Extradition

Yes, U does hold an extradition treaty with Brazil. The treaty was signed on January 13, 1961 and June 18,1962 at Rio De janeiro although the treaty came into force on Dec 17,1964. The ratification was advised by the US Senate on May 16,1961 and Oct 22,1963. It was ratified by the President of the United States of America May 29, 1961, and October 29, 1963, respectively; Later it was ratified by Brazil August 25, 1964 and the ratifications exchanged at Washington November 17, 1964;

For the complete treaty, please refer the link in sources. Hope this helps.

Yes, however Norwegian courts refuse to allow extradition on the grounds that prison conditions in the USA are inhumane.

Most states will only extradite the most dangerous felons from a state. The expense is too great to extradite petty crimes. All states must follow the Full Faith and Credit clause if a person is accused of a crime in another state.

All US states and territories honor each other's requests for extradition - there are no 'safe-haven' states - it is impossible to state with certainty whether a particular state will choose to extradite you or not, there are simply too many variables. It may depend on the offense and the seriousness of it and/or how badly they want you returned - most states WILLextradite for felony offenses.

Every State has in "inter-state compact" when it comes to extradition. What really matters to you is the severity of the crime. Each warrant is different. Unless its a very serious crime your being sought for, I wouldn't worry about it.

To be more specific, Minnesota is quite lenient in these matters. Unless the crime is a violent crime or a crime against a person, most warrants handed down by Judges as a result of a complaint filed will state "Execute in Minnesota Only" "Do Not Extradite" There are some that are a bit more serious but not to the level of violent or crimes against a person in which a warrant issued can say "Execute in Boarder States" And ALL warrants in Minnesota have territorial Limits that prevent the execution of a warrant on Federal Reservations (i.e. Indian Reservations) In these cases, cooperation is required by the Reservation Police.

All states have interstate agreements that allow parole violators to be jailed and held for the violators jurisdiction to come and get them. If Wyoming has placed your name in the national criminal database (NCIC) then they probably mean to come for you. In reality it probably depends upon the nature of the original crime - the terms of the probation - and the violation (VOP) that was committed. If the crime or VOP was minor they may choose not to spend the funds to come and get you.

Yup. Could also charge the person with "unlawful flight" to avoid prosecution. Face the music ... take your medicine, and get on with life for goodness sake.

Well, your buddy above is correct but not in most cases with Ohio. California and Ohio see the law very differently. In California you can fight this in many ways. One is could you be deported? Well, in Ohio you could. This is a necessity defense in California.

The other issue is in California the Governor must sign the wanting states warrant prior to the apprehension, and the wanting states Governor must sign it too. The other issue is it must be a state crime not a local crime. For example the city of Youngstown has no recourse for city income tax. There is also a required 72 hour waiting period allow appeal. The appeal process can take up to 1 year. I have never seen someone extradited to Ohio for a state crime.

Yes. Greece has signed an extradition treaty with US. The treaty was signed on November 1, 1932 at Washington. Treaty and exchange of notes were signed at Athens on May 6, 1931. Senate advice and consent to ratification was done on February 19, 1932. It was ratified by the President of the United States on March 10, 1932. It was ratified by Greece on October 13, 1932. Ratifications were exchanged at Washington on November 1, 1932. The treaty was entered into force on November 1, 1932. Hope this helps.

All US states and territories honor each others requests for extradition - there are no 'safe-haven' states - it is impossible to know with certainty whether a particular state will choose to extradite you or not, or for what offense - there are simply too many variables. It may depend on the offense and the seriousness of it and/or how badly they want you returned - most states WILL extradite for felony offenses.

As far as my research shows, Ecuador does have an extradition treaty with the US. There is a link to a PDF describing that treaty in the related links.

Depending upon the charge and if certain legal standards are met, Florida and the other 49 states within the United States of America tend to respect, and cooperate with, each other over extradition requests.

All US states and territories honor each other's requests for extradition - there are no 'safe-haven' states - it is impossible to state with certainty whether a particular state will choose to extradite you or not, there are simply too many variables. It may depend on the offense and the seriousness of it and/or how badly they want you returned - most states WILLextradite for felony offenses.

As with the other 48 states in the United States of America, Florida and Kentucky tend to cooperate with each other, and with the other states, in extradition requests. For such requests tend to be over serious, felony charges. But if another country is involved, then as with the other 48 states, Florida and Kentucky would leave the matter in the hands of the United States government. For involvement of a country other than the U.S. is a federal issue.

Generally cost is paid for by the country that demands extradition.

All US states and territories honor each other's requests for extradition - there are no 'safe-haven' states - it is impossible to say whether a particular state will choose to extradite you or not, there are simply too many variables - usually it depends on the offense and the seriousness of it - most states will USUALLY extradite for felony offenses.

All states extradite to Colorado, provided that legal standards are satisfactorily met. For as with the other 49 states within the United States of America, Colorado tends to respect, and cooperate with, other states on extradition requests. All of the 50 states recognize that extradition tends to be requested for the serious, felony charges. It's only when a country other than the U.S. becomes involved that the states don't interact, and take no decisionmaking role. For involvement of another country always is a federal concern.

It will depend on the severity of the assault.

The process of one state seeking the return of a person from another state is technically not extradition- it is rendition. Authorities in one state request authorities in the other state to arrest and return the person to answer to criminal charges. Those authorities may hold a hearing to determine if this is the right person, and if they should be returned. If so, the person is detained until picked up, and taken to the first state. Extradition involves two separate countries.

States of the US cannot extradite directly from foreign countries on their own authority. International extradition is conducted by the US State and/or Justice Departments who must actually be the ones to file the paperwork with the foreign government.

The United States maintains diplomatic relations, but does not have extradition treaties with the following countries: Afghanistan, Algeria, Andorra, Angola, Armenia, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brunei, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cambodia, Cameroon, Cape Verde, Central African Republic, Chad, China (People's Republic of China), Union of the Comoros, Congo, Democratic Republic of the, Cote d' Ivoire, Djibouti, Equatorial Guinea, Ethiopia, Gabon, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Indonesia, Jordan, Kuwait, Laos, Lebanon, Libya, Madagascar, Maldives, Mali, Marshall Islands, Mauritania, Micronesia, Moldova, Mongolia, Mozambique, Myanmar, Namibia, Nepal, Niger, Oman, Qatar, Russian Federation, Rwanda, São Tomé and Príncipe, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Serbia and Montenegro, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Togo, Tunisia, Uganda, Vanuatu, Vietnam, Western Samoa, Yemen, and Zimbabwe.

No. State are sovereign governments under the constitution, and one state cannot enter another state to retrieve a prisoner without permission from the state holding the prisoner. Counties are only political subdivisions within a state, and there are no such protections. A prisoner may be moved from one county to another within the same state with no court intervention or violation of rights.

Warrants are a matter of public record and police departments and other law enforcement agencies generally post them on their website and/or in some cases newspapers print a list of persons who have active warrants. The information can also be found through online court records but the interested party would probably need to know the court, the date and the docket number where the warrant was issued. The best place to start would be to do a search of the county police department website where it is believed the warrant may have been issued. Added: To my knowledge, there are no publicly accessible websites or databases that reveal this information. Simplest and easiest way is to call your local law enforcement agency and simply ask.

Yes, depending upon the charge and if legal standards are met. For Iowa and the other 49 states within the United States of America respect, and cooperate with, each other on extradition requests. Such requests tend to be made over the serious, felony charges and for the more heinous crimes. But neither Iowa nor any one of the other states makes decisions once it's ascertained that a country other than the U.S. is involved. For such involvement automatically demands the role of the federal government as decisionmaker.

Only Thailand and China have extradition treaties (not ratified by Cambodia) with Cambodia under the UNTOC and OECD.