Extradition

No. However, the non custodial obligated parent will most likely be refused entry into the U.S. and/or it's commonwealths.

Mississippi (and EVERY state) extradites in-custody prisoners they wish to have returned for prosecution. Extradition if also referred to as a "Governor's Warrant' and all states honor them, albeit with some restrictions.

When a US state has custody of a criminal who is wanted in another US state, the US Constitution demands that he/she be extradited (Article IV, Section 2, Clause 2).

Dubai has extradition treaties at least with Afghanistan, the UK, Australia, and Iran, if not others.

How long is "long?" If you have waived extraditon AND the wanting state is in the process of extraditing you, then it will tak as long as the process takes - UNLESS - it becomes long enough to file a writ of Habeus Corpus. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Habeas_corpus_in_the_United_States

Cuba and the United States do not maintain diplomatic relations, and don't extradite.

Typically not, especially under the prevailing budget restraints existing today. HOWEVER - All US states and territories honor each other's requests for extradition - there are no 'safe-haven' states - It is impossible to know with certainty whether a particular state will choose to extradite you for a particular offense, or not, there are simply too many variables. It may depend, in part, on the offense and the seriousness of it, and/or how badly they want you returned - most states WILL extradite for felony offenses.

In Article IV, Section 2, Clause 2 of the US Constitution, the interstate rendition of fugitives was established. Beginning in 1793, other laws were enacted to support this clause.

Generally, it states that the executive authority of a state may order that an indicted suspect or fugitive be returned to face charges in that state, in the jurisdiction in which a crime was committed. Conflicts with this can occur where more than one state has a legitimate claim on the individual involved.

The precedent to blocking extradition in Kentucky v. Dennison (based on slavery, 1861) was reversed by the US Supreme Court in Puerto Rico v. Branstad in 1987.

No. There is no reciprocity between New York and Florida. Dui's are all too common to spend the money to extradite you. I have a Felony Warrant for possession of prescription drugs in Florida, and they have my address in NY, the Long Island police are aware of my warrant and so is the department of home land security. No one has made an arrest so far because they cannot. Rest easy, they may threaten to arrest you, but unless you act out of control, they will not because Florida has no intention of coming to get you.

Yes. Ohio has a five hundred mile limit. KY got me eleven hundred miles away

if it,s a felony Ohio should go any where to pick them up ...

All US states and territories honor each other's requests for extradition - there are no 'safe-haven' states - it is impossible to know with certainty whether a particular state will choose to extradite you or not, there are simply too many variables. It may depend on the offense and the seriousness of it and/or how badly they want you returned - most states WILLextradite for felony offenses.

Unable to answer due to insufficient information. ANYTHING is always possible. What is a "minor" crime. If PA considers the offense to be significant enough, yes, they can extradite you from any state.

That would be most countries where Mexico does not have a direct representation (i.e. where Mexico has no embassy nor diplomatic relations). That would include most African countries such as Mozambique or Libya and some Central and South Asian countries, such as Kazakhstan, Mongolia and Papua New Guinea.

4th May 1948 Canal Water Pact with India

18 Feb 1950 Friendship Pact with India

2nd April, 1950 Liaquat Nehru Pact

8th Dec, 1954 SEATO

23rd Sep, 1955 CENO

21st May, 1960 Boundary Agreement with Iran

5th January, 1963 Trade Agreement with China

24th Feb, 1963 Border Agreement with China

March, 1965 Cultural Pact with India

10th January, 1966 Tashkent Pact with India

3rd July, 1972 Simla Pact with India

28th August, 1973 Delhi Agreement with India on PoWs

15th Sep, 1986 Pact for Nuclear Cooperation with China

14th April, 1988 Geneva Pact with Afghanistan, USA

and USSR

14th May, 1991 Culture and Trade Agreement with

Saudi Arabia

19th June, 1992 Silk Agreement with China

17th Aug, 1997 Nuclear Programmer for Energy

Agreement with China

6th June, 1999 Agasta Marine Agreement with

France

March, 1999 Lahore Declaration with India

Nov, 2001 Non NATO Alliance with USA

July, 2001 Agra Declaration with India

20th Feb, 2002 To combat terrorism Activities

Agreement with USA

June,2003 Chashma Nuclear Power Agreement

with China

4th July, 1999 Washington Declaration with USA

and India

Feb, 2006 To combat terrorism Activities

Agreement with Afghanistan

August, 2006 Armament Agreement with Saudi

Arabia and UAE

March, 2007 Up-gradation of Karakoram Highway

Agreement with China

20th March, 2007 Administrative Control of Gawadar

Port Agreement with Singapore

23rd july, 2008 Extradition of Criminals agreement

signed with Iran

The paper work that is processed during incarceration can hold a person up to thirty days. Known warrent that isn't caught in the system during incarceration makes on think they are in the clear. Though on the exit out of prison a search is done in and out of countries, states, counties. Seven days is the usual time in last minute extradite or transfer. When the paper work is done proper there will be a two week date set after exit date from prison. They usually come on the last day. This applies to federalies also. Tricky huh

Extradition procedure depends upon several mitigating circumstances, some of which could be: If an FTA bench warrant is issued, which indicates the person is also a fugitive from justice and in contempt of court. If there were injuries and/or property damage involved as a result of the person driving under the influence, that could result in additional criminal charges and/or civil action. The prior criminal history (if any) of the accused/convicted person. Extradition is an expensive and sometimes lengthy process so it is used sparingly. However, if the person has an active warrant of any type they will not be able to obtain a driver's license or legal documentation of indentity in any US state.

hells no. never.. i had felony warrants from cali and was in wi and they never wanted me ever.. i got wisconsin new cases too and every time cali said non exterdiatable

The Philippines has concluded extradition treaties with Indonesia (1976), Australia (1988), Canada (1989), Switzerland (1989), Micronesia (1990) the United States (1994), Hong Kong and South Korea. All these treaties follow the "non-list" type of double criminality approach, where there is no traditional listing of crimes, as this could lead to difficulties where the countries denominate crimes differently.

All states will extradite, depending on the severity of the crime in question. For instance, every state will extradite for homicide charges. States usually help each other out in this respect.

Until 1980s, it was allowed. In Kennedy v. Dennison, 1861, the Supreme Court held that the constitution didn't give the Federal government that right. For more than a century, the word 'shall' in the Extradition clause was read as 'may'.


Then in 1987, Puerto Rico v. Branstad, it was unanimous that the federal courts can indeed order an unwilling governor to extradite a fugitive.

Depending upon the charge and if certain legal standards are met, Indiana and the other 49 states within the United States of America tend to respect, and cooperate with, each other on extradition requests. For such requests tend to be made over the serious, felony charges and regarding the more heinous of crimes. But neither Indiana nor any one of the other states makes decisions if a country other than the U.S. becomes involved. For such involvements demands the role of the federal government as decisionmaker.

yes

The governor of Alaska formally requested the governor of Oklahoma to extradite a person suspected of murder in Alaska who had been arrested in Oklahoma and the authorities in Turkey to extradite another murder suspect who was reported by news media to be in Turkey.

All US states and possessions honor each other's requests for extradition.