Extradition

The question itself defines the word and the process - it is an example of inter-governmental cooperation.

interstate coorperation!!!!!!1

The absconder would be arrested for a Parole Violation.

The absconder would most likely spend the rest of their sentence in a state prison (unless the judge specifies otherwise), and may face additional charges.

Not with the whole EU but only with some of the EU Member States.

That depends on the charges and the statute of limitations which go with them.

You need the services of a good lawyer. Short answer is yes, depending on the circumstances.

You don't file a writ to be brought to court. You file a writ to have someone else brought to court.

As to how long the court has to execute a writ, the writ itself will say how long it is good for. In some places, a warrant never expires, you could be brought in 50 years after the warrant was issued.

However, if the state has a statute of limitations then that may apply. But if you're not in the state the statute of limitations does not apply.

So it could be anything up to forever.

Iceland

The governor of the state where the crime was committed. Generally the order will also be signed by the prosecuting attorney but that is not required to make the extradition order valid and fully enforceable.

yes, you certainly can. Most states will extradite for offenses but how far they will travel will often depend on the seriousness of the crime. For a traffic offense, it is doubtful that a state will travel over 50 miles or so to bring someone back, but for a serious felony, they may travel across the country. The length of time that the state has to pick a person up is usually defined as "a reasonable period of time." That all depends on how close the requesting state is. 15 days might be reasonable to expect Alabama to pick up a person being held in Georgia but 30 days might be allowed for California to pick up the same detainee.

Kenya has extradition with countries contiguous with Kenya, Commonwealth countries, the United States, Italy, Finland, Greece, Poland, Spain, and Germany. These are all mentioned explicitly in the "Extradiction (Contiguous and Foreign Countries) Act", Chapter 76 of the Laws of Kenya.

I found reference to a bilateral treaty with Peru. There may be more.

In most cases, forever. The Statute of Limitations laws normally toll the limit for time spent out of the jurisdiction of the state or country. Meaning they could be arrested upon return and charged with the crime.

The US Constitution requires each State to give "full faith and credit" to the laws of every other State, which includes extradition requests.

India maintains extradition treaties with about 30 other countries.

Extradition within the states is entirely discretionary. If there is a warrant out for your arrest in North Carolina, you would be immediately detained upon positive identification, anywhere in the country. Once you were in custody, local law enforcement would contact the court(s) by which, any outstanding warrants had been issued. Whether or not you would be extradited, would depend on the severity of the crime, the price of transporting you, and the attitude of the judge. The decision of whether to extradite or not, may take a while itself, during which time, you would be incarcerated without bail / bond.

The term "extradition" applies only to situations where a person is in one state and wanted for a criminal offense in another state. Within the same state, people can be transported from one county to another to face charges with no court intervention. The only obstacle is that the jurisdiction that wants the prisoner has to be willing to fetch them from wherever they are. Some areas have private transportation services that move prisoners from one jail to another on a regular route and schedule.

It appears they do now. Wikipedia is out of date.

They receive federal matching funds for child support enforcement, as to refusing to do so could affect getting that money.

Did you flee the state or did you not get caught originally but were never convicted?

Most likely NO since the cost involved would be higher than the state would want to spend on extraditing.

The higher the value or the higher the number of bad checks would play into this and so if you have 20-30 bad checks or $1,500 or higher, then they may try but 24 years seems less likely.

However, NEVER step foot in Massachusetts or they may snag you on old warrants.

In this day and age of budget crunches, it may seem unlikely - BUT - where the law is concerned, never say "never!" All US states and territories honor each other's requests for extradition - there are no 'safe-haven' states - It is impossible to know with certainty whether a particular state will choose to extradite you for a particular offense, or not, there are simply too many variables. It may depend, in part, on the offense and the seriousness of it, and/or how badly they want you returned - most states WILL extradite for felony offenses and crimes of violence.

If you are issued a subpeona, yes. You can.

Not enough information is given. HOWEVER - if you were charged with a crime in ME and were found to be wanted by CA after you were charged with the ME offense, you can be held by ME until they handle THEIR charge against you. THEN, they might release you to CA. On the other hand, if ME has no charges against you - believe me - as soon as they receive the papers from CA they will ship you off. They don't want to spend their tax money feeding and housing you any longer than they have to.

Every country except Norway.