Articles of Confederation

To allow the government to enact and enforce laws

Who wanted to replace the Articles of Confederation?

13 tax and trade system.

Did not give congress the power to tax

Operating big businesses

None actually, it is the ninth Amendment you are referring to. It states: The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

The Articles of Confederation was the first form of government created for America before the US Constitution. The members of the Second Continental Congress approved the Articles for ratification, thus any of them can be considered witnesses. Congress members included Benjamin Franklin, John Adams, George Washington, and any of the Founding Fathers.

It lasted for such a short period of time because the nations leaders deemed it ineffective and decided to replace it with the Constitution, followed by a Bill of Rights.

There was no President under the Articles of Confederation.

Each individual state

There were multiple weaknesses behind the failure and downfall of the Confederate States of America. The chief of which was an economic system of plantations and forced labor that was not sustainable, coupled with a lack of heavy industrial and rail capacity, in comparison to the Northern States.

16

Yes he did i saw in google

true

One accomplishment of the national government under the Articles of Confederation was the passage of legislation establishing the way in which new states could enter the Union. The Northwest Ordinance of 1787 paved the way for making new territories into states on the same legal footing as the original 13 (as opposed to having them be subordinate colonies).

It created a stronger federal government that would be superior in many but not all ways to the state governments. The Articles of Confederation simply created a loos conglomeration of the states each acting as if it were a country of its own. In many ways the states could not get along with one another, such as in areas of interstate commerce. Something had to be done to make the states co-operate with one another so the stronger federal system was created.

The first article of the Constitution for the United States discusses the Legislative branch. The second discusses the Executive branch, and the third discusses the Judiciary.

congress did not have control of foreign trade

The question is what would happen if Canada choose to join the United States and accept the supremacy of the U.S. Constitution. No one knows and the question invites everyone to add to this answer with their own ideas, so I'll start.

If such a note had not been preceded by debates and votes within Canada it would create a political crisis in Canada and might ruffle some feathers south of the border. Without the debates and votes such a note would lack legitimacy and would likely not be accepted by the U.S. and certainly not by citizens of Canada.

If such debates and votes lead to such a note it would be one formal step in a long process. A process many believe is already occurring.

Or a process that many believe will never occur. The U.S. of the 21st century has little need to invite Canada to join them. It might actually be counter-productive as the new members would gain rights they currently do not have.

There is no need to grant those rights to have military control over Canada, the U.S. already has that, Just as there is no need to grant admission to gain unfettered access to Canadian resources.

It could be argued that any such move by Canada would be blocked by an amendment to the U.S. Constitution long before Canada could send such a note. The U.S. already has what it wanted from Canada and without the costs that would come with admitting Canada into their Union.

Under the Articles of Confederation, the US Congress did not have the power to impact the economy. It could not enforce nationwide laws, or enact measures such as tariffs.

No they were abolished when the constitution was put into place.

To a stronger central government. They didn't work because everyone was an individual and not united under a single working government.

I'd have to guess the fact only the states had power, and central congress didn't really have any. (The states argued about it as well)