Grammar

The silent letter is 'e'.

More correctly it is referred to as a MUTE letter.

The mute 'e' lengths the sound of the preceeding vowel.

e.g.

Garbage & 'Gar bag'

Like & lik (lick)

Mute (myout) & mut. . .

Ah, what a lovely question! Both "in your letter" and "on your letter" can be correct, depending on the context. If you're referring to something written inside the letter, you would say "in your letter." If you're talking about something physically attached to the outside of the letter, you would say "on your letter." Just follow your heart and use whichever feels right in the moment.

The Greek roots of "telephone" are tele- "at a distance" and phoneo "speak."

When sand meets the sea

"I am looking forward to going there" is a correct sentence from a grammatical standpoint. However, it may sound more natural to say "I am looking forward to going to (insert place here)", depending on the dialect of your area.

disobey

common noun

The sentence "All is invited" is not grammatically correct. The verb "is" should agree with the plural subject "All," so it should be "All are invited." In this corrected form, the verb "are" matches the plural subject "All," making the sentence grammatically accurate.

The correct phrasing is "seven and five are thirteen." In this case, "seven and five" are two separate numbers that are being added together to equal thirteen. When combining two distinct quantities, the verb should agree with the plural subject "seven and five," making "are" the appropriate verb choice.

Both are correct. Use proudest except where most proud seems better. Proudest is the English way of making the superlative, and most proud is the French way. Since the Norman Conquest of 1066, which imposed a form of French upon English speakers, using frenchified vocabulary and grammar may be seen as somehow higher class. Utter nonsense, but there you go. One rule that almost works is this: monosyllabic or native English adjectives take -er and -est, borrowed polysyllabic adjectives take "more" and "most."

Ah, the age-old question of "on" or "in" when talking about time. It's like deciding whether to paint a happy little tree on the left or in the middle of your canvas. Both "on" and "in" can be used with November, depending on the context. You can say an event is happening "in November" to talk about the month as a whole, or you can say it's happening "on November 15th" to be more specific about a particular day. Just like choosing different brush strokes, both options can bring beauty to your language.

The plural possessive form of "reindeer" is "reindeers'." In this case, the plural form of "reindeer" is "reindeer," and to show possession, you add an apostrophe after the "s" in the plural form. This indicates that something belongs to multiple reindeer.

Well, honey, "revunged" may sound like something straight out of Dr. Seuss, but it's not exactly Webster's material. So, if you're planning on using it in a Scrabble game, I'd say you're out of luck. Stick to real words, darling, and leave the made-up ones to the poets.

Well, honey, it's simple as pie. "Friend's" comes before "friends'" alphabetically because the apostrophe comes before the "s" in the good ol' English dictionary. So, if you're looking for your buddy's possession, you'll find it before you stumble upon a group of pals' belongings. Easy peasy lemon squeezy!

Oh, what a lovely question! The words with the same vowel sound as "pool," "tool," "wool," "book," "hood," "school," and "loop" all have the "oo" vowel sound. It's like a little chorus of harmony in the English language, bringing warmth and coziness to our hearts. Keep exploring the beauty of sounds in words, my friend!

The correct phrase is "bear resemblance." "Bear" in this context means to carry or support, so when we say something "bears resemblance" to something else, we mean it shows similarity or likeness. "Bare resemblance" would imply a lack of resemblance, which is not the intended meaning.

An example of A-S-V-O-A (Agent-Subject-Verb-Object-Adverbial) pattern in a sentence could be "The chef (A) skillfully (A) prepared (V) the delicious (O) meal (S)." In this sentence, the agent is the chef, the subject is the meal, the verb is prepared, the object is delicious, and the adverbial is skillfully. This pattern helps to clearly identify the roles of each element in the sentence structure.

Oh, dude, the suffix for memory is "-ory." It's like the cherry on top of the word, making it all official and stuff. So, yeah, next time you're talking about memory, just remember to throw in that fancy suffix "-ory."

Oh, dude, should you put a comma after "when" in reality? Well, technically, if "when" is used as a conjunction to introduce a dependent clause, you don't need a comma. But hey, if you're feeling fancy and want to add a little pause for dramatic effect, go ahead and throw in that comma. Like, who's gonna stop you? It's your sentence, man.

Either can be correct, depending on the context. 'Who' is used for the subject of the verb and 'whom' for the object.

'The man who I saw was kissing the girl was your uncle.' (Subject - I saw he was kissing the girl.)

'The man whom I saw kissing the girl was your uncle.' (Object - I saw him kissing the girl.)

Let's add a little touch-up to that sentence. How about this: "When America was first discovered, it was a land abundant in incredibly rich natural resources." Just like adding a happy little tree to a painting, a small adjustment can make a big difference!

Ah, isn't that a lovely question? The suffix for president is "-cy." It's like adding a little happy tree to the end of the word to give it that finishing touch. Just remember, there are no mistakes, only happy accidents in the world of words.