Crime

"Discovery" is conducted in the pre-trial phase of the court case.

Michael Joseph Fortier and his wife Lori were arrested as accessories in the 1995 Oklahoma City Bombing (Murrah Federal Building) by Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols. He pled guilty to failing to warn authorities, but received a reduced sentence in exchange for his testimony.

Blacks and mexicans

As a officer of the court ,I would remand the parolee back to jail for resentencing.

There are several jobs one can get with a criminal justice degree. There is: police officer, probation officer, correctional officer, private detective, forensic science technician, to name a few.

An act of Passive Fraud results from the failure to disclose information when there is a duty to do so

Prosecutors and defense attorneys

No he is not

I doubt there are any statistics on that topic. John Wayne Gacy Jr. and Charles Whitman were both Boy Scouts s there have been some. Statistically, Former scouts are less likely to be convicted of crimes than non-scouts and more likely to attend church, more likely to give to charity and more likely to give the moral answers to questions.

i think on the all world dangerous area is Afghanistan.

A plea bargain benefits a judge by avoiding a lengthy trial. It is supposed to be an agreement to a lesser charge in exchange for a guilty plea, however it has been usurped by prosecutors and judges who only agree to token reductions and often threaten accused with further charges or spousal inclusion in indictments if plea agreements are not signed.

I posted the Slate article about that in the related links box below.

The Pennsylvania system evolved a separate confinement. This idea was conceived for the hardened and atrocious offenders. This system was based on five principles:

1. Prisoners will not serve their sentences by the victims vengeance, but instead have a life changing experience though the difficulties of prison by suffering in a way that will enlighten them.

2. Solitary confinement would prevent criminal activity in prison walls.

3. In Isolation, prisoners would think about the reasons of why they are in jail and would lead them to be sorry for their wrong actions.

4. Solitary confinement in itself would be punishment because humans enjoy company. Therefore, solitary confinement is taking that joy away.

5. Solitary confinement is cost efficient because prisoners will not need a long time to repent and there will be few guards.

The New York System evolved a rival concept called the congregation system. Prisoners were held in solitary confinement-like conditions at night, but during the day the prisoners were to work yet were not permitted to look at each other or socialize.

The New York System also created the contract labor system. Private employers would provide machinery and raw materials and the prisons would provide the prisoners as laborers. Because the inmates made products to sell, the costs of the prison was covered by the contract labor system.

The differences Pennsylvania had in mind was keeping the prisoners Isolated, wanted the prisoners to repent, and wanted the prisoners to think about the bad things they have done. New York`s different ideas were strict discipline and obedience. This was required since the prisoners were going to be in the same area.

The way Pennsylvania`s system affected the inmate`s daily lives were to remain in their cells for eating, sleeping and working. Life as a prisoner in New York was different. They stayed in their cells at night but the inmates were together to eat and to work.

The activities of the Pennsylvania prisoners were Bible reading and working on crafts in their cells. New York`s prisoners activity were to work together in shops.

Steinbeck was a man of the people that loved to interact with others. His experiences working with the less fortunate inspired him to become a powerful voice for the poor.

He used a special kind of ammo called expanding bullets that is illegal in most countries. They're also called dumdum bullets. When dumdum bullets hit the target they expand inside the target, in this case inside the body, causing much more damage than normal bullets.

Yes. That person is still taking something that is not theirs. The first robber will be charged with the bigger crime for which the penalty is harsh. The second one will still face charges, but not of bank robbery.

Take the serial number (or Vehicle Identification Number/VIN) off the frame and bring it to the police or local DMV and ask them to 'run' it for a stolen check. Usually they are glad to do this with no charge.

Bikes are frequently stolen and parts and even engines swapped out, but the frame VIN (by which bikes are titled and registered) will always be there. If it is missing - stay away from it!

Yes

So-called "Simple Assault" would be a good example.

municipal agencies

There are many reasons why people assault other people. Here are some of the common ones:

1. Out of anger. Someone may attack another person because of something the other did or was thought to have done..

2. To rob them.

3. To sexually assault them. Rapists often beat their victims to overpower them and make it easier to commit rape.

4. To kill them. The murder or the attempt to murder is an assault, and sometimes the victims are assaulted first as part of kidnapping them before either killing them or taking them to one or more persons who might do the actual killing.

5. To join a gang. Some gangs may have initiation rituals such as attacking random strangers. They also attack those who want to join the gang.

6. Out of curiosity. Some people attack others just to see what it feels like.

7. Out of mental illness or substance abuse. They are not in their right mind and may perceive threats that aren't there.

Victims precipitate 0% of all crimes. The decision to commit the crime is still made by the perpetrator and always precipitated by that person. No matter how dumb, naive, careless, greedy, or even guilty of a crime the victim may be, the person who decides to commit the crime against them is still the perpetrator and the person who was subject to the crime is still the victim. The percentage of occurrence that the perpetrator is the only victim of their own crime is negligible, and that person is still the perpetrator. I can't imagine what that scholar's specialty is, certainly not crime.

A court would usually send them to a mental institution.