AMD Microprocessors

I just bought a model 170 series b ser#c754716 in relativeley good condition for $200.00 Canadian.

Be gay with it, or when your system starts press delete to enter bios in there you should be able to access your cpus bus speed or whatever it is, anyway set it from 200mhz to whatever you desire maybe try 230mhz??

With a Radeon HD 7540D, it is unlikely that you will be able to run Battlefield 4. Your CPU would be able to handle it, but that graphics card will bottleneck your processor. You would need to switch graphics cards to play. A good card would be the Radeon HD 6790.

AMD Athlon II X4 645 - 3.1GHz - 2MB L2 - 0MB L3

The AMD C-60 APU is a 9 Watt, Brazos series, dual-core mobile processor with an integrated GPU on the same die.

Codenamed "Ontario" the CPU is a 1 GHz dualcore processor, using the Bobcat microarchitecture, with 2 x 512 KB L2 cache and is capable to turbocore to 1.33 GHz. Built using the 40 nm bulk fabrication process it supports SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4a, NX Bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, and AMD-V.

The GPU is a Radeon HD 6290 running at 276 - 400 MHz in a 80 Unified Shaders: 8 Texture-mapping Units: 4 Render-output Units configuration. Interestingly the GPU is marked as a Radeon HD 6000 series (which uses Northern Islands Shaders) even though it uses Evergreen Unified Shaders which belong to the Radeon HD 5000 family of GPUs.

Depends how you broke it, if you fried it you can't repair it, if you broke a pin you might be able to fix it with some luck by finding which pin broke and locating the pins hole on the socket so you can put a small metal material to make contact with the broken pin's 'remains'.

hey there, seeing as though the e-450 is a very low range cpu, it will definatly not run skyrim on high/medium. skyrim is just too detailed. i have the same processor/graphics and my laptop actually does run skyrim on low. just dont expect smooth graphics all the time. what you are trying to do is run an amazingly detailed game on a low power netbook processor.

if youre not too bothered with the occasional stutter once in a while it will run,

if you want high framerates, even on low settings it will NOT run.

yup! Fear 1, Doom 3 BGF edition, Tomb raiders before the new reboot of 2013, Ps2 and N64 Emulators run pretty smooth, Call of duty MW1 and 2 will run nicely, Portal 2 will be nice playable, Half-Life 1 will run perfectly almost, Half Life 2 Will play at 30-40 fps (nice), Team Fortress 2 is PLAYABLE, No problems with Far Cry 1, 2 and even 3 will run, bad graphics only for Somes games like Tf2 and Far Cry 3.

Have a nice day!

Your voice is terrible and the computer wants to kill itself.

SMA connectors

Overall Intel CPU(s) have been the best in the market. With AMD Athlon 64 launch ,AMD was the leading company around 2003 and 2004.
AMD gives out more heat and uses more energy than Intel.
AMD is usually cheaper than Intel.
If we focus on 3GHz of Intel P4 we can see that it will carry out processes much faster.As i know Intel P4 have more cache than AMD and Considering the 2 cores and low heat, Intel is the better choice for a long run ,reliability and speed .

celeron

They are used on laptops just not anymore. On older laptops Pentium 4 and AMD FX processors where not used not because of size, because they could not develop a cost safe cooling system (a fan that spins fast enough) to keep the processors cool enough during peak performace. They started to use these when the technoligy was developed (out there) and fairly praced but was hardly used because core duo came out soon after and was expected to come even sooner therefor they stoped working with the single processors and starting using the cooling tech for duo but theres still alot with outhere with those processors just no longer manufactured.

you can't run two apposing processors at the same time in a computer that's like if you have two brains for one person