Nationalism

maybe if you read book Kenny weaver you would get the answer

Nationalists believe that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land. Also, they believe that the national government represents all the people. States' Rights people believe that one can only use delegated powers.

amor patrio final answer

Bohemia. They were both Czech nationalists.

The Risorgimento

Historical Identity
Vietnam, like most Southeast Asian countries is a natural nation-state. This means that because of a long history of centuries (nearly 1000 years) defending a particular set of borders and establishing a particular national identity, the concept of a "Vietnamese Nation" was more or less universally accepted both by Kinh People (the ethnic majority of Vietnam), by Non-Kinh who had historically been part of Vietnam, and by Non-Kinh who were outside of Vietnam, like the Cambodians, Laotians, and Thais.

What really led to the development of the Vietnamese identity was the constant attempts by China to invade and overrun Vietnam. This created a strong level of patriotism and a unique identity as the "resistance to the Chinese". (Such kinds of resistance-based identity are common and very powerful, such as the Irish Identity, the Kosovar Identity, the Indonesian Identity, and the US Identity.) When compared to the neighboring Laotians and Cambodians, the Vietnamese embrace of more Chinese-style religion (Daoism, Ancestor Worship, and some aspects of Buddhism), made the Vietnamese distinct from the Theravada Buddhism that prevailed among the other two groups.

Modern Vietnam
Modern Vietnamese nationalism and the communism is a direct result of resistance to the modern French Occupation in Indochina. Ho Chi Minh and other Vietnamese saw communism as a form of liberation for the Vietnamese people who had been ravaged by the exceedingly capitalistic removal of their resources for the French industrial machine. The First Indochina War, when Vietnam pushed for independence from the French led to the cultivation of a new Vietnamese resistance-based identity on top of the resistance to China. After this, the war between North Vietnam and the United States, in order to reunify the country, also led to a surge in nationalism and a strengthening of the Vietnamese identity.

If the word is used without judegement the positives are:

1) Patriotism and national pride. This is opposed to national apathy or even self hatred of ones nation and its culture.

2) Civic pride whereby people consider the wellbeing of the nation to be important in their everyday lives. JFK said it best when he pronounced "think not what your country can do for you, think what you can do for your country".

3) A more cohesive society so long as nationalism is not linked to racial qualities. True positive nationalism embraces newcomers and instills them with the same pride in their new homeland that those born there already have.

Negatives are:

1) Bigotry and intolerance. Human nature being what it is tends to corrupt concepts that should be positive. Isolationism, racism and ethnic conflict are common.

2) Facism. The extreme is always a possibility once the door has been opened.

3) Simplistic thinking and population control through propaganda. Nationalism by its nature tends not to allow deversity of opinions and this results in accusations of disloyalty. As soon as you hear people shout phrases such as "un-American", "un-British" and "un-Australian" etc etc around, its a sign of people hijacking national identity to quell the views of their oponents.

4) Expolitation of the people by their leaders. JFK's already quoted statement can also have a horrendous aspect to it: reducing citizens to mindless drones to be exploited whereby the government does not serve the people, the people serve the government.

5) The creation of false enemies. Either in the form of actual people or in concepts, nationalism tends to create the existence of opposing forces, those who are a threat to the nation. Usually, these are not really a threat at all but are perceived so because they do not conform. Homosexuals, religious groups, ethnic groups, conscientious objectors, foreign powers and new ideas are all frequently portrayed as "wrong" or a threat.

Nationalism can be a tool of manipulation by the leadership of a group or nation and can lead to grave violence.

My opionn cant be ao im

The Soviet Union did not treat the Kazakhs very well. Many of the Kazakhs were starving and then Gorbachev forced the resignation of Kunayev and installed a Russian. Gorbachev also made a deal to sell Kazakhstan's oil. There were riots. Other people in Moscow were upset with Gorbachev as well. Nazarbayev at first wanted to stay in the Soviet Union but later decided independence was best.

They believe that African Americans need to live separately from whites.

ethnic nationalism......also known as exclusive nationalism

civic nationalism..........also known as inclusive nationalism

The national anthem and the coat of arms are examples of the cultural nationalism. They basically define the cultures and ideals shared by a country. Other include the national flags and colors.

He got mad at the politics when he was a vice president

Nationalism in the light of Islam would mean what school of religious thought you subscribe to,

National unity: political stability, economic stability, cultural improvements.

International Regocnition: hegemony, either more or less influence in global polictics.

It can be. but you need to know what type of person you are and what you actually want for your country, say if your country wants oil, but to get that they need to burn down forests, if you are a eco-friendly person, then being a nationalist would not be desirable. Hope this answers your question!

Nationalism became prominent in the latter two-thirds of the 19th century as the various peoples in European empires began to have national consciousnesses.

One of the main differences between civic and ethnic nationalism is what brings the people together. In civic nationalism it is the country and political views of the people. In ethnic nationalism it is not the country, state, or city that brings people together. It is the ethnicity, language, or religion that unites them.

by using the blood and iron technie so that they could all unify and be proud of there country

Pride in one's country

Nationalism is a strong and deep consensus among a large amount of the population that ones country is superior in many ways over other countries. Nationalism does not necessarily mean aggression against other nations. It can be, however, it not need be. Certainly nations, even in ancient times believed their culture and their nations actions at home and abroad were the correct ones. The most outstanding examples of extreme nationalism are as follows, but not all inclusive. A. The Roman Republic and Empire; B. the British Empire; C. France, especially under Napoleon; D. the Spanish empire in the New World. In the the 20th century, Germany under Hitler, Italy under Mussolini, and yes the British Empire as it existed well into the 20th century. The communism of the USSR was based to a great extent upon nationalism as well as Imperial Japan. The list is quite long so I have supplied information about a few nations that had nationalism among its population. Once again, the concept of nationalism is a deep pride in ones country, however, this does not mean it will begin a war. Nationalism is successful in uniting a people in a radical love for ones country.

Because if people felt patriotic towards their country they're more likely to support their country in time of need.

The gokturk khanate's orkhon insciptions written in 735 A.D. contains elements from modern nationalism. The person who is said to release the gokturks from chinese dominance speaks out the lords and telling them of how they are mistreating the people and saying their traditions will never perish unless the sky falls down and the earth is torn apart in an obviously nationalistic manner. I can't say for sure if this is the "birthplace" of modern nationalism but this is the oldest evidence of nationalist sentiment in history.