Holocaust

In 1997, production increased to roughly 7.76 billion broilers with an estimated weight of nearly 37.5 billion pounds

The Wikipedia articles on the two men give the name of the father of Sigurd Rascher as Hanns August Rascher and of Sigmund Rascher as Hanns-August Rascher.

______

According to the German-language Wikipedia article on Sigurd Rascher, he was the brother of Sigmund Rascher, the notorious Nazi doctor at Dachau.

Jews died

they told the Jews that the shower rooms were just for taking showers but they are actually gas chambers

Depends on where the gas chamber was. Many chambers were on railcars people thought they were going to the camps then they released blue pellets called Zyklon-B a common cheap efficent way to kill Jews. The other ones were big enough to fit 20-30 people they were told they were getting showers but really they were being murdered on the spot. After the chambers they took the dead bodies to the crematoria and threw them in the cremators.

+++

The victims were not killed on the trains, though some were gassed in vans by diverting the exhaust into the compartment. The trains simply transported the Jews and others to the concentration and extermination camps, which became fitted during the War with purpose-built gas-chambers disguised as shower-blocks, and crematoria. Zyklon-B was actually a rodenticide. It was not designed for killing people, but the Nazis used it for that.

it is in halloweeen

Auschwitz opend, It would be known to be the bloodiest place Jews were in

no, they collected them.

because they blamed the jews for causing the financial crisis.

well, you lead them on. and then prove that everything you've led them to believe is false, while still smiling. but it isn't nice, it is just fun.

no they gave them nothing.

Simply, you waste time. You can also say that you waste money if you could have been working instead of shopping.

The word is tainted by its associations.

It means "leader," but Adolf Hitler was called "Fuhrer" by many of his followers, so the word is not used much anymore. For the same reasons that Germans wouldn't name their sons Adolf and Italians wouldn't name their sons Benito.

Since the late 1700s. Karlsruhe was built as a completely new, planned town in the 1700s. There were Jews in some of the nearby towns earlier.

Van Buren Youth Camp (VBYC), located in Van Buren.

=== === They called them Konzentrationslager.

No. The Jews had done no harm at all to the Germans. The reasons were racial and ideological, together with a belief in bizarre conspiracy theories.

the US national Holocaust museum is in Washington DC.

The Holocaust DID happen- and there's no way you can possibly say it didn't. The concentration camps are still there as memorials. There are people who were THERE in the camps that are still alive today, and there's no way to fake the Holocaust pictures. --- The arguments produced by Holocaust deniers consist largely of picking over the accounts of survivors for trivial discepancies. Others are downright dishonest and fake counter evidence.

Imprinting, group think, social needs. Humans are social animals (apes) hardwired to organize into groups for survival and reproduction. There are many reasons people think conforming to an existing environment is favorable to thinking about an environment they are not familiar with.

The omnipresent topic of majority influence is religion. Most people believe in God; the majority. Now observe this clip from Jesus Camp and analyze why Rachel prefers to believe in God. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8PXrBQlN9Rw

At the end you will notice positive reinforcement from her father. Now that is a very strong influence. Statistically, if most people are a majority then most people will positively and powerfully influence the people close to them with majority beliefs.

The converse can be true, take for example the racist in American History X
becoming a leader of a hate group because of his slain father's beliefs. The 'majority' changes because of new ideas, ways communication, and their appeal to hardwired emotions. The general contest of ideas has motivations at that most people choose to be part of in a small way.

People generally answer "yes" instead of "no" to something they have no clue about, because they have unconditional positive regard towards the person asking the question. Parents imprint speech patterns into their children the same way other people imprint the tendency to be accommodating and "a team player". Why not? The social power is undeniable for a majority of people.

Its the same as not coming up with original ideas. If the US Senate had 100 unique and uncooperative bills to consider on an issue, then it would take conformity to eventually reach a decision. It is practical to agree to the existing majority consensus because a Senator would have think much more, gather good evidence, and offend people close by politically with a new proposal. It is convenient and unthinking to just agree.

But as I said previously, in society and politics, "most people choose to be part" of the majority in some small way. This is the same feeling behind "Centrist" or "Moderate" feelings that less people will be offended by a belief in the ideological center. But this is irrational. People agreeing to Propositions 1) or 2) will be offended because they see conflicting items in a budget with solutions of either:

1) continued funding of a school at $1,045,000
2) increased funding of a school at $1,180,000

The obvious compromise, to offend less people who may decide differently, is to fund the school at around $1,112,500. The majority would agree with a compromise, inconsiderate of the items in the budget, the desire of taxpayers not to redistribute additional money, the desire to dramatically improve education, alternatives, amendments, or a conflicting reasons. The majority would rather not involve reasons to decrease the school's funding or to double the school's funding, because they would create arguments and social discord. For the same reason a majority would not consider the full variety of amendments because they would hurt feelings and detract from social needs.

That is why majorities tend to be stupid, they do not exhaust all the possibilities when they decide or 'think'. Minorities are much more likely to research alternatives to real world problems. They need to become a majority to have the authority to solve those problems. And they need to have good beliefs or alternatives or else they will continue to be a minority with its social problem.

Of course all issues and beliefs cannot have clear majorities. Even the majority of people who believe in God can be subdivided into religions, sects, countries, and geographical locations where the groups may be a minority. Understand that even no majority is clear-cut, people feel the need to believe they are part of it.

To keep madame schachter quiet, several strong men from the train car would beat her, till she stopped. They nearly killed her several times. While and after they did this, her son would just sit next to her holding her hand.

Hitler was a charismatic leader, he offered optimism and a way out of Germany's problems in a post WWI society.

There were no Holocaust events in 1937.

I suppose that Elie would say that all the children were sent straight towards the gas chambers and if you were a baby you got thrown in the air and shot.

You can't as the holocaust did not actually happen. It was invented by Jews to create pity for them as another ordeal they endured for their "god".