Totalitarianism

No, Israel is not considered a totalitarian government. It operates as a parliamentary democracy with multiple political parties, regular elections, and a system of checks and balances. While there are criticisms regarding its treatment of Palestinians and certain civil liberties issues, the framework of governance allows for political dissent and civil society participation. Totalitarian regimes, in contrast, suppress dissent and operate without political pluralism.

Great Britain and France initially adopted a policy of appeasement towards totalitarian dictators, particularly in the 1930s, hoping to avoid another war by making concessions. This approach was exemplified by the Munich Agreement of 1938, where they allowed Hitler to annex parts of Czechoslovakia. However, as aggressive actions continued, particularly with Germany's invasion of Poland in 1939, both nations shifted to a policy of military confrontation, leading to their involvement in World War II. Ultimately, their early attempts at diplomacy failed to contain the expansionist ambitions of dictators like Hitler and Mussolini.

The government controls and censors the media.

Totalitarianism is a political system in which the state seeks to control every aspect of public and private life, often led by a single party or leader. It typically employs propaganda, censorship, and state repression to maintain power and suppress dissent. The effects of totalitarian regimes have historically included widespread human rights abuses, loss of individual freedoms, and significant social and economic upheaval, as seen in countries like Nazi Germany and Stalinist Soviet Union. Ultimately, totalitarianism can lead to societal fear, stagnation, and resistance movements.

In a totalitarian state, indoctrination is a systematic process used to instill the regime's ideology in citizens, often through education, propaganda, and media control. This effort aims to eliminate dissent, promote loyalty, and shape individuals' beliefs and values to align with the state's objectives. By controlling information and discouraging critical thinking, the regime seeks to create a homogeneous society that unconditionally supports its rule. Ultimately, indoctrination serves as a tool for maintaining power and suppressing opposition.

In a totalitarian state, the government maintains strict control over all aspects of life, often employing surveillance, propaganda, and repression to suppress dissent. Citizens are typically restricted from leaving the country to prevent the escape of potential opposition and to maintain the regime's power and narrative. Additionally, strict border controls and legal penalties deter individuals from attempting to flee. These measures create a climate of fear and control, making it extremely difficult for individuals to seek freedom elsewhere.

Ideology serves as a framework for regimes to articulate their goals, values, and beliefs, thereby legitimizing their actions to both domestic and international audiences. By promoting a specific worldview, regimes can rationalize policies and decisions, whether they involve repression, aggression, or social reforms, as being in the interest of a perceived greater good. This ideological justification often helps to unify supporters, suppress dissent, and create a narrative that frames opposition as a threat to societal ideals. Ultimately, ideology can transform arbitrary actions into a moral imperative, making them more palatable to the populace.

loss of its people

In a totalitarian regime, the working and lower classes often experience oppression, limited freedoms, and economic exploitation. They may face harsh living conditions, censorship, and a lack of political representation, leading to widespread fear and disillusionment. Dissent is typically met with severe punishment, stifling any potential for organized resistance or social mobility. As a result, social inequality tends to deepen, further entrenching the regime's power and control.

Both are authoritarian governments, but totalitarianism exerts more control over every aspect of citizens' lives.

Stalin was a totalitarian, because he maneuvered himself into total control of the government by use of terror and fear. He controlled the secret police and the Politburo of the Communist Party and by that he effectively controlled everything. He permitted no political opposition, ignored laws when he wanted to and essentially imposed his personal will on the country.

Answer this question… A leader sends secret police to spy on citizens suspected of not supporting him.

Ideas from the Soviet Union.

It seems like, to Hobbes, that state can do no wrong in regards to ruling society. So meybz and probz. His social philosophy is regarded as the forerunner to totalitarianism.

Only about 20, because Kellogg's Cereal company doesn't reach some countries.

It's an interesting question and not an easy one to answer. Totalitarian states are very rare and usually don't last long. The idea is a state that seeks to establish total control over its citizen/subjects. Saudi leaders certainly show totalitarian impulses, and things like the 'religious police,' the filtering of the internet, complete control of the media, and the high degree of programming of peoples' minds certainly show the 'big brother' aspects of the saudi state. my evaluation is that it is an aspiring totalitarian regime.

A dictator. Russia is a fine example, lenin was a totalitariast it means he wants to control ever aspect of his peoples lives e.g. religion, hobbies, past-times and ever other aspect of their lives

yes

Totalitarian regime is a form of government in which the nation's government has total control over the people. The citizens have no rights to vote/elect for officials or new governmental laws.

Because they do not have to answer to anybody.

Nobody can actually control what a person thinks other than that particular person, but the governments and secret police in totalitarian states do as much as they can to influence people's thought patterns and control their access to information.

The regular police are recognazible by their uniforms, and by the signs on their cars and station buildings. It it moreover clear (and regulated by law) what the scope and limitations are supposed to be regarding their methods and authority.

With the secret police, none of these things apply.

The Russian revolution was like a firecracker with a very long fuse.

In 1881 Alexander 3 succeeded his father alexander 2, and halted all reforms in Russia.

To wipe out revolutionaries, Alexander 3 used harsh measures.

To establish a uniform russian culture, Alexander 3 oppressed other national groups within Russia.

Rapid industrialization changed the face of the Russian economy. With the help of British and French investors work began on the worlds longest continuous rail line the trams Siberian railway. In 1903 Russian Marxists split into two groups over revolutionary tactics. The revolutionaries would not have to wait long to realize their visions. On January 22, 1905 about 200,000 workers and their families approached th czars winter palace in st. In 1914 Nicholas 2 made the fateful decision to drag Russia into works war 1.

Promoting a national goal