Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Email
Answers.com

Korean War

Did you mean: Korean War (war, United States/North Korea/South Korea), Why did the United States get involved in the Korean War? (history), war (in sociology, politics) More...

 
Dictionary: Korean War
 

n.

A conflict that lasted from 1950 to 1953 between North Korea, aided by China, and South Korea, aided by United Nations forces consisting primarily of U.S. troops.


Search unanswered questions...
Enter a word or phrase...
All Community Q&A Reference topics
 

Korean war (1950-3). In 1945, the Japanese colony of Korea was divided ‘temporarily’ between the USSR and the USA along the line of the 38th Parallel of latitude. Some five years later the division persisted, despite repeated efforts at reunification by the UN. Stalin established a satellite state under Kim Il-sung in North Korea, while in the south the Republic of Korea (ROK) was formed under an autocratic right-wing coalition, elected under UN supervision. Its president was Syngman Rhee, a fiery old patriot. The leaders of both North and South Korea wished to unite the country by force of arms. Neither the Americans nor Stalin were minded to supply the means to do so. Chafing, each side skirmished indeterminately along the 38th Parallel.

On 9 February 1950, perceiving that US support for the ROK was declining, Stalin at last assented to an invasion of the south and the new ruler of China Mao Tse-tung concurred. War stocks including tanks, artillery, and aircraft were delivered from Siberia to the North Korean People's Army (NKPA). Mao returned a host of seasoned Korean soldiers serving among his armies to their homeland. Soviet staff officers in Kim's headquarters completed a plan of operations.

With complete surprise, the offensive was opened in summer showers on 25 June 1950. It was a Sunday; many of those in the southern defence lines were away on weekend leave and the ROK army took US forces with them in headlong retreat. Although the attack was immediately condemned by the USA, Britain, Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and South Africa, followed by a majority of UN members, it was only the fact that the USSR was boycotting the Security Council that permitted the passage of a UN resolution not merely condemning it, but authorizing the formation of a multinational force to combat the aggression. Gen Douglas MacArthur, the US shogun in Japan following WW II, was appointed C-in-C. Two US divisions were rushed to Korea from Japan under strong air and sea cover, but these were unfit, untrained occupation troops who were roughly handled by the hardy and well-drilled NKPA. Eventually five divisions were fed into the peninsula as they arrived, mostly US but including a British-led Commonwealth brigade. Formed as the Eighth Army under the US Lt Gen Walton H. Walker, these troops along with the ROK army remnants held a perimeter around Pusan, the principal southern port.

Meanwhile MacArthur was building up a reserve corps in Japan consisting of the 1st Marine and 7th Infantry Divisions and launched them in an amphibious landing at the port of Inchon on the west coast of the peninsula, 200 miles (322 km) behind the battle front. It was a hazardous venture, but successful. In mid-September, the marines captured the port and were joined ashore by the 7th Division to liberate Seoul, the national capital of Korea. Apprehensive of such a landing, Mao had earlier reinforced the Fourth Field Army (in fact an army group) in north-east China with two divisions. Now anticipating the destruction of the NKPA, he discussed countermeasures with Stalin.

From 22 September 1950, Walker's Eighth Army and the resuscitated elements of the ROK army began to break out of the Pusan perimeter. Shattered by intensive air as well as ground action, the NKPA filtered away through the central mountain chain. On the 27th, the American I Corps linked up with 7th Infantry Division near Seoul. MacArthur asked Washington for instructions: was he to stand on the 38th Parallel or cross it in pursuit?

While Truman considered this, Chinese PM Chou En-lai gave warning through Indian diplomatic channels that ‘if the American authorities decided to cross … China will be forced to act accordingly’. The British chiefs of staff took this to mean Chinese military intervention, a response to be avoided at all costs while Stalin threatened in Europe. The US and British governments, in close consultation, disagreed; likewise a majority in the UN. China might be bluffing and to hold back would surely offer Kim an opportunity to raise new forces and strike again. Against the protests of the communist bloc in the UN, where the USSR had resumed its place, the decision was taken to occupy North Korea as a preliminary to uniting North and South following democratic elections.

China was not bluffing. As the UN and ROK armies advanced, Gen P'eng Te-huai marched 130, 000 soldiers of the Fourth Field Army into Korea, a host represented as ‘volunteers’ to establish the pretence that China remained aloof from the struggle. Stalin had promised them air cover, but withheld it as the march began, believing that Soviet fighters could not operate under a similar pretext—a Soviet pilot shot down and captured would discredit claims to neutrality. Mao collapsed temporarily with a nervous breakdown. P'eng responded more positively by restricting all movement to the winter nights. This simple stratagem paid a high dividend.

Crossing the Yalu river into north-west Korea, his veterans emerged from the darkness on 26 October, unexpected because undetected by the UN air force, to encircle and penetrate the UN and ROK formations approaching them. Usually fighting at night, sometimes in snowstorms, P'eng's light infantry bore in, shifting their axes of attack frequently, until on 6 November, they had swept so far afield that it became essential to draw them back, laden with plunder from the retreating UN forces, to regroup.

The governments of the UN alliance were stunned by this setback so soon after the defeat of the NKPA. Seeking at least to stabilize the battlefield, a truce was suggested as a preliminary to reaching an accommodation with their foes. The creation of a buffer zone was contemplated. All this was ‘wind past the ear’ to the Chinese. When, at MacArthur's insistence, his troops, rebalanced and reinforced, advanced again on 24 November, Walker deployed eight UN and four ROK divisions. They were assailed almost at once by 30 of the Chinese. Despite considerable supporting firepower, the Eighth and ROK armies were still unable to withstand the close actions forced upon them selectively by P'eng's forces across the front from coast to coast. Gen Walker decided to break contact while he maintained some measure of control. He withdrew his line 150 miles (241 km) south below the Han, abandoning Seoul. Almond's X Corps in the north-east began a closely contested withdrawal to the coast. Many in the UN Command believed that they would be driven out of Korea altogether.

The Korean war, 1950-1. (Click to enlarge)
The Korean war, 1950-1.
(Click to enlarge)


The UN forces moved in trucks. The Chinese marched. When the latter again closed on the UN and ROK positions in January 1951, they were suffering from exposure in temperatures often below 20 °C at night, lacking proper clothing and supplies. P'eng asked for a pause but Mao urged him on. Lt Gen Matthew Ridgway, replacing Walker who had been killed in an accident, brought his subordinate commanders to order. The Eighth Army was to stand and fight. As the Chinese ardour waned, the spirits of the Eighth Army waxed. They held the line and, encouraged, counter-attacked. Now P'eng was forced to withdraw. By mid-April 1951, Ridgway's line commanded the 38th Parallel. Its numbers had risen: battalions and brigades from eleven nations had joined the Eighth Army and even the ROK army was maturing. A new strategy had been implemented whereby they would roll with the punches in the event of a new Chinese offensive.

As the winter ended, P'eng was indeed preparing to strike again. Forty assault divisions were available to him. The march to contact began on 21 April, directing principal thrusts across the Imjin and Kap'yong rivers, areas held by chance by the 29th British and 27th Commonwealth brigades. Both held firm while the UN line ‘rolled’ back unbroken, drawing out the enemy. Sustaining high casualties, running short of supplies due to widespread air attack, P'eng's 40 assault divisions were unable to maintain their momentum. They drew off never to engage in a strategic offensive again. Manoeuvre was succeeded by costly but localized trench warfare, using the tactics of WW I, employing the weapons of WW II. Seven American, one British Commonwealth, and eleven ROK Divisions held the line, together with battalions and a brigade from fourteen other nations. It scarcely moved for the remaining two years of the war.

This change was occasioned by the opening of armistice talks, nominally between the opposing commanders-in-chief. Stalin was content to play a waiting game. Mao was more or less persuaded that Korea offered no further triumphs for him. The American public was unwilling to back uncertain prospects of victory when peace was an option. A ceasefire might have been agreed in 1951 but for American and British Commonwealth insistence that no POW would be returned against his will, a condition that affected only the Chinese and North Koreans. The UN prisoners and ROK prisoners had been treated so shamefully by their communist captors that all but a handful opted for repatriation.

In the POW camps in the South, Chinese who nursed preferences for Nationalist China on Taiwan, or NKPA members disenchanted with Kim Il-sung's regime, demonstrated their preferences vehemently. Communist zealots rioted in opposition. The American camp authorities lost control of the compounds periodically. Essentially, the Beijing regime could not accept any admission that there could be Chinese who preferred the Nationalist camp. Armistice prospects declined.

American air commanders sought during the stalemate to win the war by bombing the enemy into submission, attacking troops, industries, and communications repeatedly. Inevitably, many civilians were among the casualties. The full effect of their offensive was limited by UN rules forbidding attacks on targets in China or any use of atomic weapons—for good reasons; it would have been counter-productive politically and ineffective militarily. But in North Korea the capacity to survive exceeded the bombers' capability for destruction. UN naval forces maintained their domination of the sea flanks in all seasons but lacked the means to break the massed ranks of the Chinese and NKPA remnant.

Fortunately a common factor militated for peace: the costs of war. By the time Stalin died in March 1953, these were becoming intolerable to the Chinese. Eisenhower, succeeding to office in 1953, was also anxious to end the expense of a protracted holding action. He declared that he would resume active operations in Korea if the armistice negotiations remained unproductive and hints emerged from Washington that atomic weapons might be used. In this climate, negotiations came to life; sick and wounded prisoners were exchanged. Thereafter, with the adoption of a screening system for prisoners, contrived to save Chinese sensitivities, the basic obstacle to an armistice was overcome. Despite the arbitrary release of many NKPA prisoners by Syngman Rhee and late operations by the communist forces to secure ground of tactical advantage, an agreement was completed. Hostilities ceased on 27 July 1953, some three years after they began.

This first military operation by UN forces failed to reunite the Korean nation but saved those in South Korea from the tyrannical and incompetent government of Kim Il-sung. It exposed to members of the Chinese People's Liberation Army flaws in Mao's military leadership which had far-reaching consequences. No less, the victory won in Korea, albeit qualified, encouraged a powerful section of American opinion to believe that the USA could win any war of its choice in Asia. The Vietnam war lay ahead.

Bibliography

  • Fehrenbach, T. R., This Kind of War (New York, 1963).
  • Hastings, Max, The Korean War (London, 1987).
  • O'Neill, Robert, Australia in the Korean War, 2 vols. (Canberra, 1981 and 1985).
  • Pannikar, K. M., In Two Chinas (London, 1955).
  • Tu P'ing (also Du Ping), In the headquarters of the CPV (Beijing, 1989)

— Anthony Farrar-Hockley

 

(1950–1953)

War came to Korea in 1950–53 as both a civil war on the Korean peninsula and the first military clash of the Cold War between forces of the Soviet Union and its Communist clients and the United States and its allies. It was, therefore, potentially the most dangerous war in world history.

Even before the war against Germany and Japan drew to a close in 1945, the United States and the Soviet Union assumed competing roles in shaping the postwar world. As the two undisputed victorious powers, they influenced the course of every political problem emerging from the debris of war. Unfortunately, hostility between the two powers increased at the same time and threatened the outbreak of another war, which after 1949 risked the use of atomic weapons.

The conservative forces eventually coalesced in the Republic of Korea under the leadership of President Syngman Rhee. A North Korean state, The Democratic People's Republic created by the Soviet Union and headed by Premier Kim Il‐sung, adopted a policy of opposition to Rhee's government and for unification of the Korean peninsula by armed force.

North Korean ground forces crossed the 38th Parallel into South Korea about 4:30 A.M. on 25 June 1950 (24 June Washington time). The main attack, led by two divisions and a tank brigade, aimed at Uijongbu and Seoul. In the central mountains, two North Korean divisions drove toward Yoju and Wonju and on the east coast, a reinforced division headed for Samchok.

In an emergency session on Sunday, 25 June, the UN Security Council (with the USSR boycotting because of the refusal to admit the People's Republic of China) adopted an U.S.‐sponsored resolution branding the North Korean attack a breach of the peace and calling on the North Korean government to cease hostilities and withdraw. The North Koreans did not respond to the UN resolution, so on the following Tuesday, the United States offered a follow‐up proposal that “the members of the United Nations furnish such assistance to the Republic of Korea as may be necessary to repel the armed attack and to restore international peace and security in the area.” Subsequently, the UN Security Council designated the president of the United States as its executive agent for the war in Korea. President Truman, in turn, appointed Gen. Douglas MacArthur as the Commander in Chief, United Nations Command (CICUNC). The military organization to wage war was in place.

Saving South Korea was certainly the most urgent UN war aim, but President Harry S. Truman also believed that the Soviet Union was the most dangerous threat to the western allies. The UN Command had to stop the North Koreans and eject them from South Korea by military means, no small task with the North Korean army rolling south and no UN troops on the ground. Moreover, while accomplishing this, the UN coalition had to avoid expanding the war into Asia and to Europe by provoking China or the Soviet Union to enter the struggle. So the Truman administration adopted additional, unilateral war aims designed to keep the violence confined to the Korean Peninsula, to keep the Soviets out of the war, to maintain a strongly committed UN (and NATO) coalition, and to buy time to rearm the United States and its allies.

At first, MacArthur had little choice in how to fight the North Koreans. Somehow he had to slow down their offensive sufficiently to give him time to mount a counter‐attack against their flanks or rear. His forces consisted of four undermanned and partially trained U.S. Army divisions comprising Gen. Walton Walker's Eighth Army, the South Korean army, then falling back in front of the enemy, an ill‐equipped U.S. air force, and growing naval U.S. strength. When the President ordered use of American troops, the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) immediately sent additional army forces, marines, and air and naval forces to strengthen MacArthur's command. As these units began to deploy, MacArthur requested more reinforcements that included between four and five additional divisions.

In all, fifty‐three UN member nations promised troops to assist South Korea. Of all, the nations of the British Commonwealth were most ready to fight when war broke out. Great Britain, Australia, New Zealand and Canada were the first to send air, sea, and ground forces. Eventually UN allies sent over 19,000 troops to Korea. All were assigned to the U.S. Eighth Army.

MacArthur's first task was to block what appeared to be the enemy's main attack leading to the port of Pusan in the south. Rushing American ground and air forces from Japan to Korea, he hoped to delay the enemy column and force it to deploy, then withdraw UN forces to new delaying positions and repeat the process. With any luck, he could gain enough time to muster an effective force on the ground. For this task he ordered General Walker to send units to confront the enemy on the road to Pusan. Walker sent a small infantry force—Task Force Smith—to lead the way. While reinforcements were moving to Korea, MacArthur pushed the rest of Walker's Eighth Army (less the 7th Infantry Division) into Korea to build up resistance on the enemy's main axis of advance. With these forces and the South Koreans, Walker hoped to delay the enemy north and west of a line following the Naktong River, to the north, then east to Yongdok on the Sea of Japan. If forced to withdraw farther, he proposed to occupy the Naktong River line as the primary position from which Eighth Army would defend the port of Pusan.

With the main enemy force applying heavy pressure along the primary axis aimed at Pusan, Walker had to fight off two North Korean divisions, advancing around the west flank deep into southwest Korea. From there they could turn east and strike directly at Pusan. To head off this threat, Walker sent the 25th Infantry Division to meet the North Koreans west of Masan and stop them. In savage battle, the 25th slowed the North Koreans, and Walker pulled the Eighth Army and Republic of Korea Army (ROKA) behind the Naktong River line to defend Pusan.

Walker's retirement into the Pusan Perimeter fit MacArthur's plans perfectly. Now he could exercise close control over both the battle on the peninsula and preparations for an amphibious counterstroke, now planned for mid‐September. As reinforcements poured into Pusan and combat strength began to favor Walker, MacArthur started to shunt units, equipment, and individual replacements to Japan to rebuild a corps for use in the amphibious operation. With complete superiority of air power and growing strength in tanks, artillery, and infantry, MacArthur believed that Eighth Army and the ROKA could hold Pusan.

North Koreans launched violent, piecemeal attacks against the perimeter beginning on 5 August. By the end of August, the defenders had thrown back the first barrage of attacks, but a new onslaught began on the night of 31 August. This time the enemy hit simultaneously and even more savagely. American reinforcements had, however, greatly increased the combat power of the allies, and by 12 September the North Korean offensive had spent itself on all fronts against Walkers' skillful defense.

While the Eighth Army fought to hold Pusan, Mac Arthur readied the forces he had assembled in Japan to eject the North Koreans from Korea. He selected the port of Inchon near Seoul as the objective in spite of undesirable hydrographic characteristics. High tides, swift currents, and broad mud flats threatened the safety of an amphibious assault force. But Inchon also had some features that convinced MacArthur that the prize was worth the risk. The North Koreans, concentrated around Pusan in the south, would be vulnerable to an attack so far to the north, and the capture of Inchon would lead directly to the fall of Seoul. Because Seoul, the capital of South Korea, was the intersection of most of the major roads and railroads in South Korea, its capture would trap the North Koreans and force them to surrender or escape to the mountains, abandoning all their heavy equipment. MacArthur believed he could defeat the North Koreans in one decisive battle—the Inchon Landing.

Early in September, naval air forces struck targets up and down the west coast of Korea. As D‐day for Inchon approached, surface gunfire support ships began to add their weight. On 15 September, U.S. Marines of the newly formed X Corps successfully assaulted the port, paving the way for army troops that followed. In the ensuing campaign, North Korea forces fought bitterly to hold the capital. On September 28, Seoul fell, and by October 1, Marines held a line close to the 38th Parallel, blocking all roads and passes leading to Seoul and its port at Inchon.

Weakened by the heavy fighting of July and August, the Eighth Army could not at first break out of the Pusan perimeter. Finally, a week after X Corps landed at Inchon, the North Koreans began to waver. On 23 September they began a general withdrawal, and Eighth Army units advanced to link up with X Corps. MacArthur had won his battle and the UN was poised to exploit his success.

In retrospect, the turning point in the Korean War was the decision now made to cross the 38th Parallel and pursue the retreating enemy into North Korea. At President Truman's direction, the National Security Council (NSC) staff had studied the question and recommended against crossing the 38th because ejecting the North Koreans from South Korea was a sufficient victory. To this, the JCS objected. MacArthur, they argued, must destroy the North Korean army to prevent a renewal of the aggression. On 11 September—four days before the Inchon Landing—the president adopted the arguments of the JCS. Most importantly, Truman changed the national objective from saving South Korea to unifying the peninsula. After the UN Assembly passed a resolution on 7 October 1950 calling for unification of Korea, MacArthur was free to send forces into North Korea.

MacArthur's attack on North Korea never achieved the success of his earlier operations. Beginning 7 October, he sent the weakened Eighth Army in the main attack against the North Korean capital of P’yongyang without adequate combat support. As the supporting attack, he planned another powerful amphibious assault by X Corps to strike the east coast port of Wonsan on 20 October. Although the Eighth Army advanced rapidly toward P’yongyang against light resistance, the amphibious attack by X Corps was six days late landing in its objective area because mine sweepers had to clear an elaborate minefield. On 11 October, Wonsan fell to a South Korean corps, almost two weeks before the marines could land. P’yongyang fell on the 19 October.

After the capture of P’yongyang and Wonsan, allied troops streamed north virtually unopposed. Truman worried about possible Chinese intervention, but at a conference at Wake Island on 15 October, MacArthur belittled this possibility and was optimistic about an early victory. There was, however, little time to enjoy the successes of mid‐October. Beginning on the 25 October, a reinvigorated enemy struck the Eighth Army in a brief but furious counterattack. By 2 November intelligence officers had accumulated undeniable evidence from across the front that Chinese forces had intervened, and the Eighth Army had to stop its advance.

Chinese leaders had tried to ward off a direct confrontation with the Americans by warning the UN not to cross the 38th Parallel. American leaders interpreted these statements as bluff rather than policy. But they were wrong; Josef Stalin, the Soviet premier, asked Mao Zedong, the Chinese premier, to send Chinese forces to the aid of his clients, the North Koreans. After much deliberation, Mao decided to intervene. On 19 October Chinese Peoples Volunteers (CPV) crossed the Yalu River and massed some 260,000 troops in front of the UN Command.

After replenishing supplies, MacArthur's forces were ready. On 24 November the troops of the Eighth Army, unaware of the presence of massed Chinese forces, crossed their lines of departure. Within twenty‐four hours after the Eighth Army jumped off, the Chinese struck back, aiming their main attack at the South Korean ROKA II Corps on the army's right flank. Two days later the CPV hit U.S. X Corps as it advanced into the mountains of eastern Korea. Stunned and outnumbered, American and South Korean units recoiled, beginning a long retreat that ended in January 1951, only after the UN forces fell back south of the 38th Parallel and once again gave up the city of Seoul. X Corps fought its way back to the port of Hungnam on the east coast and then rejoined Eighth Army in the south.

During the first week of December 1950 when reports from the front were incomplete and most grim, President Truman met in Washington with Prime Minister Clement Attlee of the United Kingdom. Though initially far apart, Truman and Attlee, after four days of intense discussion, reached a compromise solution on Korea. They would continue to fight side‐by‐side, find a line and hold it, and wait for an opportunity to negotiate an end to the fighting from a position of military strength. Moreover, they reaffirmed their commitment to “Europe first” in the face of Soviet hostility toward NATO. In this way, the decision to unify Korea was abrogated and a new war aim adopted.

The most immediate military effect of the talks was to prevent MacArthur from exacting revenge for his humiliating defeat. The JCS limited his reinforcements to replacements, shifted the priority of military production to strengthening NATO forces, and wrote a new directive for MacArthur requiring him to defend in Korea as far to the north as possible. MacArthur disagreed with giving priority to Europe at the expense of the shooting war in Korea. He was outraged at the thought of going on the strategic defensive and fought against his new directive with all his might. Nevertheless, on 12 January 1951, the JCS sent him the final version of the directive, and the UN coalition had a new war aim designed to bring about a negotiated settlement.

Just two days before Christmas 1950, the command of the Eighth Army passed to Lt. Gen. Matthew B. Ridgway after Gen. Walker died in a truck accident. From his position on the Department of the Army staff in Washington, Ridgway came to the Eighth Army well informed of the strategic situation in Korea. He arrived at his new headquarters determined to attack north as soon as possible. Somehow he had to stop the retreat and turn the army around; until then the Eighth Army continued to withdraw. In early January 1951 UN forces gave up Seoul.

Finally, Ridgway's front line units began reporting light contact with the enemy. Sensing the opportunity to turn on the Chinese, Ridgway stopped the army on a line from P’yongt’aek in the west, through Wonju in the center, to Samch’ok on the east coast. When American divisions, withdrawn with X Corps, moved up to thicken the line in the lightly held center, Ridgway ordered his forces to patrol north and find the enemy. In a series of increasingly powerful offensives, he then sent the Eighth Army north: Operation Thunderbolt jumped off in January, Roundup in February (though a tactical setback), Killer in late February, Ripper in March, and Rugged in April. By this time, Ridgway's army had once again crossed the 38th Parallel where its forward units dug into strong defensive ground in anticipation of an enemy counteroffensive. Surprisingly, the shock came, not from the enemy as Ridgway expected, but from Washington, when MacArthur was dismissed by President Truman.

MacArthur's dismissal resulted from his rejection of Truman's policy. As Ridgway neared the 38th again, the position of military strength envisioned in the Truman‐Attlee conference had seemed near at hand. Truman took advantage of Ridgway's success to invite the Communists to negotiate a cease fire. After reading the text of Truman's proposed message, MacArthur broadcast a bellicose ultimatum to the enemy commander that undermined the president's plan. Truman was furious. MacArthur had preempted presidential prerogative, confused friends and enemies alike about who was directing the war, and directly challenged the president's authority as Commander in Chief. As Truman pondered how to handle the problem, Congressman Joseph W. Martin, Minority (Republican) Leader of the House of Representatives, released the contents of a letter from MacArthur in which the general repeated his criticism of the administration. The next day Truman began the process that was to end with Mac Arthur's being relieved from command on 11 April 1951.

After MacArthur's dismissal, Ridgway took his place as Commander in Chief, Far East and CINCUNC. Lt. Gen. James A. Van Fleet, an experienced and successful World War II combat leader, took command of the Eighth Army. On 22 April, as Van Fleet's Eighth army edged north, the CPV opened the expected general offensive, aiming their main attack toward Seoul in the west. The Chinese, numbering almost a half million men, drove Van Fleet once again below the 38th Parallel. On 10 May, the Chinese jumped off again after shifting seven armies to their main effort against the eastern half of the UN line. Taking advantage of the Chinese concentration in the east, Van Fleet attacked suddenly in the west, north of Seoul. The effect was dramatic; surprised CPV units pulled back, suffering their heaviest casualties of the war, and by the end of May found themselves retreating into North Korea. By mid‐June, UN forces had regained a line, for the most part, north of the 38th Parallel.

Regardless of UN success on the battlefield, ending the war turned out to be a maddeningly long process. U.S. planners knew that the Truman‐Attlee agreement made it unlikely that the war would end in a conventional victory. The UN allies had even adopted negotiating an armistice as a war aim. The time seemed right for the Chinese and North Koreans as well since they needed a respite from the heavy casualties suffered in the UN offensive. They agreed to meet with UN representatives when in late June 1951, the Soviets proposed a conference among the belligerents.

Negotiations were initially hampered by silly haggling over matters of protocol and the selection of a truly neutral negotiating site. Even so, on 26 July 1951 the two sides finally reached an agreement on an agenda containing four major points: selection of a demarcation line and demilitarized zone, supervision of the truce, arrangements for prisoners of war (POWs), and recommendations to the governments involved in the war. With an agreed agenda in hand, and Panmunjom—a town between opposing lines, suitable to hold talks—the negotiators began the lengthy process of debating each item. Handling POWs proved to be the most difficult problem on the agenda, but fixing the demarcation line was the most damaging. By dealing with the final position of the armies first, the UN negotiators blundered into an agreement that permitted the Communists to stalemate the battlefield and to wage a two‐year political war at the negotiating table.

At issue was a U.S. scheme seeking quick agreement on a demarcation line. On 17 November the UN delegation proposed the current line of contact as the demarcation line providing that all remaining agenda items were resolved within thirty days. The communists accepted the proposal on 27 November debated the remaining agenda items for thirty days, and then failed to reach agreement. They used the thirty days to create a tactical defense so deeply dug in that both sides had to accept a stalemate.

From that moment on, the battlefield changed to a static kind of war, more reminiscent of World War I than anything that had happened since. Beginning in the winter of 1951–1952, the war came to be defined by elevated sites named Porkchop Hill, Sniper's Ridge, Old Baldy, T‐Bone, Whitehorse, Punchbowl and a hundred other hilltops between the two armies. There followed a seemingly endless succession of violent fire fights, most of them at night, to gain or maintain control of hills that were a little higher and ridges that were a bit straighter. All of them, no matter how large the forces engaged, were deadly encounters designed to provide leverage for one side or the other in the protracted political battle going on at Panmunjom. In an historical age when technology enabled greater mobility than at any other time, tactical warfare in Korea went through a regression that can only be explained in terms of its close relationship to the negotiations. Constant pressure was its purpose, not decisive victory.

In Panmunjom negotiators plodded through the remaining agenda items. Supervising the armistice agreement was an extremely complex issue, but a compromise emerged that permitted rotation of 35,000 UN troops and supplies each month through specified ports of entry. In addition, both sides accepted Swedish, Swiss, Polish, and Czech membership on an armistice commission. Political recommendations to the belligerents were agreed in the astonishingly short period of eleven days. Both sides called for a conference to convene three months after a cease fire. At that time all political issues that had not been settled during the negotiations would be discussed.

What to do about prisoners of war was the major obstacle to final agreement. The UN Command wanted prisoners to decide for themselves whether or not they would return home. The Communists insisted on forced repatriation. To restore movement to the talks, the International Red Cross polled prisoners as to where they wanted to go. The results, announced early in April 1952, surprised everyone. Of 132,000 Chinese and North Korean POWs screened, only 54,000 North Koreans and 5,100 Chinese wanted to go home. The communist delegation was incredulous and accused the United Nations of influencing the poll. From that moment on, negotiations bogged down on the POW issue.

At about this time, May 1952, General Ridgway left Tokyo to become Supreme Allied Commander, Europe. Gen. Mark Clark, who had made his reputation during World War II in Italy, replaced Ridgway as CINCUNC and inherited a difficult situation. Unable to carry the war to the enemy in a decisive way and stalemated in the armistice talks, Clark—with the approval of the administration—finally ordered the UN delegation to walk out of Panmunjom on 8 October. With no one to talk to, the Communists hammered away at UN treatment of POWs and alleged UN violations of the neutral zones surrounding the negotiating site.

Over the fall and winter of 1952–53, three events broke the impasse. In November, Dwight D. Eisenhower won the election for the presidency, ushering in a new style of toughness toward the Communists—including discussion of using atomic weapons. In December, Clark read about an International Red Cross resolution calling for the exchange of sick and wounded POWs. In February 1953 Clark sent letters to the Chinese and North Korean leaders proposing that they exchange the sick and wounded. Before the Communists could respond, the third and perhaps most important event occurred: Josef Stalin died on 5 March 1953.

So achieving a cease‐fire was the result of a complex set of circumstances and interwoven pressures. Eisenhower's toughness increased the pressure on the battlefield. He believed that the Truman strategy was the only practical one, but still something ought to be done to give the Communists an incentive to reach agreement. He permitted Clark's aircraft to bomb dams in North Korea, flooding the countryside. He instructed the JCS to prepare plans for more intensive maneuver—even atomic warfare—should negotiations break down. He authorized movement of atomic delivery aircraft to the Far East and initiated training for low‐level attack with atomic bombs. And he sent John Foster Dulles, his Secretary of State, to India in April to let it be known that the United States was prepared to renew the war at a higher level unless progress was made at Panmunjom.

Clearly, Chinese leaders carefully considered these news signals, but it is conjectural to connect Ike's toughness and Stalin's death directly to the Communist agreement to end the war. Still, we do know that Stalin's death resulted in a deadly power struggle in the Kremlin that probably focused Soviet leaders on settling their internal problems rather than supporting a prolonged war. Moreover, East European states needed to be kept in line after Stalin's death, and something had to be done to restore deteriorating relations with the governments of China and North Korea, both of which had lost confidence in the Soviet government for not taking a more active part in the war.

On 26 April, negotiating sessions resumed at Panmunjom where a final solution to handling the remaining POWs took shape in the months that followed. Those who chose not to go home were to be turned over to a neutral repatriation commission. If they still did not want to go home, the neutral commission would release them to whichever government they chose. As the delegations wrapped up the details, it seemed that a cease‐fire was not far off.

While the UN worked diligently toward an armistice, South Korean President Syngman Rhee became obstructive. Rhee saw the rush toward an armistice as contrary to South Korea's best interest, and he did not trust the Communists should the UN Command pull out. So on the night of 18 June, Rhee ordered his guards on the POW compounds to release some 25,000 friendly North Koreans. The Communists cried “foul.” Eisenhower, feeling betrayed, was outraged. But in order to save the cease‐fire, he negotiated with the South Korean president, pledging a mutual security pact after the cease‐fire, long term economic aid, expansion of the South Korean armed forces, and coordination of U.S. and ROK objectives at the political conference. Though costly for the United States, the agreement secured Rhee's cooperation and cleared the way for an armistice.

While negotiating the final details of a truce, the Chinese communists sought one last military advantage. They mounted a limited offensive that was designed to push UN negotiators toward a settlement more agreeable to the Communist side; managed carefully, the offensive might also create the illusion of a peaceful settlement following a Communist victory. The attacks began on 10 June 1951 and by 16 June the UN line had been pushed back some 4,000 yards. Although some ground was recovered, fighting slackened as commanders of contending armies prepared to sign the truce. At 10 A.M. 27 July 1953, the darkest moment in Mark Clark's life, he signed the armistice documents to end the Korean War.

For a war intended to be limited, the human toll was staggering. Although Chinese and North Korean casualties are unknown, estimates of total losses amounted to almost two million, plus perhaps a million civilians. The UN Command suffered a total of 88,000 killed, of which 23,300 were American. Total casualties for the UN (killed, wounded, missing) were 459,360, 300,000 of whom were South Korean.

Nevertheless, limiting the war in Korea made a significant contribution to the history of the art of war. First, the Korean War demonstrated alternative strategies designed to gain national objectives without resorting to atomic war. For this reason, the Korean War is less about tactical evolution than about political goals, the strategy to achieve those goals, and the operational art designed to make the strategy succeed. Second, the war caused the U.S. government to arm the nation and its allies on a permanent basis and to bring its military force to a high state of combat readiness, prepared to respond quickly to any threat to national or alliance security. Never again would the United States find itself as ill‐prepared as it had been when the Korean War began.

[See also Korea, U.S. Military Involvement in; Korean War, U.S. Air Operations in; Korean War, U.S. Naval Operations in.]

Bibliography

  • Mark W. Clark, From the Danube to the Yalu, 1954.
  • Roy E. Appleman, South to the Naktong, North to the Yalu, June‐November 1950, 1961.
  • Walter G. Hermes, Truce Tent and Fighting Front, 1966.
  • Matthew B. Ridgway, The Korean War, 1967.
  • J. Lawton Collins, War in Peacetime, 1969.
  • James E. Schnabel, Policy and Direction, the First Year, 1972.
  • Joseph C. Goulden, Korea: the Untold Story of the War, 1982.
  • D. Clayton James, The Years of MacArthur: Triumph and Disaster, 1945–1964, 1995.
  • Burton I. Kaufman, The Korean War: Challenges in Crisis, Credibility and Command, 1986.
  • Rosemary Foot, A Substitute for Victory: The Policy of Peacemaking at the Korean Armistice Talks, 1990.
  • Shu Guang Zhang, Deterrence and Strategic Culture: Chinese American Confrontations, 1949–1958, 1992
 
US Military Dictionary: Korean War
Top

(1950-53) a conflict between North Korean and Chinese armies fought to a stalemate against South Korean and U.N. forces led by the United States. After back and forth fighting, including the dramatic Inchon Landing, U.N. armies came close to Korea's northern border, drawing China into the war. After being pushed back again and suffering 459, 360 casualties, the United Nations, led by newly elected President Dwight D. Eisenhower, offered peace talks. Both sides agreed to an armistice that kept Korea divided and is still in effect.

See the Introduction, Abbreviations and Pronunciation for further details.

 
Political Dictionary: Korean War
Top

The Korean War began on 25 June 1950 when the forces of communist North Korea crossed the 38th Parallel of latitude to invade South Korea. At the time it was widely assumed in the West, and in the United States in particular, that this act of aggression had been planned and ordered by the Soviet Union as a test of Western resolve in the wider context of the Cold War. Nowadays, however, it is believed that the initiative came primarily from the North Korean regime which bitterly resented the artificial partition of the country that had followed the collapse of Japanese rule in 1945. So it may be that President Harry Truman's extremely robust response was based on a misapprehension of what was involved.

In any event, the upshot was that the United States persuaded the Security Council of the United Nations, which was being temporarily boycotted by the veto-wielding Soviet Union, to authorize the sending of military assistance to the victim. The United Nations forces, commanded by US General Douglas MacArthur, narrowly succeeded in preventing the total conquest of South Korea and then went on to drive the North Koreans back across the 38th Parallel. At this point Truman, perhaps unwisely, insisted on punishing the aggressor by taking the war into North Korea. This in turn provoked Chinese intervention in October 1950 which saved North Korea and eventually led to an armistice being agreed 1953 on the basis of a virtual return to the status quo ante.

Late in 1950, however, Truman was urged by some Americans to go for all-out victory even if it meant bombing China, thereby risking a possible escalation to nuclear war if the Soviets then saw fit to intervene. But he resisted this advice and accordingly felt driven to dismiss MacArthur, who did not try to conceal his dissent. Thus the outcome of the Korean War was seen by some as the first war the Americans had failed to win and was held by others to be the first example of the UN-based collective security system actually succeeding in rescuing a victim of aggression.

— David Carlton

 

(1950 – 53) Conflict arising after the post-World War II division of Korea, at latitude 38° N, into North Korea and South Korea. At the end of World War II, Soviet forces accepted the surrender of Japanese forces north of that line, as U.S. forces accepted Japanese surrender south of it. Negotiations failed to reunify the two halves, the northern half being a Soviet client state and the southern half being backed by the U.S. In 1950 North Korea invaded South Korea, and U.S. Pres. Harry Truman ordered troops to assist South Korea. The UN Security Council, minus the absent Soviet delegate, passed a resolution calling for the assistance of all UN members in halting the North Koreans. At first North Korean troops drove the South Korean and U.S. forces down to the southern tip of the Korean peninsula, but a brilliant amphibious landing at Inch'on, conceived by Gen. Douglas MacArthur, turned the tide in favour of the UN troops, who advanced near the border of North Korea and China. The Chinese then entered the war and drove the UN forces back south; the front line stabilized at the 38th parallel. MacArthur insisted on voicing his objections to U.S. war aims in a public manner and was relieved of his command by Truman. U.S. Pres. Dwight D. Eisenhower participated in the conclusion of an armistice that accepted the front line as the de facto boundary between the two Koreas. The war resulted in the deaths of approximately 2,000,000 Koreans, 600,000 Chinese, 37,000 Americans, and 3,000 Turks, Britons, and other nationals in the UN forces.

For more information on Korean War, visit Britannica.com.

 
British History: Korean War
Top

Korean War, 1950-3. On 25 June 1950 the communist North Korean army attacked the Republic of South Korea, crossing the 38th Parallel, which acted as the artificial boundary. The army of the South was forced to retreat. On 27 June the United Nations voted to provide military aid and the USA led a fifteen-nation task force to the peninsula. On 15 September the UN gained the initiative by launching an amphibious assault on Inchon and pushed north capturing Pyongyang, the North Korean capital. However, by January 1951 the communists, massively reinforced by China, were marching south again. A cease-fire came into effect on 10 July. The two Koreas remained implacably opposed until the 21st cent.

 
US History Encyclopedia: Korean War
Top

The Korean War began on 25 June 1950, when forces of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) attacked southward across the thirty-eighth parallel against the army of the Republic of Korea (ROK). Trained and armed by the Soviet Union and the People's Republic of China (PRC) and substantially out-numbering the South Koreans along the front, the North Koreans advanced rapidly, capturing Seoul, the ROK capital, on 28 June.

The U.S. administration of Harry S. Truman reacted sharply. With Secretary of State Dean G. Acheson taking the lead in advising the commander-in-chief, the United States rushed the Korean issue to the United Nations Security Council in New York. The Soviet Union was boycotting that body over its refusal to grant China's seat to the recently founded PRC under Mao Zedong, thus making possible the quick passage of U.S.-drafted resolutions on 25 and 27 June. The first called for a cessation of hostilities and the withdrawal of DPRK forces north of the thirty-eighth parallel, the second for assistance from member states to the ROK "necessary to repel the armed attack and to restore international peace and security in the area." Already the United States was aiding the ROK with arms, ammunition, and air and naval forces. On 30 June, as the North Koreans advanced south of Seoul, Truman committed to the battle U.S. combat troops stationed in Japan. On 7 July the UN Security Council passed another U.S.-drafted resolution creating a United Nations Command (UNC) in Korea under American leadership. Truman appointed General Douglas MacArthur, the commander-in-chief of U.S. Forces, Far East, to head the UNC.

The Korean War lasted for over three years. Although the United States and ROK provided over 90 percent of the manpower on the UN side, fourteen other governments sent forces of some kind and unofficially Japan provided hundreds of laborers in critical Korean industries and in its former colony's harbors operating American vessels. On the North Korean side, the PRC eventually committed over a million troops, and the Soviet Union contributed large-scale matériel assistance and hundreds of pilots and artillery personnel. United States forces suffered in battle alone over 142,000 casualties, including 33,000 deaths; the Chinese nearly 900,000 casualties, including 150,000 deaths. Koreans on both sides endured far greater losses. Total casualties in the war, military and civilian combined, numbered over 3 million.

Origins of the War

The war originated in the division of the peninsula in August 1945 by the United States and the Soviet Union. Korea had been under Japanese rule since early in the century. American leaders believed that, with its defeat in World War II, Japan should lose its empire but that Koreans would need years of tutelage before being prepared to govern themselves. The United States surmised that a multipower trusteeship over the peninsula, to involve itself, the Soviet Union, China, and perhaps Great Britain, would provide Koreans with the necessary preparation while averting the great-power competition that had disrupted northeast Asia a half century before. Yet as the Pacific war approached its end, the Allied powers had not reached precise agreements on Korea. On the eve of Japan's surrender, President Truman proposed to Soviet premier Joseph Stalin that their governments' forces occupy Korea, with the thirty-eighth parallel as the dividing line between them. Stalin agreed.

At the Moscow Conference of Foreign Ministers in December 1945, the United States did advance a trustee-ship proposal, but the Soviets watered it down to include merely negotiations toward trusteeship in a joint commission made up of representatives of the two occupation commands in Korea. The new body soon became stalemated, adjourning in May 1946. The Americans aligned with the Korean right in the south, while the Soviets sided with the extreme left in the north. Despite a second attempt to resolve differences in the joint commission in the spring and summer of 1947, the Soviet-American stalemate continued, as the escalating Cold War in Europe and the Middle East dampened prospects for accommodation in other areas. In September the United States referred the Korean issue to the UN General Assembly.

By this time South Korea was in considerable turmoil. Since the beginning of the occupation, the Americans had favored conservative Korean groups who had either collaborated with the Japanese or spent most of the period of Japan's rule in exile. The economic division of the country, the influx of over a million Koreans into the territory south of the thirty-eighth parallel from Japan, Manchuria, and North Korea, and poorly conceived occupation policies combined to produce widespread discontent. Meanwhile, the extreme right, led by Syngman Rhee, agitated aggressively for establishment of an independent government in the south. With support in Congress waning for the U.S. occupation, the Truman administration decided to refer the Korean issue to the United Nations.

The Soviets refused to cooperate in creating a unified government in Korea, so the United States persuaded the international organization to supervise elections below the thirty-eighth parallel. These occurred on 10 May 1948, and the boycott of them by leftist and some rightist leaders ensured a victory for Rhee and his allies. When the ROK came into being on 15 August, Rhee stood as its president and the conservative Democratic party dominated the National Assembly. Less than a month later, the Soviet Union brought into existence the DPRK in the north, led by the Communist Kim Il Sung as premier. Confident of the relative strength of their creation, the Soviets withdrew their occupation forces at the end of the year. Given the widespread turmoil in the south, which included guerrilla warfare in mountain areas, the Americans did not withdraw their last occupation forces until June 1949. Even then, they left substantial quantities of light arms for the ROK army and a 500-man military advisory group to assist in its development.

Beginning in March 1949 Kim Il Sung lobbied Stalin for approval of and matériel support for a military attack on the ROK. Stalin initially demurred. At the end of January 1950, with the Communists having won the civil war on mainland China, with Mao in Moscow negotiating a military alliance with the Soviet Union, and with support for the ROK in the United States appearing less than firm, he changed his mind. Over the next several months, Stalin approved the shipment to North Korea of heavy arms, including tanks, thus giving the DPRK a clear military advantage over the ROK. North Korea was also strengthened by the return of tens of thousands of Korean nationals who had fought on the Communist side in China. In meetings with Kim in Moscow in early April, Stalin explicitly approved a North Korean attack on South Korea, provided Mao also gave his blessing. Although he believed that the United States would not intervene, especially if the North Koreans won a speedy victory, he made it clear that, if Kim ran into difficulty with the Americans, he would have to depend as a counter on direct Chinese, not Soviet, intervention. When in mid-May Mao endorsed Kim's proposal for an early attack on the ROK, the plans proceeded to their final stage.

The Course of the War

Even with the intervention of U.S. troops in July, the DPRK nearly drove the enemy out of Korea. By early August forces fighting under the UN banner were squeezed into the Pusan perimeter, on the southeastern corner of the peninsula. At the end of the month DPRK forces launched an offensive that over the next two weeks inflicted more enemy casualties than in any other comparable period during the war.

Yet UN troops now outnumbered their opponents and, on 15 September, General MacArthur launched a counteroffensive at Inchon, the port for Seoul. By month's end UN forces had broken out of the Pusan perimeter and retaken Seoul. DPRK forces were in headlong retreat northward and the United States had altered its objective from reestablishing the thirty-eighth parallel to destroying the enemy and reuniting the peninsula under a friendly government. ROK units began crossing the old boundary on 1 October and other UN units followed a week later, by which time the UN General Assembly had given its endorsement.

Long anticipating such developments, the PRC now moved decisively toward intervention. The DPRK appealed to Beijing for aid on 1 October and Stalin urged Mao to comply. The "Chinese People's Volunteers" (CPV) under General Peng Dehuai commenced large-scale movements into Korea on 19 October.

Despite contact with CPV soldiers from 25 October on, UN ground forces did not stop their movement northward. General MacArthur was determined to win a quick and total victory and, despite reservations in the Pentagon and the State Department, Washington proved unwilling to order him to halt. On 24 November UN forces began what they hoped would be an "end-the-war offensive." Four days later, with CPV forces over 200,000 strong engaged in a strong counterattack against severely overextended UN units, MacArthur declared that he faced "an entirely new war."

Over the next month UN troops retreated to the thirty-eighth parallel. On New Year's Eve CPV units crossed the old boundary in an attempt to push enemy forces off the peninsula. MacArthur told Washington that the U.S. choice was between expanding the war to air and naval attacks against mainland China and accepting total defeat.

Adhering to a Europe-first strategy and faced with allied pressure to both persevere in Korea and contain the war there, the Truman administration refused to follow MacArthur's lead. During the second week of January the CPV offensive petered out below Seoul in the face of severe weather, supply problems, and the regrouping of UN forces under the leadership of General Matthew B. Ridgway, who had taken over the U.S. Eighth Army in Korea in late December. Over the next three months, UN forces, outnumbered on the ground but controlling the air and enjoying a sizable advantage in artillery, gradually pushed the enemy northward, retaking Seoul in mid-March. A month later UN units held a line slightly north of the thirty-eighth parallel in all sectors except the extreme west.

This evolving situation produced a final showdown between Truman and MacArthur. The president was content, if possible, to settle the war roughly where it had begun the previous June, and he was under steady pressure to do so from allies and neutrals in the United Nations. Dissatisfied with less than total victory, the UN commander continued to scheme for an expanded war. Anticipating a Chinese spring offensive at any moment and facing continued public dissent from MacArthur, Truman on 11 April removed his field commander from all his positions, appointing Ridgway in his place. The action set off a storm of protest in the United States, but Truman held firm, aided by UN forces in Korea, which repulsed massive Chinese offensives in April and May. Following consultations in Moscow in early June, the Communist allies decided to seek negotiations for an armistice.

Peace Negotiations

On 10 July negotiations began between the field commands at Kaesong, just south of the thirty-eighth parallel. Despite restraint on both sides from seeking major gains on the battlefield, an armistice was not signed for over two years.

The first issue negotiated was an armistice line, and this took until 27 November to resolve. The Communists initially insisted on the thirty-eighth parallel; the UN command, which was dominated by the United States, pressed for a line north of the prevailing battle line, arguing that this would be reasonable compensation for its agreement in an armistice to desist its pounding of North Korea from the air and sea. After much acrimony, the suspension of the talks for two months, and small battle-field gains by the UN side, the parties agreed to the existing "line of contact"—provided, that is, that agreement on all other issues was reached within thirty days.

Two main issues remained on the agenda: "arrangements for the realization of cease fire and armistice … including the composition, authority, and functions of a supervising organization for carrying out the terms;" and "arrangements relating to prisoners of war." With the UN command relaxing its military pressure on the ground and the Communists securing their defensive lines as never before, neither side had a compelling reason to give way. Nonetheless, by April 1952 essential agreement had been reached on the postarmistice rotation of troops in Korea, the replacement and introduction of matériel, and the makeup and authority of a Neutral Nations Supervisory Commission. The one remaining item was the fate of prisoners of war (POWs).

The POW issue was bound to be difficult, as it involved captured personnel on both sides who had participated in the ongoing civil conflicts in Korea and/or

China. Many of the prisoners held by the United Nations had begun the war in South Korea, been captured by the DPRK army, and eventually been impressed into it. Others had fought in Nationalist armies during the Chinese civil war and later been integrated into the CPV. Not all of these prisoners wanted to return to the DPRK or PRC at war's end. Negotiations eventually became stalemated over the fate of Chinese prisoners. In October 1952, after months without progress, the UNC suspended talks.

Negotiations did not resume until April of the following year. By this time Dwight D. Eisenhower had replaced Truman as president of the United States (20 January) and Stalin had died (5 March). When negotiations failed to achieve quick success, the American president ordered the bombing of dikes in North Korea, which threatened the DPRK's food supply; he also threatened to terminate the talks and expand the war. In early June the Communists finally accepted the U.S. position on POWs. The centrality of Eisenhower's actions in this out-come remains uncertain.

The fighting would have ended in mid-June had it not been for the action of Syngman Rhee, who opposed an armistice without Korea's unification. His wishes ignored, he ordered ROK guards to release over 25,000 anti-Communist Korean POWs held in the south. This action on 18 June led to strong protests from the Communists and a crisis in U.S.-ROK relations. After the Communists launched successful limited offensives against ROK forces along the battlefront and the Americans promised to negotiate a defense treaty with the ROK immediately following the conclusion of fighting, Rhee finally agreed not to disrupt—but not to sign—an armistice. The Communists joined the UNC in signing the agreement on July 27.

Impact of the War

The war left Korea at once devastated and less likely than at any time since 1945 to become the focal point of international military conflict. Unlike the thirty-eighth parallel, the armistice line based on established battlefield positions was defensible on both sides. More important, while leaders of the divided country refused to rule out forceful unification—indeed, Rhee positively craved it—the great powers were now sufficiently committed to preventing its success by the other side to discourage their clients from initiating the effort.

Although the war was limited almost entirely to Korea, its impact was global. Fearful that the North Korean attack of June 1950 represented the beginning of the Soviet Union's use of force to achieve its purposes, the United States instituted a fourfold increase in defense spending; signed military pacts with Japan, the Philippines, Australia, New Zealand, and the ROK; added Greece and Turkey to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO); created a NATO command led by an American general; increased the U.S. troop presence in Europe from two to six divisions; and pushed for the rearming of West Germany. The United States also intervened to save Taiwan from the Communists, eventually signing a defense pact with the Nationalist government there, and initiated formation of the Southeast Asia Treaty Organization, which in the following decade played a pivotal role in the direct U.S. military intervention in Indochina.

If the prudence of some of these actions may be questioned, there can be little doubt that the long-term impact of the war was contrary to Soviet interests. The Soviet Union was in a poor position economically to compete with a U.S.-led alliance system partially mobilized for war on a permanent basis. Furthermore, although the Korean War brought the Soviet Union and the PRC closer together for the short term, it helped tear them apart within less than a decade of its end. China's intervention in Korea to prevent a total U.S. victory greatly enhanced the PRC's self-confidence and prestige. The limited scope and initial delay of Soviet aid to the Chinese effort produced resentment in Beijing and reinforced its determination to develop an independent capacity to defend itself and project power beyond its borders.

Yet the war also produced both short-and long-term problems in Sino-American relations. In addition to augmenting feelings of bitterness and fear between the PRC and the United States, the conflict led to American intervention to save Taiwan from conquest by the Communists. U.S. involvement in the island's fate represents the single most acrimonious issue in Sino-American relations to the present day.

Bibliography

Blair, Clay. The Forgotten War: America in Korea, 1950–1953. New York: Times Books, 1987.

Chen, Jian. China's Road to the Korean War: The Making of the Sino-American Confrontation. New York: Columbia University Press, 1994.

Cumings, Bruce. The Origins of the Korean War. Vol. 1, Liberation and the Emergence of Separate Regimes, 1945–1947. Vol. 2, The Roaring of the Cataract, 1947–1950. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1981–1990.

Goncharov, Sergei N., John W. Lewis, and Xue Litai. Uncertain Partners: Stalin, Mao, and the Korean War. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1993.

Kaufman, Burton I. The Korean War: Challenges in Crisis, Credibility, and Command. New York: Knopf, 1986.

Pierpaoli, Paul G., Jr. Truman and Korea: The Political Culture of the Early Cold War. Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 1999.

Stueck, William. The Korean War: An International History. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1995.

Thornton, Richard C. Odd Man Out: Truman, Stalin, Mao, and the Origins of the Korean War. Washington, D.C.: Brassey's, 2000.

West, Philip, and Suh Ji-moon, eds. Remembering the "Forgotten War." Armonk, N.Y.: M. E. Sharpe, 2001.

Zhang, Shu Guang. Mao's Military Romanticism: China and the Korean War, 1950–1953. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1995.

 

Following the defeat of Japan in 1945, the Soviet Union and the United States jointly occupied Korea, which had been ruled by Japan for four decades. After the United States and USSR failed to agree on the composition of a government for the country, separate states were established in 1948 in the two occupation zones, each aspiring to extend its rule over the remainder of the country. In 1949 North and South Korea engaged in serious fighting along their border, and on June 25, 1950, the North Korean army launched a massive conventional assault on South Korea, led by Soviet-made tanks.

Because North Korea was closely controlled by the Soviet Union and heavily dependent on Soviet assistance, Western leaders unanimously viewed the attack on South Korea as an act of Soviet aggression. Fearing that a failure to repel such aggression would encourage Moscow to mount similar invasions elsewhere, leading possibly to a third world war, the United Nations (UN) for the first time in its history authorized the creation of a multinational force to defend South Korea. The United States commanded the UN forces and contributed the overwhelming majority of troops, supplemented by units from Canada, the United Kingdom, France, Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, Greece, Turkey, Ethiopia, South Africa, Thailand, Australia, the Philippines, New Zealand, and Colombia.

The invasion of South Korea also prompted the United States to take a series of actions that shaped the Cold War for the remainder of the USSR's existence. The United States sent naval forces to protect Taiwan from an attack from the mainland, strengthened its support for the French in Indochina, solidified NATO, moved toward the rearmament of Germany, signed a separate peace treaty with Japan, tripled its military spending, and began to station troops overseas indefinitely.

After UN forces advanced into North Korean territory in October 1950, the People's Republic of China sent massive numbers of troops to prevent a North Korean defeat. The Soviet Air Force also intervened, thinly disguised as Chinese, beginning an undeclared air war with the United States that was the only sustained military engagement between the two superpowers. By the spring of 1951 the war had become a stalemate along a front roughly following the prewar border. Negotiations for an armistice began in the summer of 1951, but the war was prolonged another two years, at the cost of massive casualties and intensification of the East-West conflict worldwide. The armistice signed in July 1953 left intensely hostile states on the Korean peninsula, the North backed by the Soviet Union and China, and the South by the United States and its allies.

Russian archival documents made available in the 1990s show that Western leaders were correct in assuming that the decision to attack South Korea was made by Josef Stalin. His chief aim was to prevent a Japanese attack on the Soviet Union through the Korean peninsula, and he concluded that the U.S. failure to prevent a communist victory in China indicated that it would not intervene to prevent a similar victory in Korea. He was never willing to commit Soviet ground forces but urged the Chinese and North Koreans to keep fighting. Immediately after Stalin's death the new leadership in Moscow decided to bring the war to an end.

Bibliography

Stueck, William. (1995). The Korean War: An International History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Weathersby, Kathryn. (1995). "To Attack, or Not to Attack? Stalin, Kim Il Sung and the Prelude to War." Cold War International History Project Bulletin 5:1 - 9.

Weathersby, Kathryn. (1995 - 1996). "New Russian Documents on the Korean War." Cold War International History Project Bulletin 6 - 7:30 - 84.

Weathersby, Kathryn. (1998). "Stalin, Mao, and the End of the Korean War." In Brothers in Arms: The Rise and Fall of the Sino-Soviet Alliance, 1945 - 1963, ed. Odd Arne Westad. Washington, DC, and Stanford, CA: Woodrow Wilson Center Press/Stanford University Press.

—KATHRYN WEATHERSBY

 
Columbia Encyclopedia: Korean War
Top
Korean War, conflict between Communist and non-Communist forces in Korea from June 25, 1950, to July 27, 1953. At the end of World War II, Korea was divided at the 38th parallel into Soviet (North Korean) and U.S. (South Korean) zones of occupation. In 1948 rival governments were established: The Republic of Korea was proclaimed in the South and the People's Democratic Republic of Korea in the North.

Relations between them became increasingly strained, and on June 25, 1950, North Korean forces invaded South Korea. The United Nations quickly condemned the invasion as an act of aggression, demanded the withdrawal of North Korean troops from the South, and called upon its members to aid South Korea. On June 27, U.S. President Truman authorized the use of American land, sea, and air forces in Korea; a week later, the United Nations placed the forces of 15 other member nations under U.S. command, and Truman appointed Gen. Douglas MacArthur supreme commander.

In the first weeks of the conflict the North Korean forces met little resistance and advanced rapidly. By Sept. 10 they had driven the South Korean army and a small American force to the Busan (Pusan) area at the southeast tip of Korea. A counteroffensive began on Sept. 15, when UN forces made a daring landing at Incheon (Inchon) on the west coast. North Korean forces fell back and MacArthur received orders to pursue them into North Korea.

On Oct. 19, the North Korean capital of Pyongyang was captured; by Nov. 24, North Korean forces were driven by the 8th Army, under Gen. Walton Walker, and the X Corp, under Gen. Edward Almond, almost to the Yalu River, which marked the border of Communist China. As MacArthur prepared for a final offensive, the Chinese Communists joined with the North Koreans to launch (Nov. 26) a successful counterattack. The UN troops were forced back, and in Jan., 1951, the Communists again advanced into the South, recapturing Seoul, the South Korean capital.

After months of heavy fighting, the center of the conflict was returned to the 38th parallel, where it remained for the rest of the war. MacArthur, however, wished to mount another invasion of North Korea. When MacArthur persisted in publicly criticizing U.S. policy, Truman, on the recommendation of the Joint Chiefs of Staff removed (Apr. 10, 1951) him from command and installed Gen. Matthew B. Ridgway as commander in chief. Gen. James Van Fleet then took command of the 8th Army. Ridgway began (July 10, 1951) truce negotiations with the North Koreans and Chinese, while small unit actions, bitter but indecisive, continued. Gen. Van Fleet was denied permission to go on the offensive and end the “meat grinder” war.

The war's unpopularity played an important role in the presidential victory of Dwight D. Eisenhower, who had pledged to go to Korea to end the war. Negotiations broke down four different times, but after much difficulty and nuclear threats by Eisenhower, an armistice agreement was signed (July 27, 1953). Casualties in the war were heavy. U.S. losses were placed at over 54,000 dead and 103,000 wounded, while Chinese and Korean casualties were each at least 10 times as high. Korean forces on both sides executed many alleged civilian enemy sympathizers, especially in the early months of the war.

Bibliography

See R. E. Appleman, South to the Nakong, North to the Yalu (1961); D. Rees, Korea (1964); B. I. Kaufman, The Korean War (1986); I. F. Stone, The Hidden History of the Korean War (1988); C. Blair, The Forgotten War (1989); S. Weintraub, MacArthur's War (2000); D. Halberstam, The Coldest Winter (2007).


 

Although it is often described as the "forgotten war," the conflict in Korea cost some 3 million lives over the course of three years, and helped set the tone for the larger Cold War. Both an international and a national conflict, the Korean War demonstrated the strengths and limitations of the United Nations (UN), and established the framework for the policy of containment that would lead the United States into the much longer conflict in Vietnam. Korea also solidified American attitudes toward communism, and reaction to events there served to influence both the rise of Senator Joseph McCarthy and the fear of communist "brainwashing." As much a war of intelligence as of arms, Korea saw the birth of the modern U.S. signals intelligence framework as the Armed Forces Security Agency (AFSA) gave way to the National Security Agency (NSA). In the end, an allied force of South Korean, American, British, Australian, and Turkish troops frustrated the aspirations of the North Korean Communist government, aided by the People's Republic of China, to control the Korean peninsula. The truce in 1953 established an uneasy framework—not quite war, not quite peace—that nevertheless remains in place half a century later.

Background

The roots of the Korean War, like those of the Vietnam conflict, lay in World War II. Soon after 1945, the British and American alliance with the Soviet Union broke down in Europe, and the Korean hostilities brought the end of this partnership in Asia as well. The Soviets had fought World War II entirely on their western front, and only entered the Pacific war on a last minute bid for territory. Years earlier, the little-known tank battle between Soviet and Japanese forces at Nomonhan in August 1939, had discouraged Japan from any hope that a war with the Soviets would yield easy victory. Therefore, when Adolf Hitler invaded the Soviet Union in June 1941, his Japanese allies did not join him in making war on Russia.

Soviet dictator Josef Stalin's lack of participation in the Pacific theatre did not preclude his plans to extend the reach of Soviet Communism into that area. He was aided by an agreement with the United States that the Japanese would surrender to Soviet forces north of the 38th parallel on the Korean peninsula, which enabled him to establish a Communist government in Pyongyang under the leadership of Kim Il Sung. (Despite North Korean state hagiographers' later attempt to recast their "Great Leader" as a war hero, in fact he had spent the entire war under Stalin's protection, behind Soviet lines.)

By 1947, it had become apparent that Korea, in Japanese hands since 1910, would not easily be reunited under a non-Communist government. Soon another event served to further raise the specter of Communist expansionism in Asia. In October 1949, the victory of Mao Zedong's forces placed the world's largest population under the Communist rule of the People's Republic of China (PRC). Meanwhile, the United States had withdrawn its troops from Korea, and it now petitioned the UN to ensure free elections in Korea. The Soviets had withdrawn their troops as well, but refused to agree to these elections. On June 25, 1950, Kim's armies swept southward to unite the country by force.

An emergency meeting of the UN Security Council resulted in a resolution to stop the North Korean assault. Though the Soviet Union was one of the five permanent Security Council members—along with the United States, United Kingdom, France, and the Republic of China—it had boycotted the meeting in protest of the U.S. effort to block the admission of the PRC. Because of their failure to show up at the Security Council meeting (a mistake they would not again repeat), the Soviets were unable to exercise their veto power against the American call for a "police action" on the Korean peninsula.

Although the Korean conflict is rightly called a war, there was no accompanying declaration by the U.S. Congress; instead, President Harry S. Truman ordered U.S. troops into battle as part of a UN peacekeeping force on June 27, 1950. Four U.S. divisions landed on the Korean peninsula to join the South Korean forces there, but the North Koreans soon drove them all the way to Pusan, at the extreme southeastern end of the peninsula. Soon afterward, however, General Douglas MacArthur abruptly shifted the tide of the war by landing a massive force at Inchon, some 100 miles (160 km) south of the 38th parallel and well behind North Korean lines. He thus, cut the North Korean army in two, and began moving northward, toward what now looked like an easy victory.

As the UN forces moved toward the Yalu River, which separated North Korea from China, Beijing issued a stern warning that it would not look lightly on the presence of a hostile force just across the border. MacArthur, however, remained confident, and at Thanksgiving 1950 promised Americans that their sons would be home for Christmas. This was not to be, as on November 25 the Chinese People's Liberation Army swept across the border with a force of some 180,000 soldiers. By December 15, the allied forces had fallen back below the 38th parallel, and two weeks later, on the last day of 1950, a Chinese-North Korean force numbering half a million troops pushed into South Korea again.

Thanks to relentless bombing by allied forces, the Communist force did not manage to move any further into South Korean territory, and thus began a lengthy stalemate that would characterize the remainder of the war. American leaders were sharply divided as to the means of resolving the conflict. MacArthur favored an extremely aggressive policy toward China, and proposed a naval blockade combined with bombing of Chinese bases in Manchuria. Truman, however, recognized the danger of such action, which he believed would bring a swift response from the Soviet Union. In the sharply polarized world climate, the price of aggression in Korea would almost certainly be armed conflict with the Soviets, and since they had managed to acquire atomic secrets through spies in the West, the result could very well be nuclear war.

The difference of opinion between MacArthur and Truman characterized that which would come to prevail between hard-line anti-Communists on the one hand, and pragmatists on the other. Overstepping the bounds of his authority as a military leader, MacArthur called on the American people to support his war plans, and for this act of insubordination, Truman relieved him of duty on April 11, 1951. Replaced by General Matthew B. Ridgway, MacArthur returned to the United States a hero, as much for his determination to defeat Communism as for his leadership against the Japanese in World War II. He would become a powerful symbol for the most extreme anti-Communist elements, who soon gained a voice in the Senate under the leadership of McCarthy. Thus began a sort of cold war within the Cold War, a division of the American public that would culminate with the bitter disagreements over the Vietnam War that emerged nearly two decades later.

Eisenhower and the War's End

Meanwhile, on July 10, 1951, the allied forces began a lengthy series of talks with the Communists. The situation remained unresolved during the 1952 presidential elections, and helped pave the way to victory for Republican presidential candidate Dwight D. Eisenhower. One of the most misunderstood of modern American leaders, Eisenhower was neither a fool nor a hard-liner, and precisely because he had led U.S. forces in Europe during World War II, he recognized the dangers of military adventurism, and tended to be even more of a pragmatist in military matters than Truman had been. Eisenhower, who years later would coin the phrase "military-industrial complex" as he warned against its rise in his farewell presidential address, opposed the Korean War, and vowed to end it.

Winning the presidency with the promise "I shall go to Korea," Eisenhower soon made good on his vow. His policy was the embodiment of Theodore Roosevelt's famous dictum about walking softly and carrying a big stick: though mild on the surface, in private discussions with Chinese leaders he made it clear that he would take aggressive steps, up to and including the use of nuclear weapons, if the talks were not soon brought to resolution. Though fighting resumed briefly in June 1953, in the end Eisenhower's gambit won out, and on July 27, the two sides signed an armistice. Although the South gained possession of some eastern mountains north of the 38th parallel, the line virtually served as the boundary between North and South Korea.

In keeping with the emerging modern face of warfare, the Korean conflict was as much a battle of propaganda and intelligence as it was one of military forces. Both sides took large numbers of prisoners of war (POWs), which they exchanged at the end of the fighting, and the Communists in particular made heavy use of the propaganda value to be gained from POWs. Eight different POW camps dotted a stretch along the Yalu River, and in these facilities the Communists sought to demoralize their captives by segregating them according to rank, nationality, and even race. They bombarded the POWs on a daily basis with lessons on the superiority of Communism over capitalism, but the purpose of these activities seems to have been harassment rather than an actual effort to win converts.

The experience added a new term to the English language: brainwashing. The term referred to a variety of psychological and sometimes physical techniques intended to obliterate an individual's beliefs and replace them with new ones. Despite fears of brainwashing that spread through American society in the war's aftermath, there was never any conclusive psychological proof that brainwashing as such actually occurred. Some servicemen did make statements favorable to their captors, and others collaborated with the Communists, but these actions were the result either of fatigue under captivity, or of a simple desire for self-preservation.

Allied signals intelligence. In the behind-the-scenes dimension of the Korean War, the success of allied efforts in signals intelligence (SIGINT) was much more firmly established than that of the Communists in brainwashing. Continuing their record of achievements established in World War II, British and American cryptanalysts proved highly adept at breaking Chinese ciphers. Of particular significance was the breaking of Chinese one-time pad ciphers, which had been supposedly unbreakable, by American cryptanalysts. This was especially noteworthy in light of criticisms that U.S. intelligence had failed to predict the coming of the war itself.

In fact, the modern U.S. intelligence community had only barely come into existence at the war's outset, and Korea marked a turning point. Before the war, budgets for intelligence operations had been lean, but after the out-break of hostilities, Washington made a much firmer commitment to its intelligence community. Only three years before the war began, the National Security Act of 1947 had established the Central Intelligence Agency, and NSA had yet to be born. Instead, AFSA coordinated all cryptographic activities, though the leading SIGINT agency for the U.S. forces was the Army Security Agency (ASA).

Whereas AFSA is remembered as an administrative failure, and was further tainted by the discovery that one of its personnel, William Weisband, had been working for the Soviets since 1934, ASA had a number of notable successes. It cultivated a program of Korean linguists, and used a signal intercept technique from World War I to great effect. This was the ground-return intercept, which used the principle of electric induction to pick up Chinese and North Korean telephone traffic. Also significant was the work of the Air Force Security Service (AFSS), which regularly intercepted information on planned bombing runs and helped allied forces protect their facilities. As for the AFSA, it had been formed to coordinate the SIGINT activities of the military services, but by 1952 Washington had recognized its lack of success in doing so, and in that year a secret memo from Truman established the NSA.

The Legacy of Korea

Some 37,000 Americans died in Korea, along with smaller casualties among the British, Australian, and Turkish forces. The North Koreans lost half a million soldiers, and the Chinese sustained losses of one million. By far the worst casualties belonged to the South Koreans, who lost 1.3 million civilian and military personnel. Though the war resulted in a stalemate, it preserved South Korean independence, and resulted in the establishment of boundaries that remained in place 50 years later.

The war helped draw sharp lines between the Communist world and the West, and in its immediate aftermath, Americans were confronted with the specter of not one but two Communist superpowers allied against them. The Soviet-Chinese alliance would not hold, however, and by 1969 the two nations had become more hostile toward one another than either was toward the United States.

By gaining what could be construed as a victory in Korea, American leaders came away with the mistaken impression that large commitments of troops was a viable means of containing Communist expansion in small Asian nations. Thus, within a year of the Korean War's end, U.S. forces would become involved in another effort to roll back the Communist tide on the Asian continent, this time much further south, in Vietnam.

As for the two countries whose conflict had drawn the world's attention, the war only solidified the division between them. For many years, South Korea would maintain a strict authoritarian regime that, while liberal in comparison to that of North Korea, was hardly so by modern standards. In the 1980s, however, it would emerge as an economic powerhouse, and as its populace prospered, they began to demand greater political options. In time, their nation would become an example of the relationship between economic and political liberalization.

By contrast, North Korea would serve to exemplify the disastrous consequences of strict totalitarian control in practice. An Orwellian state, it was the virtual kingdom of Kim, which he would pass on—along with the gruesome cult of personality that developed around him—to his son Kim Jong Il upon his death in 1994. Plagued by famine, unable to sustain even the most basic needs of its populace, North Korea survived on the remittances sent home by citizens living in Japan, and by arms sales to other rogue dictatorships. Its development of missile technology, which it exported to extremist regimes of the Islamic world, would earn it a place, along with Iran and Iraq, on the "axis of evil" described by President George W. Bush in 2002.

Further Reading

Books

Blair, Clay. The Forgotten War: America in Korea, 1950–1953. New York: Times Books, 1987.

Goulden, Joseph C. Korea, the Untold Story of the War. New York: Times Books, 1982.

Hastings, Max. The Korean War. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1987.

Ridgway, Matthew B. The Korean War: How We Met the Challenge; How All-Out Asian War Was Averted; Why MacArthur Was Dismissed; Why Today's War Objectives Must Be Limited. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1967.

Stokesbury, James L. A Short History of the Korean War. New York: W. Morrow, 1988.

Toland, John. In Mortal Combat, Korea, 1950–1953. New York: Morrow, 1991.

Tomedi, Rudy. No Bugles, No Drums: An Oral History of the Korean War. New York: Wiley, 1993.

Weintraub, Stanley. MacArthur's War: Korea and the Undoing of an American Hero. New York: Free Press, 2000.

Electronic

Korean War 50th Anniversary Commemoration. U.S. Department of Defense. <http://korea50.army.mil/> (April 12, 2003).

NSA Korean War 1950–1953 Commemoration. National Security Agency. <http://www.nsa.gov/korea/> (April 12, 2003).

 
Law Encyclopedia: Korean War
Top
This entry contains information applicable to United States law only.

The Korean War was a conflict fought on the Korean Peninsula from June 1950 to July 1953. Initially the war was between South Korea (Republic of Korea) and North Korea (Democratic People's Republic of Korea) but soon developed into an international war involving the United States and nineteen other nations. The United States sent troops to South Korea as part of a United Nations "police action," which sought to repel the Communist aggression of North Korea. Before the war ended in a stalemate, the People's Republic of China had intervened militarily on the side of North Korea, and the Soviet Union had supplied military equipment to the North.

At the end of World War II in 1945, the Soviet Union occupied the Korean Peninsula north of the thirty-eighth degree of latitude, while the U.S. occupied the territory south of it. In 1947, after the United States and the Soviet Union failed to negotiate a reunification of the two separate Korean states, the United States asked the U.N. to solve the problem. The Soviet Union, however, refused a U.N. proposal for a general election in the two Koreas to resolve the issue and encouraged the establishment of a Communist regime under the leadership of Kim Il-sung. South Korea then established a democratic government under the leadership of Syngman Rhee. By 1949 most Soviet and U.S. troops had been withdrawn from the Korean Peninsula.

On June 25, 1950, North Korea, with the tacit approval of the Soviet Union, launched an attack across the thirty-eighth parallel. The U.N. Security Council passed a resolution calling for the assistance of all U.N. members to stop the invasion. Normally, the Soviet Union would have vetoed this resolution, but it was boycotting the Security Council in protest of the U.N.'s decision not to admit the People's Republic of China.

Sixteen nations joined the U.N. forces, with President Harry S. Truman immediately responding by ordering U.S. forces to assist South Korea. Truman did so without a declaration of war, which until this time had been a prerequisite for U.S. military involvement overseas. Though some Americans criticized Truman for this decision, generally the country supported his action as part of his strategy of "containment," which sought to prevent the spread of Communism beyond its current borders. Korea became the test case for containment.

The North Korean forces crushed the South Korean army, with the South Koreans holding just the southeastern part of the peninsula. U.N. forces, under the command of General Douglas MacArthur, stabilized the front. On September 15, 1950, MacArthur made a bold amphibious landing at Inchon, about one hundred miles below the thirty-eighth parallel, cutting off the North Korean forces. The North Korean army was quickly crushed, and more than 125,000 soldiers were captured.

MacArthur then sent U.N. forces into North Korea, proclaiming on November 24 that the troops would be home by Christmas. As U.N. forces neared the Yalu River, which is the border between North Korea and Manchuria, the northeast part of China, the Chinese army attacked them with 180,000 troops. The entrance of China changed the balance of forces. U.S. troops took heavy casualties during the winter of 1950-51 as the Chinese army pushed the U.N. forces back across the thirty-eighth parallel and proceeded south. U.N. forces finally halted the offensive south of Seoul, the capital of South Korea. A U.N. counteroffensive in February 1951 forced the Chinese to withdraw from South Korea. By the end of April, U.N. forces occupied positions slightly north of the thirty-eighth parallel.

It was during this period that President Truman became concerned about the actions of MacArthur. The general publicly expressed his desire to attack Manchuria, blockade the Chinese coast, and reinforce U.N. forces with troops from Nationalist China, with the goal of achieving victory. Truman, however, favored a limited war, fearing that MacArthur's course would bring the Soviet Union into the war against the United States. When MacArthur continued to make his views known, Truman, as commander in chief, relieved the general of his command on April 11, 1951. The "firing" of MacArthur touched off a firestorm of criticism by Congress and the public against Truman and his apparent unwillingness to win the war. Nevertheless, Truman maintained the limited war strategy, which resulted in a deadlock along the thirty-eighth parallel.

In June 1951 the Soviet Union proposed that cease-fire discussions begin, and in July the representatives of the U.N. and Communist commands began truce negotiations at Kaesong, North Korea. These negotiations were later moved to P'anmunjom.

The Korean War affected U.S. domestic policy. In April 1952 President Truman sparked a constitutional crisis when he seized the U.S. steel industry. With a labor strike by the steelworkers' union imminent, Truman was concerned that the loss of steel production would hurt the Korean War effort. He ordered Secretary of Commerce Charles Sawyer to seize the steel mills and maintain full production. The steel industry challenged the order, bringing it before the Supreme Court. In Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co. v. Sawyer, 343 U.S. 579, 72 S. Ct. 863, 96 L. Ed. 1153 (1952), the Court refused to allow the government to seize and operate the steel mills. The majority rejected Truman's claim of inherent executive power in the Constitution to protect the public interest in times of crisis.

Truman's popularity declined because of the war, which contributed to his decision not to run for reelection in 1952. In the presidential race, Republican Dwight D. Eisenhower easily defeated Democrat Adlai Stevenson. Eisenhower, a former Army general and World War II hero, pledged to end the war. The truce negotiations, which broke off in October 1952, were resumed in April 1953. After Eisenhower hinted that he was prepared to use nuclear weapons if a settlement was not reached, an armistice was signed on July 27, 1953.

More than 33,000 U.S. soldiers died in the conflict, and 415,000 South Korean soldiers were killed. It is estimated that 2,000,000 North Koreans and Chinese died. The United States has maintained a military presence in South Korea since the end of the war, because North Korea and South Korea have remained hostile neighbors.

See: Cold War; Labor Law; Labor Union; Presidential Powers; Stalin, Joseph; Vietnam War.

 
History Dictionary: Korean War
Top

A war, also called the Korean conflict, fought in the early 1950s between the United Nations, supported by the United States, and the communist Democratic People's Republic of Korea (North Korea). The war began in 1950, when North Korea invaded South Korea. The United Nations declared North Korea the aggressor and sent military aid to the South Korean army. President Harry S. Truman declared the war a “police action” because he never asked Congress to pass an official declaration of war. He thereby established a precedent for President Lyndon Johnson, who committed troops to the Vietnam War without ever seeking a congressional mandate for his action.

General Douglas MacArthur commanded the United Nations troops, who were mostly from the United States. The tide turned against North Korea with the landings at Inchon, and its troops were pushed back into the north; but reinforcements from the People's Republic of China soon allowed the North Koreans to regain lost territory. In 1953, with neither side having a prospect of victory, a truce was signed. In the course of the war, President Truman removed MacArthur from his command for insubordination. (See Truman-MacArthur controversy.)

 
Wikipedia: Korean War
Top
Korean War
Part of the Cold War

Clockwise, from top: The US Army at the 38th parallel; F-86 Sabre fighter aeroplane in Korean combat; Incheon harbour, starting point of the Battle of Incheon; Chinese soldiers welcomed home; 1st. Lt. Baldomero Lopez, USMC, over the top of the the Incheon seawall.
Date 25 June 1950 (1950-06-25) – 27 July 1953
Location Korean Peninsula
Result Cease-fire armistice; North Korean invasion of South Korea repelled, US–UN invasion of North Korea repelled; Korean Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) established; little territorial change at the 38th parallel border, essentially uti possidetis; technically, at war.
Territorial
changes
DMZ; both gained little border territory at the 38th parallel.
Belligerents
 United Nations (UN Resolution 84):
 Republic of Korea
 United States
 United Kingdom
 Australia
 Belgium
 Canada
 Colombia
Flag of Ethiopia Ethiopia
Flag of France France
Flag of Greece Greece
 Luxembourg
 Netherlands
 New Zealand
 Philippines
Flag of South Africa South Africa
 Thailand
 Turkey

Naval Support and Military Servicing/Repairs:
 Japan


Medical staff:
 Denmark
 Italy
 Norway
 India
 Sweden

North Korea and Allies:

Flag of North Korea Democratic People's Republic of Korea
Flag of the People's Republic of China People's Republic of China
 Soviet Union

Commanders
Flag of South KoreaSyngman Rhee
Flag of South Korea Chung Il-kwon
Flag of South Korea Paik Sun-yup
Flag of the United States Douglas MacArthur
Flag of the United States Matthew Ridgway
Flag of the United States Mark Wayne Clark
Flag of the United States Harry S. Truman
Flag of the United States Dwight D. Eisenhower
Flag of the Philippines Elpidio Quirino
Flag of the Philippines Fidel V. Ramos
Flag of Turkey Tahsin Yazıcı
Flag of North Korea Kim Il-sung
Flag of North Korea Choi Yong-kun
Flag of North Korea Kim Chaek
Flag of the People's Republic of China Mao Zedong
Flag of the People's Republic of China Peng Dehuai
Flag of the Soviet Union Joseph Stalin
Flag of the Soviet Union Georgy Malenkov
Strength
Flag of South Korea 590,911
Flag of the United States 480,000
Flag of the United Kingdom 63,000[1]
Flag of Canada 26,791[2]
Flag of Australia 17,000
Flag of the Philippines 7,430[3]
Flag of Turkey 5,455[4]
Flag of the Netherlands 3,972
Flag of France 3,421[5]
Flag of Greece 2,163[6]
Flag of New Zealand 1,389
Flag of Thailand 1,294
Flag of Ethiopia 1,271
Flag of Colombia 1,068
Flag of Belgium 900
Flag of South Africa 826
Flag of Luxembourg 44
Total: 941,356–1,139,518
Flag of North Korea 260,000
Flag of the People's Republic of China 926,000
Flag of the Soviet Union 26,000
Total: 1,212,000
Note: The figures vary by source; peak unit-strength varied in e war.
Casualties and losses
South Korea
137,899 KIA[7]
450,742 WIA[8]
32,838 MIA/POW[9]
United States
36,516 dead (2,830 non-combat)
92,134 wounded
8,176 MIA
7,245 POW[10]
United Kingdom
1,109 dead[11]
2,674 wounded
1,060 MIA or POW[12]
Turkey
721 dead[13]
2,111 wounded
168 MIA
216 POW
Canada
516 dead[14]
1,042 wounded
Australia
339 dead[15]
1,200 wounded
France
300 KIA or MIA[16]
Greece
194 KIA[17]
459 wounded
Philippines
112 KIA[3]
Netherlands
123 KIA[18]
Belgium
106 KIA[19]
Luxembourg
2 KIA[20]
New Zealand
33 KIA[21]
South Africa
28 KIA and 8 MIA[22]
Total: 776,000+
North Korea:
215,000 dead,
303,000 wounded,
120,000 MIA or POW[12]
China
(Chinese estimate):

114,000 killed in combat
34,000 non-combat deaths
380,000 wounded
21,400 POW[23]
(U.S. estimate):[12]
400,000+ dead
486,000 wounded
21,000 POW
Soviet Union:
282 dead[24]
Total: 1,190,000-1,577,000+
Total civilians killed/wounded: 2.5 Million (est.)[25]
South Korea: 990,968[26]
373,599 killed[27]
229,625 wounded[28]
387,744 abducted/missing[29]
North Korea: 1,550,000 (est.)[30]

The term Korean War refers to the warfare between North Korea (Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, DPRK) and South Korea (Republic of Korea, ROK) begun 25 June 1950 and paused with an armistice signed 27 July 1953.

The war occurred consequent to both countries aggressively attempting Korean national–peninsular reunification under their respective governments — because they occupied the immediate months before open warfare with escalating skirmishes and raids at the 38th Parallel border, and the failed all-Korea elections in 1948. [31] The negotiations ceased when North Korea invaded South Korea on 25 June 1950. The United States and the United Nations intervened for the South. After a rapid UN counter-offensive reversing the initial North Korean invasion, the People's Republic of China (PRC) intervened for North Korea — deciding the war towards an armistice that approximately restored the original border between the Koreas. Since then, North Korea unilaterally withdrew from the armistice on 27 May 2009.[32]

Although a civil war gone awry, other geopolitical factors counted; an external power sponsored each Korea, thus international political obligations facilitated a civil war's metamorphosing into an hegemonic proxy war of the Russo–American Cold War (1945–91); moreover, Korean War also denotes the skirmishes before and since the war. [33]

Contents

The names of the war

In South Korea, the war is informally called the 6·25 War and 6·25 (Korean: 6·25 전쟁, the invasion date), while the formal name is Hanguk jeonjaeng ("Korean War"; Hangul: 한국전쟁; Hanja: 韓國戰爭). In North Korea, the formal name is Joguk haebang jeonjaeng ("Fatherland Liberation War"; Hangul: 조국해방전쟁; Hanja: 祖國解放戰爭), and "Korean War" is the informal. In China, it is termed the War to Resist America and Aid Korea (), as well as the "Korean War" (韓國戰爭 Hángúo zhànzhēng, or 韓戰 Hánzhàn for short; also: 朝鮮戰爭 Cháoxiān zhànzhēng).[34]

In the US, the war officially is a police actionKorean Conflict, not Korean War — to avoid the lack of a legitimate declaration of war by the U.S. Congress. Colloquially, it also is The Forgotten War and the The Unknown War, because it was not a victory, and, unlike the Second World War and the Vietnam War it is culturally forgotten.[35] As military science, the Korean War combined First- and Second- world war strategies and tactics — swift infantry attacks followed air bombing raids. Moreover, because neither side occupied the territory conquered, the initial campaign warfare became trench warfare, lasting from January 1951 until the 1953 border stalemate and armistice.

Japanese Imperial rule

Upon defeating Qing Dynasty China in the First Sino-Japanese War (1894–5), the Empire of Japan occupied the Korean Empire (1897–1910) of Emperor Gojong — a peninsula strategic to its sphere of influence. [36] A decade later, on defeating Imperial Russia in the Russo-Japanese War (1904–5), Japan made Korea its protectorate, with the Eulsa Treaty in 1905, then annexed it with the Japan-Korea Annexation Treaty in 1910. [37][38] Despite national resistance, life in Japanese Korea was brutal; Koreans were considered sub-human; nationalists and the intelligentsia fled the country. Some founded the Provisional Korean Government, headed by Syngman Rhee, in Shanghai, in 1919, that proved a “government-in-exile” recognised by few countries. In the event, from 1919 to 1925 and onwards, Korean Communists led the internal and external national liberation warfare against the Japanese Colony. [39]:23[40]

Japanese Korea was an industrialised colony and slave state; in 1937, the colonial Governor–General, Gen. Minami Jiro, commanded the cultural assimilation to Japan of the colony's 23.5 million people — by banning Korean language, literature, and culture, replaced with the Japanese, and that the populace rename themselves as Japanese. In 1938, the Colonial Government established labour conscription; by 1939, 2.6 million Koreans worked overseas as forced labourers; by 1942, Korean men were conscripted to the Japanese Army.

Meanwhile, in China, the nationalist National Revolutionary Army and the Communist People's Liberation Army organised the (right-wing and left-wing) refugee Korean patriots. The Nationalists, led by Yi Pom-Sok, fought in the Burma Campaign (December 1941–August 1945). The Communists, led by Kim Il-sung, fought the Japanese in Korea.

The Second World War worsened Japanese exploitation of Korea — sacked of food, livestock, and metals for the war effort — which increased Korean resistance and Japan's military presence, from 46,000 (1941) to 300,000 (1945) soldiers. Japanese Korea was a slave state with 2.6 million forced labourers controlled with a collaborationist Korean police force (composed of specifically-recruited sociopaths); some 723,000 people had been sent to work in the overseas Empire and in metropolitan Japan; thousands of Korean women were conscripted to military prostitution as sexual comfort women for Japanese soldiers. By January of 1945, Koreans were 32 per cent of Japan’s labour force; in August of 1945, when the US atomic-bombed Hiroshima, they were about 25 per cent of the people incinerated.[41]

The Russo–American division of Korea excluded the Koreans — who were represented by US Army colonels Dean Rusk and Charles Bonesteel. [42] Two years earlier, at the Cairo Conference (November 1943), Nationalist China, the UK, and the USA decided that Korea should become independent, “in due course”; Stalin concurred. In February of 1945, at the Yalta Conference, the Allies failed to establish the Korean trusteeship first discussed — in 1943 — by Pres. Roosevelt and PM Anthony Eden. Per the Russo–American agreement, the USSR declared war against Japan on 9 August 1945, and, by the 10th, the Red Army occupied the Korean peninsular north, via amphibious landings north of the 38th parallel and its Twenty-Fifth Army entering from Manchuria, China. [43][44] Some three weeks later, on 8 September 1945, parting from Okinawa, Lt. Gen. John R. Hodge, USA, entered Korea through Incheon to accept the Japanese Imperial surrender south of the 38th parallel.[45]

Korea divided

At the Potsdam Conference (July–August 1945), the Allies unilaterally decided to divide Korea — without consulting the Koreans — in contradiction of the Cairo Conference (November 1943) Churchill, Chiang Kai-shek, and FDR declarations that Korea would be a free nation and an independent country. [39][45]:24-25[39][46]:25[39]:24[47] Moreover, the earlier Yalta Conference (February 1945) granted to Joseph Stalin European "buffer zones" — satellite states accountable to Moscow (a fait accompli, per the Red Army), and expected Soviet pre-eminence in China — Manchuria, [48] for joining (6 August 1945) the US Pacific war against Japan "three months after the surrender of Germany". [48] By 10 August, the Red Army occupied the peninsular north; as agreed, the Red Army halted at the 38th parallel on 26 August — and for three weeks awaited the US arrival to the Korean peninsular south (8 September 1945), from Okinawa, 600 miles distant. [39]:25[39]:24 Meanwhile and earlier, on 3 September 1945, Lt. Gen. Yoshio Kozuki, Commander, Japanese 17th Area Army in Korea, called Gen. John R. Hodge, Commander, XXIV Corps and US Commander, Korea, telling him that the Soviets were south of the 38th parallel — at Kaesong ; Gen. Hodge trusted the Japanese Army report.[45]

On 10 August 1945 — with the 15 August Japanese surrender nigh — the Americans ignored if the Russians would honour their part of the Joint Commission, the US-sponsored Korean-occupation agreement. A month earlier, to fulfil the politico-military requirememnts of the US, Col. Dean Rusk and Col. Charles Bonesteel III, divided the Korean peninsula at the 38th parallel after hurriedly deciding (in thirty minutes), that the US Korean Zone of Occupation must minimally include two ports. [45][49][50][51] Explaining why the occupation zone demarcation (38th parallel) was so far south, Col. Rusk observed, “even though it was further north than could be realistically reached by US forces, in the event of Soviet disagreement ... we felt it important to include the capital of Korea in the area of responsibility of American troops”, especially when “faced with the scarcity of US forces immediately available, and time and space factors, which would make it difficult to reach very far north, before Soviet troops could enter the area.” [48] The Soviets agreed to the US occupation-zone demarcation, to improve Soviet Eastern European-occupation negotiation-leverage with the Allies in Europe, and because each would accept Japanese surrender where they stood. [39]:25

As the Military Governor, Gen. Hodge directly controlled South Korea via the United States Army Military Government in Korea (USAMGIK 1945–48). He established control by first restoring to power the key Japanese colonial administrators and their Korean and police collaborators, [31] and second, by refusing the USAMGIK’s official recognition of the People's Republic of Korea (PRK) (August–September 1945), the provisional government (agreed with the Japanese Army) with which the Koreans had been governing themselves and the peninsula — because he suspected it was Communistic. These US policies voiding popular Korean sovereignty provoked the civil insurrections and guerrilla warfare preceding, then constituting, the Korean civil war. [37]

In December 1945, the Russo–American Allies administered Korea via the US–USSR Joint Commission, agreed at the Moscow Conference of Foreign Ministers (October 1945), and, again excluding the Koreans, decided the country would become independent after a five-year trusteeship — action facilitated by each régime sharing its sponsor's ideology. [52][39]:25-26 The incensed Korean populace revolted; in the South, some protested, some rose in arms; [37] to contain them, the USAMGIK banned strikes (8 December 1945) and outlawed the PRK Revolutionary Government and the PRK People's Committees (12 December 1945). Months later, those sovereignty suppressions provoked the 8,000-railroad-worker strike (23 September 1946) in Busan — political action which quickly extended throughout American Korea; the USAMGIK had lost civil control. On 1 October 1946, Korean police killed three students in the “Daegu Uprising”; the people counter-attacked, killing 38 policemen. Like-wise, on 3 October, some 10,000 people attacked the Yeongcheon police station, killing three policemen and injuring some 40 more; elsewhere, populaces killed some 20 landlords and pro-Japanese South Korean officials. [46] In the event, the USAMGIK declared martial law to control South Korea; in controlling the Koreans with foreigners (Japanese colonial administrators) and Korean collaborators, the US discredited its declarations of a “Free Korea”.

In the event, the right-wing Representative Democratic Council, led by nationalist Syngman Rhee, opposed the Russo–American trusteeship of Korea, arguing that after thirty-five years (1910–45) of Japanese colonial ruleforeign rule — most Koreans opposed another foreign rule, i.e. Russo–American. Gaining advantage from the native political temper, the US quit the Soviet-supported Moscow Accords — and, using the 31 March 1948 UN election-deadline to achieve a non-Communist civil government in the US Korean Zone of Occupation — convoked national general elections that the Soviets opposed, then boycotted, insisting that the US honour the Moscow Accords.[53][54][39]:26[55] The resultant anti-Communist South Korean Government promulgated a national political constitution (17 July 1948) elected a president, the American-educated strongman Syngman Rhee (20 July 1948), and established the Republic of South Korea on 15 August 1948. [56] Like-wise, in the Russian Korean Zone of Occupation, the USSR established a Communist North Korean Government[39]:26 led by the astute politician–soldier, Kim Il-sung.[33] Moreover, President Rhee's régime expelled Communists and leftists from Southern national politics; disenfranchised, they headed for the hills, to prepare guerrilla war against the US-sponsored ROK Government.[33]

As nationalists, Syngman Rhee and Kim Il-Sung each was intent upon reunifying Korea under his political system.[39]:27 Partly because they were the better-armed, the North Koreans could escalate the continual border skirmishes and raids, and then invade — with proper provocation — whereas South Korea, with limited US matériel could not match them.[39]:27 In that time, the US Government mistakenly believed that all Communists — regardless of nation and country — constituted a Communist bloc based in Moscow; thus the US misperceived the civil war between the Koreas, as a Soviet hegemonic manœuver in the Russo–American Cold War.

Course

The Fatherland Liberation War: North Korea invades

The United States received less than a fortnight's notice of the Korean War — the Chinese-authorised, North Korean invasion of South Korea on 25 June 1950. The CIA provided the early notice; before the war, in early 1950, CIA China station officer Douglas Mackiernan had got Chinese and North Korean intelligence forecasting the summer KPA invasion of the South. Earlier, after the US missions had left the Communist People's Republic of China, he volunteered to remain and get the intelligence. Afterwards, he and a team of CIA local mercenaries then escaped the Chinese, in a months-long horse trek across the Himalaya mountains; he was killed within miles of Lhasa city, Tibet — yet his team delivered the intelligence to headquarters. Thirteen days later, the North Korean People's Army (KPA) crossed the 38th-parallel border and invaded South Korea. MacKiernan was posthumously awarded the CIA Intelligence Star for valour.[57]

Under the guise of counter-attacking a South Korean provocation raid, the North Korean Army (KPA) crossed the 38th parallel, behind artillery cannonades, at Sunday dawn of 25 June 1950.[39]:14 The KPA said that Republic of Korea Army (ROK Army) troops, under command of the régime of the "bandit traitor Syngman Rhee", had crossed the border first — and that they would arrest and execute President Singman Rhee.[45] In the past year, both Korean armies had continually harrassed each other with skirmishes — and each continually raided the other country across the 38th-parallel border, as in a civil war.

Hours later, the United Nations Security Council unanimously condemned the North Korean invasion of the Republic of South Korea (ROK), with UNSC Resolution 82, so adopted despite the USSR, a veto-wielding power, boycotting the Council meetings since January — protesting that the (Taiwan) Republic of China, and not the (mainland) People's Republic of China held a permanent seat in the UN Security Council.[58] On 27 June 1950, President Truman ordered US air- and sea forces to help the South Korean régime. After debating the matter, the Security Council, on 27 June 1950, published Resolution 83 recommending member-state military assistance to the Republic of Korea. Incidentally, whilst awaiting the Council's fait accompli announcement to the UN, the Soviet Deputy Foreign Minister accused the US of starting armed intervention in behalf of South Korea.[59]

The USSR challenged the legitimacy of the UN-approved war, because (i) the ROK Army intelligence upon which Resolution 83 is based came from US Intelligence; (ii) North Korea (Democratic People's Republic of Korea) was not invited as a sitting temporary-member of the UN, which violated UN Charter Article 32; and (iii) the the Korean warfare is beyond UN Charter scope, because the initial North–South border fighting is classed as civil war. Moreover, the Soviet representative boycotted the UN to prevent Security Council action, to challenge the legitimacy of UN action; legal scholars posited that deciding upon an "action" required the unanimous vote of the five permanent members.[60][61]

The North Korean Army launched the "Fatherland Liberation War" with a comprehensive air–land invasion using only 231,000 soldiers, who captured scheduled objectives and territory — among them, Kaesŏng, Chuncheon, Uijeongbu, and Ongjin — which they achieved with 274 T-34-85 tanks, some 150 Yak fighters, 110 attack bombers, 200 artillery pieces, 78 Yak trainers, and 35 reconnaissance aeroplanes.[45] Additional to the invasion force, the KPA had 114 fighters, 78 bombers, 105 T-34-85 tanks, and some 30,000 soldiers stationed in North Korea.[45] The invasion's rapidity was feasible because of the KPA's flexible logistics system that transported matériel as the troops advanced. At sea, although comprising only several small warships, the North Korean and South Korean navies fought in the war as sea-borne artillery for their in-country armies.

In disproportionate contrast, the ROK Army defenders were unprepared. In South to the Naktong, North to the Yalu (1998), R.E. Applebaum reports the ROK forces' low combat-readiness on 25 June 1950. The ROK Army had 98,000 soldiers (65,000 combat, 33,000 support), no tanks, and a twenty-two piece air force comprising 12 liaison-type and 10 AT6 advanced-trainer aeroplanes. There were no large foreign military garrisons in Korea at invasion time — but there were large US garrisons and air forces in Japan.[45]

Within days of the invasion, masses of ROK Army soldiers — of dubious loyalty to the Syngman Rhee régime — either were retreating southwards or were defecting en masse to the Communist North, to the KPA.[39]:23 Throughout, the KPA air force continually bombed Kimpo Airport, at the capital city Seoul, which the KPA captured and occupied in the afternoon of 28 June 1950, the third day of the invasion. In supporting the infantry and tanks, the KPA air force dog-fought the ROK air force over Seoul: 37 ROK fighter planes to 9 KPA fighters. Two days later, on 30 June 1950, the KPA and the ROK Army fought their largest North–South-only battle: the North destroyed 89 tanks, 76 artillery pieces, 19 bombers, and 21 fighters, killed 7,000 and captured 16,000 ROK soldiers. Despite the immediate success, North Korean expectation of the summary surrender of President Syngman Rhee's Government — and thus of the definitive peninsular reunification of the Korean Fatherland — ended with the US-led UN participation in the war between the Koreas.[citation needed]

Police Action: the United States intervenes

Gen. MacArthur, UN Forces CiC (seated), observes the naval shelling of Incheon from aboard the USS Mt. McKinley, 15 September 1950.
US infantry light machinegun position, Korea, 1950–53.
Korean children pass an M-46 tank
A GI comforts a grief-stricken infantryman crying for a dead buddy.
Near Song Sil-li, a 6th Tank Bn. tank shoots the enemy, in support of the 19th RCT, 10 January 1952.

Despite the rapid post-war Allied demobilisations (a serious logistics problem for US forces in Asia), there were substantial US forces occupying Japan, and, under Gen. Douglas MacArthur's command, they could fight the North Koreans. [39]:42 In that time and place, besides the Americans, only the British Commonwealth could supply comparable military might.

On Saturday 24 June 1950, US Secretary of State Dean Acheson telephonically informed President Harry S. Truman, “Mr. President, I have very serious news. The North Koreans have invaded South Korea.” [62] [63] Truman and Acheson discussed a US invasion response with defence department principals, who agreed that the United States was obligated to repel military aggression, paralleling it with Adolf Hitler's 1930s aggressions, and said that the mistake of appeasement must not be repeated. [64] President Truman acknowledged that fighting the invasion was pertinent to the American global containment of Communism:

"Communism was acting in Korea, just as Hitler, Mussolini and the Japanese had ten, fifteen, and twenty years earlier. I felt certain that if South Korea was allowed to fall Communist leaders would be emboldened to override nations closer to our own shores. If the Communists were permitted to force their way into the Republic of Korea without opposition from the free world, no small nation would have the courage to resist threat and aggression by stronger Communist neighbors."[65]

He announced that the US would counter "unprovoked aggression" and "vigorously support the effort of the [UN] security council to terminate this serious breach of peace." [66] In Congress, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman, Gen. Omar Bradley warned against appeasement — that Korea was as good a place as any "for drawing the line" against International Communist expansion. In August of 1950, the President and the Secretary of State easily persuaded the Congress — who gave them $12 billion to pay for the additional Asian military expenses essential to the goals of National Security Council Report 68 (NSC-68), the global Containment of Communism. [67]

Per State Secretary Acheson's recommendation, President Truman ordered Gen. MacArthur to transfer matériel to the Army of the Republic of Korea (ROK Army) while giving air cover to the evacuation of US nationals. Moreover, the President disagreed with his advisors recommending unilateral US bombing of the North Korean forces, but did order the U.S. Seventh Fleet to protect Taiwan — Generalissimo Chiang Kai-Shek's China — whose Nationalist Government (confined to Formosa island) asked to fight in Korea. The Americans denied the Nationalist Chinese request for combat, lest it provoke a Communist Chinese intervention.[68]

The Battle of Osan was the first significant American–Korean fighting in the Korean War, by the 540-soldier Task Force Smith, 24th Infantry Division (Japan).[39]:45 On 5 July 1950, the US Army fought the North Korean People's Army (KPA) Army at Osan — and was immediately defeated: 1,416 dead and wounded, 785 taken prisoner.[39]:45-47 The victorious North Koreans progressed southwards, forcing the 24th Division's retreat to Taejeon, which the North also captured;[39]:48 the Division lost 3,602 dead and wounded and 2,962 GIs taken prisoner — including Maj. Gen. William F. Dean, the Division Commander.[39]:48 Overhead, the North Koreans shot down 18 US Air Force fighters and 29 bombers. The USAF shot down 5 North Korean fighters.

By August, the KPA had repelled the ROK Army and the U.S. Eighth Army, Gen. Walton Walker, Commanding, to the vicinity of Pusan city, in the southeast corner of peninsular Korea. [39]:53 In their southward advance, the North Koreans purged South Korea's intelligentsia — by capturing and killing civil servants and intellectuals. [39]:56 On 20 August, Gen. MacArthur warned KPA Leader Kim Il-Sung that he was responsible for atrocities committed against UN soldiers. [39][56]:56 By September, the US-led UN Forces controlled only the perimeter of Pusan city — about 10 per cent of the Korean peninsula. Only reinforced and re-equipped, and supported with naval artillery and air force bombing support, could the UN forces hold the line at the Nakdong River. In US military history, this "back-against-the-sea" holding action is known as the "Pusan Perimeter".

Escalation

US forces attack railroads south of Wonsan, on the east coast of North Korea.

In the desperate Battle of Pusan Perimeter (August–September 1950), the Americans withstood North Korean attacks meant to capture the city; they failed. Soon, the USAF interrupted North Korean logistics; 40 daily ground-support sorties with strategic bombers[citation needed] destroyed 32 bridges, stopping most daytime road and rail traffic.[39]:47-48 Hidden in tunnels by day, North Korean military and civil trains travelled only at night.[39]:66 To deny matériel to the North Korean forces, the USAF destroyed supply dumps, petroleum refineries, and harbours; the US Navy air forces attacked transport hubs. In consequence, the North Korean Army, over-extended throughout the peninsular south, could not be supplied.[39]:58

Meanwhile, US garrisons in Japan continually despatched soldiers and matériel to reinforce the Pusan Perimeter.[39]:59-60 Tank battalions went to Korea from San Francisco (in the continental US), and, by late August, Pusan was equipped with some 500 medium tanks.[39]:61 In early September 1950, UN–ROK forces were prepared, and out-numbered the North Koreans 180,000 to 100,000 soldiers, and then counter-attacked.[39][45]:61

Hanguk jeonjaeng: the ROK, US, and UN in North Korea

Against the rested, re-kitted, and re-armed Pusan Perimeter defenders and reinforcements, the KPA were under-manned and poorly supplied; worse, unlike the US, they lacked naval and air artillery support. [39]:61[39]:58 To relieve the Pusan Perimeter, the UN CIC, Gen. MacArthur, recommended an amphibious landing at Incheon, behind the KPA lines. [39]:67 On 6 July, he ordered Maj. Gen. Hobart Gay, Commander, 1st Cavalry Division, to plan his division's amphibious landing at Incheon; on 12–14 July, the 1st Cavalry Division embarked from Yokohama to reinforce the 24th Infantry Division.[2]

The Operation Chromite amphibious assault of Incheon deployed in violent tides, and was awaited by a strong, entrenched enemy.[39]:66-67 Soon after the war began, Gen. MacArthur had begun planning the matter — yet the Pentagon opposed him.[39]:67 In the event, when authorised, he activated his attack USMC-USA-ROKA force — the X Corps, Gen. Edward Almond, Commander, composed of 70,000 1st Marine Division infantry; the 7th Infantry Division; and some 8,600 ROK Army soldiers.[39]:68 By the 15 September attack date, the assault force faced relatively few, but tenacious, KPA defenders at Incheon; military intelligence, psychological operations, guerrilla reconnaissance, and protracted cannonades facilitated the US–ROK forces having a relatively-light battle with the KPA; although the US naval cannonades destroyed most of Incheon city.[39]:70

The Incheon landing, allowed the 1st Cavalry Division to begin its northward fighting from the Pusan Perimeter. "Task Force Lynch" — 3rd Bn, 7th Cav Rgt, and two 70th Tank Bn units (Charlie Company, Intelligence–Reconnaissance Platoon) — effected the "Pusan Perimeter Breakout" through 106.4 miles of enemy territory to join the 7th Infantry Division at Osan. [3] The X Corps rapidly defeated the KPA defenders, and threatened to trap the main KPA force in South Korea;[39]:71-72 Gen. MacArthur quickly recaptured Seoul;[39]:77 and the almost-isolated KPA rapidly retreated northwards, with only some 25,000 to 30,000 soldiers reaching the north.[69][70]

The UN invade North Korea

Urban combat: US Marines fight the KPA for the Korean capital.

The United Nations Command repelled the KPA northwards, past the 38th parallel, with the ROK Army crossing after them, into North Korea, on 1 October 1950. [39]:79-94 Six days later, on 7 October, per authorisations, the US and UN Command forces followed the ROK Army into North Korea. [39]:81 The X Corps landed at Wonsan (SE North Korea) and Iwon (NE North Korea), already captured by ROK Army forces. [39]:87-88 The Eighth US Army and the ROK Army drove up western Korea, and captured Pyongyang city, the North Korean capital, on 19 October 1950. [39]:90 At month’s end, the UN Command held 135,000 KPA prisoners of war; the North Korean People’s Army appeared to disintegrate.

To gain advantage of the strategic momentum, Gen. MacArthur (and others in the US Government), believed it necessary to extend the Korean War into China — North Korea's logistical fount — and destroy the PRC depots supplying the North Korean war effort. President Truman and other political leaders disagreed; Gen. MacArthur was ordered caution at the North Korea–China border.[39]:83

Enter the Dragon: the War to Resist America and Aid Korea

On 27 June 1950, two days after the war’s start and three months before the Chinese intervention to the Korean War (2 October 1950), President Truman despatched the 7th US Fleet to the Taiwan Straits, to protect the insular Nationalist Republic of China (Taiwan) from the Communist PRC. [71] On 4 August 1950, Mao Zedong reported to the Politburo that he would intervene upon the readiness of the People’s Volunteer Army to deploy. On 20 August 1950, Premier Zhou Enlai informed the United Nations that “Korea is China’s neighbor. ... The Chinese people cannot but be concerned about a solution of the Korean question” — thus, via neutral-country diplomats, the PRC warned the USA that they would intervene against the UN Command to safeguard the national security of the (year-old) PRC. [39]:83 President Truman interpreted the communication as “a bald attempt to blackmail the UN”, and dismissed it offhand.[72] The Politburo authorised the intervention on 2 October 1950 — the day after the ROK Army’s northward crossing of the 38th-parallel border.[73] Later, the PRC reported that the US had violated Chinese national airspace when en route to bombing North Korea, before China intervened in Korea.[74]

US artillerymen fire a 105mm howitzer, Uirson, Korea, August 1950.
US Marines (1st Marine Div) capture PVA soldiers during combat in the central front, Hoengsong, Korea, 2 March 1951.

In September, PRC Premier Zhou Enlai added diplomatic and personal force to Mao’s cabled arguments to Stalin in Moscow for requested assistance and matériel; the awaiting Mao re-scheduled launching the “War to Resist America and Aid Korea” from the 13th to the 19th of October 1950. Moreover, the USSR limited their assistance to air support no closer than 60 miles (100km) from the infantry battlefront — because Soviet pilots were to fight in the aerial warfare. Despite the Soviet half-portion to the Chinese request — the Soviet Air Force MiG-15 jet aeroplanes (camouflaged as PRC Air Force) were a serious combat challenge for the UN Command air forces. To wit, one area of sky, pilots nick-named “MiG Alley”: the PRC MiGs were superior to the USAF Lockheed F-80 Shooting Star jets — until the North American F-86 Sabre arrived.

On 8 October 1950, the day after the US Army’s northward crossing of the 38th-parallel border into North Korea, Mao Zedong assembled the Chinese People's Volunteer Army (70 per cent drawn from the People's Liberation Army), who were to fight the “War to Resist America and Aid Korea”, and ordered them to the Yalu River, and be at the ready to go across the river and into the trees.[citation needed] The Soviet matériel would make the Chinese intervention a strategic manœuver furthering Asian Communist revolutionary power; Mao told Stalin: “If we allow the United States to occupy all of Korea, Korean revolutionary power will suffer a fundamental defeat, and the American invaders will run more rampant, and have negative effects for the entire Far East.”

Despite the over-sized, First World War–style infantry formations fighting the war, US MI aerial reconnaissance had difficulty sighting PVA units in day time, because their march and bivouac discipline minimized aerial detection. [39]:102 The PVA marched “dark-to-dark” (19:00–03:00hrs), and aerial camouflage defences, concealing every soldier, pack animal, and equipment, where deployed by 05:30hrs. Meanwhile, daylight advance parties scouted for the next bivouac site. When soldiers had to move or march by day, if an aeroplane appeared, everyone was to remain motionless ’til the threat flew away; [39]:102 PVA officers might shoot security violators. [45] Such battlefield discipline allowed a three division-army to march 286 miles (460km), from An-tung (Manchuria), north of the Yalu River, to its Korean combat zone, in some 19 days; another division, night-marched a circuitous mountain route, averaging 18 miles (29km) daily for 18 days.

Meanwhile, on 10 October, the 89th Tank Battalion was attached to the 1st Cavalry Division, increasing the armour available for the Northern Offensive. On 15 October, after moderate KPA resistance, the 7th Cavalry Regiment and Charlie Company, 70th Tank Battalion captured Namchonjam city. On 17 October, they flanked right-wards, away from the principal road (to Pyongyang), to capture Hwangju. Two days later, on 19 October, 1950, 1st Cavalry Division captured Pyongyang, the North Korean capital city.

Elsewhere, also on 15 October 1950, President Truman and Gen. MacArthur met at Wake Island in the mid–Pacific Ocean, to a meeting much publicised by the General’s discourteous refusal to meet the President in the US — because he was busy with the war. [39]:88 To Truman, Gen. MacArthur speculated there was little risk of Chinese intervention to Korea; [39]:89 that the PRC’s opportunity for aiding the KPA had elapsed. He estimated that the PRC had 300,000 soldiers in Manchuria, and some 100,000–125,000 soldiers at the Yalu River, concluding that half might cross south, but that “if the Chinese tried to get down to Pyongyang, there would be the greatest slaughter” without air force protection. [69][75]

In the War to Resist America and Aid Korea, the first Chinese–American fighting occurred on 1 November 1950; deep in North Korea, thousands of PVA soldiers encircled and attacked scattered US, UN, and ROK Army units with three prongs — from the north, northwest, and west — and over-ran the defensive-position flanks. [76] Then, in late November 1950, in the west, the PVA attacked along the Chongchon River, and over-ran several ROK Army divisions and the flank of the remaining UN forces. [39]:98-99 The US Eighth Army’s ensuing retreat is the longest in US Army history, [77] made feasible by the Turkish Brigade’s successful, but very costly, rear-guard delaying action at Kunuri — near China — slowing the PVA attack for some 4 days, (26–30 November). In the east, at the Battle of Chosin Reservoir, a US 7th Infantry Division Regimental Combat Team (3000 soldiers) and a USMC division (12,000–15,000 marines) also unprepared for the Chinese encirclement tactics escaped — with X Corps covering- and artillery support fire — albeit with some 15,000 casualties, for all three units. [78]

Initially, front-line PVA infantry had neither heavy fire-support nor crew-served light infantry weapons, but quickly took advantage of their disadvantage; in How Wars Are Won: The 13 Rules of War from Ancient Greece to the War on Terror (2003), historian Bevin Alexander reports:

The usual method was to infiltrate small units, from a platoon of fifty men to a company of 200, split into separate detachments. While one team cut off the escape route of the Americans, the others struck both the front and the flanks in concerted assaults. The attacks continued on all sides until the defenders were destroyed or forced to withdraw. The Chinese then crept forward to the open flank of the next platoon position, and repeated the tactics.

In South to the Naktong, North to the Yalu (1998), R.E. Appleman delineates the PVA’s encirclement attack:

In the First Phase Offensive, highly-skilled enemy light infantry troops had carried out the Chinese attacks, generally unaided by any weapons larger than mortars. Their attacks had demonstrated that the Chinese were well-trained, disciplined fire fighters, and particularly adept at night fighting. They were masters of the art of camouflage. Their patrols were remarkably successful in locating the positions of the UN forces. They planned their attacks to get in the rear of these forces, cut them off from their escape and supply roads, and then send in frontal and flanking attacks to precipitate the battle. They also employed a tactic, which they termed Hachi Shiki, which was a V-formation into which they allowed enemy forces to move [in]; the sides of the V then closed around their enemy, while another force moved below the mouth of the V to engage any forces attempting to relieve the trapped unit. Such were the tactics the Chinese used with great success at Onjong, Unsan, and Ch’osan, but with only partial success at Pakch’on and the Ch’ongch’on bridgehead. [45]

In late November, the PVA repelled the US, Un, and ROK forces in northeast North Korea south of the 38th-parallel border. Retreating from the peninsular north faster than they had (counter-) invaded it, they raced to the North Korean east coat to establish a defensive perimeter of the port city Hungnam — and await eventual evacuation, in December 1950. [39]:104-111 In the event, 193 shiploads of US, UN, and ROK forces and matériel — ca. 105,000 soldiers, 98,000 civilians, 17,500 vehicles, 350,000 tons of supplies — embarked to Pusan, at the far-southern-end of peninsular Korea, [39]:110 before departing, the retreating US, UN, and ROK forces’ scorched-earth denial operation razed most of Hungam city. [69][79]

Aftermath of Chosin Battle-Operation Glory

Following the conflict, the United Nations dead were buried at a temporary gravesite near Hŭngnam. Operation Glory occurred from July to November 1954, during which the dead of each side were exchanged; remains of 4,167 U.S. soldiers and marines were exchanged for 13,528 North Korean and Chinese dead. In addition, 546 civilians who died in United Nations prisoner of war camps were turned over to the South Korean government.[80] After "Operation Glory" 416 Korean War "unknowns" were buried in the Punchbowl Cemetery. According to a DPMO white paper[81] 1,394 names were also transmitted during "Operation Glory" from the Chinese and North Koreans (of which 858 names proved to be correct); of the 4,167 returned remains were found to be 4,219 individuals of whom 2,944 were found to be Americans of whom all but 416 were identified by name. Of 239 Korean War casualties unaccounted for: 186 not associated with Punchbowl unknowns (176 were identified and of the remaining 10 cases 4 were non-Americans of Asiatic descent; one was British; 3 were identified and 2 cases unconfirmed). In 1990-1994 North Korea excavated and returned more than 200 sets of remains-very few have been identified because of co-mingling of remains.[82] From 1996 to 2006 220 remains were recovered from near the Chinese border.[83]

Fighting across the 38th Parallel (early 1951)

B-26 Invaders bomb supply warehouses in Wonsan, North Korea, 1951.

In January 1951, the Chinese and North Korean forces struck again in their 3rd Phase Offensive (also known as the Chinese Winter Offensive). The Chinese repeated their previous tactics of mostly night attacks, with a stealthy approach from positions some distance from the front, followed by a rush with overwhelming numbers, and using trumpets or gongs both for communication and to disorient their foes. Against this the UN forces had no remedy, and their resistance crumbled; they retreated rapidly to the south (referred to by UN forces as the "bug-out").[39]:117 Seoul was abandoned and was captured by communist forces on January 4, 1951.

To add to the Eighth Army's difficulties, General Walker was killed in an accident.[39]:111 He was replaced by a World War II airborne veteran, Lieutenant-General Matthew Ridgway, who took immediate steps to raise the morale and fighting spirit of the battered Eighth Army, which had fallen to low levels during its retreat.[39]:113 Nevertheless, the situation was so grim that MacArthur mentioned the use of atomic weapons against China, much to the alarm of America's allies.[citation needed]

UN forces continued to retreat until they had reached a line south of Suwon in the west and Wonju in the center, and north of Samchok in the east, where the front stabilized.[39]:117 The People's Volunteer Army had outrun its supply line and was forced to recoil.[39]:118 The Chinese could not go beyond Seoul because they were at the end of their logistics supply line[citation needed] — all food and ammunition had to be carried at night on foot or bicycle from the Yalu River.

In late January, finding the lines in front of his forces deserted, Ridgway ordered reconnaissance in force, which developed into a full-scale offensive, Operation Roundup.[39]:121 The operation was planned to proceed gradually, to make full use of the UN's superiority in firepower on the ground and in the air;[39]:120 by the time Roundup was completed in early February, UN forces had reached the Han River and re-captured Wonju.[39]:121

The Chinese struck back in mid-February with their Fourth Phase Offensive, from Hoengsong in the center against IX Corps positions around Chipyong-ni.[39]:121 A short but desperate siege there fought by units of the U.S. 2nd Infantry Division, including the French Battalion, broke up the offensive;[39]:121 in this action, the UN learned how to deal with Chinese offensive tactics and be able to stand their ground.

Roundup was followed in the last two weeks of February 1951, with Operation Killer, by a revitalized Eighth Army, restored by Ridgway to fighting trim.[39]:121 This was a full-scale offensive across the front, again staged to maximize firepower and with the aim of destroying as much of the Chinese and North Korean armies as possible.[39]:121 By the end of Killer, I Corps had re-occupied all territory south of the Han, while IX Corps had captured Hoengsong.[39]:122

On March 7, 1951, the Eighth Army pushed forward again, in Operation Ripper, and on March 14 they expelled the North Korean and Chinese troops from Seoul, the fourth time in a year the city had changed hands.[39]:122 Seoul was in utter ruins; its prewar population of 1.5 million had dropped to 200,000, with severe food shortages.[70]

MacArthur was removed from command by President Truman on April 11, 1951 for insubordination, setting off a firestorm of protest back in the U.S.[39]:123-127 The new supreme commander was Ridgway, who had managed to regroup UN forces for the series of effective counter-offensives.[39]:127 Command of Eighth Army passed to General James Van Fleet.[39]:130

A Chinese soldier killed by U.S. Marines of 1st Marine Division during an attack on Hill 105 in 1951

A further series of attacks slowly drove back the communist forces, such as Operations Courageous and Tomahawk, a combined ground- and air-assault to trap communist forces between Kaesong and Seoul. UN forces continued to advance until they reached Line Kansas, some miles north of the 38th parallel.[39]:131

The Chinese were far from beaten, however; In April 1951 they launched their Fifth Phase Offensive (also called the Chinese Spring Offensive).[39]:131 This was a major effort, involving three field armies (up to 700,000 men).[39]:132 The main blow fell on I Corps, but fierce resistance in battles at the Imjin River and Kapyong, blunted its impetus, and the Chinese were halted at a defensive line north of Seoul (referred to as the No-Name Line).[39]:133-134

A further Communist offensive in the east against ROK and X Corps on May 15 also made initial gains, but by May 20 the attack had ground to a halt.[39]:136-137 Eighth Army counterattacked and by the end of May had regained Line Kansas.[39]:137-138

The decision by UN forces to halt at Line Kansas, just north of the 38th Parallel, and not to persist in offensive action into North Korea, ushered in the period of stalemate which typified the remainder of the conflict.

Stalemate (July 1951–July 1953)

The rest of the war involved little territory change,[39]:175-177 large-scale bombing of the north,[39]:175-177 and lengthy peace negotiations, which began on July 10, 1951 at Kaesong.[39]:145 Even during the peace negotiations, combat continued. For the South Korean and allied forces, the goal was to recapture all of South Korea before an agreement was reached in order to avoid loss of any territory.[39]:159 The Chinese and North Koreans attempted similar operations, and later in the war they undertook operations designed to test the resolve of the UN to continue the conflict. Principal military engagements in this period included the Battle of Bloody Ridge[39]:160 and Battle of Heartbreak Ridge[39]:161-162 in 1951, the Battle of Old Baldy, the Battle of White Horse, the Battle of Triangle Hill and the Battle of Hill Eerie in 1952, the sieges of Outpost Harry, the Battle of the Hook and the battle for Pork Chop Hill in 1953.

Territory changed hands in the early part of the war until the front stabilized.

The peace negotiations went on for two years,[39]:144-153 first at Kaesong, and later at Panmunjon.[39]:147 A major issue of the negotiations was repatriation of POWs.[39]:187-199 The Communists agreed to voluntary repatriation but only if the majority would return to China or North Korea, something that did not occur.[39]:189-190 Since many refused to be repatriated to the communist North Korea and China, the war continued until the Communists eventually dropped this issue.[39]:242-245

In October 1951, U.S. forces performed Operation Hudson Harbor intending to establish the capability to use nuclear weapons. Several B-29s conducted individual simulated bomb runs from Okinawa to North Korea, delivering "dummy" nuclear bombs or heavy conventional bombs; the operation was coordinated from Yokota Air Base in Japan. The battle exercise was intended to test "actual functioning of all activities which would be involved in an atomic strike, including weapons assembly and testing, leading, ground control of bomb aiming," and so on. The results indicated that nuclear bombs would be less effective than anticipated, because "timely identification of large masses of enemy troops was extremely rare."[84][85][86][87][88]

On November 29, 1952, U.S. President-elect Dwight D. Eisenhower fulfilled a campaign promise by going to Korea to find out what could be done to end the conflict.[39]:240 With the UN's acceptance of India's proposal for a Korean armistice, a cease-fire was established on July 27, 1953, by which time the front line was back around the proximity of the 38th parallel, and so a demilitarized zone (DMZ) was established around it, presently defended by North Korean troops on one side and by South Korean, American and UN troops on the other. The DMZ runs north of the parallel towards the east, and to the south as it travels west. The site of the peace talks, Kaesong, the old capital of Korea, was part of the South before hostilities broke out but is now part of the North. North Korea and the United States signed the Armistice Agreement, with Syngman Rhee refusing to sign.[89]

Memorials to those who died can be found in many countries such as this one in Pretoria for South African casualties.

The total numbers of casualties suffered by all parties involved may never be known. Each country's self-reported casualties were largely based upon troop movements, unit rosters, battle casualty reports, and medical records.

The Western numbers of Chinese and/or North Korean casualties are based primarily on battle reports of estimated casualties, interrogation of POWs and captured documents. Most scholars provide a wide range of estimates on the number of death and wounded. A good compilation of these sources is in the democide web site (see Table 10.1).[90] US sources state that the number of American Korean area deaths were 36,940.[91] These sources state that Chinese deaths ranged from 100,000 to 1,500,000; most estimates are in the 400,000 range. The North Korean battle dead estimates were 214,000 to 520,000; the most common estimates were in the 500,000 range. South Korean civilian estimated deaths were in the 245,000 to 415,000 dead. Total civilian deaths were in the 1,500,000 to 3,000,000 range with most estimates in the 2,000,000 range.

The Chinese estimation of UN casualties states that the joint declaration of the Chinese People's Volunteers and the Korean People's Army said their forces "eliminated 1.09 million enemy forces, including 390,000 from the United States, 660,000 from South Korean, and 29,000 from other countries." The vague "eliminated" number gave no details to that of dead, wounded and captured. Regarding their own casualties, the same source said that "the Chinese People's Volunteers suffered 148,000 deaths altogether (among which 114,000 died in combat, incidents, and winterkill, 21,000 died after being hospitalized and 13,000 died from diseases); 380,000 were wounded and 29,000 missing, including 21,400 POWs (of whom 14,000 were sent to Taiwan, 7,110 were repatriated)." This same source concluded with these numbers for North Korean casualties, "the Korean People's Army had 290,000 casualties and 90,000 POWs; there was a large number of civilian deaths in the northern part of Korea, but no accurate figures were available."[92]

The casulties of the various UN forces are listed in the infobox, along with their estimates of Chinese and North Korean casualties.

Characteristics

Armoured warfare

Supporting the 8th ROK Army Division, a US Sherman tank fires its 76mm gun at KPA bunkers on “Napalm Ridge”, Korea, 11 May 1952.
US infantrymen comparing the early-model M9 bazooka to the larger M20 model.

Initially, North Korean armour dominated the battlefield with Soviet Type 58 medium tanks designed in the Second World War. [93] The KPA’s tanks confronted a tank-less, unarmoured ROK Army armed with few modern anti-tank weapons, [39]:39 which were WWII-model 2.36-inch (60mm) M9 bazookas, effective only against the 45mm lateral armour of the T-34-58 tank. Moreover, the US forces arriving to Korea were equipped with light M24 Chaffee tanks (on Japan-occupation duty) that also proved ineffective against the larger KPA T-34 tanks.[citation needed]

During the initial hours of warfare, some under-equipped ROK Army border units used 105mm howitzers as anti-tank guns to stop the tanks heading the KPA columns, firing high-explosive anti-tank ammunition (HEAT) over open sights (point-blank range) to good effect; at war’s start, the ROK Army had 91 such cannon, but lost most to the invaders. [94]

Countering the initial combat imbalance, the US and UN Command reinforcement matériel included heavier US M4 Sherman, M26 Pershing, M46 Patton, and British Centurion tanks that proved effective against North Korean armour, challenging its battlefield dominance. [39]:182-184 Unlike in the Second World War (1939–45), wherein the tank proved a decisive weapon in the open-country, air–land battles fought the Allies and the Axis fought in the European plains, the Korean War (1950–53) featured few open-country tank battles — principally disallowed by the mountainous, heavily-forested land; in Korean warfare, cavalry mostly supported infantry.

Aerial warfare

In MiG Alley, a MiG-15 shot down by an F-86.
In the Korean War, the NKAF shot down some 16 B-29 bombers

The Korean War is among the last twentieth-century wars featuring propeller-powered aeroplanes — i.e. the air force fighters P-51 Mustang, F4U Corsair, Hawker Sea Fury, and the Supermarine Seafire, [39]:174 whose battle-front presence owed to military logistics practice, using extant stocks ’til delivery of the new equipment, hence, turbojet–powered fighter aeroplanes, such as the F-80 Shooting Star and the F9F Panther soon arrived to dominate the battlefield skies by out-fighting North Korea’s propeller-powered air force of Yakovlev Yak-9 and Lavochkin La-9 aeroplanes. [39]:182

Beginning in late 1950, the Korean People's Air Force (KPAF) began flying the Soviet MiG-15 jet. Seeking combat experience, Soviet Air Force pilots fought missions against the US air forces, to learn the West’s aerial combat techniques. The USSR’s direct aerial participation in the Korean War is a casus belli that the UN Command overlooked, lest the war in and for the Korean peninsula expand — as the US initially feared — to include three Communist countries, North Korea, the Soviet Union, and China, and so escalate from conventional to atomic warfare; a rule-of-war, agreed aforehand by the US and the UN. [39]:182 At first, UN Command air force fighters, including the Royal Australian Air Force Gloster Meteors, successfully countered the Soviet aircraft, however, the superior MiGs out-flew the first-generation jets of the UN Command in the early war. [95]

In December 1950, the U.S. Air Force (USAF) deployed the F-86 Sabre to counter the MiG-15. [39]:183 Although the MiG flew higher — (50,000 vs. 42,000 feet (12,800 m) — an advantage at the start of combat, however, in level flight, the aeroplanes’ maximum speeds were comparable — ca. 660 mph (1,060 km/h); the MiG climbed faster, the Sabre turned and dove better. Armaments-wise, the MiG carried two 23mm- and one 37mm cannon, the Sabre carried six .50 calibre (12.7mm) machine guns aimed with radar-ranged gunsights. Moreover, in the (new) jet-powered aerial warfare of the mid-twentieth century, US pilots had the biomedical piloting advantage of the anti-G suit (first deployed for this war), allowing pilots greater control over (not) fainting from the g-forces of dog-fighting. Despite its advantages against the MiG, the F-86 Sabre required much maintenance, a technical matter grounding much of the UN Command’s air force strength.[citation needed]

By early 1951, the battle lines were established, and changed little until 1953. In summer and autumn of 1951, the outnumbered USAF F-86 Sabres — only 44 at one point — of the 4th Fighter Wing continued seeking battle in MiG Alley, near the River Yalu, against Chinese and North Korean air forces capable of deploying some 500 aircraft. Following Colonel Harrison Thyng’s communication with the Pentagon, the 51st Fighter Interceptor Wing reinforced the beleaguered 4th Fighter Wing in December 1951; for the next year-and-a-half stretch of the war, aerial warfare continued so. [96]

Despite the advanced F-86 Sabre jet fighter aeroplane, UN Command pilots continued struggling to match, out-fight, and defeat the Soviet-piloted MiG-15s of the NPAF.[citation needed] In the event, the UN gradually (mostly) gained Korean battlefield air superiority ’til war’s end, decisive for the UN Command, first, to attack into the peninsular north, and second, to resist the Chinese intervention to the Korean War. [39]:182-184 North Korea and China also had jet-powered air forces, however, their limited training and experience made it strategically untenable to lose them against the better-trained US and UN Command air forces. In the event, as the US and the USSR fed matériel to their Korean proxy war, they found themselves virtually matched, technologically, when the USAF deployed the F-86F against the MiG-15, late in 1952.

Post-war, the USAF reported 792 MiG-15s and 108 other aeroplanes shot sown by F-86 Sabres versus 78 Sabres shot down by the Soviets and North Koreans, a 10:1 kill-ratio;[citation needed] some post-war research confirms only 379 USAF kills. The Soviet Air Force reported some 1,100 air-to-air victories, and 335 MiG combat losses. The PRC air force reported 231 aeroplanes, mostly MiG-15s, lost in aerial combat, and 168 other aircraft lost. The KPAF reported no data, but the UN Command calculates the KPA lost some 200 aircraft in the war’s first stage, and 70 other aircraft after the Chinese intervention. The USAF doubts Soviet claims of 650 victories against F-86 Sabres, and Chinese claims of defeating 211 F-86 aeroplanes. Recent published US figures cite 674 F-86s in Korea in the war,[citation needed] and total losses were some 230. [97] Comparing F-86 Sabre and MiG losses must include the aeroplane’s purpose; MiG primary targets were B-29 Superfortress bombers and ground-attack fighter-bombers; F-86 Sabre primary targets were the MiG-15s.

The helicopter came into its military own in the Korean War. A US Navy Sikorsky H-19 Chickasaw flying near an aircraft carrier. [98][99]

Moreover, the aerial warfare of the Korean War (1950–53) featured the initial combat service support deployment of the helicopter as an ambulance, replacing the jeep as the principal out-of-battlefield transport for wounded soldiers. [98] In the Second World War (1939–45), the YR-4 helicopter saw limited aerial-ambulance work, but in the Korean War — where terrain trumped the jeep as the speedy, wounded-soldier transport to hospital — [100] helicopters — e.g. the Sikorsky H-19 — partly assumed the medical evacuation (medevac) function in the battlefield, from the litter, the truck, and the jeep. [101] The helicopter proved militarily valuable to the US in Korea, as the practical, combat-testing of the post-war technologic developments in rotary-wing aircraft occurred since 1945. The limitations of jet aeroplanes as aerial support artillery identified the close air support functionality of the helicopter, leading to development of helicopter gunships (e.g. the AH-1 Cobra), that featured in the US–Vietnam War (1965–75). [98]

Bombing Campaigns

The bombing of cities and villages in North Korea and partially in South Korea was comparable to that having occurred in Germany and Japan during World War 2. Remarkably, napalm was used widely for the first time. On August 12 1950 the US Air Force dropped 625 tons of bombs on North Korea. Two weeks later, the daily load amounted to about 800 tons. 18 of North Korea's cities were more than 50% destroyed. General William Dean, who had been in North Korean captivity, reported that most of the North Korean cities and villages he had seen were in ruins or were simply snow-covered wastelands.[102]

Naval warfare

To disrupt North Korean communications, the USS Missouri fires a salvo from its 16-inch guns, Chong Jin, North Korea, 21 October 1950.

Because the North Korean navy was not large, the Korean War features few naval battles; mostly the combatant navies served as naval artillery for their in-country armies. The significant naval battle between North Korea and the UN Command occurred on 2 July 1950; the the US Navy cruiser Juneau, the Royal Navy cruiser Jamaica, and the frigate Black Swan fought four North Korean torpedo boats and two mortar gunboats, and sank them.

The UN Command navies sank supply and ammunition ships to deny the sea to North Korea. The Juneau sank ammunition ships that had been present in her previous battle. The last sea battle of the Korean War occurred at Inchon, days before the Battle of Incheon; the ROK ship PC 703 sank a North Korean mine-layer and three other ships in the Yellow Sea. [103]

Korean atomic warfare

In The Origins of the Korean War (1981, 1990), US historian Bruce Cumings reports that in a 30 November 1950 press conference, President Truman's allusions to possibly attacking the invading North Korean forces with atomic bombs "was a threat based on contingency planning to use the bomb, rather than the faux pas so many assumed it to be." The President sought Gen. MacArthur's dismissal from Korean war command because his insubordination demonstrated his political unreliablity as a US Army officer: Gen. MacArthur might disobey the the US civil government about using or not using atomic bombs. Also on 30 November 1950, the USAF Strategic Air Command was ordered to "augment its capacities, and that this should include atomic capabilities." In the Korean War, the US escalated closest to atomic warfare in April 1951, because the Chinese had amassed new armies at the Sino–Korean frontier; thus, at the Kadena USAF Base, Okinawa, the bomb-assembly pits became operational and crews assembled atomic bombs for the Korean War, "lacking only the essential nuclear cores."

On 5 April 1950, the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) issued orders for retaliatory atomic-bombing of Chinese military bases in Manchuria, if either their armies crossed into Korea or if PRC- or KPA bombers attacked Korea from there. The President had ordered transferred nine Mark-IV nuclear capsules "to the Air Force's Ninth Bomb Group, the designated carrier of the weapons" and "signed an order to use them against Chinese and Korean targets." President Truman never transmitted said order, because he had politically out-witted the JCS to agreeing to sack the insubordinate Soldier MacArthur (announced 10 April 1950), and because neither the USSR nor the PRC escalated the war.[46][verification needed]

Moreover (and contradictorily), President Truman then remarked that his government were actively considering using the atomic bomb to end the war in Korea (implying that Gen. MacArthur would control it), but that only he — the US President — commanded atomic bomb use, and that he had not given authorisation. For the matter of atomic warfare was solely a US decision, not the collective decision of the UN. Hence his 4 December 1950 meeting with UK PM Clement Attlee (and Commonwealth spokesman), French Premier René Pleven, and Foreign Minister Robert Schuman to discuss their worries about Korean atomic warfare. The Indian Ambassador, Pannikkar, reports, "that Truman announced that he was thinking of using the atom bomb in Korea. But the Chinese seemed totally unmoved by this threat ... The propaganda against American aggression was stepped up. The Aid Korea to resist America campaign was made the slogan for increased production, greater national integration, and more rigid control over anti-national activities. One could not help feeling that Truman's threat came in very useful to the leaders of the Revolution, to enable them to keep up the tempo of their activities."[69][104][105]

Six days later, on 6 December 1950, after the Chinese intervention repelled the US–UN and ROK armies to retreat from northern North Korea, Gen. J. Lawton Collins (Army Chief of Staff), Gen. MacArthur, Admiral C. Turner Joy, and Gen. George E. Stratemeyer, and staff officers Maj. Gen. Doyle Hickey, Maj. Gen. Charles A. Willoughby, and Maj. Gen. Edwin K. Wright, met in Tokyo to plan strategy against the Chinese. They composed three atomic warfare hypotheses comprehending the next weeks and the next months.[69] In the first, if the Chinese continue their full attack — but the UN Command is forbidden from blockading and attacking China by sea and air, and without Chiang Kai-shek's Nationalist Chinese reinforcements, and no increase to Gen. MacArthur's US forces until April 1951, when four divisions of National Guard soldiers might be sent to him, then atomic weapons might be used in North Korea.[69] In the second, if the Chinese continue their full attack — but the UN Command has blockaded China and has regular aerial reconnaissance and effectively bombs the Chinese interior, and the Nationalist Chinese soldiers are maximally exploited, and tactical atomic-bombing is to hand, Gen. MacArthur could hold positions in far north Korea.[69] In the third, if the Chinese agree not to cross the 38th parallel, Gen. MacArthur recommends that he UN should accept an armistice disallowing Chinese and North Korean troops south of the 38th parallel, and requiring their guerrillas to withdraw north. The US Eighth Army remains protecting the Seoul–Inch'on area, while X Corps retreats to Pusan. A UN commission should supervise implementation of armistice.[69]

Although the US planned atomic warfare in the Korean War, President Truman did not immediately threaten it after the Chinese intervention, but 45 days later, he remarked about using the atomic bomb only after the Chinese army had repelled the UN Forces to retreat. Gen. MacArthur et al. did not compose the atomic warfare scenarios until after the President's remark during the 30 November 1950 press conference. The US decision to forgo atomic warfare was not because of "a disinclination by the USSR and PRC to escalate" the Korean War — but because of UN Ally pressures, notably the UK, the Commonwealth, and France, worried about the geopolitical imbalance wherein NATO would be defenceless whilst the US fought China, who then might persuade the USSR to conquer Western Europe.[69][106]

War crimes

Crimes against civilians

MEMO (25 Jul ’50) to Gen. Timberlake, USAF; SUBJECT: Policy on Strafing Civilian Refugees:
It is reported that large groups of civilians, either composed of or controlled by North Korean soldiers, are infiltrating U.S. positions. The army has requested we strafe all civilian refugee parties approaching our positions. To date, we have complied with the army request in this respect.
It recommends a revised policy and practice.
Prisoners killed by retreating KPA, Daejeon, South Korea, October 1950.

On conquering a place, North Korean Army political officers then purged South Korean society of its intelligentsia, by assassinating every educated person — academic, governmental, religious — who might lead resistance against the North; the purges continued during NPA retreat.[107] Like-wise, in combating enemy infiltration — immediately after the invasion in June of 1950 — the South Korean Government ordered the nation-wide "pre-emptive apprehension" of politically-suspect (disloyal) citizens. In the event, the military police and Right-wing paramilitary (civilian) armies — abetted by the US — summarily executed thousands of Left-wing and Communist political prisoners at Daejeon Prison and in the Cheju Uprising (1948–49).[108] US diplomat Gregory Henderson, then in Korea, calculates some 100,000 pro–North political prisoners were killed and buried in mass graves. Contemporarily, the South Korean Truth and Reconciliation Commission received reports of some 7,800 civilian killings, in 150 places, occurred before and during the war.

Besides uniformed campaign combat, North Korean soldiers also fought the US–UN forces by tactically infiltrating guerrillas among refugees — who (usually) could approach soldiers for food and help in a battlefield; for a time, US troops fought under a "shoot-first-ask-questions-later" policy against every civilian-refugee approaching US battlefield positions; an unwise tactical carte blanche that led combat-weary US soldiers to indiscriminately kill some 400 civilians at No Gun Ri (26–29 July 1950), in central Korea.[109][110]

The warfare of the Korean armies included forcibly conscripting the available civil men and women to their war efforts. In Statistics of Democide (1997), Prof. R. J. Rummel reports that the North Korean Army conscripted some 400,000 South Korean citizens.[107] The South Korean Government reported that before the US re-captured Seoul, in September 1950, the North abducted some 83,000 citizens; the North says they defected.[111][112]

Bodo League massacre

South Korea massacred civilians who were suspected as members of the Bodo League. The casualties were from 10,000 to 100,000 (see Wiki Link on Bodo League massacre), other estimates say the casualties were 200,000 to 1,200,000.[113]

At least 100,000 people were hastily shot by the South Korean authorities and dumped into makeshift trenches, abandoned mines or the sea before and after North Korea invaded the south in June 1950. Declassified records show U.S. officers were present at one of these sites and that at least one U.S. officer sanctioned another mass political execution if prisoners otherwise would be freed by the North Koreans. Uncounted hundreds were subsequently killed, witnesses reported. Some mass killings were carried out before the war; many came in the first weeks after the June 25, 1950, invasion, and others occurred later in 1950 when U.S. and South Korean forces recaptured Seoul and the southerners rounded up and shot alleged northern collaborators.[114]

The South Korean Truth and Reconciliation Commission[115] says petitions relating to executions of leftists outnumber by 6-to-1 those dealing with right-wingers' deaths. It should be noted that this figure reflects the absence of North Korean participation in the Commission. Survivor Kim Jong-chol, 71, reported his experience in Namyangju as follows;

When the people from the other side (North Korea) came here, they didn't kill many people," he said, contrasting that with "indiscriminate" killing by southern authorities.
 
— Kim Jong-chol[114]

The AP has reported that declassified U.S. military documents show U.S. Army officers took photos of the assembly line-style executions outside the central city of Daejeon, where the commission believes 3,000 to 7,000 people were shot and dumped into mass graves in early July 1950. Other once-secret files show that a U.S. Army lieutenant colonel reported giving approval to the killing of 3,500 political prisoners by a South Korean army unit he was advising in Busan, if the North Koreans approached that southern port city, formerly spelled Pusan.[114] The files show the U.S. command was aware in other ways as well of the organized bloodbaths.[citation needed] Although at the time U.S. diplomats reported confidentially they had urged restraint on the South Koreans, there was no sign the U.S. military, with formal command over the southerners, tried to halt the mass executions.[114]

Prisoners of war

A summarily-executed US Army PoW.

As with the ideological raisons d'etre fueling the Korean War, the combatants — North Korea, South Korea, the US–UN — each treated prisoners of war (PoWs) differently; notwithstanding the Geneva Convention. To wit, the US reported that North Korea mistreated prisoners of war: soldiers were beaten, starved, put to forced labor, marched to death, and summarily executed;[116] [117] PoWs were killed at the battles at Hill 312, Hill 303, Pusan Perimeter, Daejeon — discovered during early US–UN and ROK after-battle "mop-up" actions. Later, a US Congress war crimes investigation, the United States Senate Subcommittee on Korean War Atrocities of the Permanent Subcommittee of the Investigations of the Committee on Government Operations reported that "... two-thirds of all American prisoners of war in Korea died as a result of war crimes".[118][119][120]

The North Korean Government reported some 70,000 ROK Army PoWs; 8,000 were repatriated. South Korea repatriated 76,000 Korean People's Army (KPA) PoWs.[121] Besides the 12,000 US–UN Forces PoWs dead in captivity, the KPA might have press-ganged some 50,000 ROK PoWs into the North Korean military.[107] Per the South Korean Ministry of Defense, by 2008 there yet were some 560 Korean War POWs detained in North Korea; from 1994 'ntil 2003, some 30 ROK PoWs escaped the North.[122] The North Korean Government denied having PoWs from the Korean War, and, via the Korean Central News Agency, reported that the US–UN allies killed some 33,600 KPA PoWs; that on 19 July 1951, in PoW Camp No. 62, some 100 PoWs were killed as machine-gunnery targets; that on 27 May 1952, in the 77th Camp, Koje Island, with flamethrowers, the ROK killed some 800 KPA PoWs who rejected "voluntary repatriation" South, and instead demanded repatriation North; and that some 1,400 PKA PoWs were secretly sent to the US to be atomic-weapon experimental subjects.[123][124]

Legacy

The Korean War Memorial at the Washington State Capitol, Olympia, Washington.
Republic of Korea (ROK) and US (U.S.) soldiers monitor the Korean DMZ from Observation Post (OP) Ouellette. The view is northwards, April 2008.

The Korean War (1950–53) was the first proxy war in the global Russo–American Cold War (1945–91). It became the standard model for the next sphere-of-influence wars containing International Communism, especially of the Sino–Soviet variety, (i.e. 1945 Viet Nam). As such, it established proxy war as how the US and the USSR nuclear superpowers, would indirectly fight each other in a third country (Asian, Latin American, African) — per the NSC68 Containment Policy extending the Cold War from the Allied-occupied Europe of 1945 to the revolutionary, post–colonial Asia of 1950. The warfare ended at the 38th parallel, now the Korean Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) — 248 x 4 km (155 x 2.5 mi) — peninsular demarcation between the countries. Moreover, the Korean War benefited the other participant combatants, Turkey entered NATO.[125]

Each country's post-war recovery was different; South Korea stagnated in the first post-war decade, only later industrialising and modernising. The North Korean economy recovered quickly, and, until around 1975, it surpassed South Korea's economy.[citation needed] The contemporary North Korea is spartan, while South Korea is a consumer society. The CIA World Factbook estimates North Korea's GDP (PPP) is $40 billion, which is 3.0 per cent of South Korea's $1.196 trillion GDP (PPP). North Korean personal income is $1,800 per capitum, which is 7.0 percent of the South Korean $24,500 per capitum income.

Anti-Communism remains in Southern politics, however, the Uri Party practiced a "Sunshine Policy" towards North Korea. The US often disagreed with the Uri Party and (former) ROK Pres. Roh about relations between the Koreas. The Grand National Party (GNP), the Uri Party's principal opponent, is anti-North Korea. In the US, National Public Radio, on 7 September 2007, reported that US President George W. Bush offered a possible Korean War peace treaty with North Korea only when they ceased developing nuclear power (and weapons).[126] The President said, "We look forward to the day when we can end the Korean War. That will end — will happen when Kim verifiably gets rid of his weapons programs and his weapons."[127] US conservatives criticised Pres. Bush's declaration as reversing his earlier policy of régime change in North Korea.[128] In October 2007, at the second Inter-Korean Summit, South Korean President Roh Moo-hyun and North Korean Leader Kim Jong-Il signed a joint declaration of intent for peace treaty talks to formally end the Korean War.[129] On 27 May 2009, North Korea withdrew from the 1953 armistice, because South Korea has violated its terms, after South Korea joined a US-led initiative to search North Korean ships for nuclear weapons;[130][131] although South Korea had not been a signator.[132]

Depictions

Art

Artist Pablo Picasso's painting Massacre in Korea (1951) depicted violence against civilians during the Korean War. By some accounts, killing of civilians by U.S. forces in Shinchun, Hwanghae Province was the motive of the painting.[citation needed] Ha Jin's War Trash contains a vivid description of the beginning of the war from the point of view of a Chinese soldier and of the fear of retribution Chinese POWs felt from other Chinese prisoners if they were suspected of being unsympathetic to communism or to the war.

Photography

Film

Unlike World War II, there are relatively few Western feature films depicting the Korean War.

There were several South Korean films, including:

  • Tae Guk Gi: The Brotherhood of War (2004), directed by Kang Je-gyu, became extremely popular in South Korea and at the 50th Asia Pacific Film Festival, Taegukgi won the "Best Film", while Kang Je-gyu was awarded the "Best Director". Taegukgi saw a limited release in the United States.
  • Welcome to Dongmakgol (2005) shows the effect of the warring sides on a remote village. The titular village soon becomes home to surviving North Korean and South Korean soldiers, who in time lose their suspicion and hatred for each other and work together to help save the village after the Americans mistakenly identify it as an enemy camp.

North Korea has made many films about the war, mostly by the government supporting forceful, armed reunification of the North and South of Korea.[citation needed] These have portrayed war crimes by American or South Korean soldiers while glorifying members of the North Korean military as well as North Korean ideals.[135][verification needed]

Battle on Shangganling Mountain (Shanggan Ling, Chinese: 上甘岭) is a depiction of the Korean War from the Chinese point of view, made in 1956. The movie is about a group of Chinese soldiers blocked in Triangle Hill area for several days and survive until they are relieved.

See also

Notes

  1. ^ "On This Day 29 August 1950". BBC. http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/august/29/newsid_3053000/3053107.stm. Retrieved on 2007-08-15. 
  2. ^ "Veterans Affairs Canada —The Korean War". Veterans Affairs Canada. http://www.vac-acc.gc.ca/general/sub.cfm?source=history/koreawar. Retrieved on 2007-08-15. 
  3. ^ a b "Filipino Soldiers in the Korean War (video documentary)". http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9SBmEl3Gv60. Retrieved on 2008-03-24. 
  4. ^ Walker, Jack D. "A brief account of the Korean War". http://www.koreanwar-educator.org/topics/brief/brief_account_of_the_korean_war.htm. Retrieved on 2007-08-15. 
  5. ^ "French Participation in the Korean War". Embassy of France. http://www.info-france-usa.org/atoz/koreawar.asp. Retrieved on 2007-08-15. 
  6. ^ Thomas, Abbott & Chappell (1986), pp. 22-23
  7. ^ "Casualties of Korean War". Ministry of National Defense of Republic of Korea. http://www.withcountry.mil.kr/info/koreanwar/war3/20070214/1_-3722.jsp?menu=menu2. Retrieved on 2007-02-14. 
  8. ^ "Casualties of Korean War". Ministry of National Defense of Republic of Korea. http://www.withcountry.mil.kr/info/koreanwar/war3/20070214/1_-3722.jsp?menu=menu2. Retrieved on 2007-02-14. 
  9. ^ "Casualties of Korean War". Ministry of National Defense of Republic of Korea. http://www.withcountry.mil.kr/info/koreanwar/war3/20070214/1_-3722.jsp?menu=menu2. Retrieved on 2007-02-14. 
  10. ^ "All POW-MIA Korean War Casualties". http://www.aiipowmia.com/koreacw/kwkia_menu.html. Retrieved on 2007-08-15. 
  11. ^ "The UK & Korea, Defence Relations". Office of the Defence Attache, British Embassy, Seoul. http://www.britishembassy.gov.uk/servlet/Front?pagename=OpenMarket/Xcelerate/ShowPage&c=Page&cid=1101397831756. Retrieved on 2007-08-15. 
  12. ^ a b c Hickey, Michael. "The Korean War: An Overview". http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/worldwars/coldwar/korea_hickey_04.shtml. Retrieved on 2007-08-16. 
  13. ^ "The Turks in the Korean War". http://www.korean-war.com/turkey.html. Retrieved on 2007-08-15. 
  14. ^ "Canadians in Korea: Epilogue". Veterans Affairs Canada. 1998-10-06. http://www.vac-acc.gc.ca/remembers/sub.cfm?source=history/koreawar/valour/epilogue. Retrieved on 2007-10-27. 
  15. ^ "Korean War 1950–53: Epilogue". Australian War Memorial. 2007-10-16. http://www.awm.gov.au/atwar/korea.htm. Retrieved on 2007-11-12. 
  16. ^ "Departure of the French batallion". French newsreels archives (Les Actualités Françaises). 2003-11-05. http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2eo52_depart-du-bataillon-francais-051119. Retrieved on 2007-08-16. 
  17. ^ "Greek Expeditionary Force". Korean War.com. http://www.korean-war.com/greece.html/. 
  18. ^ Oprichting van Nederlands VN-detachement bestemd voor Korea
  19. ^ Belgium United Nations Command
  20. ^ Belgium United Nations Command
  21. ^ New Zealand in the Korean War
  22. ^ "South Africa in the Korean War". korean-war.com. November 20, 2006. http://www.korean-war.com/soafrica.html. 
  23. ^ Xu, Yan. "Korean War: In the View of Cost-effectiveness". Consulate-General of the People's Republic of China in New York. http://www.nyconsulate.prchina.org/eng/xw/t31430.htm. Retrieved on 2007-08-16. 
  24. ^ Кривошеев Г. Ф., Россия и СССР в войнах XX века: потери вооруженных сил. Статистическое исследование (Krivosheev G. F., Russia and the USSR in the wars of the 20th century: losses of the Armed Forces. A Statistical Study Greenhill 1997 ISBN 1-85367-280-7)(Russian)
  25. ^ "Casualties of Korean War". Ministry of National Defense of Republic of Korea. http://www.withcountry.mil.kr/info/koreanwar/war3/20070214/1_-3722.jsp?menu=menu2. Retrieved on 2007-02-14. 
  26. ^ "Casualties of Korean War". Ministry of National Defense of Republic of Korea. http://www.withcountry.mil.kr/info/koreanwar/war3/20070214/1_-3722.jsp?menu=menu2. Retrieved on 2007-02-14. 
  27. ^ "Casualties of Korean War". Ministry of National Defense of Republic of Korea. http://www.withcountry.mil.kr/info/koreanwar/war3/20070214/1_-3722.jsp?menu=menu2. Retrieved on 2007-02-14. 
  28. ^ "Casualties of Korean War". Ministry of National Defense of Republic of Korea. http://www.withcountry.mil.kr/info/koreanwar/war3/20070214/1_-3722.jsp?menu=menu2. Retrieved on 2007-02-14. 
  29. ^ "Casualties of Korean War". Ministry of National Defense of Republic of Korea. http://www.withcountry.mil.kr/info/koreanwar/war3/20070214/1_-3722.jsp?menu=menu2. Retrieved on 2007-02-14. 
  30. ^ "Casualties of Korean War". Ministry of National Defense of Republic of Korea. http://www.withcountry.mil.kr/info/koreanwar/war3/20070214/1_-3722.jsp?menu=menu2. Retrieved on 2007-02-14. 
  31. ^ a b Hermes, Jr., Walter (1966). Truce Tent and Fighting Front. Center of Military History. pp. 2,6,9. http://www.army.mil/cmh-pg/books/korea/truce/fm.htm. 
  32. ^ http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5goGcm6AL4tHyTt3gp1PUV6rNu9fA
  33. ^ a b c "The Korean War, 1950–1953 (an extract from American Military History, Volume 2—revised 2005)". http://www.army.mil/cmh-pg/books/AMH-V2/AMH%20V2/chapter8.htm. Retrieved on 2007-08-20. 
  34. ^ "War to Resist US Aggression And Aid Korea Marked in DPRK". (China's) Peoples Daily (English version). http://english.people.com.cn/english/200010/26/eng20001026_53620.html. Retrieved on 2007-08-16. 
  35. ^ "Remembering the Forgotten War: Korea, 1950-1953". Naval Historical Center. http://www.history.navy.mil/ac/korea/korea1.htm. Retrieved on 2007-08-16. 
  36. ^ Stokesbury, James L (1990). A Short History of the Korean War. New York: Harper Perennial. ISBN 0688095135. 
  37. ^ a b c James F, Schnabel. "United States Army in the Korean War, Policy and Direction: The First Year". pp. 3, 18. http://www.history.army.mil/books/P&D.HTM. Retrieved on 2007-08-19. 
  38. ^ "Treaty of Annexation (Annexation of Korea by Japan)". USC-UCLA Joint East Asian Studies Center. http://www.isop.ucla.edu/eas/documents/kore1910.htm. Retrieved on 2007-08-19. 
  39. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac ad ae af ag ah ai aj ak al am an ao ap aq ar as at au av aw ax ay az ba bb bc bd be bf bg bh bi bj bk bl bm bn bo bp bq br bs bt bu bv bw bx by bz ca cb cc cd ce cf cg ch ci cj ck cl cm cn Stokesbury, James L (1990). A Short History of the Korean War. New York: Harper Perennial. ISBN 0688095135. 
  40. ^ The Oxford Companion to World War II (1995) p.516
  41. ^ The Oxford Companion to World War II (1995) p.516
  42. ^ McCullough, David (1992). Truman. Simon & Schuster Paperbacks. pp. 785, 786. ISBN 0671869205. 
  43. ^ R. Whelan Drawing the Line: the Korean War 1950–53; London (1990) p.22
  44. ^ The Oxford Companion to World War II (1995) p.516
  45. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Appleman, Roy E (1998). South to the Naktong, North to the Yalu. Dept. of the Army. pp. 3, 15, 381, 545, 771, 719. ISBN 0160019184. http://www.army.mil/cmh/books/korea/20-2-1/toc.htm. 
  46. ^ a b c Cumings, Bruce (1981). Origins of the Korean War. Princeton University Press. chapter 4. ISBN 89-7696-612-0. 
  47. ^ Becker, Jasper (2005). Rogue Regime: Kim Jong Il and the Looming Threat of North Korea. New York: Oxford University Press, USA. pp. 52. ISBN 019517044X. 
  48. ^ a b c Goulden, Joseph C (1983). Korea: The Untold Story of the War. McGraw-Hill. pp. 17. ISBN 0070235805. 
  49. ^ McCune, Shannon C (1946-05), "Physical Basis for Korean Boundaries", Far Eastern Quarterly May 1946 (No. 5): 286–7 
  50. ^ Grajdanzev, Andrew (1945-10), "Korean Divided", Far Eastern Survey XIV: 282 
  51. ^ Grajdanzev, Andrew, History of Occupation of Korea, I, pp. 16 
  52. ^ Becker, Jasper (2005). Rogue Regime: Kim Jong Il and the Looming Threat of North Korea. New York: Oxford University Press, USA. pp. 53. ISBN 019517044X. 
  53. ^ "For Freedom". TIME. 20 May 1946. http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,792877-1,00.html. Retrieved on 2008-12-10. "Rightist groups in the American zone, loosely amalgamated in the Representative Democratic Council under elder statesman Syngman Rhee, protested heatedly ..." 
  54. ^ "The Failure of Trusteeship". infoKorea. http://myhome.shinbiro.com/~mss1/failure.html. Retrieved on 2008-12-10. 
  55. ^ "Korea Notes from Memoirs by Harry S. Truman". The U.S. War Against Asia (notes). III Publishing. http://www.mcn.org/e/iii/politics/asian_war/korea_truman_notes.html. Retrieved on 2008-12-10. "U.S. proposed general elections (U.S. style) but Russia insisted on Moscow Agreement." 
  56. ^ a b "The Korean War, The U.S. and Soviet Union in Korea". MacroHistory. http://www.fsmitha.com/h2/ch24kor.html. Retrieved on 2007-08-19. 
  57. ^ Gup, Ted (2000). The Book of Honor: Cover Lives and Classified Deaths at the CIA.
  58. ^ Malkasian, Carter (2001). The Korean War: Essential Histories. Osprey Publishing. pp. p.16. 
  59. ^ Statement by the Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs of the USSR, July 4, 1950
  60. ^ Leo Gross, "Voting in the Security Council: Abstention from Voting and Absence from Meetings", The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 60, No. 2 (Feb., 1951), pp. 209–57.
  61. ^ F. B. Schick, "Videant Consules", The Western Political Quarterly, Vol. 3, No. 3 (Sep., 1950), pp. 311–25.
  62. ^ Korea: The Untold Story of the War, Joseph C. Goulden (1982) p.48
  63. ^ Hess, Gary R. Presidential Decisions for War : Korea, Vietnam and the Persian Gulf. New York: Johns Hopkins UP, 2001.
  64. ^ Graebner, Norman A. The Age of Global Power: The United States Since 1939. Vol. V3641. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1979.
  65. ^ Truman, Harry S. The Autobiography of Harry S. Truman. Ed. Robert H. Ferrell. New York: University P of Colorado, 1981. 1955
  66. ^ Hess, Gary R. Presidential Decisions for War: Korea, Vietnam and the Persian Gulf New York: Johns Hopkins UP, 2001.
  67. ^ Hess, Gary R. Presidential Decisions for War: Korea, Vietnam and the Persian Gulf New York: Johns Hopkins UP, 2001
  68. ^ Korea: The Limited War|Rees|David |1964|MacMillan|London|p.27
  69. ^ a b c d e f g h i Schnabel, James F (1992). United States Army In The Korean War: Policy And Direction: The First Year. Center of Military History. pp. 155–92, 212, 283–4, 288–9, 304. ISBN 0-16-035955-4. http://www.army.mil/cmh/books/P&D.HTM. 
  70. ^ a b Korea Institute of Military History (2000). The Korean War: Korea Institute of Military History 3 Volume Set. Bison Books, University of Nebraska Press. vol. 1, p.730, vol. 2, pp. 512–529. ISBN 0803277946. 
  71. ^ http://history.sandiego.edu/GEN/20th/korea.html
  72. ^ Another Such Victory: President Truman and the Cold War, 1945–1953, p.390 (2002) Stanford University Press, ISBN 0804747741.
  73. ^ Chen Jian, China’s Road to the Korean War, p.184.
  74. ^ Communist China’s Changing Attitudes Toward the United Nations, International Organization, Vol. 20, No.4 (Autumn 1966), pp.677–704.
  75. ^ Donovan, Robert J (1996). Tumultuous Years: The Presidency of Harry S. Truman 1949-1953. University of Missouri Press. pp. 285. ISBN 0826210856. 
  76. ^ "The Korean War: The Chinese Intervention". US Army. http://www.history.army.mil/brochures/kw-chinter/chinter.htm. 
  77. ^ Cohen, Eliot A; Gooch, John (2005). Military Misfortunes: The Anatomy of Failure in War. Free Press. pp. 165–195. ISBN 0743280822. 
  78. ^ Hopkins, William (1986). One Bugle No Drums: The Marines at Chosin Reservoir. Algonquin. 
  79. ^ Rear Admiral Doyle, James H; Mayer, Arthur J (April 1979), "December 1950 at Hungnam", U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings vol. 105 (no. 4): 44–65 
  80. ^ "Operation Glory". Army Quartermaster Museum, U.S. Army. http://www.qmmuseum.lee.army.mil/korea/op_glory.htm. Retrieved on 2007-12-16. 
  81. ^ [1]
  82. ^ JPAC Wars And Conflicts
  83. ^ Remains from Korea identified as Ind. soldier – Army News, opinions, editorials, news from Iraq, photos, reports – Army Times
  84. ^ Hasbrouck, S. V (1951), memo to file (November 7, 1951), G-3 Operations file, box 38-A, Library of Congress 
  85. ^ Army Chief of Staff (1951), memo to file (November 20, 1951), G-3 Operations file, box 38-A, Library of Congress 
  86. ^ Watson, Robert J; Schnabel, James F. (1998). The Joint Chiefs of Staff and National Policy, 1950–1951, The Korean War and 1951–1953, The Korean War (History of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Volume III, Parts I and II). Office of Joint History, Office of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. part 1, p. v; part 2, p. 614. 
  87. ^ Commanding General, Far East Air Force (1951), Memo to 98th Bomb Wing Commander, Okinawa 
  88. ^ Far East Command G-2 Theater Intelligence (1951), Resumé of Operation, Record Group 349, box 752 
  89. ^ "Syngman Rhee Biography: Rhee Attacks Peace Proceedings". Korean War Commemoration Biographies. http://korea50.army.mil/history/biographies/rhee.shtml. Retrieved on 2007-08-22. 
  90. ^ "North Korean Democide: Sources, Calculations and Estimates". http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/SOD.TAB10.1.GIF. Retrieved on 2009-04-25. 
  91. ^ "U.S. death toll from Korean War revised downward, Time reports". CNN. 2000-06-04. http://archives.cnn.com/2000/US/06/04/korea.deaths/. 
  92. ^ Xu, Yan (2003-07-29). "Korean War: In the View of Cost-effectiveness". Consulate General of the People's Republic of China in New York. http://www.nyconsulate.prchina.org/eng/xw/t31430.htm. Retrieved on 2007-08-12.