Holocaust

no one. some governments that were set up as puppets of the Nazis were overthrown though.

Skilled workers generally did not find work. Most of the labour was of a general physical variety; construction, digging, carrying and the like.

The only reason there were punishments in Nazi concentration camps is because the German guards enjoyed humiliating and torturing their captives to death.

Israel's stability was not contingent on the Holocaust. Israel's stability came about as a result of the Armistice of 1949 with the Arab States in the Arab-Israeli War of 1948-9.

Manifestly the US did not. There were things the British were telling the US prior to WW2 that the US may or may not have acted upon. But the Holocaust was not one of these things because, unless I am misinformed, the British knew very little about the Holocaust at that time. Indeed prior to the relief of Belsen in 1945 very little indeed was known about the treatment of the Jews & others. The fact that the Russians had liberated Aushwitz & other places in Poland 6 months previous and had said nothing.....

Ed " Kookie " Byrnes of " 77 Sunset Strip " is still alive.

He is 74 years old - Born July 20, 1933.

yes he is a survivor of the holocaust

The Holocaust was too big, covering many different types of people for anyone to work out who, where and when the 'they' that you refer to are.

Irena Sendler's official memoir "Matka Dzieci Holocaustu" was published in Poland in 2005. The English version will be released in the US in late 2010. A documentary film based on the memoir with the last long interviews Irena Sendler gave will be broadcast in the US in 2011. For more information see www.irenasendlerfilm.com.

He wasn't involved. The Holocaust didn't really start until well after he had died. He was indirectly involved in that he had played a role in Hitler's takeover of Germany in 1933. The Nazi Party's strong antisemitism was well known, but he couldn't have known that it would lead to the horrors of the Holocaust.

Read the book THE MAN WHO BROKE INTO AUSCHWITZ by Denis Avey with Rob Broomby to find out.

Germany was defeated. Judaism survived.

If you mean whose idea it was, it was designed by Adolf Hitler who believed in a Germanic "master-race" based on the genuine Aryan racial type. Few now use the term, preferring instead "Caucasian".

It is important though to realise that he was not alone in one aspect of his plan: Eugenics. This was thoroughly discredited by the Nazis' actions, but even before Hitler adopted it, eugenics - the idea of selective human breeding - was a widely-held notion in W. Europe and the USA, despite itsodious theory. Nor should we forget that humanity can be all too easily cold and ruthless for political expediency. Hitler's regime stands out for its utter, systematicbarbarity but is not alone in Mankind's Hall of Shame.

The earlier eugenecists did not advocate mass-murder of so-called"undesirables" butstillbelieved in breeding for intelligence, sporting prowess or otherspurious values; but from it, the Nazis had two "solutions". One was the exterminations to which you refer. The other was their "Liebensraum" (sp?) programme by which suitably Aryan parents would be used as breeding-stock. Ironically noneof the Nazi High Command, including Hitler himself, looked particularly Aryan. One of the saddestresults was that after the war, many of the children born, often illegitimately, to Norwegian woman by invading German soldiers were treated abominably by step-parents and orphanages as if to punish them for choosing to be born as Liebensraum babies. Especially if the conception was suspected as being by love-affair rather than rape: the soldiers themselves were not all barbarians, and many residents found it best not to object too much to the occupation.

We should not forget though that although the Nazi's extermination policy was deliberate, Hitler's friend then foe Stalinkilled at least as many by his dreadfulcruelty,negligence and managerial incompetence. This wasmainly in the name of dogma rather than racial "purity"; although Stalin hated gypsies, Jews and homosexuals as much as Hitler did.

Nor should we forget that Switzerland (neutral in both World Wars) ran her own anti-Romany crusade from the 1940s to early'60s. Under it, the Swiss government kidnapped Romany children and farmed themout under new official identitiesvia state- andchurch- run orphanages to step-families of State-approved pedigree.The idea was that once their parents and grand-parents had died out naturally, Switzerland would be gypsy-free.

Hitler'sThird Reichsimply killedanygyspies it caught.

The UK was not entirely innocent. We sheltered many fleeing from the Nazis, and declared war on Germany for her Nazi territorial ambitions - not yet fully understanding what the Nazis were doing to the Jews and others they despised. Yet from the 1950s to the early-60s the UK Govt contracted charities like Barnadoes and Vatica-run orphanagesto send children from poor backgrounds, expecially if born under the terrible stigma of illegitimacy, to a "new life" inCanada, Australia and New Zealand.Using RC Church institutions like the appalling "Christian Brotherhood" and their female Nazarene counterparts in thosereceiving nations, many of the children ended up as little more than slaves and vicims of terrible abuse. The British Government had embarked on its plan with genuinely good intentions, but made no effort to monitorits implementation and the children themselves.

Adolf Hitler's regime is a hall-mark of barbarity - but has no monopoly oncruelty.

no it is not. Think of a metaphor as a simile without the "like" or "as" bcause that's basically what it is. It wouldn't make sense to say "like you could scarcely contain your feelings of triumph". Above this, it is not a comparison, nothing is being compared in the statement. if you like this answer and it helped you, please recommend me vvvvvvvvvvvvv (ameriziliano)

This question makes no sense. Dachau was a concentration camp in Germany that was established with the establishment of the Nazi Government. This camp was the first of its kind however it was kept for people who were trying to overthrow the new government and people who were deemed dangerous to the new rule. I hope you see now why your question makes no sense. ___ Steady on! In fact after the Nuremberg Tribunal, the hanged Nazi leaders' corpses were in fact disposed of at Dachau. See, for example, this: "The death sentences were carried out 16 October 1946 by hanging ... The bodies were brought to Dachau and burned (the final use of the crematories there) with the ashes then scattered into a river." (Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuremberg_Trials)

I'm not quite sure if you mean family members, friends or the abuser that you are trying to make see that it's the abuser's attitude that creates conflict. All you need to know is NO ONE has the right to abuse you! Also, you have no right to abuse anyone. To fight back at an abuser is dangerous and it leads nowhere. If you have had enough of the abuse it's time to seek help to get out of the environment you are in and never mind what others think or understand. My rule of thumb on this "Until you have walked a mile in that person's shoes (the victim) no one has a right to comment negatively." YOU know what goes on behind closed doors. There is no need to try and convince anyone! YOU CAN NOT CHANGE YOUR ABUSER! Abusers are usually the product of the environment they either grew up in, or an environment they created for themselves. Still, this is no excuse because they know they abuse and therefore, they should have gotten psychological help for themselves, but seldom do. Abusers are sneaky, vicious, under-mining and when they abuse their mate, a family member, children or the elderly it is suppose to make them feel superior, but only for a brief moment and thus, the abuse continues. Abuser's only know one word "control!" They can't control society or the world around them, BUT, they can control who is in their home. Abusers are actually weak and fear society as a whole. They often feel they have not been treated fairly or they should have all the things others in society have. They may resent the fact they weren't lucky enough to make good money or brought up in a family with money. They see themselves as much more intelligent than the average person and therefore, they are angry that they aren't rewarded for their intelligence. They feel "they missed the boat." If the abuser was abused by his/her parents then they grew up with deep-rooted anger. Children can't fight back against their abusers so they suppress their anger until they are old enough to leave home and the anger spills out and the abuse is a chain reaction. Other abusers could be in a job where they work hard and never seem to get anywhere in the company and instead of changing companies they internalize things and become angry. Some abusers are simply just mean to the bone and have no real reason for their behavior. Abuse is in every culture, race, rich or poor and the famous. Don't hang around your abuser and think they will change. It's a road you are going to have to travel and many women make the transition of getting help from their local "Abused Women's Center" and getting help fighting the system against their abuser and end up leading normal and healthy lives. Many formerly abused women end up meeting and marrying a wonderful man and leading a very normal lifestyle. Your are stronger than you think hon. Good luck Marcy

Jews could not own property, go to schools, write books and Jewish businesses were boycotted. Also, listening to the BBC because it was considered a source of the enemy and could cost you your life

The embalming process is two steps: first embalming fluid is pumped into main vessels of the body, which in turn displace the blood. This is done at four points: the femoral arteries and the radial arteries or sometimes the carotid arteries. Next the embalmer, using a trocar - a long tube with a sharp pointed end, aspirates all of the internal organs to rid them of gasses and fluids, and replaces the abdominal cavity with embalming fluid. The cavity fluid is then aspirated and the hole that's left from the trocar is plugged up with a stopper. If the body has been autopsied, a preservative compound is used and the incisions made by the medical examiner are stitched together using a thick mortuary twine. The body is then dressed, casketed, and cosmetized. In some cases the face is re-sculptured using plastic compounds and putty. In

No,he was exacuted

One would assume so. He did many experimental surgeries without any medicine for the "patient", and he did many selections when new prisoners arrived.

not really, they were rounded up and handed over to the Germans

Camp Coffee was created in 1876.

No, there were identical decrees at various times in the Middle Ages.

Grey

From Wikipedia: "On 1 April 1933, Jewish doctors, shops, lawyers and stores were boycotted. Only six days later, the Law for the Restoration of the Professional Civil Service was passed, banning Jews from being employed in government. This law meant that Jews were now indirectly and directly dissuaded or banned from privileged and upper-level positions reserved for “Aryan” Germans. From then on, Jews were forced to work at more menial positions, beneath non-Jews."