Scientists

Ernest Rutherford died in 1937

i wonder how much they get paid because i want to be a scientist.!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Type your answer here... D.Comparing the composition of the crust to other bodies in the solar system

Linnaeus was a Swedish scientist that lived from 1707 to 1778. He devised a system still used today for classifying plants and animals on the basis of similarities in internal structures. He is often called the father of modern botany.

Linnaeus is also known for popularizing binomial system of plant nomenclature.

scientist use a thermometer to read temperature

Peguins

A person who studies crystals is known as a crystallographer. The study of crystal is known as crystallography which looks at the formation and development of crystals.

Molecular Analysis

Follow me @BkgGreen.

Each of a pair of seismic stations can determine the direction a seismic wave came from, and if that data is plotted on a map, the location where the lines cross will be the epicenter of the quake.

We would need to know what the two structures are to respond to this question.

Two, one for the genus and one for the species. The genus is always capitalized and comes first followed by the species (not capitalized).

Understanding practical and theoretical limitations can allow a scholar to carefully limit their area of expertise and research. Acknowledging limitations also allows for isolating sources of error.

Louis broiled broth for 15 min. He then let it sit for one year in a swan neck flask. He noticed that some dust had accumulated in the top part of the flask. So he took a sample, form the broth inside the flask. He noticed that nothing was inside of growing in it. So he then preceded to shake the broth in the flask in such a way, that it would touch the dust at the top. He then took a sample from that and it was highly bacteria ridden.

People questioned if she was a good scientist

The names of 20 scientist in the world include Marie Curry, Galileo Galilei, Robert Koch, Steve Irwin, Joseph Lister, Dian Fossey, Carl Sagan, Charles Darwin, and Sigmund Freud. Others include John Dalton, Linus Pauling, Francis Bacon, Leland Clark, Ivan Pavlov, Isaac Newton, and Ramon Barba. An additional four are Paul Dirac, Robert Boyle, Ronald Ross, and Ibn Rushd.

1. she is a girl
2. she is a person
3. she lives on earth

Well the three things are, to find a cure for cancer, to find if you could live on mars(or if their is any living things on mars, and the third is that they are trying to prove that global warming exists. The scientist must have lots of patience and the willingness to never give up to solve these problems

nature versus nurture

To be more sure of their results. Say you are testing the effects of aspirin on heart disease. If you only tested two people (one that got aspirin and one that got a placebo) there are an enormous number of reasons why the two people could be different BESIDES getting aspirin or placebo. If you tested 1000 that got aspirin and 1000 that got placebo and the two groups differed, it should be because of the aspirin (the other possible explanations should cancel-out in such a large sample, why would all the people with the worst heart health or all the men end-up in one group?). The larger the "sample size" the more sure we will be that the effect was actually due to the aspirin. This also enables us to look not at the effect of aspirin on an individual (something that is very unstable and varies a lot from person to person) but the effect of aspirin on a GROUP. An effect that is far more stable. In general, the more variable the effects, the larger the sample you will need. Physics and Chemistry usually deal with very stable effects, so they need a small sample. Psychology, Sociology and other Social Sciences usually deal with very variable effects, so they need LOTS of people to be sure the effects they see are real. In general, the larger the sample is, the more accurate our results are. Large samples also ensure a normal distribution and other advantages for statistical testing, but these samples must be RANDOM samples or they do not mean what we think they do.

Part of the structure of science is the means to communicate unambiguously so that others can test and replicate ones work.

A single common set of units is far less likely to create confusion and error compared to a miscellany of units.

A classic of how NOT to do something is the airlines where, for political reasons, heights are in feet, distances in km, speed in knots.

None of the units are compatible with the others and there have been crashes where people have misunderstood which units the figures are being quoted in.

In any case,there is the problem of having a standard.

i.e what is a "foot" for example.

The difficulty of defining and maintaining standards is such that I believe that there is now only one set of standards in the world . SI

All other units are derived from those using conversion factors.

eg and inch is EXACTLY 2.54 cm by definition.

And a pound is EXACTLY 454 g by definition.

Thus no one needs to worry about holding standards for an inch or a pound etc.

How the Heart and Circulatory system work.

Because they might have to make sure they are correct

Every living thing gets their 'scientific name' by roots of Latin words. For example, the animal 'cat' is Felis Catus, which moth mean 'cat'.

The names are classified by the 'class' each animal is in.