What made a knight most valuable to a lord?
A knight was very valuable to a lord because knights had to follow a set of rules called chivalry which said that knights had to support their lords in battle no matter what and had to obey their lords. In return, the lords gave knights land where peasants farmed and they had to pay the knight that owned the land. But at the same time, knights also had to pay their lord.
At least in the U.S., two of the most famous rarities are the 1804 silver dollar and 1913 Liberty nickel. Both were actually unauthorized issues but were struck at the Mint, so they have level of legitimacy not found in many other "under the table" issues. (In fact, the 1804 dollars weren't even struck in 1804!). To the best of everyone's knowledge, all specimens have been accounted for. Recent auctions have been in the $1 million to $1.5 million range.
List four things about knights?
The Knights Templar were a powerful Christian military. They had a reputation of being fearsome but were learned men who were dedicated to protecting people of all religions. They were great statesmen and economic traders. The Knights Templar were dedicated to protecting all things Holy as well as the Holy Land.
Did the Freemasons help with the cover up of John F. Kennedy's murder?
No, we may have sunk the SS. Andrea Doria1 but we didn't cover up JFK's assassination. Bad movies aside, it's pretty clear that Lee Harvey Oswald murdered Kennedy.
1 Or it may have been the M/V Stockholm. Usually the simplest explanation is correct and there is no need to attribute a tragedy to some dark conspiracy.
Conspiracy theories abound, and I don't think we'll ever really know the whole truth.I have decided further speculation on this topic would be a fruitless waste of time.The key figures are dead or soon to be dead , so soon there will be no one left to tell us the truth.
Where is the knights of templar castle located?
The Templar Knights did not have a "headquarters" or main place of residence- much like modern military forces; there are bases that are controlled by the military, but in truth belong to the government.
Did the Free Masons evolve from the Knight Templar?
Free masons were established approximately 150 b.c
The Knights Templar were established during the middle ages approximately 1120 a.d.
But, no.
Does the Order of Malta still exist?
The Order of Malta still exists and is located in Rome, Italy. It is a Roman Catholic order that spends time helping the poor and aids victims of natural disorders, war, and epidemics.
Who is the current Duke of Touraine?
Investor (property and international) and philanthropist Dr. Albert Allen, MBA, DBA, PhD of London and D.C. is the current Duke of Touraine of France, title once held by the Royal Family; also holds the titles of Lord of Crofton of Greater London and Count of Semur of France, titles once held by the Nevilles, the royal Tudors monarchs, the Knights Templar, the largest English philanthropists of the 18th/19th century and the French Royal Anjous; resides between London, Washington D.C., Beijing and several Latin American countries.
What is the name for Knights Templar that protect Mary Magdalene?
Outside the Bible there's no evidence that Mary Magdalene ever existed. Answer to your question; None The Knights Templar did not exist at the time that Mary Magdalene lived. These knights were founded in the 12th Century. Their main purpose was to protect the pilgrim holy sites of Jerusalem.
What crimes were there in the Middle Ages?
In the early middle ages, there was a concept of weregeld, which provided a fine for killing someone, without distinction as to intent. The fine was relative to that person's social rank; killing a landless peasant cost 60 solidi, possibly two year's wages for the peasant; killing a priest was 300, unless he was saying mass at the time, in which case he cost 400; and up the fines went until you got to the king, for whose death the fine was 15,000 solidi paid to his family and another 15,000 paid to the state for the loss of his services. Imagine that: At least one time and place of the Middle Ages had a fine prescribed for killing a king.
The Lex Alamanorum provided a fine for rape of a married woman, and a slightly lower fine for rape of single woman. Exposing a part of a woman's body was also met with a fine, which varied according to the part: lifting her hat to expose her head cost 6 solidi, which was a lot of money in those days, and since the solidus was 12 denarii, this was the equivalent of about two month's wages for the average laborer. The various legal codes also protected women from physical abuse in various ways, and it was a bad idea for men to abuse their wives in most places.
There were a number of very surprising provisions. For example the Lex Frisionum made it not a criminal act for a mother to kill her newborn child. Whether this was related to an early perception of post-partum depression or not is unknown, but it certainly illustrates the fact that medieval law was not all derived from the Bible.
There certainly were severe legal codes and severe punishments in some places. The Saxon legal code made it a capital offense to eat meat during Lent. The Plantagenet Kings and others were renowned for use of torture. So I can hardly characterize the Middle Ages as easy or soft on criminals. Indeed, I think they can only be characterized as highly varied.
Punishments and legal proceedings were also varied. There were ecclesiastical courts for clerics, and anyone who was a cleric could ask to be tried by the Church instead of civil authorities. It was fairly difficult to identify just who a cleric was, so eventually, the legal question was became whether the the person be able to read and write. For this purpose, the person was asked to read the 51st Psalm. As far as I know, no one tested to see if the person had memorized the 51st Psalm. Ecclesiastical courts were more merciful than civil, the food was better in prisons run by the Church, and one of the popes banned clergy from participating in torture, so ecclesiastical courts did not use it. (I can just picture criminals teaching each other how to read so they can get a break in court.)
It was possible in some places to defend a person by having that person take an oath asserting innocence, and have twelve people swear that they believed the oath was valid. And in much of medieval Europe, a fugitive could take refuge in a church or monastery for whatever crime, and no one, including agents of the king, could remove or harm that person.
I think this question deserves a lot of research and attention. The ignorance we show of the Middle Ages seems often to be greater than the ignorance of which we accuse the time. A link below is to a Wikipedia article on Germanic Law, which has many links to medieval legal codes.
Another answer:rebellion, treason, heresy, witchcraft, vagrancy, smuggling, robbers, kind napping, working on Sundays, stealing, receiving stolen goods, murder, disobeying a king, not cooking bread to the right height and dressing like a noble if you are not one! just to name a few.Was a Knight of Templar in America in 1362?
theoretitcally, we have no true proof, considering no one is alive from that time period, but according to the history channel... maybe.
Are religious rituals important for a true devotee?
It would depend which religion or organization you are referring to. In some religions, rituals are a mainstay or worship. For others, education, evangelizing, or meditation are more important. Some rituals are considered cherished traditions in sororities and fraternities. In certain closed organizations, intense rituals can be a part of initiation.
Who founded the knights of templars?
not positive on spelling but its something like Hugh D'pan, ive only heard it pronounced so im not certain
just checked my book, its Hughes de Payens
Hugues de Payens in 1118.
Where the Knight Templar mercenaries?
The Knights Templar were not mercenaries in the traditional sense; they were a medieval Christian military order founded in the early 12th century. Their primary mission was to protect Christian pilgrims traveling to the Holy Land and to defend the territories captured during the Crusades. While they did engage in military actions, their members were bound by religious vows and operated under the authority of the Church, rather than being hired for pay like typical mercenaries.