The Celts defended their land from the Romans simply because they were colonising their land and burning their forests. The Romans would hunt wolves, which were exceptionally plentiful in the British Isles. The Celts never hunted wolves, as they understood their spiritual connection with man: This had been their custom for at least 8000 years before the Romans came.
the romans defeated the celts most of the time in all battles when they tried to rebel rome or invade roman territory its true celts caused alot of trouble to romans from time to time but romans still won all the time because of better decipline military training and technology and of course knowledge
If you mean the conquest of Gaul by Julius Ceasar in the Gallic Wars, it took place in 58-50 BC.
This is a very broad question because the Celts inhabited large parts of Western Europe and the Romans beat scores of Celtic groups in northern Italy, France, Belgium, Spain, Switzerland, Austria and Britain. Usually they beat them though military superiority and perseverance and also sometimes with the help of friendly or allied Celtic chieftains. This does not mean that it was always easy. The conquests of Celtic Gaul (France and Belgium) took eight years and that of Wales 30 years. The Celtiberians of Spain gave the Romans a very hard time for 170 years. The suppression of a revolt by the Celts of Pannonia (eastern Austria, western Hungary and parts of Croatia, Serbia, Slovenia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and western Slovakia) was extremely hard. The Romans pushed into Scotland, but then abandoned this conquest. On the other hand, the conquests of Gallia Cisalpina(northern Italy) Celtic Rhaetia (eastern and central Switzerland, part of southern Germany, eastern Austria, and part of Lombardy, in Italy) Noricum (most of Austria and part of Slovenia) and England were easy.
The Celts would fight using swords and other weapons. They would ride in chariots and use spears to kill their enemies in war.
Yes, they did. If the many Celtic tribes scattered across Europe had been unified, it is very unlikely that the Romans would have been able to conquer them.
with pure will and power and in single combat
but then they got over thrown couple hundred years later
they Was Well Organised That They Killed Them:)
Because the Romans had better things
yes
The Celts and the Romans had a verry big fight knowone knows except the Celts and the Romans by Leo rackauskas
The Romans and the Celts fought in Hadrians Wall.
The last battle between the Romans and the Celts was the Battle of Watling street
Well apart from the obvious answer, that Romans were from Italy and Celts were from northern Europe, like the British Isles and Ireland, the way they organised is totally different too. Celts were tribal but Romans followed a system of government not unlike some governments today.
the bump on the shield was copied from the Celts. nothing else was because the Celts went to war naked.
The Celts and the Romans had a verry big fight knowone knows except the Celts and the Romans by Leo rackauskas
The Romans and the Celts fought in Hadrians Wall.
The last battle between the Romans and the Celts was the Battle of Watling street
the Romans
The Romans
To the Romans the Celts were simply the group of people who lived to the north of them. Remember the Celts were not a nation, they were an ethnic group such as the Slavs, Mongols, Norse, etc.To the Romans the Celts were simply the group of people who lived to the north of them. Remember the Celts were not a nation, they were an ethnic group such as the Slavs, Mongols, Norse, etc.To the Romans the Celts were simply the group of people who lived to the north of them. Remember the Celts were not a nation, they were an ethnic group such as the Slavs, Mongols, Norse, etc.To the Romans the Celts were simply the group of people who lived to the north of them. Remember the Celts were not a nation, they were an ethnic group such as the Slavs, Mongols, Norse, etc.To the Romans the Celts were simply the group of people who lived to the north of them. Remember the Celts were not a nation, they were an ethnic group such as the Slavs, Mongols, Norse, etc.To the Romans the Celts were simply the group of people who lived to the north of them. Remember the Celts were not a nation, they were an ethnic group such as the Slavs, Mongols, Norse, etc.To the Romans the Celts were simply the group of people who lived to the north of them. Remember the Celts were not a nation, they were an ethnic group such as the Slavs, Mongols, Norse, etc.To the Romans the Celts were simply the group of people who lived to the north of them. Remember the Celts were not a nation, they were an ethnic group such as the Slavs, Mongols, Norse, etc.To the Romans the Celts were simply the group of people who lived to the north of them. Remember the Celts were not a nation, they were an ethnic group such as the Slavs, Mongols, Norse, etc.
The Celts.
no an neither did romans
actually the celts did not die , instead they now live with romans . some celts died due to a war between the romans and the celts . now some people like celtic music and clothes
The Celts primarily spoke Celtic languages, such as Gaulish, Brythonic, and Goidelic. The Romans spoke Latin.
nobody sorta won it but the celts stripped naked and painted theirselvles blue and chased the romans away
Well apart from the obvious answer, that Romans were from Italy and Celts were from northern Europe, like the British Isles and Ireland, the way they organised is totally different too. Celts were tribal but Romans followed a system of government not unlike some governments today.