Government

A region that does not have permanent residents or a working government is a possession.

They all ready located there. Now, since the Trump administration the departments have added people who want to close or make that department invalid.

Who knows what will happen? That's the cause of much anxiety these days.

Government can build some pathways to allow easier transportation of settlers.

2.  government can promote the low density area as a healthier alternative for living than the high density area.

3. Government can advertise the potential resources that can be found or manufactured from the natural resources within the area.

yall suck on here I cant find any of the answers

no

true

The Armed Forces is an element of the Department of Defense. The Department of Defense is a department of the Executive Branch of government.

The President of the United States is the head of the Executive Branch, and Commander in Chief of the United States Armed Forces.

Theocracies

Oligarchies

Dictatorships

Absolute monarchies

Communism

International corporations

The EU commission

The United Nations

Totalitarianism

Reason: Correct on apex

Chester Alan Arthur pushed the act which set up civil service exams to replace presidential appointments. This action was largely a response to the assassination of President Garfield by a disappointed office-seeker.

It is in charge of the U.S. Capitol Police and the oversight of federal elections.

There have never any governments in which only one person can serve. One person cannot possibly run a whole government by him/herself. During the 244-year period of the Roman monarchy the government was headed by a king who had government officials who served as his subordinates. During the 482-year period of the Roman republic the consuls were the two annually elected heads of the republic and there were four other types of elected officers of state, who also served in the government (the censors, the praetors, the aediles and the quaestors). During the 503-year period of rule by emperors the emperors were absolute rulers and appointed the officials who served in their governemnts

A desire that the government cannot satisfy is happiness. Even the best government can't do that for us... we have to learn it for ourselves.

It helps create jobs, fortune, power, and all the qualities that makes a strong bond with unity in it's support system, thus, making a better and more organized nation! (unlike America) XD

China, Cuba, Laos, and Vietnam. This is known as communism.

The U.S. Congress consists of 100 U.S. Senators and 435 members of the U.S. House of Representatives.

It depends on the cause of the downturn and on the country. Small countries with very open economies for instance are very dependent on the up- and downturns of the countries they do business with and have little influence on those up- and downturns. Generally speaking, Western countries have a 'mixed' economy in which free market forces and private enterprise have a major influence on economic development and where Government sets the ruler and regulations to ensure things like fair competition and decent working conditions. They can stimulate or slow down economic development through things like taxes and Tax treaties, development policies and by acting as a customer for industries, placing orders.

Central banks - strictly speaking not part of Government, but often seen as such - play a major role in overseeing the banking sector and setting short-term and long-term interest levels, thereby either stimulating or slowing down economic growth.

So Governments have a lot of instruments at their disposal. But consumer's trust in the economy and their willingness to buy and invest is at the bottom of any economic development, positive and negative. After the Stock market crash of 1929 many sensible measures were taken and policies adopted by the US and other Governments, but with public trust at zero they simply didn't work. When Japanese households stopped spending in the late seventies and kept their money in the bank, no Govenment action - not even lowering the interst rate to zero - could for decades induce them to start spending again. And the latest worldwide crisis, that of 2008, was caused not by Government action but by a relatively speaking 'modest' mortgage crisis that spread like wildfire across the whole range of activities of the banking sector.

So Government is often not directly responsible for a specific downturn. It is however responsible for conducting a sound and intelligent economic and monetary policy to react to downturns, to keep consumer's trust at a healthy level and to stimulate industrial and other production; and to regulate industries in such a way that excesses and sudden meltdowns are as far as possible prevented. But the level of politically acceptable regulation varies per country, and the people that blame the Government for a downturn are often the same people that are against any 'meddling' and interference by central/Federal Government as long as things seem to be going relatively well.

Usually local government.

A very restricted type of democracy.

The three categories that make up freedom are political rights, civil rights, and economic freedom.

Clarify the presidential line of succession

It depends which war you are referring to.
After wars countries usually have a form of government imposed upon them or one they have fought to achieve.

to raise money and extend society west ward

In unstable governments, conflicts are often decided by whomever is able to obtain the most power. Whoever holds the most power is able to crush/curtail the opposition and stay in power.