The Necklace

Some of the literary terms used in "The Necklace" include irony (both situational and dramatic), characterization, symbolism, and theme (such as the dangers of vanity and the consequences of deceit). These elements help to convey the story's deeper meaning and enhance the reader's understanding of the characters and their motivations.

One of the most interesting parts of "The Necklace" is the plot twist at the end, where it is revealed that the expensive necklace Mathilde Loisel borrowed was actually a fake, making all her sacrifices and suffering for naught. This ironic twist highlights the theme of deception and the consequences of vanity and greed.

The Necklace by Guy De Maupassant is based on a young (middle-aged) woman whose life was ruined because of her dissatisfaction with an ordinary life. She was brought up in a middle-class family but her beauty and pride made her believe that she deserved a rich and lavish life. In an attempt to present her grace to others, she lost an expensive necklace and her life was ruined because she had to make up for its loss.

Hence, the necklace teaches that one must be satisfied with one's fortunes. We shouldn't dream of lavish surroundings and great possessions, we should present a realistic image of our lives to others. Otherwise we will be lost in our distant hopes, which we cannot even work towards, and in the midst fail to notice whatever happens in our own true lives.

Here is a brief summary of the ending (in point form):

Mdm. Loisel loses the necklace

Her and her husband find one at a jeweller that looks identical

They buy it for 36,000 francs

They spend 10 years repaying all of their generous family members and friends who loaned them the money

Mdm. Loisel sees her rich friend in the streets 10 years later (After she has paid off the dept)

Mdm. Loisel tells her friend the whole story

Her friend says "Oh my pore Mathilde, but mine were false. At most they were worth 500 francs!"

No, one deals with a social-climbing stunt- a wealthy woman loans a valuable prop ( or what is assumed to be) to a middle-class woman to wear to a party- the item is mysteriously lost.. then the lead character feels conscience stricken to launch a campaign to get up the value of the piece- which takes years and she is reduced to poverty in the interim- it turns out- the piece was an inexpensive wearing copy- not real diamonds at all- O Henry did a similar yarn where in a sense, the Bad Guy was the Bank of Richmond, circa l862! - there are no real evil people in (Nec klace_ though pride run amuck is a thematic, and the social-climbing stunt reduces the victim to poverty, instead of a luxury front. Ont he other hand the Most Dangerous Game deals with the reactions of man who is marooned somehow ( accident, ship wreck, something like that_ on an Island dominated by a Mad Russian ( this was written in Czarist times_ who pursues indeed the most dangerous Game- People-hunting, ( not treasure hunting or elaborate props_ here there is real violence and escape and evasion. a film was based on the story called also The Hounds of Zaroff, who was the mad Muscovite man. in the Hunting story=- I detect a vague hint of homosexuality... He smokes perfume-scented cigarettes .

The setting time in "The Necklace" by Guy De Maupassant is Paris in the late 19th century, specifically around the 1880s. The story takes place over several years, starting with the evening of a ball attended by the main characters, Mathilde and Monsieur Loisel.

The love necklace is a powerful thing that controls yourself and is only found in Australia. Over time, many people have invented stories and myths that revolve around love and certain objects. The love necklace is one of these.

M. Loisel is a character in "The Necklace." He is introduced as a clerk working in the Department of Education. After his wife loses an expensive borrowed necklace, he spends the next 10 years working a side job as a bookkeeper and copier to pay off his debt. "The Necklace" was written by Guy de Maupassant.

The lottery, a short story by one Shirley Jackson, who died in l965, is not about Gambling! It is about the hypothetical situation of what if society still openly practiced human sacrifice- how would one go about it. this somewhat unsettling topic was here presented not in science-fiction terms but seemingly plausible, not dealing with bomb shelters, expendable people, or similar technical angles ( ship wrecks, etc) provoking the sacrifice. I am not too conversant with the tale- there is a much deeper and equally thought-provoking- more so in fact novel about the possible imposition of the One-Child Policy of Communist China in the US in the near future ( props in the tale seem fairly common like phones and similar-so it is not far away)- This is a more practical potential reality but ignores basic democratic safeguards- I am not sure of the name of the novel-Lost Child, mystery child, something like that . it is very realistic for this type of story, not far off islands or planets. The Necklace is about material greed and dishonesty, and has no connection other than both are focused mainly on female characters, and The Lottery was written by a woman. N"uff Said.

Maupassant likely wants the reader to see the negative consequences of Mathilde's actions and choices, rather than to simply dislike her. By portraying her flaws and selfish behavior, he may be critiquing materialism and social climbing in society during that time period. This can lead readers to reflect on their own values and priorities.

"Your Uncle Jules" by Guy de Maupassant is a narrative that explores themes of family dynamics, social class, and the passage of time. Through the character of Jules, the story reflects on the complexities of familial relationships and the impact of societal expectations on individuals. Maupassant's clear prose and attention to detail contribute to the depth of the narrative, inviting readers to consider the nuances of human behavior and emotion.

because she believes that her dress is not elegant enough and the necklace would make it evne more beautiful! she doesnt want to look poor and she wants to fulfil her desires by being (feeling) apart of an upper class!

A job for Mr. Bell. She should have called up MMle Forestier ( owner of the lost item- immediately upon return from the party- when she noticed it was gone. Fatal pride- or maybe- well let us be real... she might have been drunk.. Senator Kennedy waited nine long hours ( to sober up) to report the Chappaquidick accident- while Mary Jo Kopechne was helplessly drowning- and it didn't happen fast like a gunshot. It has been estimated the poor girl was struggling for life at least four hours after the accidental (?) crash. Pride goeth before the Fall. Here pride cost a young woman"s life- far graver than a wearing copy of a necklace. Maybe Mme Loisel ( called also Mathilde in the story- was DRUNK>

The first thing that happened in the story "The Necklace" was that Mathilde kept on whining that she didn't have anything fancy and she wanted to be rich. But as in drama the first eventful thing that happened to Mathilde was that her husband got her a ticket to go to the fancy ball, which she also whined that she didn't have a fancy enough dress to go to the ball with.

Hope that gives you your answer.

The problem in the necklace story is that Mathilde Loisel borrows a diamond necklace to wear to a fancy event, but loses it. Instead of coming clean to the owner, she and her husband take out loans to replace it, resulting in years of financial hardship and sacrifice. The twist is that the necklace turned out to be a fake, making all their efforts and sacrifices unnecessary.

He was actually commissioned by the French Aristocracy to write it to make sure that the poor never tried to rise above what they were. It was a warning that if they tried to ever become more than they were that they would live with ten years of debt, sadness, and shame.

Madame Loisel is happy because she sees an opportunity to borrow jewelry from Madame Forestier to wear to a fancy party. This makes her excited because she believes that with fine jewelry she will be able to fully enjoy and fit in at the glamorous event.

The narrator suggests that Mathilde's problem is her desire for wealth and luxury, as well as her dissatisfaction with her current social status and material possessions. Her longing for a more glamorous life leads her to make choices that ultimately have negative consequences.

No, Madame Forestier lied about the necklace being real and told Mathilde it was only costume jewelry. The Loisel's spent years paying off the debt they incurred to replace the necklace, not knowing its true value. Madame Forestier never sold the necklace or returned any money to the Loisels.

When Madame Loisel first sees the necklace in its black satin box, it represents wealth, luxury, and the opportunity to transcend her social class. She is drawn to its beauty and sees it as a symbol of the life she desires but does not have.

Mathilde was devastated when she got home and realized she had misplaced her friend's diamond necklace. She experienced shock, and so did Mr. Loisel. They looked through the dress's folds and the wrap for the necklace but were unsuccessful. Mr. Loisel changed into his clothing and returned on foot to the search. He returned the following morning with no positive outcomes. He looked everywhere there could have been even the tiniest glimmer of hope. He was disappointed when he arrived back in the morning.

The resolution of the story "The Fun They Had" by Isaac Asimov is when the main characters reflect on their experience with a traditional school book and realize how different it is from their modern education system. They come to appreciate the value of personalized learning and human interaction compared to automated teaching methods.

Maupassant portrays Mathilde as a woman who is dissatisfied with her modest lifestyle and yearns for wealth and luxury. She is depicted as ambitious and driven by material desires, which ultimately lead to her downfall and unhappiness.

The plot of "The Necklace" by Guy de Maupassant follows Madame Loisel borrowing a necklace to wear to a fancy event, only to lose it. She and her husband then go into debt to replace it, only to later discover the original necklace was a fake. The story explores themes of pride, materialism, and the consequences of deceit.

Guy De Maupassant's â??Moonlightâ?? tells the story of a misogynist viewing women only as â??traps for menâ??. Upon learning of his nieceâ??s rendezvous with a lover he vows to catch her,. But waiting for the lovers to meet, he is overcome by the beauty of the evening, and in this light, understands the innocence of her love and is ashamed for only seeing ugliness of what is obviously another demonstration of Godâ??s beauty and grace.