Extradition

As with the other 48 states in the United States of America, Florida and Kentucky tend to cooperate with each other, and with the other states, in extradition requests. For such requests tend to be over serious, felony charges. But if another country is involved, then as with the other 48 states, Florida and Kentucky would leave the matter in the hands of the United States government. For involvement of a country other than the U.S. is a federal issue.

Generally cost is paid for by the country that demands extradition.

All US states and territories honor each other's requests for extradition - there are no 'safe-haven' states - it is impossible to say whether a particular state will choose to extradite you or not, there are simply too many variables - usually it depends on the offense and the seriousness of it - most states will USUALLY extradite for felony offenses.

All states extradite to Colorado, provided that legal standards are satisfactorily met. For as with the other 49 states within the United States of America, Colorado tends to respect, and cooperate with, other states on extradition requests. All of the 50 states recognize that extradition tends to be requested for the serious, felony charges. It's only when a country other than the U.S. becomes involved that the states don't interact, and take no decisionmaking role. For involvement of another country always is a federal concern.

It will depend on the severity of the assault.

The process of one state seeking the return of a person from another state is technically not extradition- it is rendition. Authorities in one state request authorities in the other state to arrest and return the person to answer to criminal charges. Those authorities may hold a hearing to determine if this is the right person, and if they should be returned. If so, the person is detained until picked up, and taken to the first state. Extradition involves two separate countries.

States of the US cannot extradite directly from foreign countries on their own authority. International extradition is conducted by the US State and/or Justice Departments who must actually be the ones to file the paperwork with the foreign government.

The United States maintains diplomatic relations, but does not have extradition treaties with the following countries: Afghanistan, Algeria, Andorra, Angola, Armenia, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brunei, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cambodia, Cameroon, Cape Verde, Central African Republic, Chad, China (People's Republic of China), Union of the Comoros, Congo, Democratic Republic of the, Cote d' Ivoire, Djibouti, Equatorial Guinea, Ethiopia, Gabon, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Indonesia, Jordan, Kuwait, Laos, Lebanon, Libya, Madagascar, Maldives, Mali, Marshall Islands, Mauritania, Micronesia, Moldova, Mongolia, Mozambique, Myanmar, Namibia, Nepal, Niger, Oman, Qatar, Russian Federation, Rwanda, São Tomé and Príncipe, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Serbia and Montenegro, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Togo, Tunisia, Uganda, Vanuatu, Vietnam, Western Samoa, Yemen, and Zimbabwe.

No. State are sovereign governments under the constitution, and one state cannot enter another state to retrieve a prisoner without permission from the state holding the prisoner. Counties are only political subdivisions within a state, and there are no such protections. A prisoner may be moved from one county to another within the same state with no court intervention or violation of rights.

Warrants are a matter of public record and police departments and other law enforcement agencies generally post them on their website and/or in some cases newspapers print a list of persons who have active warrants. The information can also be found through online court records but the interested party would probably need to know the court, the date and the docket number where the warrant was issued. The best place to start would be to do a search of the county police department website where it is believed the warrant may have been issued. Added: To my knowledge, there are no publicly accessible websites or databases that reveal this information. Simplest and easiest way is to call your local law enforcement agency and simply ask.

Yes, depending upon the charge and if legal standards are met. For Iowa and the other 49 states within the United States of America respect, and cooperate with, each other on extradition requests. Such requests tend to be made over the serious, felony charges and for the more heinous crimes. But neither Iowa nor any one of the other states makes decisions once it's ascertained that a country other than the U.S. is involved. For such involvement automatically demands the role of the federal government as decisionmaker.

Only Thailand and China have extradition treaties (not ratified by Cambodia) with Cambodia under the UNTOC and OECD.

All states extradite to all other states. Some wont extradite on some cases, but they are few and far between. If California asserts that they will extradite/accept the person back (and arrange the transportation), all states will cooperate with the extradition. You can try to run to a handful of other countries, but why not just get it behind you, and turn yourself in.

Essentially, all states extradite to other states. Some states choose to not extradite if the crime is relatively minor such as a theft under $10,000. Violent crimes are almost always extradited.

As far as I'm aware there are no statutory timeframes for the process of extradition. As long as the legal process between the two states has begun and is progressing, then it takes as long as it takes. Lesson to be learned? When there is a warrant for you turn yourself in and then you won't be spending weeks in someone else's jail.

what country are u asking about? you asked what countries do not, but difrent ones do and do not for difrent country's. if you live in the us. Countries which do not have extradition treaties but do maintain

diplomatic relations with the US are Afghanistan, Algeria, Armenia,

Bahrain, Bangladesh, Bophuthatswana, Brunei, Burkina Faso, Burundi,

Cameroon, Cape Verde, Central African Republic, Chad, China (People's

Republic of China), Ciskei, The Comors, Cote d' Ivoire, Djibouti,

Equatorial Guinea, Ethiopia, Gabon, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Indonesia,

Jordan, Korea (South), Kuwait, Laos, Lebanon, Madagascar, Mali,

Marshall Islands, Mauritania, Micronesia, Maldova, Mongolia,

Mozambique, Myanmar, Namibia, Nepal, Niger, Oman, Principe and San Tome, Qatar, Russian Federation, Rwanda, Saudi

Arabia, Senegal, Sudan, Syria, Togo, Tunisia, Uganda, Western Samoa,

Yemen, Zaire, and Zimbabwe. Countries which have neither diplomatic relations nor extradition

treaties with the US are Andorra, Angola, Bantu Homelands, Bhutan,

Bosnia, Cambodia, Ciskei, Cuba, Iran, Korea (North), Libya, Maldives,

Serbia, Somalia, Taiwan, Transkei, Vanuatu, and Vietnam."

Yes, in terms of the other states of the United States; no, in terms of other countries. The 50 states tend to cooperate with each other over extradition requests. Once another country becomes involved, the affected state must leave the matter in the hands of the United States government.

Mexico and the US do have an extradition agreement, so... it IS possible. BUt remember this, when you cross back over into the US as you most probably will, they can snatch you up at any time.

Probably not. Extradition is the process used when a person is in custody in one jurisdiction, but has an active warrant in another jurisdiction. In most cases, child support is a civil matter, and therefore does not bring up the issue of warrants as in a criminal matter.

If, however, there is some reason that a warrant has been issued with regard to the child support issue, then yes, the person can be extradited. The Wisconsin authorities would be notified of the person's location, and would then determine whether or not the warrant merited the expense of going to pick up the defendant and transporting him/her back to Wisconsin.

They can & will send you back home as soon as they get the chance- Paco back to Mexiland

It depends on the charge and location where you are now and where the state that the warrant was issued. Some charges, if pulled over, etc in one state... and they run your license and it pulls up the warrant, they would go ahead and arrest you, but they then would contact the agency that issued the warrant. It then depends if that state "wanted" you or if they were not going to pursue the matter (i.e. cost them more to extradite/have a hearing than original charge). This isn't likely, but sometimes they do not worry about extradition. Either way, once arrested, the agency issuing the warrant must pick you up within 30 days, or you will be released. It all depends on the charge, whether it was state or federal (federal... automatic extradition), and the state which crime occurred and your current state. More information is at 18 U.S.C. § 3182.

You've got it backwards. WI will extradite you from CA, not the other way around. The answer is, they could. It may well depend on the dollar amount of the theft. If it amounted to a felony crime, they probably will.

It6 is VERY likely. Most all states WILL take action to extradite fugitives wanted for felony offenses.