Aristotle

Aristotle didn't know the existence of earthquakes as there was no earthquake in the world at his time. However he would believe that they were cause by many people farting simultaneously if earthquakes existed back then.

Aristotle believed that matter was continuous and infinitely divisible, in contrast to Democritus who proposed that matter was composed of indivisible particles called atoms. Aristotle's view prevailed until the development of modern atomic theory in the 19th century.

He read, he studied, he discussed and debated, he intellectually analyzed and synthesized ideas, and he thought. He thought a lot, and deeply. In his day there was no distinction between science as we know it and philosophy. Aristotle was not an experimental scientist by any definition. But he could handle himself well enough when it came to thinking something through. Oh. Did I mention that he read?

Air resistance must be absent for two objects of drastically different masses to fall at the exact same speed when relying only on gravity. This is because air resistance affects the rate at which objects fall through the atmosphere, causing lighter objects to experience more air resistance than heavier objects.

Both Aristotle and Galileo triggered a Paradigm Shift.

Galileo mainly influenced the world of 'scientists'.

To be honest a universe with or without earth as centre doesn't matter that much

Probably Newton made more difference, only would there have been a 'Newton' without Galilei

But also Newton mainly influenced the world of 'scientists'.

Aristotle cause a Major Paradigm shift in The Western World. A reality Redesign.

One that changed the view about reality from a holistic view (The One, The Fire, The All, ..) in a creationist view. Physical common sense reality + supreme God.

Excuse for hunting 'barbarians', 'devils', 'witches', 'terrorists'

Aristotle did not directly contribute to microbiology, as this field of study developed centuries after his time. Aristotle's main contributions were in the fields of biology, philosophy, and logic, where he laid the groundwork for the scientific method and classification of living organisms.

The geocentric system is very plausible to people who have not looked deeply into the subject of astronomy, because at first glance, that's how things appear. We stand on a world that does not feel like it is moving. Our senses tell us that it is motionless (not counting earthquakes). It is somewhat difficult to imagine that this vast, seemingly motionless surface that we are standing on is actually moving through space. And when we look at the sky, we see various astronomical objects which rise and set, just as if they were circling the motionless Earth.

id

Aristotle advocated two classes of motion: natural motion, which is inherent to objects and includes vertical motion (up or down), and violent motion, which is caused by an external force and includes horizontal motion (push or pull).

Aristotle was a Greek philosopher who made significant contributions to various fields, including ethics, logic, and metaphysics. Ptolemy, on the other hand, was an astronomer and mathematician who developed the geocentric model of the universe. While Aristotle's work influenced a wide range of disciplines, Ptolemy's contributions were mostly focused on astronomy.

Aristotle believed that the Earth was at the center of the universe, with the sun, moon, planets, and stars revolving around it in perfect circular orbits. This geocentric model of the universe dominated Western thought for centuries until it was replaced by the heliocentric model proposed by Copernicus and further developed by Galileo and Kepler.

Aristotle did not believe in the existence of atoms. Instead, he proposed that all matter is composed of four elements - earth, air, fire, and water. Aristotle's view of matter influenced scientific thought for centuries before the development of modern atomic theory.

Galileo's theory is more accurate - in a vacuum, objects of different weights will fall at the same rate. This principle is known as the equivalence principle. Aristotle's notion was based on observations in air where air resistance affects the fall rate of heavier objects.

Aristotle's four elements are earth, water, air, and fire. He believed that these elements make up all matter and can transform into one another through processes like heating and cooling. Aristotle's ideas about the elements influenced scientific thought for centuries.

Aristotle did not have a concept of inertia per se. He believed that objects moved because they were subject to an external force, and that there was no need for a specific force to keep an object in motion. It was Galileo who later introduced the concept of inertia as a property of matter.

Aristotle's model to describe matter does not include the concept of atoms as a fundamental building block of matter. Instead, Aristotle believed that matter was continuous and infinitely divisible.

Aristotle, Democritus, and the alchemists all believed in the concept of transmutation, the transformation of substances into different forms. They also sought to understand the underlying principles of nature and the universe, with a focus on elements and the idea of a fundamental substance. Additionally, they all aimed to uncover the secrets of the natural world through observation, experimentation, and philosophical inquiry.

Aristotle believed that natural motion, such as objects falling downward or fire rising upward, did not require any external force to occur. These types of motion were thought to be inherent to the nature of the objects themselves.

Aristotle believed matter was continuous and unchanging, while scientists view matter as composed of discrete particles and subject to change. Aristotle's concept of matter lacked the atomic nature described by scientists later on.

Not without the help of air resistance.

With plenty of air resistance, a small, light, wadded-up sheet of paper could fall faster than a

big, heavy sheet of lead foil.

In the absence of air resistance, the size, age, weight, mass, shape, race, creed, color, religion,

political persuasion, gender, or national origin of the object has no effect on how it falls. They all

fall with exactly the same acceleration, and all reach the same speed in the same amount of time.

Aristotle stated that force is directly proportional to velocity because he believed that heavier objects fall faster than lighter objects due to the increase in force acting on them. He used this observation to support his theory that the speed at which objects fall is determined by the amount of force (or weight) they possess.

Aristotle did not believe in the existence of atoms. He proposed that matter is continuous and cannot be divided into indivisible particles. Aristotle's views on the nature of matter were based on his concept of the four elements (earth, water, air, fire) and his belief in qualitative rather than quantitative explanations.

Aristotle viewed matter as possessing inherent qualities and characteristics that determined its natural behavior, while scientists see matter as composed of fundamental particles with specific properties that interact based on physical laws and forces. Aristotle's view was more qualitative and subjective, while the scientific understanding is more quantitative and objective.

Democritus believed that matter was made up of indivisible particles called atoms, which varied in size and shape. Aristotle, on the other hand, proposed that matter was composed of four elemental substances - earth, water, air, and fire - which combined in different proportions to form all materials.

Aristotle's four elements are earth, water, air, and fire. Aristotle believed that these elements made up all matter in varying degrees. Earth represents solidity, water represents fluidity, air represents gaseousness, and fire represents heat.