Nationalism

Nationalism was one of the forces behind the unificationof the disparate Italian states in 1861. It was that decision to unite the diverse regional cultures and economies into a national whole that was behind today's Italian Republic. Without that force, parts of the country well may have ended up as parts of neighboring Austria, France, Slovenia, and Switzerland.

Sure but it is allsoe a political belive. It can be strong and weak, it can be left and right. Some nationalist are like nazi's others are just big patriots.

As gospels of Philippine nationalism, Rizal's novels convey the essence of his nationalism that was to reverberate in the hearts of the people. He identified this essence in his letters as his aspiration to alleviate the sufferings of the masses, to make men worthy, to avenge one day the many victims of cruelty and injustice, to erect a monument to the native tongue and to educate his people. In the two novels, the essence of Rizal's nationalism is best understood through the keen study of the characters. Through their dialogue and actions, in their ideas and ideals, or in the lack of these are seen Rizal's range of vision, his concept of love of country, his appeal for reforms, his attitude towards the friars, and his views on the weaknesses of the Filipinos.

well it caused extreme pride throughout the European nations and for them to be overly confident. So, to achieve it and get this pride they competed for raw materials, markets, and land. Nationalism led to imperialism where they competed over size of empires and also led to militarism which led to them "glorifying the military" and competing over better and larger army. This caused many disputes and tensions between the nations. Nationalism was basically the driving force that led to the war.

-your welcome (:

One result of nationalism is the promotion of a strong sense of identity and unity among people who share a common culture, language, or history. This can lead to increased social cohesion and a collective purpose within a nation. However, it can also foster exclusionary attitudes toward those perceived as outsiders, potentially resulting in conflict or discrimination against minority groups. Ultimately, nationalism can both unite and divide societies, shaping political landscapes and influencing international relations.

African Nationalism is a subjective feeling of kinship or affinity shared by the people of Africa descent, embracing all the people within the state, regardless of whether they belong to the same cultural, linguistic or enthic group.

5 element ng nationalismo

-Hitler (national socialism)

-Mussolini

They didn't. The Peace of Westphalia in 1648 did, strictly speaking.

Well nationalism has it roots in French revolution, at late XVII and at begining of XIX century some nations began to feel it national pride, before that countries just were loyal to king, there was beleaf that kings power was given by God, that was apsolutistic monarchy...When French revolution ocured, people was angry and miserable for bad life, while aristocracy lived good, so as the church. French revolution bolished king, and putted people as prime, that is diference between monarchy and republic, republic belogns to people while monarch at least in those days were property of king and aristocracy not people...So when Napoleon came to power, people were thinking he is the descendence of French revolution...Ofcoures Napoleon disminished the Inquisition that was one of mechanism of repression and terror...When Napoleon wars happened, some of major empires that had kept other nation in bondage for many years were busy fighting Napoleon...That gave opening to some nations to form national identity, and to fight their captors....So end of XVIII and begining and middle of XIX was time of revolution and nationalism...So during 1804 to 1813 we have Serbian revolution that fights Turkish Otoman empire that lead Greece to fight also Turks and some of Balkan nations, than middle of XIX century Oto von Bismark unified Germany, than Garibald united Italy...Anyway nationalism was creation of national fealing trow Europe, thanks to Napoleon wars...

I think so.

To establish a sovereign nation based on shared culture.

During World War I, the United States residents were against involvement in a war they considered to be European. People were concerned with what benefited this country only, and were not happy about sending their sons off to fight and die for the grievances of others. Those who were particularly nationalist were Irish and German immigrants who knew first hand about costly European wars.

They started to wear American flags as clothing.

Philippine Nationalism was a period of history from the 1820's to the 1860's. The main reason the development of this movement was delayed was due to political strife in the country during that time.

It means to be awesome to Europe and be a national person to it It means to be awesome to Europe and be a national person to it

Irish and Greek nationalists both wanted independence.

You could say that the Embargo Act of 1807 promoted nationalism because it led to the beginning of industrialization, where America was suddenly be able to create their own goods instead of heavily relying on trade.

When Napoleon Bonaparte invaded Germany he gave the Germans a taste of what unity was like; the German people found that it was not all bad, although ideally they would have liked it to have been brought about by a German, they found the changes that were made by national unity made certain aspects of their lives easier. Napoleon reduced landowner power, giving more say to the workers and poorer classes. He reduced the four hundred states of the Holy Roman Empire into thirty-nine. Through this and the confederation of the Rhine the boundaries were later set for Germany. Napoleon also introduced a common legal system hence making trade easier between the thirty nine newly created states on top of this he also gave the state control the church and education. On the other hand, the German people opposed French rule and the Prussians felt that they had been humiliated militarily. Therefore this meant that some of the German people associated the unification of Germany with French rule and as they resented the French the knock on effect was resentment towards the idea off unification. When Napoleon Bonaparte invaded Germany he gave the Germans a taste of what unity was like; the German people found that it was not all bad, although ideally they would have liked it to have been brought about by a German, they found the changes that were made by national unity made certain aspects of their lives easier. Napoleon reduced landowner power, giving more say to the workers and poorer classes. He reduced the four hundred states of the Holy Roman Empire into thirty-nine. Through this and the confederation of the Rhine the boundaries were later set for Germany. Napoleon also introduced a common legal system hence making trade easier between the thirty nine newly created states on top of this he also gave the state control the church and education. On the other hand, the German people opposed French rule and the Prussians felt that they had been humiliated militarily. Therefore this meant that some of the German people associated the unification of Germany with French rule and as they resented the French the knock on effect was resentment towards the idea off unification.

the forces changed and Charles x ignored the law in 1830

Germany faced many problems after WWI, the defeat of the war and the economic problems following the war. When Hilter came into power he wanted to have an aryans power that would eventually rule the world, for this he blamed the Jews and others. With all the problems in Germany many Germans were ready to support him.
After the defeat of Germany the Treaty of Versailles was set in place restricting Germany's military in an attempt to prevent a further war. Additionally much of Germany's land was lost to foreign countries. Further more Germany was made to pay for all the damages caused as a result of the war causing anger, frustration, poverty and crime a mist Germany due to the poverty. This anger caused riots and a shift towards right wing thinking as well as the Nazis. Hitler aimed to rebuild and expand Germany and as a result world war two... In other countries after the war many were left homeless with their homes and land destroyed with bills of their own to pay as well. One must never forget the countless families devastated and alone as a result of the war through ones sacrifices in war. The land was scared and new world was made out of those destroyed. Effectively with world war two being a result of all this the very world today was shaped by all this.

because people took pride in their countries, which led to boasting, hostility, etc.

He ended the revolution.

putos

Nationalism is a very tricky thing to describe. It is a sense of unifying loyalty/love for one's country.

Cultural Nationalism is one based on a cultural identity, this can have religious and ethnic connotations as well.

Lets examine the Hapsburg (Austrian-Hungarian) Empire. It was a nation dominated by a German (Austrian) elite minority, and its subjects included many Slavs (Czechs, Slovaks, Slovens, Croats, some Serbs, Bosniaks, etc). These slavic subject people were united by a strong yearning for a free nation in which their culture (which was quite different from Austrian-German) could flourish within its own boarders.

Political nationalism is also tricky, but it seems it would be based upon political identities, such a Communism or Democracy in the Cold War.