Civil Process

A summary judgment is just as enforceable as any other judgment. The only difference between a summary judgment and a judgment after a trial is that a summary judgment is granted when the court believes that a trial is unnecessary. A trial would be unnecessary if the facts of the case are either undisputed or conclusively established. Once that is shown, then the court can grant a summary judgment after a proper motion is filed.

He would need to prove fraud or undue influence or that he was legally incompetent at the time of the deed. He would need to prove that in a lawsuit.

He would need to prove fraud or undue influence or that he was legally incompetent at the time of the deed. He would need to prove that in a lawsuit.

He would need to prove fraud or undue influence or that he was legally incompetent at the time of the deed. He would need to prove that in a lawsuit.

He would need to prove fraud or undue influence or that he was legally incompetent at the time of the deed. He would need to prove that in a lawsuit.

Subpoenas are intended to compel the production of documents and/or live testimony.

Depending on the state rules of court procedure, juries are occasinally called upon the recommend sentencing. You will have to do the research to see if this procedure applies in your state.

A "Dismissed without Prejudice" order means that the lawsuit is being dismissed by the court, but the case can be re-filed if the party chooses to re-file.

This often happens when a lawsuit is filed but, for some reason, it is not pursued. Maybe a plaintiff becomes ill, or maybe a witness can't be located. The possibilities are endless. Rather than the case sitting in the court docket without there being any activity on it, the court dismisses it.

On the other hand, a case that is "Dismissed WITH Prejudice" means, usually, that the claim is barred from being refiled.

Question is unclear. A non-attorney may deliver to (i.e.: file) the notice of appearance to the Clerk of Court's office but the notice itself must identify to the court THE ATTORNEY OR FIRM who will be representing the corporation.

If they were redacted by court order (which they probably were), you probably cannot, at least not under the FOIA.

Otherwise, you must go through the courts to argue and show cause why the unexpurgated versions (if they exist) should be released to you.

he let the poor have a better life

The purpose of an appeal in a civil case is similar to the reason for allowing one in any other kind of case.

On the most basic level, it is to permit the reviewing court to determine if the trial court (1) applied the correct law to the facts that were adduced by the evidence; and (2) applied the law correctly to those facts.

As a general rule, the appellate court does not retry the evidence, nor does its substitute its view of the evidence for that of the trial judge or jury (if there had been a jury trial). Instead, it considers issues of law to ensure that the correct law was applied to the facts and that it was applied correctly.

The result of an appeal is that the trial court's (or jury's) determination is affirmed (meaning, it is left alone), reversed (meaning that it is overturned), affirmed in part and reversed in part, or remanded back to the trial court for a new trial with specific instructions as to corrections that must be made from how the trial was handled originally.

Yes. It is customary to file a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice. This has the effect of terminating the pending lawsuit and preventing the Plaintiff from refiling another suit against the same party(ies) based upon the same facts. In fact, the Defendant will likely insist upon it.

No, the jury is not required to discredit a witness simply because there is a discrepancy in their testimony or between the testimonies of multiple witnesses. Discrepancies can arise from various factors, such as memory differences or perception variations. It is the jury's role to evaluate the credibility of each witness and determine the weight of their testimony in light of all the evidence presented. Ultimately, the jury must consider the overall context and decide what they believe to be true.

Without prejuedice means that the decision is not irrevocable. That, in this instance, at some time in future you may withdraw the notice to quit.

conflict of interest

In federal court, the answer is no. I'm not aware of a notarization requirement for state court complaints, but state court rules could require it. In Pennsylvania state courts, a complaint needs to be "verified" but this does not require that it be notarized.

$10,000.00 dollars.

See below link:

You can't change the terms of a lease while it's in effect. When it is about to expire you can change the terms of it as of its renewal date. You have to give at least a 30-day notice (perhaps 60 in some states) of the changes you, the landlord, wish to make. If the tenant doesn't like the changes he can leave/move out. Now if the order of protection is against you, the landlord, then this is for a lawful reason: you probably were abusive to the tenant in some way or another. If this is true and you do make radical changes on the lease for the purpose of getting rid of your tenant, he could file a lawsuit against you for retaliatory conduct, for which he can receive a large amount of money for damages, so be careful!

There is no specific form that must be used to answer a summons in Gwinnett County. Generally the summons is delivered with a complaint; the complaint should be answered paragraph by paragraph with an admission, denial or statement that not enough facts are known to either admit or deny the allegation of the complaint.

To defend against an EEOC complaint, first, thoroughly review the allegations and gather relevant documentation, including employment records and communications. Next, prepare a detailed response addressing each claim, highlighting factual inaccuracies or justifications for the employer's actions. Additionally, consult with legal counsel experienced in employment law to formulate a strategic response and representation throughout the investigation process. Finally, cooperate with the EEOC during their inquiry while maintaining clear and open communication.

Libel is a statement in writing judged to harm the reputation of a person. Slander is a malicious report report uttered to damage a persons character. Both of these terms harm the reputation of the person they were charged against

The Seventh Amendment provides for the right to a jury trial to settle all disputes about property worth more than $20. When both parties in a conflict agree, a judge rather than a jury may settle the case.

I don't believe that there is such a thing. "PRO SE" means that you are representing yourself without benefit of legal counsel. Whereas, a class action indicates that MANY plaintiffs have gathered under one banner to bring suit against one plaintiff. The two terms are actually incompatible.