The correct Answer is Slavery, i just submitted the assignment and got it right! [:
the Nazis prohibit Jews from owning land
When questioned, should I become a prisoner of war, the Geneva Conventions, requires, but does not prohibit, you from identifying yourself to your captors. Which Principle of Behavior does the statement above refer?
The new Constitution and the fourteenth amendment had to be ratified. Women gained some right, and their was a requirment that one-fifth of all the state's revenue support public education.
The Civil War in of itself answered this question. The Constitution did not explicitly prohibit this from happening, however ratification of the Constitution may have implied that States are subject to Federal laws. Although the issue of slavery was the catalyst issue, the Civil War was about the question of States rights vs. Federal power. Up until the Union won the Civil War the right of a state to secede was a matter of dispute.
free soilers: their goal was to prohibit slavery only in new territories- many were unconvinced that the whole institution of slavery could be eliminated, some were northerns who did not want to compete economically with slavery in the new territories, others were racist and did not want blacks, free or enslaved, playing a role in westward expansion abolitionists: their goal was to abolish slavery completely they were more into the moral aspect of the issue and generally supported social equality
Yes, the northwest ordinance of 1787 prohibited slavery in the northwest territory.
The Northwest Ordinance outlawed slavery in the territory. However the ordinance did allow for indentured servants to be held in the territory. The US Constitution did not prohibit slavery at that time.
The Wilmot Proviso proposal was to prevent the introduction of slavery in any territory acquired from Mexico
King was an opponent of slavery and introduced a resolution in the Continental Congress to prohibit slavery in the Northwest Territory.i have no idea i cant even find it on my report :(
Not at all. It defined the new borders between both countries, and general laws - later disregarded - to be applied to people who were assimilated into the acquired territories.
Prohibit what?
what is to prohibit
From Wikipedia The name Green River Ordinance is given to a common American city ordinance prohibiting door-to-door solicitation. Under such an ordinance, it is illegal for any business to sell their items door-to-door without express permission from the household beforehand. Some versions prohibit all organizations, including non-profit charitable, political, and religious groups, from soliciting or canvassing any household that makes it clear, in writing, that it does not want such solicitations (generally with a "No Trespassing" or "No Solicitations" sign posted.) The ordinance is named for the city of Green River, Wyoming, the first city to enact it. The ordinance has been brought before the Supreme Court for challenge in several times. While the court has upheld these ordinances when they prohibit intrastate commerce (seeing the issue as a state's rights issue), more recent decisions suggest that a total ban on door to door soliciting would be found unconstitutional and unenforceable on the grounds of religious free speech and commercial free speech when the ordinances ban religious or interstate solicitations.
The aim of the Wilmot Proviso was to prohibit slavery in any territory gained from Mexico during the Mexican-American War. It was intended to prevent the expansion of slavery into these newly acquired territories.
The Wilmot Proviso, proposed in 1846, aimed to prohibit slavery in any territory acquired from Mexico as a result of the Mexican-American War. Despite never becoming law, it sparked intense debate over the expansion of slavery into newly acquired territories.
David Wilmot, a congressman from Pennsylvania, proposed the Wilmot Proviso in 1846. It was a failed legislative attempt to prohibit slavery in any territory acquired from Mexico after the Mexican-American War.
They are antonyms. Allow is often the opposite of prohibit.