Advocacy plays a crucial role in social change by raising awareness about key issues, influencing public opinion, and lobbying policymakers to address issues. Advocates often work to mobilize individuals and communities to take action and create the momentum needed to drive social change. Through advocacy, marginalized voices can be amplified and policies can be shaped to promote equity and justice.

Kipling did not overtly support the idea of social Darwinism. However, some of his works, such as "The White Man's Burden," have been interpreted as reflecting elements of this ideology in their portrayal of the alleged duty of more developed societies to uplift and civilize others. Kipling may have provided a critical commentary on this notion through his writing.

Some proponents argue that social Darwinism promotes a competitive society that rewards hard work and innovation. This perspective suggests that it can lead to progress and advancement in society by allowing the most capable individuals to succeed. Additionally, it encourages self-reliance and personal responsibility.

1. Inequality and poverty as a result of natural selection.
2. Imperialism and colonization by portraying them as part of the "survival of the fittest."
3. Racism and discrimination by suggesting that certain races were superior to others based on evolutionary principles.

The term "survival of the fittest," which is a key principle in the concept of social Darwinism, was coined by British philosopher and scientist Herbert Spencer. He used this term to extend Darwin's theory of natural selection to social and economic contexts, suggesting that those who are the most adaptable and competitive will thrive in society.

Social Darwinism assumes that the poor who are exploited by big business are inferior and deserve their fate because they lack the ability to compete in a competitive society. This ideology also suggests that the wealthy and successful individuals are biologically superior and have earned their status through natural selection and survival of the fittest.

Social Darwinists justified imperialism by arguing that it was the natural result of the struggle for existence and survival of the fittest. They believed that more advanced nations had a duty to conquer and civilize less advanced societies for their own benefit. This belief system provided a moral justification for exploiting and dominating other nations.

The inherent flaw in Social Darwinism was its application of biological evolutionary principles to human societies, promoting the idea that only the strongest and most capable individuals or groups should survive and prosper. This theory justified social inequality, oppression, and discrimination, neglecting important human values such as compassion, cooperation, and social responsibility.

Darwin observed variations in species across different environments, which led him to propose his theory of natural selection. He also noted similarities between species on different continents, which influenced his ideas on evolution and common ancestry. Additionally, he observed the effects of geographical isolation on species diversification.

Andrew Carnegie and John D. Rockefeller believed they were examples of social Darwinism at work. They were industrialists who amassed great wealth through their business enterprises and believed that their success was a result of natural selection, with the strongest and most capable individuals rising to the top.

Naturalism challenged the idea of social Darwinism by highlighting that not all individuals have an equal opportunity to succeed due to factors outside of their control, such as environment, genetics, and social circumstances. Naturalism emphasized the role of these external factors in shaping an individual's destiny, as opposed to social Darwinism's focus on innate superiority and survival of the fittest.

Nationalists used Social Darwinism to justify their beliefs in the superiority of their own nation or race over others. They believed that competition among nations or races would lead to the survival of the fittest, and thus used this theory to support ideas of imperialism, colonization, and discrimination against those deemed inferior.

Social Darwinism is a belief that the principles of natural selection and survival of the fittest should be applied to human society. It often justifies inequalities, competition, and the dominance of certain groups over others. This ideology has been criticized for promoting discrimination, eugenics, and exploitation.

Social Darwinism discouraged social welfare programs and government intervention to help the less fortunate, as it viewed poverty and inequality as natural outcomes of nature that should not be tampered with. It promoted the idea that the strong should thrive and the weak should perish in society, leading to a lack of empathy and support for those in need.

Social Darwinism is a belief that individuals or groups within a society will compete with each other and that the strongest or most capable will thrive, while the weak will be left behind. It is often used to justify policies and practices that promote competition and individual success over collective well-being.

Adolf Hitler misinterpreted Darwinism to support his ideology of eugenics and the idea of a superior Aryan race. He believed in the concept of survival of the fittest, which he used to justify his policies of ethnic cleansing and atrocities against certain groups, such as Jews, Romani people, and disabled individuals. Hitler's distorted views on Darwinism played a role in shaping his extremist beliefs and actions during World War II.

A Social-Darwinist defense for U.S. imperialism would argue that it is a natural expression of a dominant nation's right to expand its power and influence over weaker nations. This perspective would view imperialism as a means to establish superiority and ensure the survival of the fittest in the global arena. It may also justify imperialism as a way to spread progress and civilization to less developed societies.

Social Darwinism is a belief that individuals and societies follow the same biological laws of natural selection as plants and animals. It suggests that the strongest and most capable individuals or groups will thrive and succeed, while those who are weaker or less capable will inevitably struggle and face failure. This concept has been used to justify social inequalities, discrimination, and eugenics.

Europeans used Social Darwinism to justify their imperialistic expansion by believing that they were more "fit" and advanced than other cultures. This idea was used to legitimize their colonization and exploitation of other peoples, claiming it was their right as the superior race to rule over others. Social Darwinism also helped Europeans rationalize the concept of "survival of the fittest" in the context of international competition and conflict.

The philosophy that was a gentler version of Social Darwinism was called "Social Gospel." Its intention was to apply Christian ethics to social problems, advocating for social reform and addressing issues of poverty, inequality, and injustice through charitable works and community service.

It depends on the specific expansion project and its impact on the environment. In some cases, the benefits may outweigh the costs if proper mitigation measures are put in place to minimize environmental harm. However, in other cases, the environmental costs may be too significant to justify the expansion. It is essential to carefully weigh these factors before making a decision.

Social Darwinism was associated with the late 19th and early 20th centuries, particularly during the Gilded Age in the United States and the Industrial Revolution in Europe. It drew inspiration from Charles Darwin's theory of natural selection and applied it to society, justifying inequality and competition as natural and necessary for progress.

Business leaders benefited more from the ideas of Social Darwinism as it provided a justification for their wealth and power. By aligning with the notion of survival of the fittest, business leaders could argue that their success was a result of superior ability and worth. Workers, on the other hand, often bore the brunt of harsh working conditions and low wages justified by this ideology.

Social interactions can impact one's desires by influencing what is considered acceptable or desirable within a given social group. Peer pressure, cultural norms, and societal expectations can all shape an individual's desires based on what is valued or revered in their social environment. Additionally, personal relationships and experiences within social circles can also play a significant role in shaping one's desires.

Social Darwinism seeks to apply the theory of evolution to human institutions by proposing that natural selection should also operate in societal structures, leading to the survival of the fittest. Proponents believe that this approach could justify practices such as competition, inequality, and imperialism as natural and necessary for progress. However, this perspective has been widely criticized for its disregard of ethical considerations and the potential for justifying harmful behaviors.