Law School

The SAT Reasoning Test costs $45, whereas the SAT Subject Tests cost $20 per test. Fee waivers are available for those who qualify - just see your school's guidance counselor for a fee waiver application. If you require any other information regarding the SAT prep you can go to this excellent site called www.examviile.com.

Hillary Rodham Clinton attended Yale in 1969 and graduated Yale University in 1973.

Yes, California allows you to take the exam without going to law school. However, you do have to work with an attorney for a number of years.

To be admitted to practice you must take:

1.) the bar exam of the state in which you want to practice.

2.) the MPRE (a professional responsibility/ethics exam).

The Bar exam has two parts: one involving federal law and the other involving the law of the state in which you are taking the exam. Each state has its own way of scoring the exam and its own minimum score to pass the exam.

The MPRE is a multiple choice exam testing your knowledge of the rules of professional conduct; different states have different minimal scores for passing this exam (they range from 75-86).

In the UK, you can -- but in the US college is required before you are eligible to enter law school.

You can! only if you pass with your really high score on your LSAT test, if you get 180 which is the highest score even Harvard University will accept you.

Russian schools tend to start early, as do American schools. While some schools might vary their hours, the school day probably would begin by seven AM. Many Russian schools, especially those considered the best, tend to have longer hours than in the United States; some schools do not finish the day's studies till around dinner time.

Essentially you have asked two questions. First you ask whether the undergraduate school that you attend matters for law school admissions. The short answer is yes. The degree to which it matters, however, depends upon a great number of factors (e.g. relative prestige of the potential aw school, relative prestige of the undergraduate institution). All else being equal, a 3.0 at Harvard will get you into more law schools than will a 3.0 at Arizona State University. This question requires a case-by-case answer. Sorry.

The second question is whether admissions is all about GPA and LSAT? This question doesn't have a definite answer either, but is more answerable than the first. When your test score and GPA information are relayed to potential law schools, most of them plug the numbers into a formula that results in your being assigned a particular score (which of course will be used to rank your application based on probability of admission without consideration of soft factors). Each school will use a formula that weights GPA and LSAT score to a different degree (relative to each other). For example, school A might multiply your GPA by a factor of 10, but only multiply your LSAT score by a multiple of 5, while school B might multiply your GPA by a factor of 5, but multiply your LSAT score by a factor of 10. There is a list somewhere on line that gives approximations of these, but I can't remember where it is. In any case, if you haven't done so, proceed to http://officialguide.lsac.org/UGPASearch/Search3.aspx?SidString= and plug in your current numbers.

Some additional info that I received from a visit at UNC CH helps answer your question. I actually asked the same question while I was there and the dean's answer was pretty much: "We do not look that much into where you went to undergrad at. People have many different reasons for attending the schools they did. For instance some people just may not have been able to afford a different school, they may have needed to stay near by their home town for family problems, or their specific degree was better suited for them at their undergrad school." So if that view is taken at Unc school of law I'm pretty sure it is standardized.

The two main factors in your application are your GPA and LSAT. Your GPA is mainly an indicator of how well you did compared to your fellow students at your school and the lsat is a general "how well did you do compared to other prospective law students on a standardized level." Meaning the lsat conforms all of the applicants to the same scale rather than just comparing how well you did at your school since a student from Harvard who gets a 3.0 is probably more intelligent than a student from ECU who got a 3.5. Does that make sense? Or another example which the Dean also referred to was an applicant from Westpoint was applying and he had a GPA of 2.6. His initial reaction was that the student was an idiot but he checked into the average GPAs of the other students and found that the student was actually alot higher than his fellow students. So it all depends on the school you plan on attending but I would say that if you keep your GPA above a 3.4 and an LSAT above 158, you will have a good shot at getting into any state school unless its a top 20 school such as UC Berkley.

The other factors are the personal statement, academic resume, and addendum. The way I understand it is the personal statement and academic resumes are pretty much tie breakers and the addendum is just a complation of reasons your grades or lsat scores are low and/or your criminal background explanation. The way my LSAT prep book put it is when the schools get the apps, they divide them into three piles once the GPA and LSAT scores are reviewed. The three stacks are definatly getting in, may get in, and definatly not getting in. If there is any room after the first stack, they go through the second stack looking for the best applicants based on their scores and variable qualifications.

A website that you can go to and put your LSAT and GPA in and get a list of schools that meet your qualifications is:

http://www.studentdoc.com/lsat-scores.HTML

I hope this info helps and exuse any grammatical errors ;-)

Keller Graduate School is an accredited University and credits received will transfer to another college or university. They also accept transfer credits from other accredited schools of higher education.

Winstanley is good for Law

(located in the North West of England near Wigan)

According to The Times, the top 10 UK Law Colleges are:

1. Cambridge

2. Oxford

3. LSE

4. King's College London

5. University College London

6. Aberdeen

7. Durham

8. Leicester

9. Dundee

10. Southampton, Nottingham (tied)

The Times Article: http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/law/article4170528.ece

General Information on Law Colleges: http://www.payingforlawschool.com/law-colleges/

Generally, a full time day student will attend classes for three years excluding summers to complete the law degree. A full time evening student will need four years to complete the degree. Some law schools have, in the past, offered a "mid-year program" whereby a student will start in January and finish in June after attending full time for 2 &1/2 years straight, including summers. This type of program was not widely offered and may not be offered by many schools at the present.

For 2007 graduates, the top starting salary for new associates at the largest national firms was $160,000. Not all graduates of Harvard Law School end up in those firms.

Firms in smaller cities typically pay less, in some cases much less. Government, corporate and public interest employers also pay less.

It really depends on the type of masters degree, and the course load taken per semester. It can range from two semesters and up as a full-time student. Most individuals take their masters on a part-time bases.

you need to go to undergraduate college first and then you can apply to Harvard law school. before that you need to have at least a 3.7 college GPA and you need to take the LSAT (law school admissions test). most accepted applicants at Harvard have a 168/180 (or higher) on their LSAT.

Search online for law school rankings. Find the listing for the school that you want to attend and look at the LSAT range, which will be the range from the 25th to 75th percentile of the school's last entering class. You will probably need to score in or above this range in order to be accepted.

I once acquired a defense attorney. He got a $5000.00 retainer which covered everything but a jury trial. If the case would have gone to trial it would have been an additional $1000.00 per trial day. So per hour could be variable.

Dear Sir / Madam,

I would like to inform you that my sister is getting married on INSERT DATE. As I am the eldest in the family, most of the work related to marriage has to be completed by me. For this reason I would like to apply for the five day leave starting from DATE to DATE. I assure you that I will complete my pending work once I resume my duty again. Hope you consider this request and grant me the leave.

Thanks in advance.. Best Regards, ABC

Latin topics are very interesting to write on.

As a general rule, students wishing to carry on to graduate school and study medicine within the US, do not major in premed. Instead they study a series of courses from a range of departments covering basic biology, chemistry, physics and mathematics.These courses are no different to those that would be covered by freshmen majoring in any of those subjects. Premed students tend to major in one of the sciences although estimates are that up to a quarter end up majoring in the humanities.

For any legitimate law school, the answer is no. You have to have earned a bachelor's degree from an accredited college or university typically as a requirement and I've never heard of a law school allowing someone in based on a stellar LSAT score alone. At the most difficult law schools, you're competing against great LSAT scores as well as an amazing undergraduate GPA or graduate accomplishments. So, most likely law schools won't accept you without a bachelor's degree.

================================================================================

More and more universities are accepting law school applicants who do not have an undergraduate degree, but can demonstrate that they have the approximate equivalent of a university degree through life experience(s).

-it is an economic proposition that no good is absolutely irreplaceable that at some set of prices, consumers will substitute other goods for it...