Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Email
Answers.com

franchise

 
(frăn'chīz') pronunciation
n.
  1. A privilege or right officially granted a person or a group by a government, especially:
    1. The constitutional or statutory right to vote.
    2. The establishment of a corporation's existence.
    3. The granting of certain rights and powers to a corporation.
    4. Legal immunity from servitude, certain burdens, or other restrictions.
    1. Authorization granted to someone to sell or distribute a company's goods or services in a certain area.
    2. A business or group of businesses established or operated under such authorization.
    3. A brand name under which a series of products is released.
  2. The territory or limits within which immunity, a privilege, or a right may be exercised.
  3. A professional sports team.
tr.v., -chised, -chis·ing, -chis·es.
To grant a franchise to.

[Middle English fraunchise, from Old French franchise, from franche, feminine of franc, free, exempt. See frank1.]


Search unanswered questions...
Enter a question here...
Search: All sources Community Q&A Reference topics

1. License granted by a company (the franchisor) to an individual or firm (the franchisee) to operate a retail, food, or drug outlet where the franchisee agrees to use the franchisor's name; products; services; promotions; selling, distribution, and display methods; and other company support. McDonald's, Midas, and Holiday Inn are all examples of franchise operations.

2. Right to market a company's goods or services in a specific territory, which right has been granted by the company to an individual, group of individuals, marketing group, retailer, or wholesaler. See also brand franchise.

3. Specific territory or outlet involved in such a right.

4. Right of an advertiser to exercise an option to sponsor a television or radio show, as well as the granting of such a right by the broadcast medium (as "to exercise a franchise" or "to grant a franchise").

5. Right granted by a local or state government to a cable television operator to offer cable television service in a community.



1. license granted by a company (the franchisor) to an individual or firm (the franchisee) to operate a retail, food, or drug outlet where the franchisee agrees to use the franchisor’s name; products; services; promotions; selling, distribution, and display methods; and other company support. McDonald’s, Midas, and Holiday Inn are all examples of franchise operations.


2. right to market a company’s goods or services in a specific territory, which right has been granted by the company to an individual, group of individuals, marketing group, retailer, or wholesaler.


3. specific territory or outlet involved in such a right.


4. right of an advertiser to exercise an option to sponsor a television or radio show, as well as the granting of such a right by the broadcast medium (as “to exercise a franchise” or “to grant a franchise”).


5. right granted by a local or state government to a cable television operator to offer cable television service in a community.

Previous:Fragmentation, Fractional Share, Fractional Interest
Next:Franchise Tax, Frank, Fraud
An arrangement between a franchisor and franchisee through which the franchisee uses the company name of the franchisor and is provided specified business services in exchange for a franchise fee. The fee is usually an initial purchase requirement plus an ongoing percentage of gross sales of the business.


Example: In real estate brokerage, locally owned firms may operate as franchises of such national companies as Century 21, RE/MAX, and Red Carpet. The franchisor advertises the name and logo of the company, offers training for salespersons, and offers or provides other services to the franchisee.

Previous:Frame House, Fractionalinterest
Next:Fraud, Fraud and Flipping

The right to vote. Universal franchise is a twentieth-century phenomenon. In Britain, male franchise was extended in 1832, 1867, and 1884, and became universal in 1918; female franchise was granted in part 1918 and fully 1928 (see also suffrage). Earlier, almost no democracy permitted all adult women to vote; Athenian democracy disenfranchised women, slaves, and non-natives of Athens.

Columbia Encyclopedia:

franchise

Top
franchise, in government, a right specifically conferred on a group or individual by a government, especially the privilege conferred by a municipality on a corporation of operating public utilities, such as electricity, telephone, and bus services. Franchises may not be revoked without the consent of the grantee unless so stipulated in the contract. They may, however, be forfeited by the grantee's violation of terms, and the government may take back granted rights by eminent domain proceedings with tender of just compensation. Franchise provisions usually include tenure; compensation to the grantor; the services, rates, and extensions; labor and strike regulations; capitalization; and reversion to the grantor.

The term franchise also refers to a type of business in which a group or individual receives a license from a corporation to conduct a commercial enterprise. Corporate franchises enable a franchisee to market a well-known product or service in return for an initial fee and a percentage of gross receipts. The franchiser usually provides assistance with merchandising and advertising. Major franchise networks, which have grown rapidly in the United States since the 1960s, include fast-food restaurants, gasoline stations, motels, automobile dealerships, and real-estate agencies, and the system has expanded into many other fields.

In politics, the franchise is the right conferred on an individual to vote. In the United States, the states, with some restrictions by the U.S. Constitution, govern the qualifications of voters. By the Fourteenth and Fifteenth amendments, states were forbidden to deny suffrage to male residents over 21 years of age "on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude." The Nineteenth Amendment conferred suffrage upon women, and the Twenty-sixth Amendment lowered the voting age to 18. See voting.

Bibliography

See C. Williamson, American Suffrage from Property to Democracy, 1760-1860 (1960, repr. 1968); C. L. Vaughn, Franchising (1974).


This entry contains information applicable to United States law only.

A special privilege to do certain things that is conferred by government on an individual or a corporation and which does not belong to citizens generally of common right, e.g., a right granted to offer cable television service.

A privilege granted or sold, such as to use a name or to sell products or services. In its simplest terms, a franchise is a license from the owner of a trademark or trade name permitting another to sell a product or service under that name or mark. More broadly stated, a franchise has evolved into an elaborate agreement under which the franchisee undertakes to conduct a business or sell a product or service in accordance with methods and procedures prescribed by the franchisor, and the franchisor undertakes to assist the franchisee through advertising, promotion, and other advisory services.

The right of suffrage; the right or privilege of voting in public elections. Such right is guaranteed by the Fifteenth, Nineteenth, and Twenty-fourth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution.

As granted by a professional sports association, franchise is a privilege to field a team in a given geographic area under the auspices of the league that issues it. It is merely an incorporeal right.

Government Franchises

The consideration to be given by a person or corporation in order to receive a franchise from the government can be an agreement to pay money, to bear some burden, or to perform a public duty. The primary objective of all grants of franchises is to benefit the public; the rights or interests of the grantee, the franchisee, are secondary. A corporation is a franchise, and the various powers conferred on it are also franchises, such as the power of an insurance corporation to issue an insurance policy. Various types of business — such as water companies, gas and electric companies, bridge and tunnel authorities, taxi companies, along with all types of corporations — operate under franchises.

The charter of a corporation is also called its general franchise. A franchise tax is a tax imposed by the state on the right and privilege of conducting business as a corporation for the purposes for which it was created and in the conditions that surround it.

Power to Grant

The power to grant franchises is vested in the legislative department of the government, subject to limitations imposed by the state constitution. A franchise can be derived indirectly from the state through the agency that has been duly designated for that purpose, such as the local transportation agency that can grant a franchise for bus routes. Franchises are usually conferred on corporations, but natural persons can also acquire them. The grant of a franchise frequently contains express conditions and stipulations that the grantee, or holder, of the franchise must perform.

Not every privilege granted by a governmental authority is a franchise. A franchise differs from a license, which is merely a personal privilege or temporary permission to do something; it can be revoked and can be derived from a source other than the legislature or state agencies. A franchise differs from a lease, which is a contract for the possession and profits of property in exchange for the payment of rent.

Regulation

Once a franchise is granted, its exercise is usually subject to regulation by the state or some duly authorized body. In the exercise of police power — which is the authority of the state to legislate to protect the health, safety, welfare, and morals of its citizens — local authorities or the political subdivisions of the state can regulate the grant or exercise of franchises.

Right to Compete

While a franchise can be exclusive, exclusiveness is not a necessary element of it. Nonexclusive franchises — in- cluding those to function or operate as a public utility — do not include the right to be free of competition. The grant of such a franchise does not prevent the grant of a similar one to another, or lawful competition on the part of public authorities. The holder of a nonexclusive franchise is legally entitled to be free from the competition of one not having a valid franchise to compete. One can institute a proceeding for an injunction — a court order that commands or prohibits a certain act — and monetary damages for the unlawful invasion of the franchise. Although the franchise is not exclusive, one is entitled to protection against competition from persons operating without a franchise.

Duration

The legislature can prescribe the duration of a franchise. The powers of local authorities or political subdivisions of the state depend upon the statute that confers the power to make grants and upon any constitutional limitation.

A franchise can be terminated by the mutual agreement of the state that is the franchisor, and the grantee or the franchisee. It can be lost by abandonment, such as when a corporation dissolves because of its fiscal problems. A mere change in the government organization of a political subdivision of a state does not divest franchise rights that have been previously acquired with the consent of local authorities. A franchise cannot be revoked arbitrarily unless that power has been reserved by the legislature or proper agency.

Forfeiture

A franchise can be subject to forfeiture due to nonuse. Misuse or failure to provide adequate services under the franchise can also result in its loss. The remedy for nonuse or misuse lies with the state. Persons other than the state or public authorities cannot challenge the validity of the exercise of a franchise unless they can demonstrate that they have a peculiar interest in the matter distinct from that of the general public.

Invasion of the Franchise

A person or corporation holding a valid franchise can obtain an injunction to prevent the unlawful invasion of the franchise rights and can sue for monetary damages if there has been financial loss as a result of the infringement.

Transfer of Franchises

Subject to applicable constitutional or statutory limitation, franchises can be sold or transferred. Where the franchises involve public service, they cannot be sold or transferred unless there is authorization by the state. The person or corporation purchasing the franchise in an authorized sale takes it subject to its restrictions.

Private Franchises

Certain written contractual agreements are sometimes loosely referred to as franchises, although they lack the essential elements in that they are not conferred by any sovereignty. The franchise system or method of operation, which is of comparatively recent development, has had a phenomenal growth in particular consumer product industries, such as automobile sales, fast foods, and ice cream. The use of a franchise in this manner has enabled individuals with minimal capital to invest to become successful members of the business community.

Under the most common method of operation, the cornerstone of a franchise system must be a trademark or trade name of a product. A franchise is a license from an owner of a trademark or trade name permitting another to sell a product or service under the name or mark. A franchisee agrees to pay a fee to the franchisor in exchange for permission to operate a business or sell a product or service according to the methods and procedures prescribed by the franchisor as well as under the trade name or trademark of the franchisor. The franchisee is usually granted an exclusive territory in which he or she is the only distributor of the particular goods or services in that area. The franchisor is usually obligated by contract to assist the franchisee through advertising, promotion, research and development, quantity purchasing, training and education, and other specialized management resources.

Before 1979 fewer than twenty state legislatures had enacted laws to protect prospective franchisees from being deceived by the falsehoods of dishonest franchisors. These laws, known as financial disclosure laws, mandated that anyone offering franchises for sale in the state had to disclose material facts — such as the true costs of operating a franchise, any recurring expenses, and substantiated reports of profit earned — that would be instrumental in the making of an informed decision to purchase a franchise.

In states that did not have such legislation, the unsophisticated investor was at the mercy of the franchisor's statements. A victimized franchisee could sue a franchisor for breach of contract, but this was an expensive proposition for someone who typically had invested virtually all of his or her financial resources in an unprofitable franchise. Franchisors confronted with numerous lawsuits often would declare bankruptcy so that the franchisees had little possibility of recouping any of their investments.

The Federal Trade Commission received numerous complaints about inequitable and dishonest practices in the sale of such franchises. In late 1978 it issued regulations, effective October 21, 1979, that require franchisors and their representatives to disclose material facts necessary to make an informed decision about the proposed purchase of a franchise and that establish certain practices to be observed in the franchisor-franchisee relationship.

A franchisor must disclose the background of the company — including the business experience of its high-level executives — for the previous five years; and whether any of its executives, within the last seven years, have been convicted of a felony, have pleaded nolo contendere to fraud, have been held liable in a civil action for fraud, are subject to any currently effective court order or administrative agency ruling concerning the franchise business or fraud, or have been involved in any proceedings for bankruptcy or corporate reorganization for insolvency during the previous seven years.

In addition, there must be a factual description of the franchise as well as an unequivocal statement of the total funds to be paid, such as initial franchise fees, deposits, down payments, prepaid rent on the location, and equipment and inventory purchases. The conditions and time limits to obtain a refund, as well as its amount, must be clear as well as the amount of recurring costs, such as royalties, rents, advertising fees, and sign rental fees. Any restrictions imposed — such as on the amount of goods or services to be sold, the types of customers with which the franchisee can deal — the geographical area, and whether the franchisee is entitled to protection of his or her territory by the franchisor must be discussed. The duration of the franchise, in addition to reasons why the franchise can be terminated or the franchisee's license not renewed when it expires, also must be explained. The number of franchises voluntarily terminated or terminated by the franchisor must be reported. The franchisor must disclose the number of franchises that were operating at the end of the previous year, as well as the number of company-owned outlets. The franchisee must also be supplied with the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of the franchisees of the ten outlets nearest the prospective franchisee's location, so that the prospective franchisee can contact them to obtain a realistic perspective of the daily operations of a franchise.

If the franchisor makes any claims about the actual or projected sales of its franchises or their actual or potential profits, facts must be presented to substantiate such statements.

All of these facts — embodied in an accurately, clearly, and concisely written document — must be given to the prospective franchisee at the first personal meeting or at least ten days before any contractual relationship is entered or deposit made, whichever date is first. The purpose of this disclosure statement is to provide the potential investor with a realistic view of the business venture upon which he or she is about to embark. Failure to comply with the FTC regulation could result in a fine of up to $10,000 a day for each violation.

Some states have also enacted laws that prohibit a franchisor from terminating a franchise without good cause, which usually means that the franchisee has breached the contract. In such a case, the franchisor is entitled to reacquire the outlet — usually by repurchasing the franchisee's assets, such as inventory and equipment.

In states without "good cause" laws, franchisees claim that they are being victimized by franchisors who want to reclaim outlets that have been proved to be highly profitable. They allege that the franchisor imposes impossible or ridiculous demands that cannot be met to harass the franchisee into selling the store back to the franchisor at a fraction of its value. Com- pany-owned outlets yield a greater profit to the franchisor than the royalty payments received from the franchisee. Other franchisees claim that their licenses have been revoked or not renewed upon expiration because they complained to various state and federal agencies of the ways in which the franchisors operate. Such controversies usually are resolved in the courtroom.

In business, a relationship between a manufacturer and a retailer in which the manufacturer provides the product, sales techniques, and other kinds of managerial assistance, and the retailer promises to market the manufacturer's product rather than that of competitors. For example, most automobile dealerships are franchises. The vast majority of fast food chains are also run on the franchise principle, with the retailer paying to use the brand name.

A type of license that a party (franchisee) acquires to allow them to have access to a  business's (the franchisor) proprietary knowledge, processes and trademarks in order to allow the party to sell a product or provide a service under the business's name. In exchange for gaining the franchise, the franchisee usually pays the franchisor initial start-up and annual licensing fees.

Investopedia Says:
Franchises are a very popular method for people to start a business, especially for those who wish to operate in a highly competitive industry like the fast-food industry. One of the biggest advantages of purchasing a franchise is that you have access to an established company's brand name; meaning that you do not need to spend further resources to get your name and product out to customers.

Related Links:
If you like being your own boss, this is not the job for you. Is Buying A Franchise Wise?
Skip the first step and build off of someone else's successful business model. Share The Wealth With Franchises
Do you know how your companies really make their money? Learn to assess the systems by which businesses generate their revenue. Getting To Know Business Models
We look at a retailer's inventory turnaround times, its receivables as well as its collection period. Measuring Company Efficiency
The right CEO can make all the difference in a company's market position. CEOs Who Blazed The Trail (Kroc, Hock And Welch)


In politics, the right to vote. The Constitution left the determination of the qualifications of voters to the states. In the late eighteenth and early nineteenth century, states usually restricted the franchise to white men who owned specified amounts of property. Gradually, poll taxes were substituted for property requirements. Before the Civil War, the voting rights of blacks were severely restricted, but the Fifteenth Amendment to the Constitution, declared ratified in 1870, prohibited states from abridging the right to vote on the basis of race. Nevertheless, southern states used a variety of legal ploys to restrict black voting until passage of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Women were not guaranteed the right to vote in federal elections until ratification of the Nineteenth Amendment in 1920. In 1971 the Twenty-sixth Amendment lowered the voting age from twenty-one to eighteen. (See suffrage and suffragette.)

  • Losing the right to vote, called disfranchisement, is most commonly caused by failing to reregister, a procedure that is required every time a person changes residence.

  • Word Tutor:

    franchise

    Top
    pronunciation

    IN BRIEF: A special right or permission given by a government. Also: The right given to a dealer to sell the products of a certain company.

    pronunciation The business owner wanted to sell a franchise of her own business to someone interested in selling the same products in another city.

    LearnThatWord.com is a free vocabulary and spelling program where you only pay for results!

    Random House Word Menu:

    categories related to 'franchise'

    Top
    Random House Word Menu by Stephen Glazier
    For a list of words related to franchise, see:

      See crossword solutions for the clue Franchise.
    Wikipedia on Answers.com:

    Franchising

    Top
    A McDonald's franchise.

    Franchising is the practice of using another firm's successful business model. The word 'franchise' is of anglo-French derivation - from franc - meaning free, and is used both as a noun and as a (transitive) verb.[1] For the franchisor, the franchise is an alternative to building 'chain stores' to distribute goods and avoid the need for investments and liability for a chain. The franchisor's success depends on the success of the franchisees. The franchisee is said to have a greater incentive than a direct employee because he or she has a direct stake in the business.

    Thirty three countries, including the United States, China, and Australia, have laws that explicitly regulate franchising, with the majority of all other countries having laws which have a direct or indirect impact on franchising [2].


    Contents

    Overview

    Businesses for which franchising work best have one or several of the following characteristics[citation needed]:

    • A good track record of profitability
    • Ease of duplication
    • Detailed systems, processes and procedures
    • A unique or unusual concept
    • Broad geographic appeal
    • Relative ease of operation
    • Relatively inexpensive operation.

    As practiced in retailing, franchising offers franchisees the advantage of starting up business quickly based on a proven trademark, and immediate access to the tooling and infrastructure, as opposed to having to develop them.

    The following U.S. listing tabulates[3] the early 2010 ranking of major franchises along with the number of sub-franchisees (or partners) from data available for 2004.[4] As can be seen from the names of the franchises, the USA is a leader in franchising, a position it has held since the 1930s when it used the approach for fast-food restaurants, food inns and, slightly later, motels at the time of the Great Depression. As of 2005, there were 909,253 established franchised businesses, generating $880.9 billion of output and accounting for 8.1 percent of all private, non-farm jobs. This amounts to 11 million jobs, and 4.4 percent of all private sector output[5].

    1. Subway (sandwiches and salads) | startup costs $84,300 – $258,300 (22,000 partners worldwide in 2004).
    2. McDonald's | startup costs in 2010, $995,900 – $1,842,700 (37,300 partners in 2010)
    3. 7-Eleven Inc. (convenience stores) |startup costs in 2010 $40,500- 775,300, (28,200 partners in 2004)
    4. Hampton Inns & Suites (midprice hotels) |startup costs in 2010 $3,716,000 – $15,148,800
    5. Great Clips (hair salons) | startup costs in 2010 $109,000 - $203,000
    6. H&R Block (tax preparation and now e-filing) | startup costs $26,427 - $84,094 (11,200 partners in 2004)
    7. Dunkin Donuts | startup costs in 2010 $537,750 - $1,765,300
    8. Jani-King (commercial cleaning) | startup costs $11,400 - $35,050, (11,000 partners worldwide in 2004)
    9. Servpro (insurance and disaster restoration and cleaning) | startup costs in 2010 $102,250 - $161,150
    10. MiniMarkets (convenience store and gas station) | startup costs in 2010 $1,835,823 - $7,615,065

    Mid-sized franchises like restaurants, gasoline stations and trucking stations involve substantial investment and require all the attention of a businessman.

    There are also large franchises like hotels, spas, hospitals, etc. which are discussed further under technological alliances.

    Two important payments are made to a franchisor: (a) a royalty for the trademark and (b) reimbursement for the training and advisory services given to the franchisee. These two fees may be combined in a single 'management' fee. A fee for "disclosure" is separate and is always a "front-end fee".

    A franchise usually lasts for a fixed time period (broken down into shorter periods, which each require renewal), and serves a specific territory or geographical area surrounding its location. One franchisee may manage several such locations. Agreements typically last from five to thirty years, with premature cancellations or terminations of most contracts bearing serious consequences for franchisees. A franchise is merely a temporary business investment involving renting or leasing an opportunity, not the purchase of a business for the purpose of ownership. It is classified as a wasting asset due to the finite term of the license.

    A franchise can be exclusive, non-exclusive or 'sole and exclusive'.

    Although franchisor revenues and profit may be listed in a franchise disclosure document (FDD), no laws require an estimate of franchisee profitability, which depends on how intensively the franchisee 'works' the franchise. Therefore, franchisor fees are typically based on 'gross revenue from sales' and not on profits realized. See Remuneration.

    Various tangibles and intangibles such as national or international advertising, training and other support services are commonly made available by the franchisor.

    Franchise brokers help franchisors find appropriate franchisees. There are also main 'master franchisors' who obtain the rights to sub-franchise in a territory.

    According to the International Franchise Association approximately 4% of all businesses in the United States are franchisee-worked.

    It should be recognized[citation needed] that franchising is one of the only means available to access venture investment capital without the need to give up control of the operation of the chain and build a distribution system for servicing it. After the brand and formula are carefully designed and properly executed, franchisors are able to sell franchises and expand rapidly across countries and continents using the capital and resources of their franchisees while reducing their own risk.

    Franchisor rules imposed by the franchising authority are usually very strict in the USA and most other countries need to study them carefully to protect small or start-up franchisee in their own countries.[citation needed] Besides the trademark, there are proprietary service marks which may be copyrighted, and corresponding regulations.

    Obligations of the parties

    Each party to a franchise has several interests to protect. The franchisor is involved in securing protection for the trademark, controlling the business concept and securing know-how. The franchisee is obligated to carry out the services for which the trademark has been made prominent or famous. There is a great deal of standardization required. The place of service has to bear the franchisor's signs, logos and trademark in a prominent place. The uniforms worn by the staff of the franchisee have to be of a particular design and colour. The service has to be in accordance with the pattern followed by the franchisor in the successful franchise operations. Thus, franchisees are not in full control of the business, as they would be in retailing.

    A service can be successful if equipment and supplies are purchased at a fair price from the franchisor or sources recommended by the franchisor. A coffee brew, for example, can be readily identified by the trademark if its raw materials come from a particular supplier. If the franchisor requires purchase from his stores, it may come under anti-trust legislation or equivalent laws of other countries.[1] So too the purchase of uniforms of personnel, signs, etc., as well as the franchise sites, if they are owned or controlled by the franchisor.

    The franchisee must carefully negotiate the license. He and the franchisor must develop a marketing or business plan. The fees must be fully disclosed and there should not be any hidden fees. The start-up costs and working capital must be known before the license is granted. There must be assurance that additional licensees will not crowd the "territory" if the franchise is worked according to plan. The franchisee must be seen as an independent merchant. He must be protected by the franchisor from any trademark infringement by third parties. A franchise attorney is required to assist the franchisee during negotiations.[6]

    Often the training period - the costs of which are in great part covered by the initial fee - is too short in cases where it is necessary to operate complicated equipment, and the franchisee has to learn on his own from instruction manuals. The training period must be adequate, but in low-cost franchises it may be considered expensive. Many frachisors have set up corporate universities to train staff online. This is in addition to providing literature, sales documents and email access.

    Also, franchise agreements carry no guarantees or warranties and the franchisee has little or no recourse to legal intervention in the event of a dispute.[7] Franchise contracts tend to be unilateral contracts in favor of the franchisor, who is generally protected from lawsuits from their franchisees because of the non-negotiable contracts that require franchisees to acknowledge, in effect, that they are buying the franchise knowing that there is risk, and that they have not been promised success or profits by the franchisor. Contracts are renewable at the sole option of the franchisor. Most franchisors require franchisees to sign agreements that mandate where and under what law any dispute would be litigated.

    Regulations

    Australia

    In Australia, franchising is regulated by the "Franchising Code of Conduct", a mandatory code of conduct concluded under the Trade Practices Act 1974.

    This code requires franchisors to produce a disclosure document which must be given to a prospective franchisee at least 14 days before the franchise agreement is entered into.

    The code also regulates the content of franchise agreements, for example in relation to marketing funds, a cooling-off period, termination, and the resolution of disputes by mediation.

    The federal government is currently considering recommended changes to the Code of Conduct. These are contained in the report, "Opportunity not Opportunism: Improving conduct in Australian Franchising" tabled by a Parliamentary inquiry into franchising on 4 December 2008.[8]

    Some experts have warned that any pressure to increase the regulation of the franchising sector could make it a less attractive means of doing business.[9]

    New Zealand

    New Zealand is served by around 423 franchise systems operating 450 brands, giving it the highest proportion of franchises per capita in the world. Despite (or because of) the recession, the total number of franchised units increased by 5.3% from 2009 to 2010.[10] There is no separate law covering franchises, so they are covered by normal commercial law. This functions very well in New Zealand and includes law as it applies to contracts, restrictive trade practices, intellectual property and the law of misleading or deceptive conduct.[11]

    The Franchise Association of New Zealand introduced a self-regulatory Code of Practice for its members in 1996. This contains many provisions similar to those of the Australian Franchising Code of Practice legislation, although it should be noted that only around a third of all franchises are members of the association and therefore bound by the code.[12]

    A case of fraud in 2007 perpetrated by a former master franchisee of the country’s largest franchise system[13] led to a review of the need for franchise law by the Ministry of Economic Development.[14] The New Zealand Government decided there was no case for franchise-specific legislation at this time.[15] This decision was criticised by the Opposition,[16] which had initiated the review when in power, and the review process was questioned by a leading academic.[17] The Franchise Association originally supported the positive regulation of the franchise sector[18] but its eventual submission to the review was in favour of the status quo – self-regulation.[19]

    Brazil

    In 2008, there were about 1,013 franchises[20] with more than 62,500 outlets, making it one of the largest countries in the world in terms of number of units. Around 11 percent of this total are foreign-based franchisors.

    The Brazilian Franchise Law (Law No. 8955 of December 15, 1994) defines the franchise as a system in which the franchisor licenses the franchisee, for a payment, the right to use a trademark/patent along with the right to distribute products or services on an exclusive or semi-exclusive basis. The provision of a "Franchise Offer Circular" or disclosure document is mandatory before execution of agreement and is valid for all of the Brazilian territory. Failure to disclose voids the agreement, which leads to refunds and serious payments for damages. The Franchise Law does not distinguish between Brazilian and foreign franchisors. The National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI) is the registering authority. Indispensable documents are a Statement of Delivery (of disclosure documentation) and a Certification of Recording (INPI). The latter is necessary for payments. All sums amounts may not be convertible into foreign currency. Certification may also mean compliance with Brazil's antitrust legislation.

    Parties to international franchising may decide to adopt the English language for the document, as long as the Brazilian party knows English fluently and expressly acknowledges that fact, to avoid translation. The Registration accomplishes three things:

    * It make the agreement effective against third parties
    * It permits the remittance of payments
    * It qualifies the franchisee for tax deductions.

    Page reference in franchising in this country: Guide of Franchising - Guia do Franchising (http://www.guiadofranchising.com.br)

    China

    China has the most franchises in the world but the scale of their operations is relatively small. Each system in China has an average of 43 outlets, compared to more than 540 in the United States. Together, there are 2600 brands in some 200,000 retail markets. KFC was the most significant foreign entry in 1987 and is widespread [21] Many franchises are in fact joint-ventures, as at their forming the franchise law was not explicit. For example, McDonalds is a joint venture. Pizza Hut, TGIF, Wal-mart, Starbucks followed a little later. But total franchising is only 3% of retail trade, which seeks foreign franchise growth.

    The year 2005 saw the birth of an updated franchise law,[21] "Measures for the Administration of Commercial Franchise".[22] Previous legislation (1997) made no specific inclusion of foreign investors. Today the franchise law is much clearer by virtue of the 2007 law,[23] a revision of the 2005 law.

    The laws are applicable if there are transactions involving a trademark combined with payments with many obligations on the franchisor. The law comprises 42 articles and 8 chapters.

    Among the franchisor obligations are:

    • The FIE (foreign-invested enterprise) franchisor must be registered by the regulator
    • The franchisor (or its subsidiary) must have operated at least operated two company-owned franchises in China (revised to "anywhere")for more than 12 months ("the two-store, one-year” rule)
    • The franchisor must disclosure any information requested by the franchisee
    • Cross-border franchising, with some caveats, is possible (2007 law).

    The franchisor must meet a list of requirements for registration, among which are:

    • The standard franchise agreement, working manual and working capital requirements,
    • A track-record of operations, and ample ability to supply materials,
    • The ability to train the Chinese personnel and provide
    • Long-term operational guidance,
    • The franchise agreement must have a minimum three-year term.

    Among other provisions:

    • The franchisor is liable for certain actions of its suppliers
    • Monetary and other penalties apply for infractions of the regulations.

    The disclosure has to take place 20 days in advance. It has to contain:

    • Details of the franchisor’s experience in the franchised business with scope of business
    • Identification of the franchisor’s principal officers
    • Litigation of the franchisor during the past five years
    • Full details about all franchise fees
    • The amount of a franchisee’s initial investment
    • A list of the goods or services the franchisor can supply, and the terms of supply
    • The training franchisees will receive
    • Information about the trademarks,including registration, usage, and litigation
    • Demonstration of the franchisor’s capabilities to provide training and guidance
    • Statistics about existing units, including number, locations, and operational results, and the percentage of franchises that have been terminated, and
    • An audited financial report and tax information (for an unspecified period of time).

    Other elements of this legislation are:

    • The franchisee’s confidentiality obligations continue indefinitely after termination or expiration of the franchise agreement
    • If the franchisee has paid a deposit to the franchisor, it must be refunded on termination of the franchise agreement; upon termination, the franchisee is prohibited from continuing to use the franchisor’s marks.

    India

    The franchising of goods and services foreign to India is in its infancy. The first International Exhibition was only held in 2009.[24] India is, however, one of the biggest franchising markets because of its large middle-class of 300 million who are not reticent about spending and because the population is entrepreneurial in character. In a highly diversified society, (see Demographics of India) McDonald's is a success story despite its fare's differing from that of the rest of the world.[25]

    So far, franchise agreements are covered under two standard commercial laws: the Contract Act 1872 and the Specific Relief Act 1963, which provide for both specific enforcement of covenants in a contract and remedies in the form of damages for breach of contract.

    Kazakhstan

    In Kazakhstan franchise turnover for 2010 is 1 billion US$ dollars per year. Kazakhstan is the leader in Central Asia in the franchising market. There is a special law on franchising which went into effect in 2002. There are about 300 franchise systems and the number of franchised outlets approaches 2000.[26] Kazakhstan franchising began with the emergence of a "Coca-Cola" factory, opened to sublicense a Turkish licensor of the same brand. The plant was built in 1994. Other brands that are also present in Kazakhstan through the franchise system include Pepsi, Hilton, Marriott, Intercontinental, and Pizza Hut.

    Europe

    Franchising has grown rapidly in Europe in recent years, but the industry is largely unregulated. Unlike the United States, the European Union has not adopted a uniform franchise disclosure policy. Only five countries in Europe have adopted pre-sale disclosure obligations. They are France (1989), Spain (1996), Romania (1997), Italy (2004) and Belgium (2005).[27]

    The Code of Ethics of the European Franchising Federation is self-enforced in seventeen European states where their national franchise associations are members of the European Franchise Federation (EFF) and the International Institute for the Unification of Private Law UNIDROIT.

    All formal disclosure countries are required to furnish "Contract Summaries" highlighting:

    • The object of the contract
    • The rights and obligations of the parties
    • The financial conditions
    • The term of the contract.

    Legal consultation is needed before entering and finalizing the agreement(s). Most often one of the principal tasks in Europe is to find retail space, which is not so significant a factor in the USA. This is where the franchise broker, or the master franchisor, plays an important role. Cultural factors are also relevant, as local populations tend to be homogeneous.

    France

    France is one of Europe’s largest markets. Similar to the United States, it has a long history of franchising, dating back to the 1930s. Growth came in the 1970s. The market is considered difficult for outside franchisors because of cultural characteristics, yet McDonald’s and Century 21 are found everywhere. There are some 30 U.S. firms involved in franchising in France.[28]

    There are no government agencies regulating franchises. The Loi Doubin Law of 1989 was the first European franchise disclosure law. Combined with Decree No. 91-337, it regulates disclosure, although the decree also applies to any person who provides to another person a corporate name, trademark or trade name or other business arrangements. The law applies to "exclusive or quasi-exclusive territory". The disclosure document must be delivered at least 20 days before the execution of the agreement or any payments are made.

    The specific and important disclosures to be made are [29]:

    a) The date of the founding of the franchisor's enterprise and a summary of its business history and all information necessary to assess the business experience of the franchisor, including bankers,
    b) A description of the local market for the goods or services,
    c) The franchisor's financial statements for the previous two years,
    d) A list of all other franchisees currently in the network,
    e) All franchisees who have left the network during the preceding year, whether by termination or non-renewal, and
    f) The conditions for renewal, assignment, termination and the scope of exclusivity.

    Initially, there was some uncertainty whether any breach of the provisions of the Doubin law would enable the franchisee to walk away from the contract. However, the French supreme court (Cour de cassation) eventually ruled that agreements should only be annulled where missing or incorrect information affected the decision of the franchisee to enter into the agreement. The burden of proof is on the franchisee. [30]

    Dispute settlement features are only incorporated in some European countries. By not being rigorous, franchising is encouraged.

    Italy

    Under Italian law franchise [31] is defined as an arrangement between two financially independent parties where a franchisee is granted, in exchange for a consideration, the right to market goods and services under particular trademarks. In addition, articles dictate the form and content of the franchise agreement and define the documents that must be made available 30 days prior to execution. The franchisor must disclose:

    a) A summary of the franchise activities and operations,
    b) A list of franchisees currently operating in the franchise system in Italy,
    c) Year-by-year details of the changes in the number of franchisees for the previous three years in Italy,
    d) A summary of any court or arbitral proceedings in Italy related to the franchise system, and
    e) If requested by the franchisee, copies of franchisor's balance sheets for the previous three years, or since start-up if that period is shorter.

    Norway

    There are no specific laws regulating franchising in Norway. However, the Norwegian Competition Act section 10 prohibits cooperation which may prevent, limit or diminish the competition. This may also apply to vertical cooperation such as franchising.

    Russia

    In Russia, under chapter 54 of the Civil Code (passed 1996), franchise agreements are invalid unless written and registered, and franchisors cannot set standards or limits on the prices of the franchisee’s goods. Enforcement of laws and resolution of contractual disputes is a problem:[citation needed] Dunkin' Donuts chose to terminate its contract with Russian franchisees who were selling vodka and meat patties contrary to their contracts, rather than pursue legal remedies.[32]

    Spain

    The legal definition of franchising in Spain is an activity in which an undertaking, the franchisor, grants to another party, the franchisee, for a specific market and in exchange for financial compensation (either direct, indirect or both), the right to exploit an own system to commercialize products or services already exploited by the franchisor with enough success and experience.

    The Spanish Retail Trading Act regulates franchising.[33] The contents of the franchise must include, at least:

    • The use of a common name or brand or any other intellectual property right and a uniform presentation of the premises or the transport means included in the agreement.
    • The communication by the franchisor to the franchise of certain technical knowledge or substantial and singular know-how that has to be owned by the franchisor, and
    • Technical or commercial assistance or both, provided by the franchisor to the franchisee during the agreement, without prejudice to any supervision faculty to which the parties could freely agree in the contract.

    In Spain, the franchisor submits the disclosure information 20 days prior to signing the agreement or prior to any payment made by the franchisee to the franchisor. Franchisors are to disclose to the potential franchisee specific information in writing. This information has to be true and not misleading and include:

    • Identification of the franchisor;
    • Justification of ownership or license for use of any trademark or similar sign and judicial claims affecting them as well as the duration of the license;
    • General description of the sector in which the franchise operates;
    • Experience of the franchisor;
    • Contents and characteristics of the franchise and its exploitation;
    • Structure and extension of the network in Spain;
    • Essential elements of the franchise agreement.

    Franchisors (with some exceptions) should be registered in the Franchisors’ Register and provide the requested information. According to the regulation in force in 2010 this obligation has to be met within three months after the start of its activities in Spain.[34]

    United Kingdom

    In the United Kingdom there are no franchise-specific laws; franchises are subject to the same laws that govern other businesses. For example, franchise agreements are produced under regular contract law and do not have to conform to any further legislation or guidelines.[35] There is some self-regulation through the British Franchise Association (BFA) and the UK Franchise Organisation.

    However, there are many franchise businesses which do not become members, and many businesses that refer to themselves as franchisors do not conform to these rules.[citation needed] There are several people and organisations in the industry calling for the creation of a framework to help reduce the number of "cowboy" franchises and help the industry clean up its image.[who?]

    On 22 May 2007, hearings were held in the UK Parliament concerning citizen-initiated petitions for special regulation of franchising by the government of the UK due to losses incurred by citizens who had invested in franchises. The Minister of Industry, Margaret Hodge, conducted hearings but resisted any government regulation of franchising with the advice that government regulation of franchising might lull the public into a false sense of security. The Minister of Industry indicated that if due diligence were performed by the investors and the banks, the current laws governing business contracts in the UK offered sufficient protection for the public and the banks.[36]

    United States

    Isaac Singer, who made improvements to an existing model of a sewing machine in the 1850s, began one of the first franchising efforts in the United States, followed later by Coca-Cola, Western Union, etc.[37] and by agreements between automobile manufacturers and dealers.[38]

    Modern franchising came to prominence with the rise of franchise-based food service establishments. In 1932, Howard Deering Johnson established the first modern restaurant franchise based on his successful Quincy, Massachusetts Howard Johnson's restaurant founded in the late 1920s.[39][40] The idea was to let independent operators use the same name, food, supplies, logo and even building design in exchange for a fee. The growth in franchising accelerated in the 1930s when such chains as Howard Johnson's started to franchise motels.[41] The 1950s saw a boom in franchise chains in conjunction with the development of the U.S. Interstate Highway System.

    In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission has oversight of franchising, rather than the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The FTC administrates oversight via the FTC Franchise Rule.[42]

    The (FTC) Federal Trade Commission requires that the franchisee be furnished with a Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD) by the franchisor at least fourteen days before money changes hands or a franchise agreement is signed. The final agreement is always a negotiated document setting forth fees and other terms. Whereas elements of the disclosure may be available from third parties, only that provided by the franchisor can be depended upon. The U.S. Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD) is lengthy (300-700 pp +) and detailed (see Uniform Franchise Offering Circular (UFOC) for elements of disclosure), and generally requires audited financial statements from the franchisor in a particular format, except in some circumstances, such as where a franchisor is new. It must include such data as the names, addresses and telephone numbers of the franchisees in the licensed territory (who may be contacted and consulted before negotiations), estimate of total franchise revenues and franchisor profitability.

    Individual states may require the FDD to contain their own specific requirements, but the requirements in state disclosure documents must be in compliance with the federal rule that governs federal regulatory policy. There is no private right of action of action under the FTC rule for franchisor violation of the rule, but fifteen or more of the states have passed statutes that provide this right of action to franchisees when fraud can be proven under these special statutes. The majority of franchisors have inserted mandatory arbitration clauses into their agreements with their franchisees, some of which the U.S. Supreme Court has dealt with.

    There is no federal registry of franchises or any federal filing requirements for information. States are the primary collectors of data on franchising companies and enforce laws and regulations regarding their presence and their spread in their jurisdictions.

    Where the franchisor has many partners, the agreement may take the shape of a business format franchise - an agreement that is identical for all franchisees.

    Social franchises

    In recent years, the idea of franchising has been picked up by the social enterprise sector, which hopes to simplify and expedite the process of setting up new businesses. A number of business ideas, such as soap making, wholefood retailing, aquarium maintenance, and hotel operation have been identified as suitable for adoption by social firms employing disabled and disadvantaged people.

    The most successful example is probably the CAP Markets, a steadily growing chain of some 50 neighborhood supermarkets in Germany. Other examples are the St. Mary's Place Hotel in Edinburgh and the Hotel Tritone in Trieste.

    Social franchising also refers to a technique used by governments and aid donors to provide essential clinical health services in the developing world.

    Event franchising

    Event franchising is the duplication of public events in other geographical areas, retaining the original brand (logo), mission, concept and format of the event.[43] As in classic franchising, event franchising is built on precisely copying successful events. An example of event franchising is the World Economic Forum, also known as the Davos forum, which has regional event franchisees in China, Latin America, etc. Likewise, the alter-globalist World Social Forum has launched many national events. When The Music Stops is an example of an events franchise in the UK, in this case, running speed dating and singles events.

    See also

    References

    1. ^ "franchise" Online Etymology Dictionary
    2. ^ "International Franchise and Distribution". DLA Piper. 2012. http://www.dlapiper.com/us/services/detail.aspx?service=256. Retrieved 2012-2-2. 
    3. ^ http://www.entrepreneur.com/franchise500/index.html
    4. ^ Patterns of Internationalization for Developing Country Enterprises (Alliances and Joint Ventures) United Nations Industrial Development Organization, Vienna, 2008, ISBN 978-92-1-106443-8, pp 65
    5. ^ "The Economic Impact of Franchised Businesses In the United States". Price Waterhouse Coopers. 2012. 
    6. ^ Manual on Technology Transfer Negotiation (A reference for policy-makers and practitioners on Technology Transfer), 1996, United Nations Industrial Development Organization, Vienna, 1990, ISBN 92-1-106302-7
    7. ^ http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/article-29512.html nolo.com
    8. ^ "Opportunity not Opportunism: Improving conduct in Australian Franchising"
    9. ^ "Over regulation would harm franchising sector inquiry warned" dlaphillipsfox.com
    10. ^ http://www.franchise.co.nz/article/view/1167-survey-finds-franchise-sector-br-resilient-growing
    11. ^ http://www.franchise.co.nz/article/view/195-legislation-help-or-hindrance-
    12. ^ http://www.franchise.co.nz/article/view/117-an-introduction-to-franchising-in-new-zealand
    13. ^ http://www.franchise.co.nz/article/view/731-green-acres-master-charged-with-fraud
    14. ^ http://www.franchise.co.nz/article/view/831
    15. ^ http://www.franchise.co.nz/article/view/838-government-decides-against-franchise-regulation
    16. ^ http://www.franchise.co.nz/article/view/839-national-s-failure-to-act-on-franchise-regulation-disappointing-
    17. ^ http://www.franchise.co.nz/article/view/1226-franchise-regulation-br-reviewing-the-review
    18. ^ http://www.franchise.co.nz/article/view/576-franchise-association-calls-for-positive-regulation
    19. ^ http://www.franchise.co.nz/article/view/746-ministry-receives-submissions-on-regulation
    20. ^ http://www.allbusiness.com/legal/international-law/8887771-1.html
    21. ^ a b "Franchising in China" franchise.org
    22. ^ "China franchise regulations"
    23. ^ http://www.franchise-update.com/article.php?id=316
    24. ^ "Franchise laws in India"
    25. ^ Patterns of Internationalization for Developing Country Enterprises (Alliances and Joint Ventures) United Nations Industrial Development Organization, Vienna, 2008, ISBN 978-92-1-106443-8,
    26. ^ B.Kissikov "Franchising in Kazakhstan", Central-Asian Association of Franchising and Licensing-Association/Franchise-laws-in-India-n863929
    27. ^ http://www.peralaw.com/EU_Franchise_Disclosure.html
    28. ^ http://www.franchise.org/franchise-news-detail.aspx?id=33190 franchise.org
    29. ^ EU Franchise Disclosure peralaw.com
    30. ^ Franchise disclosure in Europe ffw.com
    31. ^ http://www.eurofranchiselawyers.com/pdf/Comparative_Table_08_06_09%20printable.pdf EuroFranchiseLawyers.com
    32. ^ Anttonen, Noora, Mika Tuunanen, Ilan Alon (2005), “The International Business Environments of Franchising in Russia,” Academy of Marketing Science Review, (5), 1-18.
    33. ^ The offer and sale of franchises are governed in Spain by the Retail Trade Act 7/1996 of January 15th as amended by Act 1/2010 of March 1. Particularly Article 62 is applicable to franchise agreements. The Act is completed by the Royal Decree 210/2010 of February 26th on Franchise Agreements.
    34. ^ See also Spain Chapter of Getting the Deal Through. Franchise 2011 by Ignacio Alonso
    35. ^ Franchise agreements subject to European Code of ethics (blog)
    36. ^ "Franchise Industry". Daily Hansard: Column Pyramid Schemes were outlawed in the UK by The Trading Schemes Act 1996. However, the legislation was so worded that legitimate Franchise Schemes were caught by the legislation and following lobbying by the British Franchise Association a memo was issued to the British Franchise Association by the Department of Trade and Industry on the 19 July 2007 which amended the wording of the legislation. The law on statute is now impossible to follow without reference to the memo. 363WH. 22 May 2007. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200607/cmhansrd/cm070522/halltext/70522h0001.htm. 
    37. ^ Franchising"
    38. ^ . http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0FJN/is_n8_v30/ai_18728418. [dead link]
    39. ^ Allen, kolin chakma.Foodservice’s theory of evolution: Survival of the fittest (1998). Nation’s Restaurant News 32(4), pp.14-17
    40. ^ Howard, T. (1996). "Howard Johnson: Initiator of franchised restaurants". Nation's Restaurant News 30 (2): 85–86. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m3190/is_nSPEISS_v30/ai_18091886. 
    41. ^ Brief History (Franchise)
    42. ^ http://www.ftc.gov/os/fedreg/2007/march/070330franchiserulefrnotice.pdf#page=102
    43. ^ Kissikov Beknur. Franchising. 

    External links


    Translations:

    Franchise

    Top

    Dansk (Danish)
    n. - franchise, koncession, fritagelse
    v. tr. - give i franchise

    Nederlands (Dutch)
    franchise, kiesrecht, systeemlicentie, vrijheid van een bepaalde beperking, recht (om een corporatie te zijn), lidmaatschap, staatsburgerschap, recht van lidmaatschap professionele sportvereniging, franchise verlenen aan

    Français (French)
    n. - franchisage, (Pol) droit de vote, (Comm) franchise
    v. tr. - franchiser

    Deutsch (German)
    n. - Wahlrecht, Konzession
    v. - das Wahlrecht verleihen

    Ελληνική (Greek)
    n. - παραχώρηση, δικαίωμα (ψήφου), προνόμιο, προνόμιο εκμετάλλευσης επιχείρησης, δικαιοχρησία, προνόμιο αποκλειστικής διάθεσης αγαθών
    v. - χορηγώ δικαίωμα ψήφου, χορηγώ ή εκμισθώνω ή πουλώ προνόμιο εκμετάλλευσης επιχειρήσεως

    Italiano (Italian)
    diritto di voto, diritto di suffragio, franchigia

    Português (Portuguese)
    n. - franquia (f)
    v. - franquear

    Русский (Russian)
    право голоса, освобождение от налогов, право на использование торговой марки

    Español (Spanish)
    n. - franquicia, concesión, licencia, derecho de voto
    v. tr. - liberar

    Svenska (Swedish)
    n. - rösträtt, medborgarrätt, privilegium, självrisk
    v. - bevilja franchise (ekon.)

    中文(简体)(Chinese (Simplified))
    公民权, 免赔额, 特权, 给以特权

    中文(繁體)(Chinese (Traditional))
    n. - 公民權, 免賠額, 特權
    v. tr. - 給以特權

    한국어 (Korean)
    n. - 투표권, 특권, 독점 판매권
    v. tr. - ~의 사용을 용납하다

    日本語 (Japanese)
    n. - 公民権, 選挙権, 特権, 独占販売権, フランチャイズ

    العربيه (Arabic)
    ‏(الاسم) إعفاء , امتياز تمنحه الحكومه (فعل) يمنح امتياز , يعفي‏

    עברית (Hebrew)
    n. - ‮זיכיון, זכות בחירה, אזרחות מלאה, חברות בארגון, זכיינות‬
    v. tr. - ‮העניק זיכיון‬


     
     

     

    Copyrights:

    American Heritage Dictionary. The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition Copyright © 2007, 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Updated in 2009. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.  Read more
    Barron's Marketing Dictionary. Dictionary of Marketing Terms. Copyright © 2000 by Barron's Educational Series, Inc. All rights reserved.  Read more
    Barron's Business Dictionary. Dictionary of Business Terms. Copyright © 2007 by Barron's Educational Series, Inc. All rights reserved.  Read more
    Barron's Real Estate Dictionary. Dictionary of Real Estate Terms. Copyright © 2008 by Barron's Educational Series, Inc. All rights reserved.  Read more
    Oxford Dictionary of Politics. The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Politics. Copyright © 1996, 2003 by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.  Read more
    Columbia Encyclopedia. The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition Copyright © 2012, Columbia University Press. Licensed from Columbia University Press. All rights reserved. www.cc.columbia.edu/cu/cup/ Read more
    $copyright.smallImage.alttext West's Encyclopedia of American Law. West's Encyclopedia of American Law. Copyright © 1998 by The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.  Read more
    Dictionary of Cultural Literacy: Economics. The New Dictionary of Cultural Literacy, Third Edition Edited by E.D. Hirsch, Jr., Joseph F. Kett, and James Trefil. Copyright © 2002 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Published by Houghton Mifflin. All rights reserved.  Read more
    Investopedia Financial Dictionary. Copyright ©2010, Investopedia.com - Owned and Operated by Investopedia US, A Division of ValueClick, Inc. All rights reserved.  Read more
    Dictionary of Cultural Literacy: Politics. The New Dictionary of Cultural Literacy, Third Edition Edited by E.D. Hirsch, Jr., Joseph F. Kett, and James Trefil. Copyright © 2002 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Published by Houghton Mifflin. All rights reserved.  Read more
    Word Tutor. Copyright © 2004-present by eSpindle Learning, a 501(c) nonprofit organization. All rights reserved.
    eSpindle provides personalized spelling and vocabulary tutoring online; sign up free Read more
    Random House Word Menu. © 2010 Write Brothers Inc. Word Menu is a registered trademark of the Estate of Stephen Glazier. Write Brothers Inc. All rights reserved.  Read more
     Rhymes. Oxford University Press. © 2006, 2007 All rights reserved.  Read more
    Bradford's Crossword Solver's Dictionary. Collins Bradford's Crossword Solver's Dictionary © Anne Bradford, 1986, 1993, 1997, 2000, 2003, 2005, 2008 HarperCollins Publishers All rights reserved.  Read more
    Wikipedia on Answers.com. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article Franchising Read more
    Translations. Copyright © 2007, WizCom Technologies Ltd. All rights reserved.  Read more

    Follow us
    Facebook Twitter
    YouTube