Civil Process

The question is not worded clearly. If the questioner already HAS counsel and wishes to discharge/fire them, all he has to do is either do it in open court while on the record, or file a motion with the court notifying the judge that they are proceeding pro se. If, right from the outset, they are not engaging counsel, that fact will be included in the information with the court filings for the case. The judge will probably strongly counsel you to retain counsel, but you DO have the right to represent yourself if you wish. Please remember the old lawyer adage: "The man who represents himself, has a fool for a client."

A responsive pleading is one that responds to what another party has filed. An answer responds to a complaint. An opposition to a motion to dismiss responds to a motion to dismiss. An affidavit and reply must be filed to a motion to dismiss a case.

It's assault so yeah. you could

What appeal action if any that could be available to the debtor depends upon the laws of the state. In most cases a civil summons does not have to be delivered into the hands of the named person, only that a reasonable attempt has been made. In a case where the summons was accepted by a member of the household the law would presume that the named person would have been made aware of such and should have responded within the required time limit and/or appeared at the date of the hearing.

You don't, a court (and its officers; judge, bailiff, etc) are immune from criminal or civil penalties for any action it takes: even if that action is clearly against established law. And, yes that is contrary to congressional intent; 42 USC 1983 & 18 USC 241,242 - but you would be asking the court to convict itself. When is the last time you saw a criminal turn themselves in for committing a crime; much less one that no one knew about? The last thing a court would do is subject itself to the authority of the people (it is supposed to serve).

Judgments are indeed renewable in Washington state. They can be renewed for up to ten years with all the penalties and interest in place.

As long as your question is referring to the executor of a will, than the answer to your question is yes.

Firstly if you are unaware that someone or a company has lodge a claim and the first you hear is when judgment has been made, you can request for a fee of £30.00 to the issuing court for the judgment to be set aside, giving reasons that no documentum was received and then try to sort out with the party issuing the claim.

If however this isn't the case, you have several options.

1) If judgment was less than 28 days and you pay this in full, then you can request that the judgment or CCJ is not entered on the register of judgments, thus this will not affect your credit rating.

2) You can offer to pay the judgment by instalments, but this may take longer that 28 days, which if this is the case the judgeent will be entered on the register and show up against you on any future credit searches. However once this is paid in full, you can request for a certificate of satisfaction, which is a formal document from the court advising that the debt has been paid (this however will not cause the CCJ to be removed from the register, this will remain for up to 6 years).

A judgment creditor can levy a bank account(s) held by the judgment debtor. An account can be frozen by the court when it appears that funds might be removed and/or transferred to avoid the judgment levy or to allow the judgment debtor to claim exempted funds in the account(S) or when the account is jointly held by a person who is not a judgment debtor. A joint account holder who is not a judgment debtor is required to present documents proving to the court the amount of funds that belong to them and which are not subject to a judgment levy. In some instances when an account is held jointly by a married couple and only one spouse is the named debtor the entire account will be exempted from a judgment creditor levy.

No, many times there are many ways around this. Your information may have not beeen given out and you didn't receive a prize they merely just entered at random for advertisement sake. If they have personal information it was probably sold to them by someone else whom you entered information for. It has tons of loop holes. Just try not to think about how identity really is.

You can sue your employer only if allowed by statute (some EEO laws) or if you suffered dollar damages through the employers failure to perform a known duty (negligence) other than workers comp beneficiaries, who can never sue for negligence.

SInce you have no right to complain, you cannot sue for being denied a right to complain.

That he did not run them. He thought that they would control and corrupt the men and methods of government for their own profit.

In my experience this is one of the most difficult things to do. You must show Fraud or a failure to separate financial transactions between the individual owner and the corporation. www.eglaw.com

Yes because when you work the state you are basically allowed to do whatever you want :-) ...

if you are asking about the limit a creditor can put on a garnishment, it is a percentage, depending on the state you live in, not the state the creditor is in po rnhub.com FU CKKK YAA

The plaintiff loses.

If it is a Mechanic's Lien then no judgment is necessary for it to be implemented. If it is not, the person will need to file a petition with the court in which the judgment lien was filed to have it lifted. In most cases the injured party can ontact the office of the clerk of the court where the judgment was granted to obtain filing information and forms. The best option is to obtain legal advice before taking action. Most attorneys offer free or minimal fee consultations to discuss options. While I agree with the above, as the local recorders office, (town,county etc)is generally restricted to recording things that have met certain qualifcations to be recorded - or perfected - against a property, asking that office why it was allowed to be recorded would be a good first step. If it was intended to be recorded against another property and is a clerical error, they will probably just fix it. If the party had qualification to record it, even if you feel it isn't worthy, then you should seek help to clear it, which may well mean paying off whatever they have against you. If they actually had no just cause, and were just doing so to harrass or strongarm you, you may get an award for damages, and they may have other legal problems. Finally, just to clarify: Mechanics and Workmans liens attach to the property immeadiatly upon the work being done. Therefore they may be against a property when you do a title check, but not able to be seen. They do however need to be recorded within 30 days of the work, (generally, most areas) which can even be after a new owner has taken title. Again, generally to record or perfect them, you must present documents like certified mail receipts of demands for payment.

small claims court

In general, Corporations cannot represent itself in legal matters and consequently require an attorney to file legal claims.