answered nor can any other question since we do not know if what we really are experiencing is an illusion created by God or real. Since God can do anything though if he is real then everything may or may not be real and what is real now could be changed at God's will. Therefore it comes down to is God real or not and there is no way to prove this since belief in God is faith based and intended to be that way by God according to man according to God.
No one can say with absolute certainty that either Creationism or Naturalism is true, although, at least in my opinion, a random explosion of matter creating perfectly function bodies, plants that work in a perfect symbiotic relationship with humans and animals, a planet the perfect distance from the sun that rotates so one side does not become to hot or cold and gives us darkness making it easier to sleep, and, I believe a random explosion of matter would have a rather difficult time creating consciousness and the laws of physics, so ,at least in my opinion, a random explosion of matter seems much less logical than an intelligent creator designing all of the previously listed things to perfectly work together to make life possible, and also may I mention that there is no real evidence for evolution, like say the fossil of an intermediate species. and also there is nothing archeology or practically anywhere that contradicts Creationism (and if you're a gap theorist like I am) even Astronomy doesn't contradict Creationism so, at least in my opinion, facts seem to lead to Creationism more than Naturalism.
What percentage of Europeans do not believe in evolution?
Fifteen per cent of the British population are said to believe in creationism. Elsewhere in Europe the proportions who believe in creationism vary between around ten per cent and twenty per cent, with countries that have a high Muslim population more likely to have a higher proportion who do not believe in evolution.
Is God the creation of the mind?
If someone feels that God is the creation of the mind, then they must also ask, who is the creator of the mind. Some would refuse to use the word who, and substitute what, as in what created the mind. That would promote the idea that there is no such thing a intelligent design, something I just can't believe.
How do you define the Creation?
Creation is the process by which the universe, living beings, and everything in existence is brought into being. It is often associated with a divine or supernatural power, responsible for the origin of the world and all living things. The concept of creation is found in various religious and spiritual beliefs, each offering its own explanation for how the world came to be.
Do atheists believe in creationism?
Atheists generally do not believe in creationism as it involves the idea of a supernatural deity creating the universe and life. Most atheists adhere to scientific explanations like evolution for the origins of life and the universe.
We were created for the glory of God.
Prior to our coming to earth we lived in a perfect condition, a place where everything was in accordance with God's laws. For us to become more perfect there had to be a way in which we could be tried and tested to see if we would obey God's laws without us being in His presence. There was only way this could be done and that was to send us to a world of His making so that we could learn by our own wisdom. Also all knowledge of our previous life would be blotted from our minds so that we could live by faith alone. Prophets would be sent to earth to teach us the gospel where we could use our agency to accept or reject it. We were thrilled to know that we would be sent to an earth so that we could prove ourselves. The preamble in Job 38 says "God asks Job where he was when the foundations of the earth were laid, when the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy-".
Answer 2
Sex is my only option
Answer 3
He created man and women to stay on this earth which he made for us.
Do you believe in the creation story?
Yes I believe in the creation story , as things can not be created so wonderfully by accident . For example we have had a seven days a week and never a eight day a week. I do not believe in the creation story, as told in the Christian Bible. Things as wonderful as all creatures on Earth at present were not created by accident, they evolved as a result of millions of accidents. What's so special about a seven-day week? Actually, a 10 day week was tried by the French after the Revolution, but it didn't work,so perhaps the human frame is somehow programmed for a 7 day cycle. Are we certain that no other length of week was used in civilisations in the distant past? Most cultures have a creation story, equally as valid as the biblical story. The aboriginies of Australia have a very beautiful creation story.
"Evolutionism" is a condescending term used by creationists or intelligent design supporters to suggest that evolution is only a belief system, or that it is somehow not scientific.
The correct term is "evolutionary science" or simply "evolution".
What did Thomas Aquinas say about creationism?
What did Thomas Aquinas say about creationism? "Creationism" as it is used today didn't exist in Aquinas's time; hence, he had no explicit position on it. Of course, he believed that the Christian God created the world.
What does the creation story teach?
Depending on which creation theory you mean, it varies in detail according to religion or spirituality, it is usually the story of how the universe and its contents were created
Jewish answer:
Among other things, the narrative of God creating the universe teaches that God created all things (including time and space, by the way), without recourse to any primordial substance; and that the creation was done to provide a backdrop upon which people would be tested, and act via their free-will.
Was man created from dirt and clay?
First take:
No, the subspecies Homo sapiens sapiens (modern humans) evolved from Homo sapiens, and from other ancestors in the Homo genus.
Humans are still classified as apes, so it's incorrect (but mostly redundant) to say we evolved from apes.
-Side Note
Many people believe that man was created from dirt and clay based on teachings from the Bible in Genesis (2:4-25). Though this belief is based on faith alone, and not any scientific evidence.
Second take:
It depends on your use of the word "created." In the take above, he assumes created to mean "derived from". Using that same reasoning, you can say that potentially yes, modern humans (Homo sapiens sapiens) were created from dirt and clay. If you research before apes along the evolutionary chain in the fossil record, single celled organisms come first. There is a theory called clay theory which suggests that clays (such as montmorillonite) accelerated the conversion of fatty acids into clusters, which in turn could enclose RNA attached to the clay. The earliest cells may have been aided by this process, therefore essentially deriving humans from clay.
source:
Hanczyc, M.M., Fujikawa, S.M. and Szostak, Jack W. (October 2003). "Experimental Models of Primitive Cellular Compartments: Encapsulation, Growth, and Division". Science 302(5645): 618-622. doi:10.1126/science.1089904
Moral conduct is the manner in which one decides to act morally. Morals, as defined by dictionary.com, are: of, pertaining to, or concerned with the principles or rules of right conduct or the distinction between right and wrong.
Was the world created in seven days?
According to the religious and christian bible, the world was believed to be, these are based on religious hope and recommendation. The world was believed and proved to be created according to the Big Bang theory, which is scientifically based on logical knowledge. Therefore, these 2 opinions and perspectives are entirely different within their claims.
ANSWER:
No, it was actually created in 6 days.
Creationism is the belief that the universe and living organisms originate from specific acts of divine creation. Proponents argue that it provides a religious explanation for the origins of life, while opponents often view it as incompatible with scientific evidence, specifically the theory of evolution. The debate around creationism centers on the scientific validity of its claims and whether it should be taught alongside evolution in educational settings.
The formulation of the theory of evolution by Charles Darwin provided a framework for understanding the origins and development of species, including humans. This influenced the field of psychology by highlighting the idea of continuity between animals and humans, leading to the emergence of comparative psychology and evolutionary psychology which examine behavior and mental processes from an evolutionary perspective. It also contributed to the development of theories such as natural selection and adaptation as explanations for psychological processes.