The archaeologist may conclude that the society valued warfare and had skilled craftsmen who produced high-quality weapons. The well-made weapons suggest a certain level of sophistication and technology within the society, as well as a focus on military prowess and defense.
What is the difference between sculptures and inscriptions?
Sculptures are three-dimensional art forms created by shaping or carving materials like stone, wood, or metal, while inscriptions are words, letters, or symbols that are engraved, carved, or printed onto surfaces like stone, metal, or paper. Sculptures are usually tangible objects meant to be viewed and experienced in physical space, while inscriptions convey information, messages, or commemorate events through written text.
The advantages of using photographs as sources?
Photographs can provide visual evidence and context to support historical research. They offer a glimpse into the past, capturing moments and details that may not be available through written records alone. Additionally, photographs can evoke emotions and connect viewers on a personal level to the subject matter.
People who hunt for evidence buried in the ground for clues about early humans are called?
Archaeologists are the people who hunt for evidence buried in the ground, such as artifacts and fossils, to learn about early humans and their civilizations. They analyze these findings to piece together the history of past human societies.
What technology did Amerigo Vespucci use?
Amerigo Vespucci used navigational technology such as the astrolabe and the compass, along with maps and charts, to aid his voyages in the late 15th and early 16th centuries. These tools helped him navigate across the Atlantic Ocean and explore the coast of South America.
What cliff dwellers disappeared mysteriously?
The Anasazi Indians, thought to have disappeared mysteriously in prehistory, more likely migrated elsewhere due to climatic change or other causes due to population increases. Pottery and other technologies that were common to them have been found in recent years in areas south of Mesa Verde: Río Grande Valley, Hopi, Zuni, Acoma and other pueblos in Arizona and New Mexico.
What is the following is not a way in which archaeologist have learned about the first Americans?
One way archaeologists have not learned about the first Americans is through direct contact with their descendants. The first Americans arrived thousands of years ago, so there are no direct descendants still living. Archaeologists must rely on artifacts, fossils, and other evidence left behind to understand the history of the first Americans.
Where do archaeologists mostly look for artifacts today?
Archaeologists mostly look for artifacts in areas with known historical significance, such as ancient civilizations, burial sites, and settlements. They also focus on places where natural forces have preserved ancient remains such as caves, deserts, and underwater sites. Additionally, they use advanced technologies like ground-penetrating radar and satellite imagery to locate potential sites for excavation.
What is the symbol of an archaeologist work?
The symbol of an archaeologist's work is typically represented by tools such as shovels, brushes, trowels, and magnifying glasses. These tools are essential for excavating, examining, and documenting artifacts and structures from historical sites.
The archaeologist may conclude that the society valued military strength and warfare as they invested resources in creating high-quality weapons. Conversely, the poor quality of farm tools suggests a lack of investment in agriculture, indicating possible food scarcity or a focus on other areas of society. This disparity could indicate a hierarchical society prioritizing military over agriculture.
What is the content of the Alexander mosaic?
The Alexander mosaic is a Roman floor mosaic that depicts the battle of Issus between Alexander the Great and Darius III of Persia. It is believed to be a copy of a Hellenistic painting and is known for its intricate details and lifelike representation of the figures and horses in battle.
Yes, a trophy can be considered an artifact as it is a physical object that represents an achievement, event, or historical significance. It holds cultural or sentimental value and serves as a tangible record of an accomplishment.
I think that it would be nice if you found human remains that you would have to call in someone like a marine archaeologist to take a look, which is similar to the procedure you have to go through if you find something like that on land. Then they could gather any remains and bury them or whatever before allowing further work to continue. That seems like it would cause delays and costs, but at least it wouldn't permanently stop people from working.
Declaring all shipwrecks burial sites automatically seems like it would get in the way of lots of other things, like people who are engaged in salvage or even in trying to clean up ocean pollution. Additionally, you encounter massive complications trying to make any rules in international waters, because no specific country's rules apply.
What is the original name of Luxor?
The original name of Luxor was Thebes. Luxor was built on the site of ancient Thebes, which was the capital of ancient Egypt during the New Kingdom period.
Archaeological evidence and linguistic analysis suggest that Bantu-speaking peoples migrated and expanded across sub-Saharan Africa during the third and second millennia B.C.E. The distribution of Bantu languages is correlated with the spread of iron-working technology and agricultural practices, indicating a movement of people rather than just ideas. This migration likely played a significant role in shaping the cultural and linguistic diversity of Africa.
What artifacts symbolize innocence?
Items that can symbolize innocence include a white dove, a baby's blanket, a daisy flower, or a blank canvas. These artifacts are often associated with purity, simplicity, and a sense of untarnished goodness.
Is a biography an archaeological source or a written historical source?
A biography is generally considered a written historical source as it is a record of someone's life written by another person. It provides insights into the individual's experiences, actions, and impact on history. Archaeological sources, on the other hand, are physical remains or artifacts that help reconstruct past societies.
What is the primary method archaeologist used to study history?
examining artifacts of a specific people.
What do the granaries of MohenjoDaro suggest to archaeologist?
The granaries of Mohenjo-Daro suggest that the Indus Valley civilization had a well-organized system for storing surplus agricultural produce. Their presence indicates sophisticated city planning and a centralized authority capable of managing food distribution and storage. Furthermore, the design and construction of the granaries reflect the advanced engineering and architectural skills of the civilization.
What is the best way to describe a hominid?
A hominid is a member of the biological family that includes humans and our closest extinct relatives, such as Neanderthals and Australopithecines. They are characterized by their bipedal stance, large brain size, and tool-making capabilities.
What is the one reason these artifacts are important to us today?
These artifacts provide valuable insight into the past, helping us understand and appreciate different cultures, societies, and historical events. They also play a crucial role in preserving heritage and promoting cultural identity.
What items to archaeologist use to study the past?
Archaeologists use tools such as trowels, brushes, shovels, and sieves to excavate and uncover artifacts from the past. They also use technologies like ground-penetrating radar, LiDAR, and drones to map and analyze archaeological sites. Additionally, they may use specialized equipment for artifact conservation, such as brushes, chemicals, and preservation materials.
What was the text of Dan Galilee's article on archaeology and the Tanakh?
People should be aware that many Hebrew Bible verses were doubted due to lack of outside evidence, and were later substantiated by archaeology.
Accordingly, researchers should have an open mind, viewing obscure verses as being potential pointers to as-yet-undiscovered finds.
Some examples of archaeology corroborating the Hebrew Bible:1) Before the late 1800s, the Hittites were known only from the Bible, and many critics said that they were fictitious.
In 1876 a dramatic discovery changed this view. A. H. Sayce, a British scholar, found inscriptions carved on rocks in Turkey. Ten years later, more clay tablets were found in Turkey at Boghaz-koy. German expert Hugo Winckler uncovered five temples, a fortified citadel and several big sculptures. Boghaz-koy turned out to have been the Hittite capital city.
2) Until recently, no evidence outside the Bible attested to King David's existence. Many critics questioned his existence. In 1993, an archaeologist named Dr. Avraham Biran and his team, digging at Tell Dan, discovered a black basalt stele, containing Aramaic inscriptions. Two of the lines included the phrases "The King of Israel" and "House of David." This discovery has forced critics to reconsider their view of the historicity of the Davidic kingdom. In 1994 more pieces were found, with inscriptions referring to Jehoram, the son of Ahab, ruler over Israel, and Ahaziah, who was "The ruler over the House of David." Dr. Hershel Shanks of the Biblical Archaeological Review states, "The stele brings to life the biblical text in a dramatic way."
3) At one time the 39 kings of ancient Israel and Judah were known only from the Biblical books. Some critics charged fabrication. But then came to light the royal cuneiform records of many Assyrian kings, mentioning the kings of Israel and Judah, including Omri, Ahab, Jehu, Menahem, Hoshea, Pekah, Hezekiah, Jehoahaz, Jehoram and Jehoshaphat.
4) The Assyrian king Sargon was known only from the Bible account (Isaiah 20:1). This Bible verse was discounted by critics as of no historical value. Then excavations revealed the ruins of Sargon's palace at Khorsabad, with many inscriptions. Sargon is now one of the best known of the Assyrian kings.
5) In 1934-39, excavations were conducted at ancient Mari on the Euphrates River (present-day Iraq). They found that ancient towns were named after the ancestors (Genesis ch.11) of Abraham:
The "city of Nahor" was found near the city of Haran which still exists to this day. Equally clear signs of early Hebrew residence appear in the names of other towns nearby: Serug (Assyrian Sarugi), Terah (Til Turakhi, "Mound of Terah"), and Peleg (Paliga, on the Euphrates near the mouth of the Habur).
6) The critics claimed that the Babylonian captivity never happened.
However, in 1935-38, important finds were made 30 miles from Jerusalem at a site thought to be ancient Lachish. Lachish was one of the cities recorded in the Bible as being besieged by the Babylonians at the same time as the siege of Jerusalem (Jeremiah 34:7).
Twenty-one pottery fragments were found in the latest pre-exilic levels of the site. Called the Lachish Ostraca, they were written during the Babylonian siege. Some of them are exchanges between the military commander and an outlying observation post, vividly picturing the final days of Judah's struggle against Babylon.
Since the 1930s, there has been more unearthing of Babylonian texts which describe the conquest of Jerusalem by Nebuchadnezzar. The historical fact of the Babylonian captivity is now undisputed.
7) The Black Obelisk of Shalmaneser the 3rd shows Jehu, king of Israel, bowing before the Assyrian king.
8) Tablets from the time of Tiglath-Pileser state that he received tribute from Jehoahaz of Judah. This is the full name of Ahaz (2 Kings 16:7).
9) A limestone relief from Sennacherib's palace at Nineveh shows the siege of Lachish.
10) The cylinder of Nabonidus, last ruler of the Neo-Babylonian Empire, shows that his son Belshazzar was co-regent with him (Daniel 5; 7:1; 8:1). Scholars had previously scoffed at Belshazzar's very existence.
Archaeological finds, such as the Ugarit documents and those of Nuzu, Mari, Susa, Ebla, and Tel el-Amarna, have repeatedly caused doubters to retract specific claims. The entire social milieu portrayed in the Torah, once criticized as anachronistic, has been shown to be historically accurate, including customs of marriage, adoption, contracts, inheritance, purchases, utensils, modes of travel, people's names and titles, etc. Professor Gleason Archer Ph.D of Harvard University states: "In case after case where historical inaccuracy was alleged as proof of late and spurious authorship of the biblical documents, the Hebrew record has been vindicated by the results of recent excavation, and condemnatory judgment has been proved to be without foundation."And a quote from a researcher named Norman Geisler: "In every period of Old Testament history, we find that there is good evidence from archaeology that the Scriptures speak the truth. In many instances, the Scriptures even reflect firsthand knowledge of the times and customs it describes. While many have doubted the accuracy of the Bible, time and continued research have consistently demonstrated that the Word of God is better informed than its critics.
"In fact, while thousands of finds from the ancient world support in broad outline and often in detail the biblical picture, not one incontrovertible find has ever contradicted the Bible."
And for those who would like a little more:
Yes, a house can be considered an artifact if it holds significant historical, cultural, or architectural value. It can provide insight into the past and serve as a representation of human creativity and craftsmanship.
When should an excavation be battened back or step?
Excavations should be battened back or stepped when the vertical face of the excavation exceeds a safe slope angle, typically 1:1 (45 degrees). This helps prevent collapses, cave-ins, and injuries. Battering or stepping the excavation face provides better stability, reducing the risk of accidents.