Warrants

there is

It would all depend on what villany you commited and what you have done since than like if you committed armed robberyy they probly wouldn't but if you did a small crime and have turned your life around they might let you.But the only way to know would be to register and see what happpens.

You're going to have to call the Jefferson County, Illinois Sheriff's Office for this one. Or probably the Illinois State Police.

It means exactly what it says. A warrant for your arrest has been issued by a judge and it has been assigned to an officer to serve on you and take you into custody. If you have knowledge that the ploice ARE holding a warrant for you, it is probably a good idea if you voluntarily turned yourself in. It looks 'better' to the court, if you do.

If their search is conducted completely in conformance to the wording of the warrant they can only search for and seize what the warrant allows AND anything else which lies IN PLAIN SIGHT. If they obtain your consent to conduct a search, they may search ANYWHERE and seize ANYTHING they find that is of an unlawful, or illegal nature.

supporting evidence

An answer (defense) would be whatever proof the defendant has that the lawsuit is not valid. The response to the summons is not the venue for explaining the defendant's personal situation, such as job loss, illness and so forth. Unfortunately the law does not consider such circumstances as being a valid defense for not paying a debt. In most states failure to respond means the defendant will lose the case by default and the plaintiff will in all likelihood be awarded a judgment for the amount of debt or damages plus legal costs and applicable penalties. You may file an answer by copying the case caption to your own paper, that is the part at the top that says wht court it is in, who the plaitniff and defendant are, and the C.A. number assigned by the court, if there is one on your complaint. Then, simply go down the numbered paragraphs in the complaint, and either admit what the sentence or paragraph says, deny what it says, or say you are without sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the paragraph. You must respond to each individually numbered paragraph in the complaint in one of those three ways. That's it. BUT, be careful because certain defenses must be raised in the answer or else they are waived and lost. The most important ones are statute of limitations, and failure of service of the complaint on you. There are other defenses as well that must be raised, but these are of the most important. You shoudl try to take the answer to the court house and ask for the clerk or prothonotary, and tell them you want to file the answer and they can help you. check with the bar association, there are always lawyers who will do these things for free.

I think you may be confusing "having evidence" with the word "allegation." Whatever 'evidence' you think you may have, it will have to be investigated to determine if, in fact, an offense was committed. Neither the prosecutor NOR the judge are law enforcement officers and do not investigate allegations of wrongdoing. Your attorney would be far better off presenting the evidence of the officers alleged wrongdoing to his department superiors or to the State Attorney General's Office. Look at it this way - if it is eventually proven that the officer HAS committed perjury, and it was instrumental in your conviction, you will win a new trial.

You could be charged with multiple offenses depending on many factors such as location, time, age, on top of the initial reason for being around the police. Firstly, just judging the question you COULD be charged with Disturbing the Peace, Curfew Violation, Battery on a Police Officer, Resisting Arrest By Violence, Simple Assault, etc, etc. The list could go on and on depending on multiple factors including location of arrest and how well the officer knows his job. The first step is a minor should not be under the influence. Secondly, a parent should be available. Third, if a minor is assaulting a police officer the minor should serve the maximum days in a juvenile detention center (all depending on local and state).

my wife was charged with shoplifting about four years ago we never received a court date so we thoght the charges were droped due to lack of evidence.she was involved in a miner traffic altercation and was informed that she had a warrant for her arrest. she has never been in trouble with the law before and the shoplifting charge was really weak.now we have to go to court on 10-28-2008 and she's really worried. please help us if you can with some information on this matter. thank you verry much

The person may do so, but if they are stopped for a traffic infraction or other matter by authorities the warrant will appear when the person's identification/driver's license is checked.

Generally anyone with an outstanding warrant for any reason will be taken into custody and the state where the warrant was issued will be notified. The person will be held until that state's authorities decides what, if any action will be taken.

It depends on the warrant. Every police agency, and plus the warrants themselves have conditions. Normally it must be a pretty serious crime for a police agency to be willing to extradite out of state arrest warrants.

In all probability, YES. A violation of probation, regardless of the nature of the offense itself, often results in an interstate warrant being issued, and you will be extradited to the state that wants you. Can the probation officer do this himself? Not likely: a warrant has to be issued by the court that sentenced you for the VOP. Then the cops in the area to which you fled will pick you up and extradite you to the wanting state.

It is very hard to challenge the validity of a search warrant. When the cops come to your door with one, you need to let them do what they're supposed to do. Later you can challenge many aspects of the search warrant, such as them exceeding the scope of the warrant, their illegal petitioning for the warrant by stating facts that were untrue (perjury), or anything else of legal challenge value.

Apart from War Crimes involving all manner of incendiaries and bombs- whole cities reduced to ashes- of a more personal type of homicide the Saint Petersburg ( actually happened in Ekaterinberg- city of Catherine, in the summer of l9l8 in the USSR probably takes the Cake- Known Dead- Nicholas, Alexandra,- Olga, Tatiana, Maria, the Crown Prince Alexis- and various palace retainers, ladies in waiting, etc. confirmation of the death of the youngest Grand Duchess was never had- you know who I am speaking of. It was , for real the Crime of the Twentieth Century- quite different and personally targeting the royal Family- not a routine bombing raid or prison-camp atrocity- those are bad too, but.

1. The charges are read.

2. Last minute motions may be filed by the litigants or the judge's own motion.

3. The prosecutor makes an opening statement.

4. The defense attorney makes an opening statement but may delay until the defense case begins.

5. The prosecutor presents and direct examines the 1st witness.

6. The defense attorney cross examines the witness.

7. The prosecutor may redirect examine the witness about issues brought up in cross.

8. The defense may then recross on issues brought up on redirect.

(This goes back and forth till both sides have no more questions.)

(Witnesses may be asked to introduce exhibits.)

9. The prosecutor presents the next witness and 5 through 8 repeats.

10. When all prosecution witnesses are finished the defense will usually motion for a directed verdict, saying there is insufficient evidence for conviction--usually denied.

11. The defense puts on its case, repeating steps 5 through 9 but with the roles reversed.

12. The prosecutor may make a brief initial closing argument.

13. The defense makes its closing argument.

14. The prosecutor makes a final closing argument (unlike TV and movies, the prosecution goes last as it has the burden of proof).

15. The judge instructs the jury.

16. The jury deliberates.

17. The jury renders it verdict.

18. The verdict is read.

19. If a conviction, the sentence is delivered, or it may be postponed pending a pre-sentencing report, else the defendant is released if not convicted.

(During the trial either side may make motions or objections. There are often sidebars where the attorneys approach the bench and speak to the judge so the jury doesn't overhear. The jury is often sent out so things can be addressed without their overhearing.)

Unless they 'slip-up' when entering you into the state system to verify your ID, then you're out of luck. When they enter your name and DOB, you're going to show up. You should just surrender to the warrant and get it over with. It's going to catch up with you sooner or later anyway, probably when you least expect it and when you can least afford it.

The date that the prison has been told they will release the inmate. It is variable though, and can change based on new crimes being charged while incarcerated or a releasing authority changing the date. A projected release date is the first or next possible date of release in an indeterminant sentence. For instance: if offender Bob's sentence began on 1/1/09 and he received the indeterminant sentence of 3-15 years, his projected release date would be 1/1/12. As mentioned previously, a releasing authority such as a parole board or panel has the authority to change this date, usually extending it. A state's governor or the President may also change this date by commutting a sentence or issuing a pardon.

An inmate is given two release dates, ERD - Earliest Release date and Max Date - Max date. They will get out between this time. Usually the erd as long as they do not have any disciplinary problems. If they get into trouble time gets add, until their max date... Unless they commit felony's inside then that changes the release date completely.

No. You must surrender yourself to the state in which the warrant was issued.

The usual penalty is getting locked up - forthwith! The actual charge would probably be FTA (Failure To Appear).

Once a properly trained working K9 indicates something illegal on you or your property, that is considered probable cause.

It basically means that authorities are looking for the person named on the warrant. Answer It means that the police are out looking for the person and will arrest upon contact.