0
Paradox and Antithesis
Includes questions related to contradictory statements or when opposing words are used to create a balance.
659 Questions
The value paradox refers to the concept that sometimes people may value things more when they are scarce or difficult to acquire, even if the actual worth of the item has not changed. This can lead to inflated perceptions of value based on scarcity rather than objective factors.
The egg came first because genetic mutations that led to the modern chicken would have occurred in the egg before the bird hatched. This means that the egg, containing the genetic mutation for the modern chicken, existed before the first chicken hatched from it.
From a darwinian perspective which came first the chicken or the egg?
From a " Darwinian " " perspective " ( perspective is a term not used in science, but usually social science/humanities ) the question makes no sense. Populations evolve, individuals are selected. If you can not get this simple concept evolution and evolutionary theory will make no sense to you and you will continue to ask ill posed questions.
Your question is directly analogous to asking something like....
" How much does the color blue weigh? "
Which came first a butterfly or an egg?
In the natural life cycle of a butterfly, the egg comes first. A female butterfly lays eggs on a host plant, which then hatch into caterpillars that eventually undergo metamorphosis to become a butterfly.
What comes a chicken or an egg?
The traditional riddle asks, "Which came first, the chicken or the egg?" It's a philosophical question about causality and evolution, with no definitive answer. Some argue the egg came first due to evolutionary processes, while others believe the chicken must have existed first to lay the egg.
Which came first the chicken or the egg Evolutionist theory?
According to evolutionist theory, the egg came first. This is because the genetic mutation needed to create the chicken would have occurred in the egg before the first chicken hatched.
What was first eggs or chicken?
The answer is chickens,because eggs come out of chickens.So the scientific method would be chickens were first. Except that eggs were being laid a long, long time before chickens existed and eggs is listed first in the question.
The Cretan paradox is a logical puzzle that arises when a person from Crete says, "All Cretans are liars." If the statement is true, then the speaker must be lying, which creates a contradiction. This paradox plays on the idea of self-referential statements and their implications.
What was the paradox of Southern culture?
The paradox of Southern culture refers to the coexistence of hospitality and politeness with a history of racism and oppression in the American South. This duality is characterized by the region's rich tradition of hospitality and charm, alongside its deeply entrenched history of racial segregation and discrimination.
What are some examples of straw man fallacy?
- Misrepresenting an opponent's argument to make it easier to attack, such as claiming they said all vaccines are harmful when they actually said there may be rare side effects.
- Oversimplifying or exaggerating an opponent's position to make it seem illogical or extreme, like suggesting that anyone who supports stricter gun control wants to completely eliminate all firearms.
- Focusing on a weak or minor aspect of an opponent's argument while ignoring the stronger points, for instance, dismissing an entire environmental conservation plan based on one small flaw in the proposal.
What came first chicken all the egg?
I think the egg came first-not nessacerikly a chickens egg but an egg may have come first I think the chicken came first because, the chicken evolved from soemthing that wasnt a chicken and once it was a chicken it had an egg. but the egg the chickn came from had a chicken in... im confused
This is one of those questions that has been debated for years. We may never know the answer...or perhaps we now do. In 2006 a geneticist, philosopher and chicken farmer say they have the answer. It was the egg. See link.
What is the meaning of paradoxical combination?
It's the combination between unsimilar manners or traits.
Example:
Level 5 Leadership is sustained through a Paradoxical Combination of Personal Humiltity and Professional will.
Well, according to the Bible, in Genesis 1:20-23, "God said, "Let the water teem with living creatures, and let birds fly above the earth across the expanse of the sky." So God created the great creatures of the sea and every living and moving thing with which the water teems, according to their kinds, and every winged bird according to its kind. And God saw that it was good. God blessed them and said, "Be fruitful and increase in number and fill the water in the seas, and let the birds increase on the earth." And there was evening, and there was morning-the fifth day."
You realize by reading this that this is the day God would have made the ducks and then told them to multiply, producing eggs. This is also the first day any other egg-laying creature would have been made so even if it is a trick question, the duck still came first.
What is the first between the two the egg or the chicken?
The Egg * The egg came first because other animals came before the chicken that had eggs of some kind. * One kind are the fish in the seas; fish lay eggs. Another are snakes; snakes also lay eggs. * Only if this question was asked as, "Which came first, the chicken or the chicken egg?", would it be a paradox. * Sexually reproducing animals also have eggs- the question doesn't specify a type of egg. * Dinosaurs had eggs. * Darwin's theory; the chicken egg came from a different species. * A chicken could not have its genetic material altered during life, so the egg must have evolved and been first. * If you take into account the doctrine of evolution, the egg's coming first becomes plausible on the cellular level under perfect circumstances (abundant food and resources). There will be an a-sexual reproduction once the environment becomes unfavorable. The species would then evolve, and a lot of animals have no parental instincts but through evolution some have started to look after their young. * An a-sexual reproduction is reproduction in which there is no fusion of male and female sex cells gametes. * The egg came first because the chicken descended from a dinosaur, and it laid an egg that was changed from Darwin's theory. * The egg came first because a chicken comes from an egg. At whatever point you decide to call the chicken a true chicken, it must have come from an egg. Because the different species before it must have evolved to make a chicken, the egg came first.
What are examples of the paradox of progress?
- Advancements in technology leading to increased automation and loss of jobs for workers.
- Economic growth contributing to income inequality and disparities in wealth distribution.
- Improvements in healthcare leading to longer life expectancy but also increasing healthcare costs and strain on resources.
- Environmental advancements leading to increased consumption and depletion of natural resources.
Who is first the chicken or the egg?
It is a philosophical question without a definitive answer. Some believe the egg came first, as mutations in the reproductive cells of an earlier species led to the first chicken egg. Others argue that the first chicken must have hatched from an egg, so the egg came first.
Which comes 1st the chicken or the egg?
This question is more of a philosophical debate. From an evolutionary standpoint, it is believed that the egg came first, as the genetic mutation necessary for a chicken to hatch must have first occurred in an egg. However, from a biblical perspective, it is said that God created the animals, including chickens, fully formed.
Is you are far too close a paradox?
No, I don't think that's a paradox because of the way that "far" is being used. It's not being used as a spatial measurement, but a metaphorical one. By the way, you should separate your sentence with commas, or quotes, or something. It's a bit confusing.
It is an impossibility were something that stops an event which results that made the stopping event not stop it, so the event happens so it makes it stop itself in a never ending cycle,and my guess to what would happen is better than yours
The below paradox is called a Logical paradox because it deals with truth and contradiction. Many logical paradoxes are variations on Russel's Paradox, a key concept in advanced logic and set theory. Most people know it through the Barber paradox or the Liar's paradox, as seen below
A paradox is simply a statement (or event) that contradicts itself.
For example, take the statement 'I always lie'. If this is a true statement (ie the speaker DOES always lie) then the statement must be false because he would be lying when he made the statement! So the true statement is false and vice versa.
An event paradox describes an event that again contradicts itself. The most famous is the 'Grandfather paradox': The paradox is this:Suppose a man traveled back in time and killed his biological grandfather before his grandfather met the traveller's grandmother. As a result of this event, one of the traveller's parents (and therefore the traveller himself) would never have been conceived or born. This would suggest that he could not have travelled back in time after all, because he didn't exist having never been born. But if this happened, this in turn implies the grandfather would still be alive, and the traveller would have been conceived, allowing him to travel back in time and kill his grandfather. But if he killed his grandfather..... and so it repeats itself.
Thus each possibility seems to contradict itself.
What came first the turkey or the egg?
If you believe in creationism, it was the turkey. If you believe in evolution, it was the egg.
No, I am here to provide helpful and accurate information to the best of my ability.
The situation you are referring to is known as the paradox of value or the diamond-water paradox, which highlights the contrast between the high value of non-essential items like diamonds and the low value of essential items like water due to their scarcity and utility in different contexts.
One good use of paradoxes is in literature. Statements can be made by main characters that contradict themselves in order to make the reader struggle to understand the true meaning of the statement, therefore making the literature a lot more interesting and complex.
For example, in Shakespeare's Hamlet, one character says " I must be cruel to be kind." This statement contradicts itself, making it a lot harder to understand than if the character had plainly stated what he meant.
Paradoxes are useful because they test the limits of our understanding, expose the fragility of things that look obvious and also make us detect that which we do not know. A masterly teacher can use paradox to help us in "learning from not understanding"
You can read more about this explanation in THE FASCINATION OF PARADOX (Learning from not understanding) Ioan Tenner 2010
What goes first the chicken or the egg?
If you "Came" and not "Goes", then I may have a solution. Think about this, can a chicken survive without an egg, yes, of course the chicken can survive without an egg. But, can an egg survive without a chicken, no, the egg must have the chicken to keep it warm. So, the obvious answer is that the chicken came before the egg.
