answersLogoWhite

0

The Necklace

The Necklace is a short story by Guy de Maupassant. It is about a covetous lady, who caused hardships for her husband by always wanting more. In this category you can find questions about the moral of this short story, its characters and its theme.

607 Questions

The diamond necklace setting?

The Necklace is a short story by Guy de Maupassant. It is about a covetous lady, who caused hardships for her husband by always wanting more. In this..

What is the brief summary of 'The Necklace'?

A poor woman who aspires to be wealthy, goes to a party where she burrows her rich friends necklace to where to. There she experiences a night where she feels as though she is wealthy. When she arrives home she realizes she lost her friend's necklace. When she doesn't find the necklace, instead of telling her friend she lost it she decides to replace the necklace which costs a lot of money. The necklace cost so much she has to lay off her servant and work extra to pay for the necklace. When she is finally able to pay for the necklace she returns it to her friend only to find out that the original necklace was a fake.

What is the complication of the necklace?

The complication of a necklace is that while it is a stunning piece of jewelry, the little clasp is nearly impossible to connect without help. Always employ the assistance of another person when putting on a necklace.

How you recommend the story of the necklace?

Yes and no, a kind of moralistic- anti-materialism parable. Much of the problems arising from the loss of the (actually valueless) article could have been averted with a timely phone call from MMe Loisel to Mme Forestier ( which means Forester or maybe Parks). Exactly how the necklace was lost is not gotten into in detail- one wonders if Mme Loisel ( pronounced Law=Zell) had been drinking at the party ( it happens) there are no direct hints of crime. If she and her husband called up the leading Cab Companies ( in a big city like Paris this could be a costly task!) why the Heck did she not notify MMe Forestier immediately after the loss- MMe Forestier would then explain, if she had a conscience- that the item was costume jewelry, and no big deal. Social-problem short stories of this type influenced a number of crime and other dramas. Often Confederate money was an ironic prop! ( all of the money was Confederate- now a commercial from the Heart Fund! The Confederate money angle was used in a number of adaptations by O.Henry and others.- one adopted in to a Superman plot. ( The Overcoat). in that all lead characters male. I didn"rt really like the story- but, well lilke an old song ( It haunted me from the Start!)

Complication of the story the diamond necklace?

The solution, or more correctly, the resolution, in 'The Necklace', is Mme Loisel learning that the necklace she had borrowed, lost and spent ten years in poverty paying for its replacement was practically worthless. Had she been more honest about losing it in the first place, she and her husband wold not have had to ruin their lives and perhaps health to replace it.

What is an example of flash back in the diamond necklace?

An example of a flashback in "The Diamond Necklace" occurs when the narrator provides a detailed account of Madame Loisel's life leading up to the day she borrows the necklace. This flashback helps establish the character's background and motivations for her subsequent actions.

Where did Mr. Loisel work?

Mr. Loisel worked as a clerk at the Ministry of Education.

Are any important statements about life or people made in the necklace either by the narrator of characters in the story?

One important statement about life in "The Necklace" is the theme of appearance versus reality, as it shows how superficial desires can lead to consequences. The story also explores the idea that true happiness comes from appreciating what one has rather than coveting what one does not. Additionally, it highlights the impact of societal expectations and the pursuit of wealth on individual happiness.

What are the significance of the title the necklace?

The title "The Necklace" signifies the central object that drives the plot of the story. It symbolizes materialism, social status, and the consequences of deceit. The necklace also represents the main character's desire for wealth and the eventual realization of the true value of things.

What is the plot and theme of the story the diamond necklace by guy de maupassant?

"The Necklace" by Guy de Maupassant is about Madame Loisel, who borrows a diamond necklace to fit in at a fancy party, only to lose it and live in poverty for years while working to pay off the debt. The story explores themes of vanity, social class, and the consequences of greed.

Who are the minor characters in the story the necklace?

In "The Necklace" by Guy de Maupassant, the minor characters include Madame Forestier, Madame Loisel's friend, who lends her the necklace, and Monsieur Loisel, Madame Loisel's husband, who plays a supporting role in the story.

Setting of the story piece of string by Guy De Maupassant?

The setting of "A Piece of String" by Guy de Maupassant is a small village in Normandy, France. The story takes place during a fair where people from the surrounding areas gather to buy and sell goods. The village is described as a close-knit community with a strong sense of gossip and suspicion.

Who is the main character in story - the necklace?

Mme Loisell, who borrows the thing from her (friend) Mme Forestier- which means Forester. Parks would not be a bad translation. In a sense MMe Forestier is the antagonist, though fatal pride- and maybe alcohol played a role. I think she ( Loisell) was drunk when she lost the necklace at the party.. and waited too long to report it... that would explain why she did not call up MMe Forestier when she first noticed the item ( which she believed to be worth 60 Grand plus) was missing.

Is there an irony in the short story strawberry spring?

Yes, there is irony in the short story "Strawberry Spring" by Stephen King. The narrator's initial suspicion of the Red Death killer turns out to be misplaced, revealing the twist at the end that the killer is actually the narrator himself. This twist creates a sense of dramatic irony for the reader.

How might the outcome of the story or resolution have changed if madame loisel had been more truthful?

If Madame Loisel had been more truthful from the beginning about losing the necklace, her husband might have been able to help her find a solution sooner. This could have prevented them from going into severe debt and enduring years of hardship. Additionally, Madame Forestier may have been more understanding and could have helped them avoid unnecessary suffering.

Why does Madame Loisel choose to barrow a luxury item?

Madame Loisel chooses to borrow a luxury item, like a diamond necklace, to feel elegant and fit in at a high society event. She wants to appear wealthy and refined to impress others and enhance her own self-image, despite not being able to afford such items herself.

How was madame frostier different to madame loisel?

Although Madame Frostier is wealthy she does not want more and more. Madam Loisel feels she is entitled to more than what she has and her pride in who she believes she should be eventually creates her downfall.

What is the cause and effect for the necklace by Guy de Maupassant?

a small thing or a chance or fate can ruin or save a person. Chance is more powerful than human resolution and it is man's destiny.

When we go through the story carefully, we find that Mathilda's life was going on very well. Although she was not satisfied with her life, het she was living better than most of the middle class women. She had a loving husband. She had a maidservant who did everything for her. She was very beautiful and looked out of her dress. All this suggests that her life was all right.

Now chance played its role and changed all her life. Her husband brought an invitation to the ball at the Minister's residence. She had no jewel to wear on the party. She went to her friend and borrowed a necklace to wear. She was very happy, but a small thing happened. She lost her necklace. It was necessary to replace that necklace. Her husband borrowed the money from every possible source and brought the necklace.

Chance again played its role. When she went to return the necklace, her friend did not open the jewel box. Actually, the necklace she had borrowed from her friend was false and she was returning the real one. If she had opened the jewel case, she would have come to know that fact and Mathilda would have been saved from future sufferings. However, chance or fate did not let her friend open the jewel case. Now their life changed and they lost everything.

It proves that chance is more powerful than human resolution. It is man's destiny.

Where is the setting of the necklace?

The story "The Necklace" by Guy de Maupassant is set in Paris, France during the late 19th century. The protagonist, Mathilde Loisel, dreams of a life of luxury and glamour, which contrasts with her modest surroundings in a middle-class household.

What are the characters of diamond necklace?

Comtesse de Lamotte-Valois was a common woman, though she was a descendant of the Valois family, a family that had once been the Royal family of France, but were replaced by the Bourbons (the family that was now on the throne and Marie Antoinette was a direct descendant from this family (her great-grandfather being Louis XIV). She always held a grudge against the Bourbons because she felt that her family should have stayed Royal instead of the Bourbons. Also, she was very poor and wanted the Royal family to support her because of her Royal blood.

She and her lover (she had a husband but also several lovers) Retaux de Villette (a master forger) made a plan. They had heard of the jewellers Boehmer and Bassenge who made a gorgeous necklace especially for Madame du Barry, but she had left Versailles due to the death of Louis XV before they had the chance to present it to her. Now they wanted Marie Antoinette to buy it, but she had refused the necklace for 3 times already because she thought it was ugly and she said "I already have enough diamonds".

The jewellers therefore where desperate to sell the necklace worth 1.6 million Francs. Rétaux de Villette was a master forger and wrote letters from 'the Queen' to the "comtesse". She stated that she wanted the necklace, but was aware of the reluctance of the King to buy it due to the current dismal financial situation of the country. She hoped that the Cardinal Prince Louis de Rohan (a man the Queen hated)could lend her the money, and she would grant him the stipend he wished for. Jeanne de la Motte was named as the Queen's agent. The Cardinal, so happy that the Queen finally seemed to trust him enough to do this for her, believed these letters to be authentic (although the autograph was very foolish and could never have been the Queen's) and agreed to buy the necklace for the Queen. A late night rendezvous was arranged, where the Cardinal met 'the Queen' (in reality a prostitute who resembled her, called Nicole le Guay d'Oliva) and received forgiveness. The jeweler was contacted and asked to bring the necklace. The necklace was given to Jeanne de la Motte to pass on to the Queen. This of course never happened, her husband promptly began selling the diamonds in Paris and London.

Because the Queen kept ignoring the Cardinal, and the jewellers came to the Queen for money, the whole scheme was over. The Cardinal and the comtesse were arrested, though, because the Queen's reputation was already down the drain and people actually believed that she spent loads of money, they thought this story was probably true also, and even though there was more than enough evidence against the cardinal, he was acquitted. The comtesse was branded with the letter V on one of her breasts (V for Voleuse, which means 'thief'). The branding was intended to be placed on her shoulder, but she fought her torturer so heavily, the hot iron landed on one of her breasts. She escaped out of prison dressed as a boy (she probably got help from Revolutionist prison guards) and fled to England where she spend the rest of her life spreading pamphlets against the Queen. The queen was blamed for everything eventhough she had nothing to do with it all.

Do you use apostrophes when stating a short story?

Yes, apostrophes are used to indicate possessiveness or contractions in a short story. They help clarify the meaning and structure of the text for the reader.

What is the type of conflict in the story The Diamond necklace?

i think the conflict begin with Mrs Loisel who pretends to be part of the high society beyond their limits.

it ends after 10 years of suffering to repay for the lost necklace which they thought it was diamond.

Explain how the authors choice of point of view affected the storys tone and plot in the necklace?

In "The Necklace," the author's choice of a limited third-person point of view allows readers to closely follow Mathilde's perspective and emotions. This viewpoint emphasizes her dissatisfaction and longing for a different life, which drives the plot of the story. The tone is shaped by Mathilde's feelings of jealousy and misplaced ambition, leading to the tragic outcome of the narrative.

In the short story The Grains of Paradise what are the three conflicts that stand out quite clearly?

1. The disbalief by the Ladinos about Tio's year in callege in Mississippi.

2. Hilario's disaproval of Tio's realtionship with Nena

3. The hot pepper battle between Cordell and Hilario

Is 'The Necklace' by Guy de Maupassant non-fiction or fiction?

"The Necklace" by Guy de Maupassant is a work of fiction. It is a short story that explores themes of social class, materialism, and the consequences of greed.