• 
• 3 answers

They eat leaves.

• 
• 2 answers

Two yrs

• 
• 1 answer

• 
• 1 answer

Conspiracy theriosts believe the evidence points to the towers and Building 7 collapsing because of controlled demolition. They claim that the airplanes hitting the buildings and the resulting fires could not have brought the buildings down in themselves. As part of their arguments, many use the example of a building in Madrid, Spain that burned for hours and did not collapse. However this incident had very little in common with September 11.

Another mystery surrounds the Pentagon. Some believe the evidence suggests that no airplane hit the building. They base this on the size of the hole left in the building and lack of finding many airplane parts at the site, however, their "evidence" is based on what is shown in photographs and anonymous eye-witness accounts. Many photographs that they do not refer to clearly show debris from an airplane outside the wall. Another mystery surrounds why the FBI immediately confiscated video from surrounding businesses that could have recorded the events at the time the damage was made to the Pentagon. Images were later released, which showed that the "video" was actually a stills camera which only took pictures every few seconds, inevitably the plane was moving at such a speed that there was not much visible on the "film" of stills.

There are more that can be found by doing a "September 11, 2001" search on Google.

There are claims that Scientists found chemicals used in demolition blasting material in the dust from the buildings- however this may be explained quite easily by investigating the types of materials used to build the sky scrapers and their chemical components. Conspiracy theorists also cite that there were also perfect angled cuts made in main supports for the building that appear to be man made, however, this can be explained by the design of the building and the way it was erected. Conspiracy theorists also like to cite that several eye witnesses reported hearing several blasts right before the collapse that sounded like gun shots- however, right before the towers collapsed, the conditions right above where the planes struck had become so unbearable that people committed suicide by jumping off the buildings. They were so high up that when their bodies finally hit the ground, the force was so great that the resulting sound sounded like a gunshot/explosion. Be aware that many conspiracy theorists misquote witnesses to make it look as though they actually claimed there were bombs going off, when what they really said was that it *sounded* like a bomb.

Conspiracy theorists also claim that the buildings were felled by controlled demolition, but that they didn't start the demolition until after the building began to collapse. In footage shown on video clips by said Conspiracy theorists, there are images of buildings that are demolished, the characteristics of the demolition do not correlate with the characteristics of the Twin Towers collapse which began from the top of the building, rather than the bottom (as with controlled demolition).

Also, the claim that fire melted the steel. This isn't really a mystery but, Melting point of Iron is 2795ºF Melting point of typical structural steel is 2750ºF

Maximum temperature of hydrocarbon fires burning in the atmosphere without pressurization or preheating is 1517ºF

Fire burns colder when its deprived of oxygen which each tower fire appeared to be deprived of oxygen from the dark smoke (however many instances such as jet fuel may also explain the dark coloured smoke), particularly in the south tower, theoretically causing the fire to burn well below 1472ºF

Also there is no evidence from the ruins of melted steel or iron, but there were pools of melted aluminum found from car rims and other aluminum things. But the melting point of Aluminum is 1220.58°F so we do know the fires were below 1517ºF but above 1220.58°F that's no where NEAR the melting point of steel/iron.

However, the steel would not have had to completely melt to cause the building to collapse, there were never any claims (by authorities) that the steel melted completely. The metal/steel would only need to be weakened by the high levels of heat to give out under the pressure of the higher floors of the building, once in motion, the collapse was inevitable.

• 
• 2 answers

2 times when migrating from Canada to Mexico

• 
• 2 answers

250 million but we need more milkweed now am I kill u or no am love pretty dress mommy dipey love

• 
• 1 answer

Monarch butterflies are not endangered but near threatened. Reasons for this include deforestation of butterfly habitat, confusion of host plants for monarch caterpillars, etc.

• 
• 1 answer

I would like you to send me the scootie webkinz and cardnal webkinz

I want you guys to make the butterfly webkinz come out in February of 2008.

um..... it already came out! I'm sorry, I know you are a Webkinz fan, but please, take these questions elsewhere. Look it up on google.ca or google.com. This is none of wikianswers business!

• 
• 2 answers

• 
• 1 answer

Like many animals and insects, they go south. There are places in Mexico where the butterflies literally blanket the trees and fill the air during the winter. Currently, these habitats are being endangered by new development.

they go to we buy any car .com

• 
• 3 answers

Weather

• 
• 1 answer

1)Butterflies,like bees, help cross pollinate plants. They get nectar from flowers which helps them with their pollination

• 
• 1 answer

Just because they were called monarchs doesn't mean this question belongs in the animal life section.

• 
• 1 answer

nothing they are posinous

• 
• 1 answer

Butterflies nomatter what size will eat sugar water. take two teaspoons of sugar mix it in a cup of water and squirt a little on a flower but you have to be carful because if the surgar water gets on its wings the butterfly will not be able to fly. you could also feed it a sliced grape, orange slice, or gatorade.

• 
• 1 answer

Monarch Butterflys live around milkweed fields, milkweed patchs and sandy areas where milk weed grows.

• 
• 1 answer

With their eyes.

• 
• 1 answer

Monarch caterpillars do not sting. It is a fairly safe assumption that no butterfly or moth larvae possess the capability to inflict a sting via an organ designed for the purpose. As for biting, their mouthparts are designed for the efficient consumption of plant material and are not likely capable of delivering a bite as a defensive mechanism. Of course, there could be rare exceptions. Unusual adaptations in nature are not without precedent.

• 
• 1 answer

Monarch butterfly larvae (caterpillars) feed exclusively on milkweed.

The adult Monarch butterfly drinks the juices of soft fruits (usually fallen fruits), and nectar from flowers. It drinks the nectar of milkweed flowers, which makes it poisonous to predators.

• 
• 3 answers

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrgggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

• 
• 1 answer

This is easy... STEP 1. Put 3 eggs on one side of the scale and put 3 eggs on the other side of the scale. If the scale balances - you know the light egg is not one of the eggs currently on the scale. If the scale tips - you know the light egg is on the "lighter" side. STEP 2. Since Step 1 will tell you which group of 3 the light egg is in... use the scale again... put 1 egg on each side. If the scale balances - the lightest egg is in your hand. If the scale tips - you know the light egg is on the "light" side.

• 
• 1 answer

no. they are shiny and black all over.

• 
• 1 answer

It uses it's probiscus, a flexable, long tongue like organ. Click on the 'Monarch Bufferfly' link on this page to learn more.

• 
• 1 answer

They have six jointed legs and on their feet are hooks for holding on tight.

• 
• 1 answer

poison