0
Who Would Win
Are you ever curious about who would defeat whom in your favorite comics? How about if more people think Jackie Chan or Bruce Lee would win a fight? Do you wonder if the crew from Star Wars would stand up to the crew from Star Trek? If so, here is the place to explore those questions and answers.
2,943 Questions
Yes, a brown bear could kill a lion, but Siberian tigers have been known to attack and kill Siberain brown bears.Siberian tigers have been known to kill smaller females and cubs but they are smart enough to stay away from large males who chase them away from kills and have been known to kill tigers. They are both formidable and more than likely avoid each other but inevitably clash from time to time.
As far as the brown bear and lion, it has been documented that grizzly bears were pitted against bulls and African lions in California I believe in the early 20th century. It was stated that the lion was killed just as easily as the bull by the bear. So according to historical documented events the answer is yes.
A lion is the faster animal at 70 mph and tiger is at 65 mph Tigers live in jungles so how does people think a tiger is faster ifd it can't chase.Lions live in grasslands which might look like slower.There is thing called an ilusion.If you see a tiger running in forest you're able to compare it to trees.Lions live in grasslands where there isn't so much to compare and look like slower.
Is a gorilla stronger than a bear?
In general, a bear is stronger than a gorilla. Bears have more physical power and are usually larger than gorillas. However, it's important to remember that strength can vary among individuals of each species.
Can a hungry wolf eat a hungry lion?
That would be very, very unlikely. A large male lion is 3 times heavier than the heaviest wolf ever recorded, and an average male lion will be 4-5 times the weight of an average wolf. An average lioness will be 3-4 times the weight of an average female wolf. Even a skinny lioness will be twice the weight of a really large male wolf. With that weight follows a corresponding advantage in striking distance, punching power and bite ability. In a one-to-one situation, the lion would most likely win quite comfortably.
In a fight between a silverback gorilla and an African lion who would win?
It's difficult to predict with certainty, as both animals are powerful predators in their own right. However, silverback gorillas have immense strength and agility, while African lions are known for their speed and hunting skills. In a confrontation, the outcome would likely depend on various factors such as size, health, and individual fighting abilities of the animals involved.
Who would win a lion or a white tiger?
If a battle will take place between male Bengal tiger and male African lion there is about 90% chance(9 out of 10 fights) that a lion will defeat the tiger.
It is a myth that tigers are better fighters or more agile. A lion is agile too, but many people forget that. Lions fight every minute of their life for meal and pride. It is actually myth that tigers are as good fighters as lions. Some people say that male tiger fights sometimes to death to winb heart of a female and tigress fights off hungry males.
A lioness will fight off hyenas and males fight for pride as much as tigers.In this point, their fighting skills are equal. But last lions hunt a prey almost every day but because only 40% (4 out of 10 hunts)are success, only oince a 2 or 3 days they hunt. This is natural. Lions hunt better because they are more intellinent and hunt togerher. Then a male comes and other lionesses and start eating. Normally it ends as a fight.If you think that lions in pride are like mother and child you're wrong. Lions often fight with each other over food unlike e.g. mother cheetah and her almost aldut cubs.
Now I've told ya one out of two most important strenghts. Skills. There are skills and power. Skills include aggression+experience and power include bite force,paw swipe and just power.
Bite force: A bite of lion in one test reached around 1400Ib.The tiger got around 1400Ib either. The wider skull has less bite force but longer skull makes your bite weaker too. The short and narrow face makes more bitting pressure. Both bite is around 1400Ib.
Paw swipe:Lion boxes with one paw but tiger boxes with two. Tiger paw swipes are fast but lack of full damage. Lion boxes with one paw, these are usually slow but carry a lot of weight behind them.
Aggression:When a male lion meets other male, it fights to end to win the pride. Sometimes those fights can carry fatal injury, which in African is very bad. Even a leopard will finish off with him.Lions practise their skills when fighting over food.
A myth is, but it was proven, that tiger canines are longer.Both canines are the size of around 5 inches long. However lion got longer claws up to 5 inches long and tigers are usually 4.5 inches, but they can reach 5 inches. Both canines and cxlaws are for both cats around 5 inches.
Tiger score
Tigers are heavier and more muscles equals being stronger.
Lion score
Lion has stronger paw swipe, they are better fighters, their claws are usually longer, they are more aggressive, and they are morew intellingent.
AnswerIf an African lion will meet Bengal tiger, The lion will most likely to win.What is better a lion or a tiger?
The tiger is better cuz it is more attractive. Lion is just the plain brownish color and its hairy. Tiger is a better fighter and could beat a lion in any fight
Yes it is totally better because the team of clemson TIGERS rock the house, and a tiger has a better roar.
Who would win in a fight a polar bear or lion?
a polerbear would win because it is stronger and has stronger and sharper teeth and the lion will be helpless
What is stronger lion or buffalo?
In general, a lion is stronger than a buffalo, as lions are apex predators adapted for hunting and killing large prey like buffaloes. Lions have strong jaws and claws, enabling them to overpower and kill buffaloes especially when hunting in groups.
Who would win a jaguar or a lion?
A jaguar would probably win since lions are pack hunters, and are not as deadly on their own. According to many sources, the jaguar is the second strongest big cat and has the strongest bite.
However, a jaguar is nowhere near as aggressive, so it would be a pretty fair match. However, the male lion would win because of its mane to protect its neck, but a jaguar would win against a lioness.
What win in a fight between a lion and a silver back gorilla?
A silverback gorilla is much stronger than a lion, and it can climb trees fast. A lion weighs 550 pounds at most, while a silverback gorilla weighs 400 pounds. A silverback gorilla might have a chance to win the lion, but it depends on the gorilla's size, the location, and if its day time or not.
The bear would win since it would be much larger and stronger.
No is hard to take down a black bear for a sibrean tiger,a grizzly bear would kill the sibrean tiger a brown bear no a Kodak bear yes very fast a polar bear yesthe only one that would lose too a tiger would be black bear and brown bear.
What is stronger - the lion or the tiger?
Lion anyday!
Tigers are stronger than lions when they are heavier than them, but lions have stronger claws/teeth.
This is the Big one. The question who would win in a fight between a lion and a tiger is one of life's great questions. The debate can get heated enough to end friendships.
Here is the final answer.
First of all for this fight we will use the Bengal Tiger, instead of the much larger Siberian Tiger, so we can give the poor Lion a chance. The fact is that the Lion still would have no shot. The Tiger is just a far superior animal. It is stronger and faster. It hunts bigger prey and doesn't need the help of something called a pride. Pride? The Lion should be ashamed.
the tiger will win due to its size and energy plus it is a better hunter
If the lion and tiger fight, the tiger would usually or sometimes beat the lion. Tigers are slightly stronger, slightly bigger, slightly heavier, and have bigger bites. But this depends on the age, health, and experiences of the tiger and lion.
No hard answer available, as both species come in several sizes. But as a big tiger can be bigger than a big lion I'd have to go with tigers as being stronger.
A tiger would diffentlly win because they are more faster and way more stronger we even asked scientis they said a Bengal tiger and all the other tigers would when will mostly all of them.
Chosen as best answer for lion vs tiger question:
Both of these animals are powerful and fierce carnivores. But scientists say that in a fight between a Bengal tiger and an African lion, there is a 90% chance that the tiger will win.
It is a well-known fact that tigers are the biggest cats in the world. Not only this, but tigers are noticeably more muscular, and better fighters. It is actually a myth that lions are better fighters than tigers, because tigers compete with each other for territory just as much as lions fight for a pride. Tigers have been noticed as better fighters because they are more swift, agile, feirce, and have better eye-coordination. They have a stronger jaw force and paw-swipe. However, it is not true that tigers have longer fangs than lions. The skulls of these two cats have been compared, and usually their canines are about the same.
The term "King" comes from the fact that a lion's mane looks like a crown, and the fact that they rule a pride. A lion's mane actually does not offer much protection; it is just used to make the lion look bigger than it really is, like a cat arching it's back. And the difference between the two cats' lifestyles adds on to which is more intelligent: Living a solitary life results in the tiger being more cunning. There are also differences in the way the two animals fight. Lions tend to stand on three legs, and use one paw to fight. Tigers normally balance on their hind legs and use both front paws to fight, giving them a huge advantage. Tigers also use "trickery", keep their heads back, and use well thought-out moves when fighting, while lions are known for blindly charging. Another important feature in how well the animals fight is the way their bodies are built. Lions are built more stiffly than tigers, and their bodies are more compact. Lions sometimes appearmore muscular in the forelimbs, but tigers have more flexible muscles.
The lion DOES have an advantage though: courage. Lions are braver, and less likely to back down from a fight. There have been reports of tigers submitting to lions when they meet in reserves, so they can avoid injury. But if the lion refuses to leave the tiger alone, than the tiger is probably going to end up victorious. Within the Bengal tiger scientists found a most disturbing ferocity. When it comes to the decision to fight, this cat attacks violently, most often winning in a fight against any lion.
In the end, the tiger's agility and accuracy comes out on top. 80% of experts agree that the tiger is the dominate cat. But not only National Geographic reporters say so. There are many polls on the internet where people can vote on who theythink would win, and one can see that many more people bet on the tiger than the lion.
That question was a problem since Romans.However archeologists never find out who won. The most comon thing is that people think tiger is the winner but somehow lion got this crown. There are some crazy people saying lion is king tiger god.That's funny , noone in the world know that title so how is this a title? It is just a imagination in someones head who thought tiger is the god.Lions not for nothing got a huge status in human imagination. Lions always fight to end and to make some films people need as much as 3-5 tigers vs 1 lion.To make the film called Big Cage they needed 4 Male Bengal tigers and they were beaten one after another. Tigers in that film were all beaten and director of Big Cage still didn't see tiger winning. He decided to cut out lion killing , defeating and dominating tigers and not only HE chased that lion into cage but said that it was A tigress who chased lion. This was the biggest lie in history.
Lions have almost no chance to loose with a tiger .A famous tiger EXPERT Kailash Sankhala Story of the Indian tiger 1977 page 119 says a lion would beat a tiger. The tiger MIGHT have a chance to get out of this flair.Tigers because they live in deep jungles they are more flair and can swift out somehow and escape.lion wouldn't chase it, after 300 yards it will asume dominant posture.As tigers are hevier they are slower.
In some fights tiger has only 2-4 hits or bites and they already get beaten. It'll took about 3-5 tigers to defeat a male lion.It IS not true that it is myth that lions are better fighters.Lions fight almost everyday for food.Territory fights are rare because tigers and lions territory can cover almost 130 kilometers squared.
Now of cat experts and reporters will always appear lion as a king and champion fighter. Lions have 75-95% chance to dominate Bengal tiger.
Tigers are stronger than lions when they are heavier than them, but lions have stronger claws/teeth.
This is the Big one. The question who would win in a fight between a lion and a tiger is one of life's great questions. The debate can get heated enough to end friendships.
Here is the final answer.
First of all for this fight we will use the Bengal Tiger, instead of the much larger Siberian Tiger, so we can give the poor Lion a chance. The fact is that the Lion still would have no shot. The Tiger is just a far superior animal. It is stronger and faster. It hunts bigger prey and doesn't need the help of something called a pride. Pride? The Lion should be ashamed.
the tiger will win due to its size and energy plus it is a better hunter
If the lion and tiger fight, the tiger would usually or sometimes beat the lion. Tigers are slightly stronger, slightly bigger, slightly heavier, and have bigger bites. But this depends on the age, health, and experiences of the tiger and lion.
Both lions and tigers are extremely strong, but the tiger has a stockier, more powerful build giving a slight advantage for him over the lion.
The question was, who is stronger not who will win.
Reliable answer (See list of sources below)
. The lion DOES have an advantage though: courage. Lions are braver, and less likely to back down from a fight. There have been reports of tigers submitting to lions when they meet in reserves, so they can avoid injury. But if the lion refuses to leave the tiger alone, than the tiger is probably going to end up victorious. Within the Bengal tiger scientists found a most disturbing ferocity. When it comes to the decision to fight, this cat attacks violently, most often winning in a fight against any tiger. In the end, the tiger's agility and accuracy comes out on top. 80% of experts agree that the lion is the dominate cat. But not only National Geographic reporters say so. There are many polls on the internet where people can vote on who theythink would win, and one can see that many more people bet on the lion than the tiger. lion's limbs are larger but a lot is covered in mane. A tiger is actually weaker than a lion.
A tiger is usually upto 50kg heavier than a lion
lion i saw that on youtube lion vs tiger on animal planet
Who would win in a fight between Darth Vader and a Dalek?
A single Dalek warrior is an incredible threat. On its own a Dalek is a violent but relatively unthreatening individual. The Dalek is a devolved humanoid species that vaguely resembles a mutant octopus. The Dalek fighting machine/Dalek combination is one of the most terrifying and destructive things in the whole universe.
The Dalek race evolved constantly until they became a threat not just to the lower species but to the higher races such as the Time Lords. Eventually the Daleks and Time Lords all but wiped each other out in a Time War.
Daleks are geniuses able to compute massive amounts of information very rapidly. They have a sucker attachment able to manipulate things at least as small as a computer keypad, a gun attachment able to exterminate all life forms and an emergency temporal shift allowing them to travel in time. This latter ability would have been more pronounced during the Time War and, in fact, they have developed the ability to power themselves from temporal energy.
Daleks can fly, self repair and have an extremely effective energy shield surrounding them. They are, in short, almost the perfect killing machines. It was estimated by the foremost expert on Daleks that a single Dalek would have been able to wipe out a significant proportion of the population of the mid 21st Century US single handedly. It is unclear if the Dalek's energy field would be able to repel a direct hit from a nuclear weapon but if it could or was able to evade such an attack there is no reason to believe that a single Dalek would not be capable of completely exterminating the entire human race.
Darth Vader is a Dark Lord of the Sith. Vader has telekinetic and telepathic abilities as well as extremely heightened agility, spacial awareness and precognitive abilities. Vader can kill using his telekinetic abilities over a distance of several miles (as has been seen by his execution of incompetent officiers on other vessels). Vader has an innate understanding of technology and can exert control over it. Vader also has much higher than average speed, strength, reactions and leap range. Vader also has the ability to fly or drive any vehicle far beyond the expected capabilities of the vehicle in question.
Vader is armed also with his lightsaber. The lightsaber is an energy based weapon that can cut through anything other than another lightsaber. There is some evidence to suggest that lightsabers can cut through energy fields.
In virtually every possible encounter the Dalek would win. Only The Doctor has proven to be an effective adversary to them.
Darth Vader would, despite all of the Dalek's abilities, win easily.
Vader's abilities would allow him to deflect the energy of a Dalek's attack using either his lightsaber or his inate abilities. He would be able to evade any other attack through precognition, agility and speed. He could cut through the armour of a Dalek easily with his lightsaber. His telekinetic abilities would allow him to move objects towards the Dalek or to move the Dalek itself. Vader could use his telekinetic abilities to take the Dalek's armour apart at a distance or he could take it over and force it to self destruct. He could also use the Force to simply kill the Dalek at a distance.
The only ability that Vader possesses that wouldn't help him to win would be his ability to influence the minds of others. The Dalek's singular will and phenomenal intelligence would be to great for him to exert any power over it. This would not be relevant in the grand scheme of things as he could kill the Dalek in so many other ways.
In general, wolves are faster than domestic dogs. Wolves have longer legs, lighter bodies, and more muscle mass than most domestic dog breeds, which allow them to run faster and cover more ground. Furthermore, wolves are built for long-distance endurance running, while most domestic dogs are bred for other purposes such as companionship or hunting.
Who would win in a fight a rhino or a tiger?
It would depend on various factors such as size, health, and fighting experience of the individuals involved. Generally speaking, a tiger's agility and predatory skills would likely give it an advantage over a rhino in a one-on-one fight.
Who would win in a fight a rhino or a lion?
It would depend on various factors such as size, strength, and fighting experience of each animal. Generally, a rhino's size and thick skin make it a formidable opponent, but a lion's speed, agility, and hunting skills could also give it an advantage in certain situations.
Which is more powerful - tiger or lion?
A lot of people will say lion , however they are wrong because they are just stupid lion fans that know nothing about a tiger's advantages. The tiger will win because it is stronger! heavier, more agile, bigger, has longer canines, is a better fighter, is smarter, and is not lazy and waits for females to hunt. Tigers rule and lions are no sicken beans
In a fight between a bear and a lion, the outcome would depend on the specific species of each animal and various factors such as size, age, health, and location. Generally, a grizzly bear would likely have the advantage over a lion due to its size and strength. However, a lion's agility and speed could be advantageous in certain scenarios.
Who would win between the liger and the lion?
a liger would win because its bigger faster and stronger its canines are 3.5 inches i think and its claws are also 3.5 inches to be honest it could kill a lion and a baboon but its will probably die after becausea baboon can kill a cheetah but a king cheetah could kill a baboon but a lion and a baboon have 50 chance and a single liger will also have 50 chance
How would you defend yourself from an attacking wolverine without a firearm?
when it jumps up on you, hold (with both hands) behind the ears and sharply turn its head to the right in a swift motion, as to crack its neck. Upon its dying breath, quietly whisper something witty into its ear.
I think that earth would win, (I assume you're talking about bending elements like in the show avatar the last airbender) because earth elementalists could just crush whoever was bending water. Also you can swim in water, you can't swim in earth.
Who would win in a fight a cheese string or a babybell?
In a fight between a cheese string and a Babybel, the Babybel would likely come out on top due to its compact and solid composition compared to the stretchy and pliable nature of the cheese string.
What would be the density of the shark?
The density of a shark varies depending on its species, size, and body composition. On average, the density of a shark is close to that of water, which is about 1,025 kilograms per cubic meter.
The history of swearing is complex and spans various cultures and time periods. It is difficult to attribute the invention of swearing to a single individual, as the use of profanity and vulgar language has likely evolved over centuries through cultural influences and societal norms.
