Political Theory

At its peak it was a radical democracy - that is the citizens met in fortnightly assembly, considering and deciding on all matters of government. The Council implemented these decisions. This is far more democratic than today's representative democracy where elected representatives form a parliament and vote how they or their party want, not necessarily the way their electors want.

(THIS IS BASED PRIMARILY IN THE US FOUNDING FATHERS FORM OF GOVERNMENT) Basicly, government was divided in order to create a form of government that doesn't work very well. The division was based on three key assumptions: 1) Government must exist; 2) People will manipulate government for their own advantage; 3) Government can really screw people over. So the three branches were devised so all the interest groups in the country would waste all their time and energy trying to pass laws that would make them richer, and stopping/repealing laws that would make they poorer. The hope was to have them all fight to a standstill so nothing would get done (except in the cases of things like an invasion where there would be overwhelming agreement).

The Greeks contributed to democracy through concepts like citizen participation, rule of law, and assemblies. Hammurabi's Code influenced modern legal systems with its establishment of laws and punishments, setting a precedent for justice and order. Both cultures played a role in shaping the foundations of democracy through their ideas and systems of governance.

The signing of the Magna Carta in 1215 limited the power of the English monarchy and laid the foundation for future constitutional government. The Glorious Revolution of 1688 established parliamentary supremacy over the monarchy and led to the adoption of the Bill of Rights, further strengthening democratic principles in England.

John Locke's social contract theory emphasized the protection of natural rights, including life, liberty, and property. He believed that individuals consent to be governed in order to secure these rights, and that a government's legitimacy comes from the consent of the governed. Locke also stressed the importance of limited government and the right of revolution when a government fails to protect its citizens' rights.

Political ideology is a body of thought that defines how and why governments behave or define the way political scientists and others believe they should operate. For example, Karl Marx created a political ideology that when combined by his ideas on economics was the basis of obtaining the goal of communism. Before the end result could be reached, Marx outlined the why and how this system was a scientific reality. Only time and certain events stood in the way of his ideology and those roadblocks would, based on his ieas on history were necessary and be changed.

Are you in PSBB 10th std? If so, and this is your holiday HW, just write on terrorism and how it has affected the society. You can't really say anything about democracy since most countries are democratic and its usually the non-democratic ones who are the terrorists. Are you in PSBB 10th std? If so, and this is your holiday HW, just write on terrorism and how it has affected the society. You can't really say anything about democracy since most countries are democratic and its usually the non-democratic ones who are the terrorists.

In public policy and power, elite-based theories speculate that the state is really controlled or directed by a small group of individuals, the elite. In pluralistic theories, public policy and power are seen as spaces where competing interests communicate and negotiate their desires.

An advanced democracy is a political system where citizens have a high degree of political freedom, government institutions are strong and transparent, the rule of law is well-established, and there are mechanisms in place to ensure accountability, participation, and representation of the people in decision-making processes. Advanced democracies typically have robust civil societies, independent media, and respect for human rights.

direct, representative

People in New England continue their tradition of direct democracy through town meetings where residents come together to discuss and vote on local issues. This form of local government allows residents to participate directly in decision-making processes. Additionally, initiatives such as the use of referendums and citizen petitions also contribute to the continuation of direct democracy in New England.

It is a representative democracy. In a direct democracy, citizens vote directly on issues concerning the community, while in a representative democracy, the citizens vote on people to represent them in making the decisions.

A written grant of authority from the king is typically known as a royal charter. It is a formal document issued by a monarch that grants specific rights, powers, privileges, or titles to individuals, organizations, or towns. Royal charters were commonly used in medieval and early modern Europe to establish colonies, towns, universities, and trade organizations.

No, democracy is a form of government where sovereignty is vested in the people as a whole, not in one person. In a democracy, power is distributed among the citizens through their elected representatives.

This statement suggests that in a democratic society, the ability for individuals to have freedom of expression, association, and choice is essential. Without these freedoms, individuals may not be able to participate fully in democratic processes like voting, speaking out, or holding their government accountable. Essentially, freedom empowers individuals to engage in the democratic system and helps safeguard the principles of democracy.

A unitary state is a system of government where most or all of the governing power is held by a single, central government authority. This centralized government typically delegates limited powers to lower levels of government such as states or provinces, but retains the ultimate authority. Examples of unitary states include France and Japan.

Athenian democracy in Ancient Greece. But that democracy only concerned free Athenian adult male citizens, not children, not women, not slaves, not foreigners. Sounds like a good democracy for me.

Advantages 1. everyone gets a fair trial if commited of crime 2. all people are equal befor the law Disadvantages 1. people who vote for the sake of it that are not informed of what they are doing can be contributing to the wrong government 2. donkey votes which do not count ruin everything

The four pillars of democracy are often identified as the executive branch, the legislative branch, the judicial branch, and the press or media. These pillars function to ensure a system of checks and balances, accountability, and transparency in a democratic society.

The cost of Australian democracy is funded through taxpayer money. In the 2018-2019 financial year, the Australian Electoral Commission received approximately $289 million in government funding to conduct federal elections and maintain the integrity of the electoral system.

I believe it was to have a "fairly well-bounded group, fairly independent of control by outsiders, and substantial number of members that see themselves as equal in being well qualified to have a say in governing the group."