This is not a proper conversion. Cubic centimeters (cc) is a measure of volume. Grams (g), kilograms (kg) and milligrams (mg) are measures of weight or mass.

of course!

At my mother-in-law's home.

You can get it anytime.

By the way, get my MIL also, pls.

Speed = wavelength x frequency, so wavelength is speed over frequency: 1080f/s/65hz = 16.6ft (approximately)

false

To track accounts receivables for each doctor when multiple doctors treat the same patients.

= tan ^ -1 (0.55431) = approximately 29 degrees

No. Acetone will strip the clear coat and eventually the paint

Not unless somebody is holding it down.

If the rock weighs 10N and you just set it in the water, it'll sink until it displaces

10N of water, and at that point, it has no desire to sink any further.

A 20-newton force would cause acceleration at 6 m/sec

The acceleration is given by the formula F=ma (Force = mass x acceleration)

so for the same mass, doubling the force doubles the acceleration for the same mass.

No - there are 5280 feet in one mile. Therefore, 4 miles is equal to 21120 feet.

It is type of velocity of electron.

an informal recored of all deposits to and withdrawals from a given checking account

The Tennis ball is smaller and has less weight than a basketball. The tennis ball will also have less drag.

37800

You add the mass of the containing vessel (whether it be a truck, a car, a ship, a tin can or a cardboard box) to the nett mass of the ingredients or cargo etc.

Example:

10 litres of water: 10 kg nett.

Container = 1 kg

Gross mass = 11 kg.

2,940,000 Joules

dumb de de dumb dome ee dome ee do

With a speed of 331 m/s and a frequency of 20 Hz

the wavelength is (331 m/s)/(20 Hz)=16,55 m .

Debt.

You did not exactly finish your question. Are you looking for velocity, force or some sort of bounce? Velocity can be found with v2 = v1t + 1/2at2 or v2 = acceleration times distance Kinetic energy is KE= 1/2mv2

95000x -300000 = 200000

Exergy! Today's science calls this energy, this is wrong it is Exergy NOT Energy. This is a fundamental point of science and math. This is the difference between good math and bad math, Hamilton's Vectors and the vectors used in today's science. Bad math makes bad science.

The proper analysis which the math provided is "if you drop a ball under gravity , you get energy out or exergy. If you lift a ball under gravity you put energy in." This should be obvious to a child, but it is not the rule for physicists even today.

There is a history behind this wrong view. Maxwell and the scientists wanted to call this energy, which is work-in or energy, however Hamilton's vectors which Maxwell was using called it work-out or exergy. The physicists had defined it as work-in or energy and wanted it to be positive. The Physicists prevailed and J Willard Gibbs and Oliver Heaviside invented a new vector math called Vector Analysis, where the rule is I^2= +1. This rule is in use today and hampers math and physics. It is mathematically and physically defective.

Vector Analysis is mathematically non-associative meaning A(BC) does not equal (AB)C. Hamilton's vectors are associative and A(BC)= (AB)C!

It is inconceivable that physics uses defective math but it does. You cannot have good physics with bad math.

Luvaglio is the most costly laptop. Its hand made.

Colors are determined by the wavelengths but all wavelengths travel at the same speed. So no, colors do not affect the velocity of light.

Yes it does

factory price/cost of production at market value *closing inventory at transfer price