Democratic Party

The New Deal, a series of domestic laws passed by Congress and Executive Orders by the president were major accomplishments of the Democrats during Franklin Roosevelt's terms of office. Social Security was one of these.

Ray Romano is a registered Republican. His 'Everybody Loves Raymond' co-star Patricia Heaton is also a registered Republican.

Yes, the state democratic party platform for New Jersey does include marriage equality.

Switzerland is the only one i know of as a place with direct democracy all other countries have either Representitive democracy orsomething else but if your looking for a direct answer with lots of info i think you should visit another website that knows more about government.

If one is a socialist then perhaps they can find contribution in the writings and works of Jean Jacque Rousseau, but in general he contributed nothing to the United States, unless of course one is a socialist. Rousseau was a prominent French figure who wrote novels as well as philosophical works at the time of the French Revolution and up until his death in 1778. His political and philosophical views mostly stood in stark contrast to the 18th century political movement in America. While the Americans embraced the notion that people are born with inherent and inalienable rights, Rousseau adamantly rejected this view. While there are some similarities between 18th century American philosophy and Rousseau's it is the differences that disqualify him as influential in early American politics. Any contributions that may be claimed would be by the modern day socialists who favor his "Social Contract" whereby the people abandon their natural rights and subject themselves to the general will.

It could be argued that Rousseau's views on education have profoundly influenced modern American education, but the vast majority of his ideas are more prominently found in the public schools famous for dumbing down the public and not in the private schools famous for educating the elite. To claim Rousseau made contributions to our modern public school system is to find someone to blame outside of ourselves for the tragedy that is our public school system which in the end is nothing more than a massive babysitting firm for average Americans with children. Some of those children might learn a thing or two about Rousseau, Karl Marx, Sigmund Freud, and Machiavelli, they will also learn how our country was founded by rich white slave owners, how the captains of industry who forged prosperity in this country were robber barons and how the socialist movement can't find any political footing in this country because of red baiting by the capitalist system where the rich get richer and the poor get poorer.

It is hard to find a private school in this country that has suffered the tragedy of school massacres such as Columbine. It is unlikely one will have to pass through a metal detector and negotiate the security guards that patrol public schools in a private school. The question of God in the classroom is a moot point in private schools as the school either preaches God or they don't and those parents who shop for private schools have a choice in the matter. Not so for the parents of children who attend public schools. In the public school system, the individual has abandoned his natural right to be educated and subjected himself to the general will known as School administrators and the PTA. If the socialists believe that the modern public school system is a shining example of Rousseau's influence then they condemn him as just another high minded idiot who so reviles the people in their modern form he had developed a social contract to replace the earlier divine right contract so many tyrants had relied upon, where he alone has the answer for all of us idiots who couldn't possibly survive or obtain happiness without his approval. It is the common characteristic of all utopian's that they necessarily place themselves above the mindless wickedness of the people who could not be trusted without their guidance.

Olivia Wilde, Oprah Winfrey, Alex Baldwin, George Clooney, Jennifer Aniston, Barbara Streisand, Chris Rock, Scarlett Johansson, Rosie O'Donnell, Zach Braff, Edward Norton, Jessica Alba, etc. A large majority of celebrities have democratic views.

No, because it was pro-slavery.

That is a good question, and a lot depends on how you ask it. This is because in the United States the two national parties are actually 50 state parties and territories like Puerto Rico. And each state has its own rules as to who is a member of a party. In Texas, for example, you declare your party membership by voting in that party's primary election. If you vote in the Republican primary, you are a Republican, and if you vote in the Democratic Party's primary you are a Democrat. And you can change when the next primary rolls around.

But other states, such as New York, Nevada and California, require you to register as a Democrat or as a Republican or other party, including the Green Party, the Libertarian Party or even register as non-partisan (an independent.) They do have hard statistics on who considers themselves as a Democrat or a Republican, but also have good evidence that folks go out and vote whatever way they wish.

In the 2008 Presidential Election you could say that Barack Obama, the Democrat, received 69,456,897 votes and John McCain, the Republican received 59,934,814 votes. But this does not tell the tale effectively either. A lot of American voters consider themselves as independents. That is, the are not a member of either party. Or any party.

My own estimation is that about 39% of voters consider themselves Democrats and about 35% of people consider themselves Republicans. The rest (26%) are independents. How do I come to these numbers? By watching polls on politicians who are 'obviously guilty' of some naughty act. Those are the numbers that usually turn up as supporters of the 'obviously guilty' one. The true believers. And that, I think, is the best way of telling how many people support which side.

funny,depressed,happy,jolly,joyful,caring,nice,trustworthy,untrustworthy,friendly

anything that describes a person

by not making stupid decisions, remove illegal immigrants who drain our resources and cause crime, stay out of foreign affairs unless asked to by that government, less strict gun laws that already have no purpose, less involvement in the public laws, and more effort in fixing the economy.

* * Democrats care about ending terrorism not emboldening terrorists, about fighting disease and poverty worldwide, about rejecting torture, about affordable energy costs, about fighting global warming and developing sensible alternative energy sources, about quality education for our children, about tax and election reform, about keeping religion out of government and our schools, about caring for our senior citizens, about affordable prescription drugs, about providing quality health care for all, about creating good jobs, about protecting social security and Medicaid, about sexual equality and homosexual rights, about not enabling corrupt and oppressive governments, about a woman's right to chose and a fair immigration policy, about civil rights for all, about safeguarding the environment and protecting wildlife and about not opting to stimulate corporate profits and malfeasance at the expense of the working class of this country. Democrats believe in spreading the wealth and taking the money from rich Americans who have worked hard for it or inherited it and then giving the money to the lower and middle class.

U.S. Constitution Declaration of Independance Treaty of Alliance with France Treaty of Paris

Patrick Joseph Quinn (born December 16, 1948) is the 41st Governor of Illinois and a member of the Democratic Party. Quinn became governor of the state of Illinois on January 29, 2009 when the previous governor, Rod Blagojevich, was removed from office by an impeachment conviction

There is no equivalent to "G.O.P." to refer to the Democratic Party.

The Republicans spend now and pay later. They borrow money to spend now. Democrats tax for money to spend now. It is called "pay as you go" by Democrats and "Tax and Spend" by Republicans who are "Borrow and Spend" players.

The Mugwumps

Not at all. Democrats do believe in more government intervention, however this is to assist a nation's citizens in time of need. Whereas the Republican Party believes in more individual freedom, however it let's the rich live wealthy while the poor have no help and usually suffer. The advantage of this is that people are more motivated to work hard, but this result also causes much controversy. The U.S. will never turn communist. It is more dominantly democratic, which is why the U.S. has survived every recession (which have all triggered from a republican office).

The terms listed above are explained on the strong sided view of Liberal vs Conservative, and many people are in the middle believing in some, but not complete government intervention in lives (independents).

They are not. It's a fact that atheists and agnostics usually consider themselves to be left wing, but that's no reason for thinking that they are all anti christian or anti religion. In fact, the word "anti" makes me sick when used to talk about being or not being religious. There's no problem with not being religious, we are all beings who everyday try to use their reason and rationality to be better morally, so "anti christian people" should not be just used to label someone, otherwise the anti Christ is you.

A government which is made by people is called democratic government.
A government that is selected, implemented, and constrained by the people.

Depends on how you look at it. State wide North Carolina votes Republican in most areas. But President Obama won the state in 2008 by a narrow margin.

The people of North Carolina will decide in 2012 how the state will go in this Presidential election.

famous democratic leaders would be President Obama, Prime minister Winston Churchill, England's Ex football captain John Terry

While there is no universally accepted definition of 'democracy', equality and freedom have both been identified as important characteristics of democracy since ancient time. These principles are reflected in all citizens being equal before the law and having equal access to legislative processes. For example, in a representative democracy, every vote has equal weight, no unreasonable restrictions can apply to anyone seeking to become a representative, and the freedom of its citizens is secured by legitimized rights and liberties which are generally protected by a constitution. According to some theories of democracy, popular sovereignty is the founding principle of such a system. However, the democratic principle has also been expressed as "the freedom to call something into being which did not exist before, which was not given… and which therefore, strictly speaking, could not be known." This type of freedom, which is connected to human "natality," or the capacity to begin anew, sees democracy as "not only a political system… [but] an ideal, an aspiration, really, intimately connected to and dependent upon a picture of what it is to be human-of what it is a human should be to be fully human."Many people use the term "democracy" as shorthand for liberal democracy, which may include elements such as political pluralism; equality before the law; the right to petition elected officials for redress of grievances; due process; civil liberties; human rights; and elements of civil society outside the government. In the United States, separation of powers is often cited as a central attribute, but in other countries, such as the United Kingdom, the dominant principle is that of parliamentary sovereignty (whilst maintaining judicial independence). In other cases, "democracy" is used to mean direct democracy. Though the term "democracy" is typically used in the context of a political state, the principles are applicable to private organizations and other groups as well. Majority rule is often listed as a characteristic of democracy. However, it is also possible for a minority to be oppressed by a "tyranny of the majority" in the absence of governmental or constitutional protections of individual or group rights. An essential part of an "ideal" representative democracy is competitive elections that are fair both substantively and procedurally. Furthermore, freedom of political expression, freedom of speech, and freedom of the press are considered to be essential, so that citizens are adequately informed and able to vote according to their own best interests as they see them. It has also been suggested that a basic feature of democracy is the capacity of individuals to participate freely and fully in the life of their society. With its emphasis on notions of social contract and the collective will of the people, democracy can also be characterized as a form of political collectivism because it is defined as a form of government in which all adult citizens have an equal say in the decisions that affect their lives.

They took and house and senate just over two years a go and shortly after that started saying the economy was bad. Unemployment was at 4.9 them and the Dow was at a all time high so I didn't understand how they could say the economy is bad. After hearing the economy is bad for close to a year, I, like many people I know, decided to stop major purchases (middle of 08), hold on to my money and wait until after the election to see how the economy is doing. Glad we did.