What was the name of the battle which Sam Houston fought under Andrew Jackson?
The Battle of Horseshoe Bend which was a part of the War of 1812.
Why was Andrew Jackson against federal money for internal improvements?
For one thing, he believed, as would anyone who reads the constitution carefullly, that was unconstitutional . The Constitutions lists all the powers of the federal government and says that everything not listed belongs to the states. Jackson had no complaint against internal improvement - he just believed that states should fund the ones they wanted to fund. After he got Congress to pay off the national debt, he sent excess federal funds back to states.
He also could see the danger of the "pork barrel" - the idea that Congressmen would try to buy popularity in their states by voting to send federal money, which belongs to all the people, back home to their district-- (fortunately, senators and congressmen have more personal integrity than to ever do anything like that.?!
What was Jackson's position on nullification?
He was totally against the idea of nullification and made that fact clear in a paper.
No, no I do not. But I also do not know who you are? Are you the girl from last week or the week before? If you're the one from the week before, then give me a call, lets get back in touch. ;)
Why Calhoun resigned as Vice-president and how the issue was resolved by Henry Clay?
John C. Calhoun resigned as Vice President because of controversial conflicts with President Andrew Jackson. Calhoun believed Jackson was beginning to favor northern interests, rather than his own Southern platform. He also did not approve of the Tariff of 1828 and was under the impression that the bill would be rejected. When it passed, Calhoun resigned and wrote an essay imposing the idea of nullification. Nullification is the right of a state to interject what they might believe something the government passed is unconstitutional. Henry Clay resolved the issue when he proposed the Compromise Tariff of 1833. The Compromise eventually led to the Whig Party.
How far is it from Convent Louisiana to New Orleans?
The driving distance from Convent, Louisiana to New Orleans, Louisiana is 57 miles via I-10 E per MapQuest. The driving time per MapQuest is 1 hour.
Force Bill
How old is too old to have a healthy baby?
We don't know yet, because the age keeps getting pushed further and further out. It depends on each individual mother, but a 66-year-old Romanian woman gave birth to twins in 2005. You didn't ask the follow-up, how old is too old to have a healthy baby and remain healthy yourself?! Childbearing is hard on the mother. Not that anyone asked, but I wouldn't recommend giving birth after you're old enough to get Medicare!
How did the victory at New Orleans change the American peoples views of Andrew Jackson?
it made the American People think of Andrew Jackson as a "Hero".
The Supreme Court never ruled on the subject of the Cherokee's removal because the Court held it lacked original (trial) jurisdiction over the case. John Ross would have had to refile his case in a District Court, then petition the Supreme Court to hear it on appeal. This never happened. Everything Chief Justice John Marshall wrote about the federal government's obligation to the Cherokee was personal opinion, not part of a legally binding decision.
_______________________________________________________________
What I'm about to say might help. In the court case, Worcester v. Georgia, the court said that the Cherokee's couldn't be affected by Georgia's state laws that would try to break the terms on which they self govern themselves. The court might have said this but both Georgia and President Andrew Jackson ignored the court's ruling.
_______________________________________________________________
More Information
According to popular myth, Jackson was supposed to have said, "John Marshall has made his decision, now let him enforce it!" In Paul Boller's book, They Never Said It: A Book of False Quotes, Misquotes, & False Attributions, historian Robert V. Remini claims Jackson never made such a statement. The tale is based on something Jackson wrote in a letter to John Coffee, "...the decision of the Supreme Court has fell still born, and they find that they cannot coerce Georgia to yield to its mandate,"meaning the Court's opinion was moot because it had no power to enforce its edict (not being a legislative body).
The State of Georgia wanted to evict the Cherokee tribes from treaty land because gold had been discovered on it. The Cherokee tribe took the matter to the Supreme Court, where then Chief Justice John Marshall presided.
The case, Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, 30 US 1 (1831), was dismissed for lack of original jurisdiction because the Supreme Court determined the Cherokee Nation and United States were like two separate nations, with the Cherokee's status that of a "denominated domestic dependent nation," which the federal government was obligated to protect.
In Worcester v. Georgia, (1832), Chief Justice John Marshall stated that Georgia had no legal right to interfere with the Cherokee and held that the Native Americans were not bound by Georgia law while on their own land. In the Court's opinion the territory under Cherokee occupation would have passed to the United States government following the British defeat in the Revolutionary War, and that the Cherokee Nation was not a state but a "denominated domestic dependent nation." This created an implied obligation for the federal government to defend the Native Americans against Georgia, but Jackson ignored Marshall's suggestion because Marshall's comments about the United States' obligations were personal opinion, not part of the legal decision.
While this may appear to grant the Cherokee a right to remain on tribal land, the ruling only applied to the state of Georgia. The Court lacked jurisdiction over the United States government because the United States was not party to the case, and the question before the Court related to the fate of imprisoned missionaries (Worcester, et al.), and whether the State of Georgia had a right to make laws regulating the use of Cherokee land, not removal.
Unfortunately, the decision couldn't reach the broader issue regarding Georgia's and Congress' determination to evict the Cherokee, so any allegations that the Supreme Court determined the Cherokee could remain on their land is a misinterpretation of the case.
Jackson was a staunch proponent of Indian removal because, in his view, the Indian land was a valuable commodity, and their occupation stood in the way of progress. The United States had already appropriated more than 22 million acres of land from the Creek (1814) and Seminole (1818) nations by use of military force. An earlier Supreme Court ruling, Johnson v. M'Intosh (1823), validated this practice, while the Worcester ruling seemed to condemn it, supporting, instead, Native American rights.
Both Jackson and the state of Georgia ignored the Court's ruling about Georgia law being inapplicable in Native American territory.
The US government was ultimately responsible for the Cherokee being removed from Georgia as a result of the Treaty of New Echota, ratified in 1836. Congress offered the Native Americans $5 million and land 1,000 miles away in Indian Territory (present day Oklahoma) in exchange for their Southern land. An unauthorized faction within the Cherokee Nation agreed to the Treaty, but the elected Cherokee officials protested to Congress. Congress ignored them.
President Van Buren, Jackson's cohort and successor, ordered federal troops to force some 15,000 Cherokees to leave Georgia in winter, leading to what became known as the Trail of Tears for the many who died en route.
Why is Andrew Jackson different type of president than any other previous president?
BECAUSE, He didn't wanted people to call him PRESIDENT Andrew Jackson. He wanted them to say GENERAL Andrew Jackson.
What are some nicknames for Andrew?
well since ur name is Andrew Jackson u can say AJ, or Andy, or A man hope u like these nicknames.