Court Procedure

Eventually, yes. Magistrates courts are subordinate to the court of which they are a branch. Any appeal would initially go to that court. If the appeal was not resolved at that level, THEN it could be appealed to the Court of Appeals.

In the United Kingdom, the maximum sentence that a Crown Court can give depends on the offense. For less serious offenses, the maximum sentence is typically a few years, while for more serious crimes like murder, the maximum sentence can be life imprisonment. However, the precise maximum sentence for each offense is defined by legislation.

FIrst: If you request it at your initial court hearing, it will be tantamount to your admitting guilt. You should consider this before entertaining the idea of requesting this disposition. Secondly: the judge may choose not to (or may be incapable of) granting your request. Legislatures and courts are extemely hard on DUI offenders and the legislature has often-times inposed mandatory penalties on persons convicted of, or admitting to, DUI's.

It is called a hung jury. See the link below

Go to your local law library which is located in the courthouse and all necessary filings for motions will be available. Lawyer not necessary to file a motion.

a supreme court..

Then he can suffer the consequences of anyone who doesn't do a drug test, per the entity that sent the person there. For example if someone's hire or promotion is contingent upon the results of the test, the hire or promotion can be denied.

You get boobs, and when you start your period and are going through mood swings you can tell people back off I'm on my period with out them getting made at you! It's not soo bad it only lasts a week!

Leader of the defence team in O J Simpson's murder trial.

yes i think so. i' not a lawyer but i think so because there are case going on against, Anderson of USA in bhopal gas tragedy issue and match fixing issue late Hansie Cronje SA cricket team former captain. the scandal was unearthed by Delhi police and Hansie faced an inquiry i don't know whether they filed a case against it or not.

have a nice day!

Yes, in many states and especially for capital crimes, children as young as nine-years-old have been incarcerated in prison. It is less common for children under the age of thirteen.

There are, for example, approximately 1,300 children between the ages of thirteen and eighteen currently incarcerated in the Michigan Department of Corrections facility at Lapeer, Michigan (Thumb Correctional Facility).

USUALLY A TRIAL COURT IS WHEN SOMEONE IS TAKEN TO COURT FOR SOME REASON OR ANOTHER. THE APPELLATE COURT IS WHEN YOU WANT TO APPEAL A DECISION THAT WAS MADE BY THE JUDGE

A trial court hears testimony, examines evidence, rules on the admissibility of evidence and objections of trial counsel, issues a judgment on the case, and imposes sentence or penalties/awards. A trial court may also impanel juries and give them instructions for deliberating. An appellate court only reviews the decisions of lower courts, which include trial courts and in some cases lower appellate courts. They do not hear testimony or examine new evidence. They only review the record of the lower court, and may hear oral arguments from the attorneys involved in the appeal. An appellate court may uphold the decision of the trial court, or return the case to the trial court for reconsideration or a new trial.

Quick Answer: Nothing

Expanded Answer: Unless it's a criminal/traffic type charge (e.g. DUI, Driving on Suspended, Reckless Driving, etc...) the court will most likely try you in your absence and give you the standard fine. If it is a criminal/traffic type charge the court could issue a capias for your arrest and punish you under the contempt statute where you would face up to 10 days in jail.

In most cases, yes.

The parent with sole custody must however inform the court that issued the custodial order and the non custodial parent before the move.

The non custodial parent will be given the opportunity to contest the move if he or she so chooses.

In most cases a move out of country is done without the other parent knowing. If this happens there are organizations that can help you get your child back. COntact the Red Cross for information if needed.

Yes, a child has the same rights under the constitution as an adult has, and if questioned in regards to a criminal investigation the Miranda rights must be read and the child can request a lawyer and remain silent.

In most jurisdiction juveniles are tried in a separate "juvenile court" unless they commit a serious crime that has the court elevate their offender status to that of an 'adult.' Then the juvenile is tried in adult court.

Yes, underage drinking is a misdemeanor. It is considered a MIP, Minor in possession. In the state of Michigan, both are misdemeanor's.

The law allows a parent(s) to give temporary custody (3 months or less) to a family relative or qualified adult caregiver. The parent(s) must give written notarized permission for the child/children to reside with the other person(s). This authorization should include all issues pertaining to the care of the child.Specific dates for the change of residency to begin and end. Permission for the child/children to receive medical and dental care. Permission for the child/children to be enrolled, or continue in school (if applicable). Terms for the payment of financial support. And any other necessary stipulations pertaining to the individual child/children that is needed. The parent(s) must also keep regular weekly contact with the child/children and the adult caregiver. Even if this is done in the correct way, there is no guarantee that state social services will not intervene if there are problems. Any term longer than three (3) months must be handled through the prescribed legal guidelines of the state of residency.

It depends. In most courts, The law was given that the person should not bring their camera whenever something like a testing is in progress. The law was given by the Supreme Court and is still a rule that was applied for no one to take or even think about bringing their cameras.

In many states and citys a court is allowed to tell the person who is filming or taking pictures not to film or take photo. The same could be said in stores because the property owner does not want their work to be reused or written. A court will also be notifyed and if a important meeting is recorded or filmed on videotape without the owner's permission. The person responsible can get sued or arrested! Many states carry this rule and still apply and are warned when a person does something like film and breaks the law without permission.

The same can be said for a person. If you videotape a person without his or / her permission. The owner can end up calling the police and they can charge you with trespassing on private or public property. That's why the owner wants to take really good care of their property and wants to make sure it's not caught on tape nor on camera. The person may ask the person to turn the camera off without even warning them and if a person refuses to cooperate or listen to them then they can be charged with tresspassing and can be arrested for doing so. The rule is applied to only public places and stores which have the rule for not allowing cameras inside. For example, Many stores like Kmart, Barnes And Noble Bookstore, Wal-Mart, Khol's, Or other places may have this rule so as for people to not film their private property or put their marketing on tape. The person may not allow the other person to record and put the video they made on YouTube, Etc, The person can be responsible for damages and may be liable for copyright infringement and may end up getting a sentence for about to 12 weeks in local jail or prison. In malls the same can be said when the person does not want their face to be shown on TV or on videotape. However if the person who notifys or asks you to stop filming them and you still don't listen to their instructions then they can end up getting or calling the police.

They sometimes might have signs that notify filmmakers and photographers not to bring their cameras inside the store. The store and the court has a right to protect their property from being used in television commercials, Marketing, Or even used for advertisements. If the person finds out that the filmmaker has copied or used their face in one of their videos then they could end up sueing the person and or having them charged or placed under arrest. The person may not want their identity exposed and they are known to show their face on television without their permission.

A person also can end up notifying the state attorney and also the authorites for having to put the video on YouTube and the person may be liable for damages depending on how bad he copyrights the products or items in the store. Copyright infringement is also a big crime and if the person is seen commiting it or using various products in the store to create or use them to create an ad without permission. Then the owner might get angry and tell them to stop filming and leave the store. All stores have this and there will be consequences if the person is told to stop filming and does not comply. For example, You can't film people or their public property and you certainly cannot film inside a courtroom while it's in progress and someone's inside of it. You cannot also film public meetings or even film court hearings that the person recieves and if you refuse or do not comply with the rules then they may find out and you will end up going to jail. The same with tresspassing and also for attempting not to leave the property when told to do so. The person may contact and notify the authorites and mall security can also be called if the person refuses to put their camera away! The same can be said for police and security if they tell someone that they don't want to be filmed.

So is filming a problem in stores, Courtrooms, And even inside local public shopping malls.

Yes.

Will you get sued if you use the video for advertising, Advertisements, Copyright infringement, Or use the property without the owner's permission.

Yes.

Will you get into trouble for filming local security officers and police officers inside public places.

Yes.

Will you be charged and placed under arrest for tresspassing and also for filming public local places without permission!

Yes.

The merchandise found inside dollar stores and local shopping places may be a crime to film and record without the owner's permission. In fact it is a rule that you do not film or use the products for using in your video to advertise. Some stores may not allow this and some places might tell you to leave and might say no. And other places will let you film without having a problem with attempting to tell you leave or warning you. This applies to all stores and they have this rule and policy because of security reasons so there may be reason why they don't want you filming inside buildings, Malls, Dollar stores, Or anywhere else!

When your 500 years was what i was told i guess?(:

The Homecoming Court is a representative group of students that, in a coeducational institution, consists of a King and Queen, and possibly Prince(s) and Princess(es). In a single-gender institution, the Homecoming Court will usually consist of only a King and Princes (for a male school) or a Queen and Princesses (for a female school), although some schools may choose to join with single-gender schools of the opposite gender to elect the Homecoming Court jointly.

Generally, the King and Queen are students completing their final years of study at their school (also called seniors), while the Princes and Princesses are underclassmen. In high school, 17- or 18-year-old students in their final year are represented by a King or Queen; in college, students who are completing their final year of study, usually between 21 and 23 years old.

Classmates traditionally nominate students who have done a lot to contribute to their school, then students vote for members of the Court from the nominees. Once the Homecoming Court candidates are announced, the entire student body votes for the Queen and King. The voting is often conducted by secret ballot, but other methods may also be used by certain schools.

Local rules determine when the Homecoming Queen and King are crowned. Sometimes, the big announcement comes at a pep rally, school assembly, or public ceremony one or more days before the game. Other schools crown their royalty at the Homecoming football game, a dance or other school event.

Often, the previous year's Queen and King are invited back to crown their successors. If they are absent for whatever reason, someone else - usually, another previous Queen or King, a popular teacher, or other designated person - will perform those duties. Usually, the Queen is crowned first, followed by the King. The crowning method also varies by school.

Homecoming court members who are not crowned king or queen are often called escorts or royalty . They are often expected to participate in the week's activities as well. At some schools, a Homecoming Prince/Princess, Duke/Duchess etc. (often underclassmen nominated by their classmates) are crowned along with the King and Queen; sometimes, middle school and junior high students may partake in the high school activities.

know more about the homecoming day:http://www.icollageformac.com/special-day-articles/welcome-to-homecoming.html#175