Genetic Cloning

The debate over human cloning involves complex ethical considerations. While there may be potential medical benefits, such as organ transplant opportunities and disease research, the issue of violating human dignity by treating individuals as commodities cannot be ignored. Ultimately, the balance between benefits and ethical concerns should be carefully considered in any discussion on human cloning.

Human cloning is not possible. Many cloning attempts on our closest relatives, rhesus monkeys, have resulted in utter failure with not a single successful birth. Cloning in cattle have also resulted in very few pregnancies and even fewer are born. Most of those born suffer from bizarre illnesses that never occur in nature.

In cloning complex plants, a small piece of tissue from the plant is taken and placed in a nutrient-rich medium to encourage the growth of new plants. This process allows for the production of genetically identical plants to the parent plant.

The three types of reproductive cloning are embryo cloning, adult DNA cloning, and therapeutic cloning. Embryo cloning involves transferring genetically identical embryos to surrogate mothers. Adult DNA cloning creates an animal that is an exact genetic copy of an existing animal. Therapeutic cloning involves creating embryonic stem cells for research and medical purposes.

No, Ian Wilmut did not call cloning "cloning." He is known for his work in cloning Dolly the sheep, the first mammal cloned from an adult somatic cell, but the term "cloning" was used to describe the process before his work.

Therapeutic cloning is a process that involves creating embryos for the purpose of harvesting stem cells to use in medical treatments. These stem cells can potentially be used to generate tissues or organs to replace damaged or diseased cells in the body. Therapeutic cloning is a promising technology for regenerative medicine but is still in the experimental stages.

Cloning has been a topic of scientific interest for decades, with the first successful cloning of a mammal (Dolly the sheep) in 1996. Since then, cloning technology has advanced, leading to the cloning of other animals and ongoing ethical debates surrounding the practice. Cloning has potential benefits for research and medicine but also raises concerns about ethical implications and the impact on biodiversity.

The first successful human cloning was not officially confirmed due to ethical and legal concerns surrounding human cloning. However, a controversial claim of human cloning was made in 2004 by a company called Clonaid, but this claim lacks credible evidence.

a superbug is a micro-organism that is resistant to most anti-biotics. the superbugs in recent history are imune to all anti-biotics,except one. it is the gene of the3 superbug that is resistant to the antibiotics. a tiny change in one gene or a mutation can turn a bacterial cell into a superbug. one single superbug on its own will not do much damage but if it reproduces rapidly then it could produce a large population of bacteria which are all resistant to antibiotics. superbugs can have an increased risk of being resistant to antibiotics when: A) people take antibiotics they do not really need B) people do not finish their full course of antibiotics

Orchid cloning, or micropropagation, is a technique used to produce genetically identical orchid plants. This is typically done by taking a small piece of tissue from a parent plant and growing it in a nutrient-rich medium under sterile conditions to produce new plants. This method allows for the rapid multiplication of orchids with desirable traits.

Some potential benefits of cloning include the ability to produce genetically identical animals for research purposes, such as studying genetic diseases and developing new medical treatments. Cloning can also be used in agriculture to replicate desired traits in plants and animals, leading to increased food production and crop resilience. Additionally, cloning may offer a way to preserve endangered species and genetic diversity.

Alright, please disreguard the other "answer". They take a DNA sample from the organism that is to be cloned. Then they take an embrio from an animal the same species as the animal that will be cloned. Then they extract DNA from the embrio and replace it with the DNA sample from the animal that's going to be cloned. Then they place it back in the womb or uterus of the animal the embrio belongs to. It's not really cloning like what you see on the science fiction channel, that's why it's science fiction.

of course not. Surprisingly though, it's one expariment the some scientists work on everyday. That's how big of a deal it is.


Actually, it is. Unfortunately, the problem with that is that the cells are literally cloned, so the clone would be just as old as the animal or vegetable it was cloned from, regardless of what it looked like. The person above me has obviously never looked into it fully.

It can be used to multiply a single cell or many to be used as part of another experiment requiring the same cell or type of cell. It can also be injected into other organisms/cells to create an exact copy.

Cloning is classified in biotechnology because it involves the manipulation of organisms at the genetic level to create identical copies. Biotechnology harnesses biological processes to develop products and technologies that benefit various fields, including medicine, agriculture, and industry. Cloning techniques play a significant role in advancing biotechnological research and applications.

Human cloning and animal cloning both involve creating a genetic copy of an organism, but there are differences in the ethical and legal considerations surrounding each. Human cloning raises complex ethical issues related to human rights and medical ethics, while animal cloning is primarily focused on agricultural and scientific applications. Additionally, the technologies and procedures used for human cloning may differ from those used for animal cloning.

Some people believe that cloning is a manipulation of nature because it involves replicating living organisms in a way that does not occur naturally. Others argue that it is a scientific advancement that can have beneficial applications in medicine and agriculture. The ethical implications of cloning continue to be debated.

No, cloning an organism involves producing genetically identical copies of the entire organism. Cloning a gene involves making copies of a specific gene sequence. Both processes use similar techniques, such as recombinant DNA technology, but the scale and complexity differ.

Yeast cloning is a technique used to create identical copies of a specific gene or piece of DNA by inserting it into a yeast cell. The yeast cell then replicates the DNA along with its own genome, producing multiple copies of the desired DNA sequence. This technique is often used in molecular biology research to study gene function or produce specific proteins.

Replacement cloning is a theoretical possibility, and would be a combination of therapeutic and reproductive cloning. Replacement cloning would entail the replacement of an extensively damaged, failed, or failing body through cloning followed by whole or partial brain transplant.

No, cloning does not involve meiosis. Cloning typically involves a process called somatic cell nuclear transfer, where the nucleus of a somatic cell is transferred into an enucleated egg cell to create an identical genetic copy of the original organism, bypassing meiosis.

Cloning is controlled to prevent ethical concerns such as exploitation of cloned organisms, potential harm to biodiversity, and misuse of genetic technology. Regulation ensures that cloning is conducted safely and responsibly under strict oversight.

The major challenge in using adult DNA in the cloning process is that it may have undergone mutations or epigenetic changes that can result in abnormalities in the cloned organism. Additionally, the DNA from an adult cell may have shorter telomeres, which are linked to aging and could affect the lifespan of the cloned organism. Lastly, the efficiency of cloning using adult DNA is generally lower compared to using embryonic DNA.