Grammar

Having or showing a lack of thought or intelligence; mindless

You would often use a comma before the word then, but not always. You have to understand what you are saying. I might want to say, for example, things were different 40 years ago, I was still a student then. Or, we ate the beef, then we had coffee. It can work either way.

Casual events do not typically have an ordered sequence, as they are random or unplanned occurrences. They are often spontaneous and can happen without a specific plan or timeline.

Both "agreed on" and "agreed to" are correct, but they are used in slightly different contexts. "Agreed on" is used to refer to reaching a mutual understanding or consensus about a specific topic or idea. "Agreed to" is used when referring to accepting or giving consent to a proposal, plan, or course of action.

Energy is not considered hard or soft as it is a fundamental property of matter and can exist in various forms such as kinetic, potential, thermal, etc. The hardness or softness does not apply to energy itself but can be used to describe materials or objects based on their physical properties.

Stephen Fry provides the voice of the narrator in the English version of Pocoyo.

"Soon, you will have forgotten him" and "You will soon have forgotten him" are both grammatically correct; however, while the first sounds better, neither sounds very natural. A better phrasing, if it fits the context, would be "You will soon forget him." Alternatively, you could keep the motherly tone by saying "Soon enough, you will have forgotten (all) about him," or a variation of the like.

Absolutely.

Why would you think it might be incorrect?

"Of late" is the correct phrase, meaning recently or in the recent past. "Off late" is not a standard English expression.

Respiratory compliance refers to the ability of the lungs and chest wall to expand and contract in response to changes in pressure. It is a measure of how easily the lungs can stretch and how well they can return to their resting state. High compliance means the lungs are flexible and easy to inflate, while low compliance means they are stiff and difficult to inflate.

Yes, I can provide suggestions for correcting your written sentences. Feel free to ask for help with grammar, punctuation, or clarity.

If by tipi you mean the tent used by Cheyenne Indians, then the standard English spelling is "teepee."

I have sent, he/she has sent, we have sent, they have sent.

The noun "resignation" is a companion noun for "resign." It refers to the act of resigning from a position or job.

When making a word plural generally you should add an 's' (e.g., play, chair, and balloon become plays, chairs, and balloons). However, if the word in question ends in a consonant+y then the y is eliminated and replaced with ies (party, study, and pantry become parties, studies, and pantries). If the word in question ends in an s, x, ch, or sh then 'es' is added instead of just an 's' (e.g., dress, box, match, and wash become dresses, boxes, matches, and washes).

The same rule applies when adding 's' for the third person (e.g, He dresses himself, she boxes for a living, he matches socks, and she washes clothes).

No, the correct phrasing is "It's just her and her brother." In this case, "her" should be used instead of "she" because it is the object of the verb "is."

While grammatically correct, it is better to say the only family she has is her brother. I think even better: Her brother is the only family she has. It is redundant to refer to her as a member of her own family.

It appears the sentence is incomplete or missing context. "She would have come correct" can imply that she would have behaved appropriately or accurately in a given situation.

"You were looking good" is the correct grammar. "You" is a second person pronoun that always takes the verb form "were" in past tense, regardless of the situation. "Was" is used with singular subjects, whereas "were" is used with plural subjects.

Starting with a sentence in the active voice, you change the object into the subject. Then you add the verb "to be" in the appropriate tense before the root verb. You can add the former subject after the word "by"

E.g. "John hits Jim" "Jim" is the object, so he is now our subject. We add the present tense of "to be", which in this case is "is" and the root verb "hit" and "by" followed by the former subject "John". The sentence reads "Jim is hit by John."

In the past tense "John hit Jim" becomes "Jim was hit by John". In the future, "John will hit Jim" becomes "Jim will be hit by John."

A more complicated example: "The revolutionary tribunal sentenced the poor man to five years hard labour." becomes "The poor man was sentenced to five years hard labour by the revolutionary tribunal."

By means of empathy, a great painting becomes a mirror of the self.

No, "counterdote" is not a recognized word in the English language. It seems to be a combination of "counter" and "antidote," but it is not a standard term.

Yes, lays is an action verb. The word lays is the third person, singular, present of the verb to lay (lays, laying, laid); to put or set down; to cause to lie down; to cause to subside; calm or allay; a word for an action.