answersLogoWhite

0

Atomic Bombs

Atomic bomb is an explosive device in which a large amount of energy is released through nuclear reactions. This makes an atomic bomb, more properly called a nuclear weapon, a much more powerful device than any conventional bomb containing chemical explosives. The first Atomic Bombs were used during World War 2 in 1945 by the US onto 2 Japanese cities.

2,042 Questions

Given Japan's military position would they have surrendered without the atomic bombings?

Would the Japanese Have Surrendered AnywayWould Japan surrendered sooner or later without the A-Bomb? Yes. There is no doubt that the Japanese would have finally surrendered. BUT you must understand their thinking, which is not too different in thinking from the terrorists in Iraq. They felt if they killed enough Americans WE would quit before them. With that attitude the Japanese were willing to fight on and on, despite the losses on their side. They feared that if they surrendered their civilization would be destroyed. So they had every reason to fight on. Add to that the attitude they had concerning the Emperor. How could they explain to "god" they were not willing to make every sacrifice to protect the Emperor.

Proof of this can be seen by studying the actions of the Japanese Army AFTER we dropped two bombs. They insisted the war continued, in fact they tried to kill anyone that would relay the Emperor's surrender message. (Which was on a record.)

Why were they unimpressed by the A-Bombs? The fire bombing of Tokyo destroyed more homes, and killed more people than the A-Bomb. So the A-Bomb did not impress the Army. For some reason it did impress the Emperor.

In HindsightUsing information collected after the war, and with extensive post-war surveys and interviews by the US occupying forces in Japan, modern historians no longer believe that the Japanese military would have been able to force the entire country to fight to the death. That is, while there was ample evidence (and huge preparation) for an exsanguinary defense against the anticipated U.S. amphibious landings on Japan proper, neither the Japanese military nor the civilian leadership, nor the U.S. leadership, appears to have really appreciated what historians now see as the almost certain cause of a Japanese surrender: starvation.

Japan in the summer of 1945 suffered from three major problems in terms of food and war material production:

  1. The US submarine force had all but annihilated the Japanese merchant marine, with almost all ocean-capable ships sunk, and very few of the coastal shipping vessels still surviving. Japan had no way to ship via sea any amounts of food or raw materials from their production/growing sites to where they would be consumed.
  2. Japan had very little in the way of railroad infrastructure, mostly due to the extremely mountainous terrain of much of the Home Islands. The modest amounts of railroads that had been built were in very limited areas. This made it rather simple for the US Strategic Bombing campaign to destroy it all. By mid-1945, the Japanese railroad infrastructure was in the same shape as the shipping industry - rapidly approaching complete destruction.
  3. A rice blight was raging throughout the islands, which, combined with the loss of much of the existing agricultural workforce to bombing and war death, meant that a very serious lack of rice was in the offering. Japan was looking at at rice famine in the winter of 1945.

The three factors above combined to mean that very little rice was going to be harvested, and what rice there was could not be distributed to where it was needed (primarily the cities). This meant that a massive famine was rapidly approaching. In fact, even after the August surrender and the occupation of Japan by the Allies (and, massive importation of food, primarily from the US), Japan suffered one of its more severe famines during the winter of 1945-46.

It's not unreasonable to assume that 80-90% of the total Japanese population would have gone hungry during the winter of 1945-46 if they had not surrendered. A 20-25% death toll from starvation was well within possibilities. Japanese culture was built on the implied social contract that had the nobility and ruling classes exchange protection and social niceties for the guaranty that everyone would be at least minimally fed. Once this social compact was broken, an almost certain internal uprising would have occurred, resulting in a likely Civil War.

Thus, the Japanese would almost certainly have surrendered sometime in very late 1945, or, more likely early/mid-1946. However, the country would have been in anarchy, and, even more than in August 1945, completely (materially and culturally) destroyed. The human costs of such a scenario make the atomic bombings look like drops in a bucket. Estimations of starvation deaths for a Japan determined to hold out into 1946 are in the 10s of millions - thus, there's a strong possibility that Japan would have had more deaths than even the 26 million of the USSR, from a country with less than one-third the population. That is, over two orders of magnitude more deaths than the atomic bombings.

Why did the US choose to use the atomic bomb?

We did not specifically choose either Nagasaki nor Hiroshima for the atomic bombing. We chose a target list of 6 cities, with the primary criteria being they had not already been significantly bombed conventionally. This criteria was used both to help the Japanese quickly see the destructiveness of this new bomb and to help the US military evaluate bomb effects after the Japanese surrender. On the original list Kyoto was included, but Stimson demanded it be removed due to its cultural significance so Nagasaki was selected to replace Kyoto.

Actual target selections for the attacks were made a couple days before by the field commanders from this list, a primary and a secondary target for each attack. IIRC the primary and secondary target cities for each attack were:

  1. August 6, 1945 - primary Hiroshima - secondary Kokura
  2. August 9, 1945 - primary Kokura - secondary Nagasaki

The bomb was actually dropped on Nagasaki instead of Kokura on the 9th due to a combination of bad weather and some mechanical problems preventing access to fuel in one tank of the bomber on that mission (Bocks Car). So in a way you could say that the weather choose Nagasaki to atomic bomb as much as the US did.

Had it been necessary to continue the atomic bombing, the Manhattan Project factories were scheduled and ready to produce a total of 23 bombs for delivery on Japanese cities (not just the 2 used) before the end of 1945.

What does the use of atomic bomb say about American values?

Just about as much as the rape of Nankiing says about Japanese values today or as much as Crystal Night says about German values today or as much as the invasion of Ethiopia says about Italian values today, in short, not much. P.S. If you want to dig deeper into this issue, you should read "Human Smoke" by Nicholson Baker, published quite recently by Simon & Shuster.

How was the atomic bomb created in world war 2?

On August 2, 1939, just before the beginning of World War II, Albert Einstein wrote to then President Franklin D. Roosevelt. Einstein and several other scientists told Roosevelt of efforts in Nazi Germany to purify uranium-235, which could be used to build an atomic bomb. It was shortly thereafter that the United States Government began the serious undertaking known then only as "The Manhattan Project." Simply put, the Manhattan Project was committed to expediting research that would produce a viable atomic bomb.

Making Enriched UraniumThe most complicated issue to be addressed in making of an atomic bomb was the production of ample amounts of "enriched" uranium to sustain a chain reaction. At the time, uranium-235 was very hard to extract. In fact, the ratio of conversion from uranium ore to uranium metal is 500:1. Compounding this, the one part of uranium that is finally refined from the ore is over 99% uranium-238, which is practically useless for an atomic bomb. To make the task even more difficult, the useful U-235 and nearly useless U-238 are isotopes, nearly identical in their chemical makeup. No ordinary chemical extraction method could separate them; only mechanical methods could work.

A massive enrichment laboratory/plant was constructed at Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Harold Urey and his colleagues at Columbia University devised an extraction system that worked on the principle of gaseous diffusion, and Ernest Lawrence (inventor of the Cyclotron) at the University of California in Berkeley implemented a process involving magnetic separation of the two isotopes.

Next, a gas centrifuge was used to further separate the lighter U-235 from the heavier, non-fissionable U-238. Once all of these procedures had been completed, all that needed to be done was to put to the test the entire concept behind atomic fission ("splitting the atom," in layman's terms).

Robert Oppenheimer - Manhattan ProjectOver the course of six years, from 1939 to 1945, more than $2 billion was spent during the history of the Manhattan Project. The formulas for refining uranium and putting together a working atomic bomb were created and seen to their logical ends by some of the greatest minds of our time. Chief among the people who unleashed the power of the atom was Robert Oppenheimer, who oversaw the project from conception to completion. Testing The Gadget aka Atomic BombFinally, the day came when all at Los Alamos would find out if "The Gadget" (code-named as such during its development) was going to be the colossal dud of the century or perhaps an end to the war. It all came down to a fateful morning in midsummer, 1945.

At 5:29:45 (Mountain War Time) on July 16, 1945, in a white blaze that stretched from the basin of the Jemez Mountains in northern New Mexico to the still-dark skies, "The Gadget" ushered in the Atomic Age. The light of the explosion then turned orange as the atomic fireball began shooting upwards at 360 feet per second, reddening and pulsing as it cooled. The characteristic mushroom cloud of radioactive vapor materialized at 30,000 feet. Beneath the cloud, all that remained of the soil at the blast site were fragments of jade green radioactive glass created by the heat of the reaction.

The brilliant light from the detonation pierced the early morning skies with such intensity that residents from a faraway neighboring community would swear that the sun came up twice that day. Even more astonishing is that a blind girl saw the flash 120 miles away.

Upon witnessing the explosion, its creators had mixed reactions. Isidor Rabi felt that the equilibrium in nature had been upset as if humankind had become a threat to the world it inhabited. Robert Oppenheimer, though ecstatic about the success of the project, quoted a remembered fragment from the Bhagavad Gita. "I am become Death," he said, "the destroyer of worlds." Ken Bainbridge, the test director, told Oppenheimer, "Now we're all sons of bitches."

After viewing the results several participants signed petitions against loosing the monster they had created, but their protests fell on deaf ears. The Jornada del Muerto of New Mexico would not be the last site on planet Earth to experience an atomic explosion.

Key Staff - Manhattan ProjectScientists Who Invented the Atomic Bomb under the Manhattan Project: Robert Oppenheimer, David Bohm, Leo Szilard, Eugene Wigner, Otto Frisch, Rudolf Peierls, Felix Bloch, Niels Bohr, Emilio Segre, James Franck, Enrico Fermi, Klaus Fuchs and Edward Teller.

What are the effects of atomic bombing?

The energy released from a nuclear weapon detonated in the troposphere can be divided into four basic categories: * Blast-40-50% of total energy * Thermal radiation-30-50% of total energy * Ionizing radiation-5% of total energy * Residual radiation-5-10% of total energy However, depending on the design of the weapon and the environment in which it is detonated the energy distributed to these categories can be increased or decreased to the point of nullification. The blast effect is created by immense amounts of energy, spanning the electromagnetic spectrum, with the surroundings. Locations such as submarine, surface, airburst, or exo-atmospheric determine how much energy is produced as blast and how much as radiation. In general, denser mediums around the bomb, like water, absorb more energy, and create more powerful shockwaves while at the same time limiting the area of its effect. The dominant effects of a nuclear weapon where people are likely to be affected (blast and thermal radiation) are identical physical damage mechanisms to conventional explosives. However the energy produced by a nuclear explosive is millions of times more powerful per gram and the temperatures reached are briefly in the tens of millions of degrees. Energy from a nuclear explosive is initially released in several forms of penetrating radiation. When there is a surrounding material such as air, rock, or water, this radiation interacts with and rapidly heats it to an equilibrium temperature. This causes vaporization of surrounding material resulting in its rapid expansion. Kinetic energy created by this expansion contributes to the formation of a shockwave. When a nuclear detonation occurs in air near sea level, much of the released energy interacts with the atmosphere and creates a shockwave which expands spherically from the hypocenter. Intense thermal radiation at the hypocenter forms a fireball and if the burst is low enough, its often associated mushroom cloud. In a burst at high altitudes, where the air density is low, more energy is released as ionizing gamma radiation and x-rays than an atmosphere displacing shockwave. In 1945 there was some initial speculation among the scientists developing the first nuclear weapons that there might be a possibility of igniting the Earth's atmosphere with a large enough nuclear explosion. This would concern a nuclear reaction of two nitrogen atoms forming a carbon and an oxygen atom, with release of energy. This energy would heat up the remaining nitrogen enough to keep the reaction going until all nitrogen atoms were consumed. This was, however, quickly shown to be unlikely enough to be considered impossible [2]. Nevertheless, the notion has persisted as a rumour for many years.

How many people did the atomic bomb kill strait away?

90,000-166,000 people in Hiroshima and 60,000-80,000 in Nagasaki were killed but all of them died instantaneously. There was no way how many people died instantly.

Is the atomic bomb still being used or has it been banned?

The fission style bomb (atomic bomb) has been obsolete since the invention of the hydrogen fusion (thermonuclear) bomb. Many countries have nuclear capabilities. However, no nuclear weaponry has been used against anyone since the dropping of the two atomic bombs on Japan in 1945.

The above answer is quite correct, but they asked whether it is banned or not so, yes it is banned because of the side effects of the bomb, it makes the place where the bomb had exploded unlivable for a few months or maybe even years.

Firstly, fission-only bombs are NOT obsolete; in fact, they form the majority of low-yield designs (primarily those intended for tactical battlefield use). In addition, the fusion-"boosted" fission bomb is now the standard for mid-yield bombs (low-100s kT range), due to its simplicity and much smaller size vs a hydrogen weapon. Hydrogen weapons (which, in almost all cases, are designed as the 'fission-fusion-fission' concept) become prevalent at yields above 300kT, and used solely at design yields above 500kT.

Secondly, no form of nuclear weapon has been banned by any international treaty, and thus, they are perfectly legal weapons of war. Specific uses of nuclear weapons may be considered illegal, but the weapons themselves are not. Certain countries have either disclaimed use, or legally forbidden use or development by themselves or disallowed them on their territory, but this is exclusive to those countries, and aren't international agreements.

Why is an atomic bomb called a nuke?

Well I am pretty sure they call an atomic bomb nukes because atomic bombs and be called nuclear bombs. So instead of calling these super long name they made the bomb a short nick name a nuke

Critique the manhattan project and the decision to drop the atomic bomb?

At the end of World War II, few questioned Truman's decision to drop the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Most Americans accepted the obvious reasoning: the atomic bombings brought the war to a timelier end. They did not have a problem with over one hundred thousand of the enemy being killed. After all, the Japanese attacked America, and not the other way around. In later years, however, many have begun to question the conventional wisdom of "Truman was saving lives," putting forth theories of their own. However, when one examines the issue with great attention to the results of the atomic bombings and compares these results with possible alternatives to using said bombs, the line between truth and fiction begins to clear. Truman's decision to use the atomic bomb on Japan was for the purpose of saving lives and ending the war quickly in order to prevent a disastrous land invasion.

What was klaus fuchs motivation for working on the atomic bomb for the US?

He was a atomic bomb spy who supplied the Russians with detail plans for construction of nuclear weapons.

What were Truman's options and why did he drop the atomic bomb?

Truman did not just "drop the atomic bomb", he had the Army, Navy, and Marines simultaneously preparing every single option available for destroying Japan's military ability to continue the war. Some of these were already in process, some of them were on the verge of being used, some of them would take significant time to prepare before they could be used.

  1. The Army Air Forces were already carrying out multiple nightly 1000 plane firebombing raids, each of these firebombing raids did as much damage and killed as many people as one of the atomic bombs did.
  2. The Army Corp. of Engineers Manhattan Project had plans and facilities to produce 23 atomic bombs by the end of 1945 (and many more in 1946, 1947, etc. if necessary). The first 2 of these became available in August and were used on August 6 and August 9. A 3rd had been manufactured before the Japanese surrender and could have been used sometime in late August.
  3. The US and USSR had agreed that the Soviets would declare war on Japan in the middle of August and attack both Manchuria and the far northern islands of Japan. The Soviets actually accelerated this after the atomic bombing.
  4. The Navy, Marines, and Army were planning and making preparations for a massive D-day invasion (bigger than the 1944 Normandy D-day invasion) of southern Japan in late October or early November of 1945.
  5. Large stockpiles of chemical weapons (e.g. nerve gas, mustard gas) were being prepared for use during the invasions of Japan.
  6. The Navy, Marines, and Army were planning and making preparations for a massive D-day invasion (bigger than the 1944 Normandy D-day invasion) of northern Japan in the spring of 1946.
The surrender of Japan after the 2nd atomic bomb caused Truman to cancel the orders for all of these various military options that were already in process and needed no authorization, approval, or further orders from anyone (and would have been automatically carried out as ordered, had Truman not canceled them).

The reason any and all of these options were being used or being prepared to be used was simple: it was believed that Japan would "fight to the last man" and unless their military ability to continue the war was completely destroyed the war in the pacific was not going to end. It seemed likely that this might require a 90% or larger fatality rate of the Japanese and the US was both willing and prepared to do that if it was actually necessary! Every single option and means to do this was in use by Truman!

Where was the second atomic bomb ever used in wartime dropped?

On August 9, 1945, the "Fat Man" nuclear bomb was detonated over Nagasaki.

Is it true that the atomic bomb couldn't exist without radioactivity?

Simply to put it Yes.

Atomic Bombs is a form as Nuclear bomb and Nuclear products/elements such as Uranium 235 (a material used in a atomic bomb) emits radioactive particles. Radioactivity Particles = radioactivity.

Did the atomic bomb blow up the whole japan?

The atomic bomb did not blow up the entire island of Japan. It was however unleashed upon 2 of it's major cities one of the being Nakisakyi.

Elements in the first atomic bomb?

The 1st atomic bomb codenamed the "Gadget" was exploded on July 16, 1945 SW of Socorro, New Mexico. It was an implosion type bomb using Plutonium 239. It was a test of nuclear bombs codenamed the "Trinity" test.

The 2nd atomic bomb codenamed "Little Boy" was exploded on August 6th, 1945 over the city of Hiroshima in Japan. It was a gun type bomb using Uranium 235. It was the 1st bomb dropped in anger.

The 3rd atomic bomb codenamed "Fat Man" was exploded on August 9th, 1945 over the city of Nagasaki. Like the Gadget it was an implosion type bomb using Plutonium core.