Euthanasia

Im againt euthanasia.

it is gainst god's commandments "Thou shall not kill" as well as being unethical. Life is a gift God bestowed upon us and we do not have the authority to choose when it ends. An example is a lady who was on life support for 40 DAYS. Doctors insisted she had no hope and the machine was the only thing keeping her alive while in a coma. on the 40th day she awoke from the coma. Miracle? yes!

just because it seems hopeless or a person is in pain does NOT mean they have the right to choose to die. For those in pain and want to end their life are not in their right minds as the pain twists their morals and logicval thinking. Many have recovered and stated that all they wanted to do was die but they were glad they didn't.

although some people may beleave that euthanasia is right as the euthanasia act should be right if a person has asked for there life to be ended in that way as we should not go against that as it is there choice so euthanasia should be allowed if it is asked for by others.

A key non-consequentialist concern raised regarding euthanasia is the potential violation of the intrinsic value of human life. Critics argue that permitting euthanasia undermines the moral principle that life should be preserved and respected, regardless of the circumstances surrounding an individual's suffering or choices. This perspective emphasizes the inherent dignity of each person and the ethical obligation to protect life, rather than focusing solely on the outcomes of such decisions.

Simple. Life support costs thousands, even up to millions of dollars, all depending on how long someone is kept alive. Whereas if someone ends their life voluntarily the cost is very little, say a shot to the head, slit wrists, or even the potassium from an IV drip from a full day's course being injected instantly (which is a similar amount used in lethal injections), but then the family needs to pay for the funeral afterwards.

You can create numerous words from the letters in "euthanasia," including "hate," "sun," "seat," "aunt," and "has." The total number of possible words will vary based on the rules you follow, such as word length and whether you include proper nouns or abbreviations. Generally, a variety of shorter words can be formed, and more comprehensive word games can yield a significant number of combinations. If you're interested in a specific word count or set of words, let me know!

The question of whether euthanasia is against civil liberties is complex and often hinges on individual perspectives on autonomy, morality, and the role of the state. Proponents argue that individuals should have the right to make decisions about their own bodies and end-of-life choices, viewing euthanasia as an expression of personal liberty. Conversely, opponents may contend that it undermines societal values and the sanctity of life, arguing that the state has a duty to protect all lives. Ultimately, the interpretation of euthanasia in the context of civil liberties varies based on legal, cultural, and ethical frameworks.

Three major conceptual issues of euthanasia include the ethical debate over the sanctity of life versus autonomy, the potential for abuse or coercion in vulnerable populations, and the distinction between active and passive euthanasia. Supporters argue for the right to choose death in the face of unbearable suffering, while opponents emphasize the moral implications of ending life. Additionally, concerns arise regarding the safeguards necessary to protect individuals from being pressured into euthanasia decisions. These issues highlight the complex interplay between individual rights, societal values, and medical ethics.

The term "euthanize" became more widely accepted in the mid-20th century as it began to be used in both medical and ethical discussions surrounding end-of-life care. It derives from the Greek words "eu" (good) and "thanatos" (death), and its usage has evolved to specifically refer to the practice of intentionally ending a life to alleviate suffering. As societal attitudes towards euthanasia shifted, particularly in the context of terminal illness and animal welfare, the term gained prominence in legal and medical contexts.

no...it is not legal and i dont think there is any cases in malaysia concerning euthanasia. i have went through the database.

Euthenasia is administered to those who are still living and, for whatever reason, wish to die. DNR orders affect only those whose own life fails due to natural causes and who do not wish to be brought back to life.

Euthanasia and assisted suicide raise significant legal issues, including the potential for violations of laws regarding homicide and consent, as well as the need for clear regulatory frameworks to ensure patient autonomy and safeguard against coercion. Ethically, these practices challenge principles such as the sanctity of life, the role of medical professionals, and the moral implications of ending life intentionally. Additionally, they invoke deep societal debates about suffering, dignity, and the right to choose one's end-of-life circumstances. Balancing these legal and ethical dimensions remains a complex and contentious issue in many jurisdictions.

Dr. Jack Kevorkian, often referred to as "Dr. Death," is the most well-known practitioner of voluntary active euthanasia. He gained notoriety in the 1990s for assisting terminally ill patients in ending their lives through physician-assisted suicide, claiming to honor their right to choose. His actions sparked widespread debate and led to legal challenges surrounding euthanasia and assisted suicide in the United States. Kevorkian's practices ultimately resulted in his conviction for second-degree murder in 1999.

Active,passive,voluntary,involuntary,non-voluntary

people might abuse it they could kill a person using euthanasia

making euthanasia illegal only puts the price of a human life higher, human life is no better than any other life

ok so humans can imagine, dogs dream so they have a partial level or sentience

human life is not a prized possesion it never has been

the amount of death in war should show you that by now

god read the bible or summit, get your head strait

there are not any religions that enflight on euthanasia being legal

It´s illegal here.

An opinion towards euthanasia cannot be generalized across any one society. The religion and values of some individuals make it so that prolonging of life through artificial means is frowned upon(assisted breathing/blood pumping devices), and as a result these individuals would prefer the use of euthanasia rather than see loved ones in pain and dying slowly, their lifespan increased through medical advancements. However, many people view euthanasia as equivalent to murder, as it involves a third party making the decision to end a life, no matter if the intention is only to end pain. Ultimately, if one holds that human life is sacred, then euthanasia is a gross infringement upon the right of an individual to live, no matter what the circumstance.

It's usually done by administering a massive dose of injected anaesthetic. the dog feels nothing, and simply 'goes to sleep' - hence the term 'putting a dog to sleep'.

You don't, or at least: you can't get it easily, as people who do not live in The Netherlands sometimes seem to think.

Under very, very specific circumstances, you can ask your doctor for euthanasia. Your doctor has to confirm you are completely sane and that you 'suffer unbearably'. For example: you have got cancer in a terminal phase and you suffer from enormous pains. Two other doctors, who do not know your doctor or you, will have to see you and conclude the same - independently. And they all have to file a report. Only then, your doctor won't be prosecuted if he performs euthanasia.