Actually yes it is!

Blue eyed butcher IS based on a true story

well according to one of the movies i watched.. i believe it was

"Jason Goes to Hell" it was on the tv channel AMC.

in the movie they say he was only 11

Abby is a 1974 American blaxploitation horror film about a woman who is possessed by an African sex spirit. The film stars Carol Speed as the title character, William H. Marshall; best known for portraying the lead role in Blacula, Terry Carter. It was directed by William Girdler, who co-wrote the film's story with screenwriter Gordon Cornell Layne.

No, according to George Lutz (the father of the family who lived through the haunting in Amityville in 1976) the walls never bled. He has stated this during various TV and radio interviews over the years.

The idea of the bleeding walls is likely the combination of two supposedly real events:

1) One day George and Kathy discovered tiny drops of a greenish gelatin-like substance on the carpeted floors. They cleaned it up and blamed it on the kids. When this happened a second time on a different day, the kids were not around to blame. The source for the substance was unknown.

2) Another strange activity in the house took place on the keyholes of several interior doors. A black epoxy-like substance slowly grew from the keyholes, resembling long black teardrops. During their stay, this substance grew longer, but was always hard to the touch -- it was never found in a softened state.

The fictional blood (or slime) oozing from the walls seems to be a combination of these two incidents, neither of which appear in Jay Anson's book or the later film. Jay Anson admitted to using artistic license (especially in regards to moving events around and making the story seem more exciting) but it is unclear whether this was a direct fabrication on his part, or perhaps misinformation given to Anson by a third party.

No. it's just a movie.

It is a fictional story and character, although some have claimed it is based on truth. There is no proof that it was ever true.

No, Chucky is fiction-based.

No.

Nobody- the whole point is that Norman Bates's mother was long dead, and that he had preserved her corpse using his taxidermy skills. His psychotic condition made him alternately assume her personality and then his own- when he committed murders, he would dress up in her old clothes believing himself to be her at that time, talk in her voice, and afterwards snap back into his own personality. His own character and his delusional 'mother' character would each blame the other for the killing.

Thus the 'mother' character was played by Anthony Perkins all along, wearing old ladie's clothes. The corpse discovered in the fruit cellar at the end was just a wax dummy, it wasn't a real person in make-up.

Alfred Hitchcock .

Eadweard Muybridge created the first 'motion picture' in 1878 of a galloping horse. This was a science experiment at the time, and the pictures were printed on paper cards and turned by hand crank to simulate motion.

Arms, or limbs.

Do you mean The Blair Witch Project? No, it's a pure work of fiction. Some of it's inspiration may have come from old American folk tales of paranormal events that took place in the 19th Century (most of which were probably either made up completely or else grossly exaggerated, and in any case could never be proved), but it's not based on a real story, no.

Taxidermy

No, it is not.

Yes. The film was banned in Kansas upon its original release on the grounds that it exhibited "cruelty and tended to debase morals".

Inappropriate for who, or what? Without knowing what you mean by "inappropriate," your question can't be answered. The words "appropriate" and "inappropriate" have only situational meaning. That is, anything can be appropriate or inappropriate, depending on the situation.

When the situation is left unqualified, the words "appropriate" and "inappropriate" become totally meaningless.

For example, a sexy green dress would be appropriate for a cocktail party, but inappropriate for a funeral. So you cannot simply ask, "Is this dress appropriate?" You have to specify: "Is this dress appropriate for a cocktail party?" or "Is this dress appropriate for a funeral?"

Or, "Is this movie inappropriate?" Inappropriate for who, or what? The question needs more information: "Is this movie inappropriate for an 8-year-old child?" or "Is this movie inappropriate to watch at my grandmother's 90th birthday party?" or "Is this movie inappropriate for a romantic night at home with my boyfriend?"

In other words, nothing is simply "appropriate" or "inappropriate." Whether something is appropriate or inappropriate depends on the situation, which you have failed to provide.

Friday the 13th uncut is an alternate version of the film Friday the 13th, also sometimes referred to as the 'directors cut' version. It means that it is unedited/uncut. Any scenes that were cut from the original film's theatrical release have been added back in to the uncut version.

Buster Keaton.

Of course not. :Q

Yes its about how Perez brothers lose each other and one goes

And tries to find him

Peter Cushing played a vampire in a French film called "Tender Dracula". But, it wasn't of a horror genre.

There was a film like this called 'Quaretmass and the pit'. It was in colour but some camera shots of the grasshopper/demon like creatures were in black and white because there were images from a machine 'scanning' the pods. Sorry, just read what I posted but it should say 'Quatermass' pronounced 'kwaitermass' I've seen this movie several times under the title "Five Million Years to Earth".