Medieval Warfare

Long enought go completely through your body and stick out the other side with your guts hanging from the point. That would be about 16 feet long.

Sometimes, but usually not. Because battles were mostly conducted by Royalty, there would usually only be someone to take the place of a killed or injured leader if there were other Royals on the field. There was nothing like the chain of command and the organised leadership transfers that there are in today's armies

To expound on the above, Western medieval combat was basically a semi-organized mob. Each side would consist of several groups, each usually commanded by the noble from whose lands the soldiers came. There would be a single "commander" of the whole army, but this person was often not in operational control of the army. There did not exist any sort of chain-of-command; rather, the assemblage of nobles would usually pick a leader (and often a deputy) to be in overall command. This commander could then issue what we would now call directives (rather than orders) to each of the nobles' groups.

For instance, here's how a medieval army might be "structured":

King A brings 100 knights, 1000 man-at-arms, and 500 archers.

King B bring 200 knights, 5000 man-at-arms, but no archers.

Noble C (who nominally owes fealty to King B) bring 100 knights.

Noble D (an independent noble who isn't royalty, but isn't a vassal of King A or B) bring 500 man-at-arms and 500 archers.

A, B, C, and D would all retain "command" of their individual groups of soldiers (it would be very unlikely to do something like combine the archers of A & D into one group under someone else's command). Probably, King B sould be selected as the leader of the whole army. King A would likely be elected deputy commanders. In all likelihood, though, Noble C and D would NOT take "orders" from A unless they knew that B had been killed or otherwise out-of-action.

If that sounds horrible, it was. Medieval battles were notoriously uncoordinated and chaotic, with bad battlefield communication technology making the situation even worse.

Formal chain-of-command structures didn't start occuring until the end of the medieval period, when warfare shifted towards nation vs nation rather than traditional feudal warfare. That is, things didn't really improve until the Renaissance.

People from the area that later spawned the Mongol empire, the great grass steppes, were known as the Huns at around that time.

Squire

As a general rule they're just called siege towers but in the Middle Ages they were known as belfry. You are talking about the big rectangular towers on four wheels that you roll up to the city walls, right?

Yes, over 50 wars started in Europe alone between 1400 and 1499.

This does not begin to include the unknown number of wars in Asian and the America's, yes, Native Americans had wars between themselves before Europeans arrived.

After many bombardments in history, troops take over and run the area. Some areas are left to dwindle and die. It would all depends on what people and countries have been involved in the bombardment and their battle strategies.Ê

Annelis Marie Frank.
Edith and Otto Frank were the parents of Anne Frank. Anne Franks full name was Annalies Marie Frank.

Chainmail was a way of protecting oneself in battle. It can be made by linking small metal rings in a pattern until it is big enough for a person to wear.

No, the Chinese used gunpowder before the Mongols did. So did the Jurchens, who conquered northern China in the early 1100s. The Mongols undoubtedly acquired knowledge of gunpowder weapons from the Jurchens and the Chinese.