Grammar

Firstly learn how to get your grammar correct.

The only way's you can put this is as 'What are hazelnuts used for?" or "What are the uses of hazelnuts?"

Now you have been educated the answer is eating.

obviously.

Grammar police away!

Punctuation is a feature of sentence structure. There is no word that must take any particular punctuation, and no word that cannot take any particular punctuation.

No, "dollars" is not a verb. It is a noun that refers to a unit of currency.

Not really its not proper english However you can use them in a sentence

Some examples:

Because she was ill,she didnt go to school.

Because he was a amazing footballer,he got chosen to go to the brent football trials.

Because she had ifluenza, she didnt go to school for a while.

Because Wayne Rooney fouled another player, he recieved a yellow card.

YOU GET THE IDEA NOW i hoped this helped

No, it is not common to say "Let me try your ware." A more natural way to say this might be "Can I try your product?" or "May I sample what you have?"

Yes, it is grammatically correct to say "Please do send us the driver's name." It is a polite way to ask someone to provide the driver's name.

Yes, the sentence is correct grammatically. It conveys the idea that the person being spoken to received a scolding or reprimand from their friends.

Friendlier and friendliest, respectively. More and most friendly are also correct, sometimes.

Yes, a comma should be placed before "as well as" when it is used to introduce non-essential information. If "as well as" is essential to the meaning of the sentence, then a comma is not necessary.

It's not a big deal to say me, Ericka, and Ethan.

However, you should probably say:

Ericka, Ethan, and I.

The comparative form of "central" is "more central."

It depends on the situation. With the phrase "They have written" we can think of a group of writers (they) who are still alive and say, "They have written many books." We are referring to their life, until now. Since they are alive, we can use a present tense with them, namely the present perfect (i.e., have written).

The second phrase is less common, but still possible. You might say, for example, "They felt prepared for the hearing as they had written many possible arguments." Here we are referring to a specific point in the past (they felt) and in preparation for that moment and previous to that moment they had written some arguments in preparation for what was, for them, a future event: The moment of the hearing.

The correct form is "He went to school yesterday, didn't he?"

The study of grammar and syntax is called linguistics. Linguistics focuses on the structure of language, including grammar, syntax, phonetics, and semantics.

The correct phrase is "did not go." "Went" should not be used following auxiliary verbs like "did."

The sentence: "Were he to leave, she could take his place" is gramatically correct.

The phrase is equivalent to "If he were to leave..." and the choice to use the inversion "Were he" instead of "If he were" is a more poetic form and adds emphasis. These types of emphasis-adding phrases are common in hypothetical situations (e.g., "Had I known" instead of "If I had known").

The choice of "were he to leave" is more controversial. It is a colloquial form of English, by which I mean that it is an informal, spoken phrase that one is unlikely to encounter in a formal, written context. One is more likely to find the phrase "If he left, she could take his place" in a formal context or the even more formal "Should he leave, she could take his place."

Could is the conditional form of the modal can. It is unclear from the context if the speaker means "would be able to take" meaning that his leaving would grant her the ability to replace him. I would tend to think not, rather that she has the ability to replace him already, independent of his choice to leave, and that if he left it is possible that she would replace him.

Yes, it is correct to say that it is a great assessment of oneself if the evaluation is fair, accurate, and balanced. It is important to be self-aware and honest when assessing oneself to foster personal growth and improvement.

dis-a-PEAR-ance.

Pear is the primary stressed syllable. The initial syllable has a secondary, lesser stress.

/ˌdɪs əˈpɪər əns/

As a matter of prescriptive grammar, they are functionally the same. There is no reason why one is right or the other is wrong. As a matter of descriptive grammar, we can say that the phrase "If someone were to" is almost 5 times more common than the other one.

Technically yes (although I think the term is semivowel) since in English every word has a vowel, if you ignore interjections and foreign words (Welsh for example). Generally this type of questions get bogged down in petty arguments. So the real answer should maybe be "who cares" :)

Yes it is. It means of or relating to language or liguistics.

Neither. The correct phrase is "different from".

The phrase "different than" is commonly used in the US, but it is not grammatically correct.

'Than' should only be used when degrees of comparison are applied, as in "less than", "fewer than" or "more than".

Sisters is the plural form of the word sister. For example you could say: "I have two sisters."

Sisters' refers to the possessions of those sisters. For example you could say, "My sisters' beds are beautiful" by which you mean that the beds of both of your sisters are beautiful.