Articles of Confederation

The Articles were not strong enough to support a strong country. They were too weak and did not give the national government enough power. So, the delegates decided to come up with a new form of central governenment.

LOL! i had this same question for homework. shame :P

Articles of Confederation created a weak national government with most of the governmental powers retained by the states. The Articles provided no separation of branches. There was no president or any other independent executive, nor was there a federal judicial branch. Congress, the legislature, was the only branch of government. Members elected to congress did not vote as individuals, but as states. While congress did have some powers, it could not enforce its laws on the states or the people. States were permitted to coin their own money. There was no regulation of commerce between the states and states could even enter into treaties with foreign nations and declare war, "with the consent of Congress." Congress could not tax the states or the people, it could only request funds to run the government.

.. *It was not backed by gold, silver, or land*

By creating a new property tax.

The founding fathers had lots of visions for the future United States, and some of them might have liked America to wind up like the European Union. Benjamin Franklin might appreciate the modern European Union.

The Articles of Confederation, the first governing document of the United States, were put in place in 1777 but were not ratified until 1781. The Articles gave a great deal of power to the individual states, while leaving the central government with limited power. While these intentions were admirable, the Articles of Confederation had several problems that ultimately led to its replacement by the U.S. Constitution in 1788.

One of the chief problems with the Articles of Confederation was its lack of a strong central government. The Articles gave the states the power to levy taxes, create their own money, and regulate trade with foreign nations, but the central government had no such power. This meant that the central government was unable to raise revenue for itself and was dependent on the states for funding. This lack of funding led to a lack of power, as the federal government was unable to enforce laws or even conduct foreign policy.

Another problem with the Articles of Confederation was its limited ability to protect the rights and liberties of citizens. The Articles did not provide for a Supreme Court or any other court system and lacked any form of executive branch to enforce laws. This meant that citizens were unable to appeal decisions made by state governments, and that the federal government had no way of protecting their rights.

Finally, the Articles of Confederation lacked any provisions for amending the document. This meant that any changes to the document had to be approved unanimously by all thirteen states. This made it extremely difficult to pass any changes, even minor ones. This lack of flexibility ultimately led to the Articles of Confederation being replaced by the U.S. Constitution.

In conclusion, the Articles of Confederation had several major problems that ultimately led to its replacement. These problems included the lack of a strong central government, the lack of ability to protect citizens' rights, and the inability to easily amend the document. These problems led to the creation of the more robust U.S. Constitution in 1788.

Use a personal Timeline..

They feared the articles would make a too powerful central government. That would trace back to a Monarchy like Britiains.

you had to get 9 of the 13 colonies to approve it

Two common features of the Founding Fathers were that they were white, and they were land owners. Among generalities, they were all by and large men of money and education, though most would not have been considered wealthy. Many of them were trained in the law. Another thing that they had in common was that all of them stood to be better off under a new Constitution rather than the existing Articles of Confederation.

How did the Articles of Confederation change the colonist minds about role of a centeral government

There are a few places where one can find articles from the Daily Mirror. Short of purchasing a copy of the Daily Mirror, one can go to their website directly for the latest and archived content.

the disposition of western lands.

it led the American people through last years of revolutionary was and also led to the "treaty of Paris" that ended the war. It also laid the foundation for America's later expansion

the draft started 1765 because of a war

During the Articles of Confederation period, European nations perceived the United States as politically fragmented and economically weak, lacking a strong central government to assert authority or negotiate effectively. The internal divisions and inability to enforce treaties, coupled with the U.S.'s reliance on foreign trade, led many European powers to believe that they could engage with individual states rather than the nation as a whole. Additionally, some nations viewed the U.S. as a temporary experiment that might not survive, thus diminishing the urgency to establish formal diplomatic relations.

James Madison wanted to replace the Articles of Confederation because he thought they would have a stronger national government. But Patrick Henry wanted to keep the Articles. :))

Yes, the Articles of Confederation reflected Americans' deep-seated distrust of a strong central government following their experiences under British rule. The Articles established a weak national government with limited powers, emphasizing state sovereignty and independence. This arrangement aimed to prevent the concentration of power that could lead to tyranny, but it ultimately resulted in inefficiencies and challenges in governance, prompting calls for a stronger federal structure.

The Articles of Confederation required approval from all 13 states to be ratified. Each state had to formally consent to the articles for them to take effect, reflecting the need for unanimous agreement among the states in the early years of American governance. This unanimous requirement proved challenging and contributed to the eventual recognition of the need for a stronger federal government, leading to the Constitutional Convention of 1787.

Both state governments and the Congress under the Articles of Confederation shared the power to levy taxes. While Congress could request funds from the states, it lacked the authority to impose taxes directly, relying instead on state cooperation for financial support. This sharing of power highlighted the limitations and challenges of the Articles, as states often did not fulfill their tax obligations to Congress.

Well, honey, John Langdon wasn't exactly throwing a party in celebration of the Articles of Confederation. Let's just say he wasn't their biggest fan. Langdon thought they were about as useful as a screen door on a submarine. The man wanted a stronger central government, and those flimsy Articles just weren't cutting it for him.